diff options
| author | letouzey | 2009-12-17 18:12:54 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | letouzey | 2009-12-17 18:12:54 +0000 |
| commit | 25a499db5ac19db9c678fd837d3f2dc9dd1af103 (patch) | |
| tree | abfe1628be7bf3e6fe9eec9ea839da9dbcf95c3e | |
| parent | d1f2e143ff56e53d6feee4158bc9f69b8d3e9ee1 (diff) | |
ZOdiv: fully use generic properties from ZDivTrunc.v
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12596 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
| -rw-r--r-- | theories/ZArith/ZOdiv.v | 362 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 322 deletions
diff --git a/theories/ZArith/ZOdiv.v b/theories/ZArith/ZOdiv.v index 957a20ef8c..473e25ffb7 100644 --- a/theories/ZArith/ZOdiv.v +++ b/theories/ZArith/ZOdiv.v @@ -369,17 +369,16 @@ Proof. exact Z.mod_1_l. Qed. Lemma ZO_div_same : forall a:Z, a<>0 -> a/a = 1. Proof. exact Z.div_same. Qed. +Ltac zero_or_not a := + destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0); + [subst; rewrite ?ZOmod_0_l, ?ZOdiv_0_l, ?ZOmod_0_r, ?ZOdiv_0_r; + auto with zarith|]. + Lemma ZO_mod_same : forall a, a mod a = 0. -Proof. - intros. destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0); subst. apply ZOmod_0_l. - apply Z.mod_same; auto. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not a. apply Z.mod_same; auto. Qed. Lemma ZO_mod_mult : forall a b, (a*b) mod b = 0. -Proof. - intros. destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0); subst. rewrite Zmult_0_r. apply ZOmod_0_l. - apply Z.mod_mul; auto. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.mod_mul; auto. Qed. Lemma ZO_div_mult : forall a b:Z, b <> 0 -> (a*b)/b = a. Proof. exact Z.div_mul. Qed. @@ -389,18 +388,13 @@ Proof. exact Z.div_mul. Qed. (* Division of positive numbers is positive. *) Lemma ZO_div_pos: forall a b, 0 <= a -> 0 <= b -> 0 <= a/b. -Proof. - intros. destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0); subst. rewrite ZOdiv_0_r; auto. - apply Z.div_pos; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.div_pos; auto with zarith. Qed. (** As soon as the divisor is greater or equal than 2, the division is strictly decreasing. *) Lemma ZO_div_lt : forall a b:Z, 0 < a -> 2 <= b -> a/b < a. -Proof. - intros. apply Z.div_lt; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. apply Z.div_lt; auto with zarith. Qed. (** A division of a small number by a bigger one yields zero. *) @@ -415,97 +409,40 @@ Proof. exact Z.mod_small. Qed. (** [Zge] is compatible with a positive division. *) Lemma ZO_div_monotone : forall a b c, 0<=c -> a<=b -> a/c <= b/c. -Proof. - intros. destruct (Z_eq_dec c 0); subst. rewrite !ZOdiv_0_r; auto. - apply Z.div_le_mono; auto with zarith. -Qed. - -(** Compatitility: *) -Lemma ZO_div_monotone_pos : forall a b c:Z, 0<=c -> 0<=a<=b -> a/c <= b/c. -Proof. intros; apply ZO_div_monotone; intuition. Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not c. apply Z.div_le_mono; auto with zarith. Qed. (** With our choice of division, rounding of (a/b) is always done toward zero: *) Lemma ZO_mult_div_le : forall a b:Z, 0 <= a -> 0 <= b*(a/b) <= a. -Proof. - intros. destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0); subst. rewrite !ZOdiv_0_r; auto with zarith. - apply Z.mul_div_le; auto with zarith. -Qed. - -(** TODO: finish adapting to generic results *) +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.mul_div_le; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma ZO_mult_div_ge : forall a b:Z, a <= 0 -> a <= b*(a/b) <= 0. -Proof. - intros a b Ha. - destruct b as [ |b|b]. - simpl; auto with zarith. - split. - generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a (Zpos b)) (ZOmod_lt_neg_pos a (Zpos b) Ha); romega with *. - apply Zle_left_rev; unfold Zplus. - rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_r, <-ZOdiv_opp_l. