diff options
| author | Matej Kosik | 2015-11-05 13:09:32 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin | 2015-12-10 09:35:15 +0100 |
| commit | 2a5edc8ab15e556c6ee1741ffefb6869736feada (patch) | |
| tree | 4d00e9dd5fc304d6b0771a83097a1d3bcc41ab99 | |
| parent | a90487b5b377c1eadcc4bbb373ad489b4d236a7f (diff) | |
COMMENT: question
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex index 14a5e12fc5..ea1be67ee9 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex @@ -1094,6 +1094,7 @@ $P_l$ arity implies $P'_l$ arity since $\WTEGLECONV{P'_l}{ \subst{P_l}{p_u}{q_u} we have $(\WTE{\Gamma_{I'};\Gamma_{P'}}{C_i}{s_{q_i}})_{i=1\ldots n}$; \item the sorts are such that all eliminations, to {\Prop}, {\Set} and $\Type(j)$, are allowed (see section~\ref{elimdep}). +% QUESTION: How should I interpret the above side-condition, when I am trying to show that 'list nat : Set'? \end{itemize} \end{description} |