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; auto with zarith. - apply ZO_div_pos; auto with zarith. - change (Zneg b) with (-Zpos b); rewrite ZOdiv_opp_r, Zmult_opp_opp. - split. - generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a (Zpos b)) (ZOmod_lt_neg_pos a (Zpos b) Ha); romega with *. - apply Zle_left_rev; unfold Zplus. - rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_r, <-ZOdiv_opp_l. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; auto with zarith. - apply ZO_div_pos; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.mul_div_ge; auto with zarith. Qed. (** The previous inequalities between [b*(a/b)] and [a] are exact iff the modulo is zero. *) -Lemma ZO_div_exact_full_1 : forall a b:Z, a = b*(a/b) -> a mod b = 0. -Proof. - intros; generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a b); romega. -Qed. - -Lemma ZO_div_exact_full_2 : forall a b:Z, a mod b = 0 -> a = b*(a/b). -Proof. - intros; generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a b); romega. -Qed. +Lemma ZO_div_exact_full : forall a b:Z, a = b*(a/b) <-> a mod b = 0. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. intuition. apply Z.div_exact; auto. Qed. (** A modulo cannot grow beyond its starting point. *) Theorem ZOmod_le: forall a b, 0 <= a -> 0 <= b -> a mod b <= a. -Proof. - intros a b H1 H2. - destruct (Zle_lt_or_eq _ _ H2). - case (Zle_or_lt b a); intros H3. - case (ZOmod_lt_pos_pos a b); auto with zarith. - rewrite ZOmod_small; auto with zarith. - subst; rewrite ZOmod_0_r; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.mod_le; auto with zarith. Qed. (** Some additionnal inequalities about Zdiv. *) Theorem ZOdiv_le_upper_bound: forall a b q, 0 < b -> a <= q*b -> a/b <= q. -Proof. - intros. - rewrite <- (ZO_div_mult q b); auto with zarith. - apply ZO_div_monotone; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros a b q; rewrite mul_comm; apply Z.div_le_upper_bound. Qed. Theorem ZOdiv_lt_upper_bound: forall a b q, 0 <= a -> 0 < b -> a < q*b -> a/b < q. -Proof. - intros a b q H1 H2 H3. - apply Zmult_lt_reg_r with b; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (2 := H3). - pattern a at 2; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a b); auto with zarith. - rewrite (Zmult_comm b); case (ZOmod_lt_pos_pos a b); auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros a b q; rewrite mul_comm; apply Z.div_lt_upper_bound. Qed. Theorem ZOdiv_le_lower_bound: forall a b q, 0 < b -> q*b <= a -> q <= a/b. -Proof. - intros. - rewrite <- (ZO_div_mult q b); auto with zarith. - apply ZO_div_monotone; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros a b q; rewrite mul_comm; apply Z.div_le_lower_bound. Qed. Theorem ZOdiv_sgn: forall a b, 0 <= Zsgn (a/b) * Zsgn a * Zsgn b. @@ -523,131 +460,53 @@ Qed. Lemma ZO_mod_plus : forall a b c:Z, 0 <= (a+b*c) * a -> (a + b * c) mod c = a mod c. -Proof. - intros; destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0) as [Ha|Ha]. - subst; simpl; rewrite ZOmod_0_l; apply ZO_mod_mult. - intros; destruct (Z_eq_dec c 0) as [Hc|Hc]. - subst; do 2 rewrite ZOmod_0_r; romega. - symmetry; apply ZOmod_unique_full with (a/c+b); auto with zarith. - rewrite Remainder_equiv; split. - apply ZOmod_lt; auto. - apply Zmult_le_0_reg_r with (a*a); eauto. - destruct a; simpl; auto with zarith. - replace ((a mod c)*(a+b*c)*(a*a)) with (((a mod c)*a)*((a+b*c)*a)) by ring. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; auto. - apply ZOmod_sgn2. - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r, Zmult_comm. - generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a c); romega. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not c. apply Z.mod_add; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma ZO_div_plus : forall a b c:Z, 0 <= (a+b*c) * a -> c<>0 -> (a + b * c) / c = a / c + b. -Proof. - intros; destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0) as [Ha|Ha]. - subst; simpl; apply ZO_div_mult; auto. - symmetry. - apply ZOdiv_unique_full with (a mod c); auto with zarith. - rewrite Remainder_equiv; split. - apply ZOmod_lt; auto. - apply Zmult_le_0_reg_r with (a*a); eauto. - destruct a; simpl; auto with zarith. - replace ((a mod c)*(a+b*c)*(a*a)) with (((a mod c)*a)*((a+b*c)*a)) by ring. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; auto. - apply ZOmod_sgn2. - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r, Zmult_comm. - generalize (ZO_div_mod_eq a c); romega. -Qed. +Proof. intros. apply Z.div_add; auto with zarith. Qed. Theorem ZO_div_plus_l: forall a b c : Z, 0 <= (a*b+c)*c -> b<>0 -> b<>0 -> (a * b + c) / b = a + c / b. -Proof. - intros a b c; rewrite Zplus_comm; intros; rewrite ZO_div_plus; - try apply Zplus_comm; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. apply Z.div_add_l; auto with zarith. Qed. (** Cancellations. *) Lemma ZOdiv_mult_cancel_r : forall a b c:Z, c<>0 -> (a*c)/(b*c) = a/b. -Proof. - intros a b c Hc. - destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0). - subst; simpl; do 2 rewrite ZOdiv_0_r; auto. - symmetry. - apply ZOdiv_unique_full with ((a mod b)*c); auto with zarith. - rewrite Remainder_equiv. - split. - do 2 rewrite Zabs_Zmult. - apply Zmult_lt_compat_r. - romega with *. - apply ZOmod_lt; auto. - replace ((a mod b)*c*(a*c)) with (((a mod b)*a)*(c*c)) by ring. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat. - apply ZOmod_sgn2. - destruct c; simpl; auto with zarith. - pattern a at 1; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a b); ring. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.div_mul_cancel_r; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOdiv_mult_cancel_l : forall a b c:Z, c<>0 -> (c*a)/(c*b) = a/b. Proof. - intros. - rewrite (Zmult_comm c a); rewrite (Zmult_comm c b). - apply ZOdiv_mult_cancel_r; auto. + intros. rewrite (Zmult_comm c b). zero_or_not b. + rewrite (Zmult_comm b c). apply Z.div_mul_cancel_l; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOmult_mod_distr_l: forall a b c, (c*a) mod (c*b) = c * (a mod b). Proof. - intros; destruct (Z_eq_dec c 0) as [Hc|Hc]. - subst; simpl; rewrite ZOmod_0_r; auto. - destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0) as [Hb|Hb]. - subst; repeat rewrite Zmult_0_r || rewrite ZOmod_0_r; auto. - assert (c*b <> 0). - contradict Hc; eapply Zmult_integral_l; eauto. - rewrite (Zplus_minus_eq _ _ _ (ZO_div_mod_eq (c*a) (c*b))). - rewrite (Zplus_minus_eq _ _ _ (ZO_div_mod_eq a b)). - rewrite ZOdiv_mult_cancel_l; auto with zarith. - ring. + intros. zero_or_not c. rewrite (Zmult_comm c b). zero_or_not b. + rewrite (Zmult_comm b c). apply Z.mul_mod_distr_l; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOmult_mod_distr_r: forall a b c, (a*c) mod (b*c) = (a mod b) * c. Proof. - intros; repeat rewrite (fun x => (Zmult_comm x c)). - apply ZOmult_mod_distr_l; auto. + intros. zero_or_not b. rewrite (Zmult_comm b c). zero_or_not c. + rewrite (Zmult_comm c b). apply Z.mul_mod_distr_r; auto. Qed. (** Operations modulo. *) Theorem ZOmod_mod: forall a n, (a mod n) mod n = a mod n. -Proof. - intros. - generalize (ZOmod_sgn2 a n). - pattern a at 2 4; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a n); auto with zarith. - rewrite Zplus_comm; rewrite (Zmult_comm n). - intros. - apply sym_equal; apply ZO_mod_plus; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zmult_comm; auto. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.mod_mod; auto. Qed. Theorem ZOmult_mod: forall a b n, (a * b) mod n = ((a mod n) * (b mod n)) mod n. -Proof. - intros. - generalize (Zmult_le_0_compat _ _ (ZOmod_sgn2 a n) (ZOmod_sgn2 b n)). - pattern a at 2 3; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a n); auto with zarith. - pattern b at 2 3; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq b n); auto with zarith. - set (A:=a mod n); set (B:=b mod n); set (A':=a/n); set (B':=b/n). - replace (A*(n*A'+A)*(B*(n*B'+B))) with (((n*A' + A) * (n*B' + B))*(A*B)) - by ring. - replace ((n*A' + A) * (n*B' + B)) - with (A*B + (A'*B+B'*A+n*A'*B')*n) by ring. - intros. - apply ZO_mod_plus; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.mul_mod; auto. Qed. (** addition and modulo @@ -660,186 +519,45 @@ Qed. Theorem ZOplus_mod: forall a b n, 0 <= a * b -> (a + b) mod n = (a mod n + b mod n) mod n. -Proof. - assert (forall a b n, 0<a -> 0<b -> - (a + b) mod n = (a mod n + b mod n) mod n). - intros a b n Ha Hb. - assert (H : 0<=a+b) by (romega with * ); revert H. - pattern a at 1 2; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a n); auto with zarith. - pattern b at 1 2; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq b n); auto with zarith. - replace ((n * (a / n) + a mod n) + (n * (b / n) + b mod n)) - with ((a mod n + b mod n) + (a / n + b / n) * n) by ring. - intros. - apply ZO_mod_plus; auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; auto with zarith. - apply Zplus_le_0_compat. - apply Zmult_le_reg_r with a; auto with zarith. - simpl; apply ZOmod_sgn2; auto. - apply Zmult_le_reg_r with b; auto with zarith. - simpl; apply ZOmod_sgn2; auto. - (* general situation *) - intros a b n Hab. - destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0). - subst; simpl; symmetry; apply ZOmod_mod. - destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0). - subst; simpl; do 2 rewrite Zplus_0_r; symmetry; apply ZOmod_mod. - assert (0<a /\ 0<b \/ a<0 /\ b<0). - destruct a; destruct b; simpl in *; intuition; romega with *. - destruct H0. - apply H; intuition. - rewrite <-(Zopp_involutive a), <-(Zopp_involutive b). - rewrite <- Zopp_plus_distr; rewrite ZOmod_opp_l. - rewrite (ZOmod_opp_l (-a)),(ZOmod_opp_l (-b)). - match goal with |- _ = (-?x+-?y) mod n => - rewrite <-(Zopp_plus_distr x y), ZOmod_opp_l end. - f_equal; apply H; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.add_mod; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOplus_mod_idemp_l: forall a b n, 0 <= a * b -> (a mod n + b) mod n = (a + b) mod n. -Proof. - intros. - rewrite ZOplus_mod. - rewrite ZOmod_mod. - symmetry. - apply ZOplus_mod; auto. - destruct (Z_eq_dec a 0). - subst; rewrite ZOmod_0_l; auto. - destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0). - subst; rewrite Zmult_0_r; auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_le_reg_r with (a*b). - assert (a*b <> 0). - intro Hab. - rewrite (Zmult_integral_l _ _ n1 Hab) in n0; auto with zarith. - auto with zarith. - simpl. - replace (a mod n * b * (a*b)) with ((a mod n * a)*(b*b)) by ring. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat. - apply ZOmod_sgn2. - destruct b; simpl; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.add_mod_idemp_l; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOplus_mod_idemp_r: forall a b n, 0 <= a*b -> (b + a mod n) mod n = (b + a) mod n. Proof. - intros. - rewrite Zplus_comm, (Zplus_comm b a). - apply ZOplus_mod_idemp_l; auto. -Qed. + intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.add_mod_idemp_r; auto. + rewrite Zmult_comm; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOmult_mod_idemp_l: forall a b n, (a mod n * b) mod n = (a * b) mod n. -Proof. - intros; rewrite ZOmult_mod, ZOmod_mod, <- ZOmult_mod; auto. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.mul_mod_idemp_l; auto. Qed. Lemma ZOmult_mod_idemp_r: forall a b n, (b * (a mod n)) mod n = (b * a) mod n. -Proof. - intros; rewrite ZOmult_mod, ZOmod_mod, <- ZOmult_mod; auto. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not n. apply Z.mul_mod_idemp_r; auto. Qed. (** Unlike with Zdiv, the following result is true without restrictions. *) Lemma ZOdiv_ZOdiv : forall a b c, (a/b)/c = a/(b*c). Proof. - (* particular case: a, b, c positive *) - assert (forall a b c, a>0 -> b>0 -> c>0 -> (a/b)/c = a/(b*c)). - intros a b c H H0 H1. - pattern a at 2;rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a b). - pattern (a/b) at 2;rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq (a/b) c). - replace (b * (c * (a / b / c) + (a / b) mod c) + a mod b) with - ((a / b / c)*(b * c) + (b * ((a / b) mod c) + a mod b)) by ring. - assert (b*c<>0). - intro H2; - assert (H3: c <> 0) by auto with zarith; - rewrite (Zmult_integral_l _ _ H3 H2) in H0; auto with zarith. - assert (0<=a/b) by (apply (ZO_div_pos a b); auto with zarith). - assert (0<=a mod b < b) by (apply ZOmod_lt_pos_pos; auto with zarith). - assert (0<=(a/b) mod c < c) by - (apply ZOmod_lt_pos_pos; auto with zarith). - rewrite ZO_div_plus_l; auto with zarith. - rewrite (ZOdiv_small (b * ((a / b) mod c) + a mod b)). - ring. - split. - apply Zplus_le_0_compat;auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (b * ((a / b) mod c) + (b-1)). - apply Zplus_le_compat;auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (b * (c-1) + (b - 1)). - apply Zplus_le_compat;auto with zarith. - replace (b * (c - 1) + (b - 1)) with (b*c-1);try ring;auto with zarith. - repeat (apply Zmult_le_0_compat || apply Zplus_le_0_compat); auto with zarith. - apply (ZO_div_pos (a/b) c); auto with zarith. - (* b c positive, a general *) - assert (forall a b c, b>0 -> c>0 -> (a/b)/c = a/(b*c)). - intros; destruct a as [ |a|a]; try reflexivity. - apply H; auto with zarith. - change (Zneg a) with (-Zpos a); repeat rewrite ZOdiv_opp_l. - f_equal; apply H; auto with zarith. - (* c positive, a b general *) - assert (forall a b c, c>0 -> (a/b)/c = a/(b*c)). - intros; destruct b as [ |b|b]. - repeat rewrite ZOdiv_0_r; reflexivity. - apply H0; auto with zarith. - change (Zneg b) with (-Zpos b); - repeat (rewrite ZOdiv_opp_r || rewrite ZOdiv_opp_l || rewrite <- Zopp_mult_distr_l). - f_equal; apply H0; auto with zarith. - (* a b c general *) - intros; destruct c as [ |c|c]. - rewrite Zmult_0_r; repeat rewrite ZOdiv_0_r; reflexivity. - apply H1; auto with zarith. - change (Zneg c) with (-Zpos c); - rewrite <- Zopp_mult_distr_r; do 2 rewrite ZOdiv_opp_r. - f_equal; apply H1; auto with zarith. + intros. zero_or_not b. rewrite Zmult_comm. zero_or_not c. + rewrite Zmult_comm. apply Z.div_div; auto. Qed. (** A last inequality: *) Theorem ZOdiv_mult_le: forall a b c, 0<=a -> 0<=b -> 0<=c -> c*(a/b) <= (c*a)/b. -Proof. - intros a b c Ha Hb Hc. - destruct (Zle_lt_or_eq _ _ Ha); - [ | subst; rewrite ZOdiv_0_l, Zmult_0_r, ZOdiv_0_l; auto]. - destruct (Zle_lt_or_eq _ _ Hb); - [ | subst; rewrite ZOdiv_0_r, ZOdiv_0_r, Zmult_0_r; auto]. - destruct (Zle_lt_or_eq _ _ Hc); - [ | subst; rewrite ZOdiv_0_l; auto]. - case (ZOmod_lt_pos_pos a b); auto with zarith; intros Hu1 Hu2. - case (ZOmod_lt_pos_pos c b); auto with zarith; intros Hv1 Hv2. - apply Zmult_le_reg_r with b; auto with zarith. - rewrite <- Zmult_assoc. - replace (a / b * b) with (a - a mod b). - replace (c * a / b * b) with (c * a - (c * a) mod b). - rewrite Zmult_minus_distr_l. - unfold Zminus; apply Zplus_le_compat_l. - match goal with |- - ?X <= -?Y => assert (Y <= X); auto with zarith end. - apply Zle_trans with ((c mod b) * (a mod b)); auto with zarith. - rewrite ZOmult_mod; auto with zarith. - apply (ZOmod_le ((c mod b) * (a mod b)) b); auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_le_compat_r; auto with zarith. - apply (ZOmod_le c b); auto. - pattern (c * a) at 1; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq (c * a) b); try ring; - auto with zarith. - pattern a at 1; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a b); try ring; auto with zarith. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. apply Z.div_mul_le; auto with zarith. Qed. (** ZOmod is related to divisibility (see more in Znumtheory) *) Lemma ZOmod_divides : forall a b, a mod b = 0 <-> exists c, a = b*c. -Proof. - split; intros. - exists (a/b). - pattern a at 1; rewrite (ZO_div_mod_eq a b). - rewrite H; auto with zarith. - destruct H as [c Hc]. - destruct (Z_eq_dec b 0). - subst b; simpl in *; subst a; auto. - symmetry. - apply ZOmod_unique_full with c; auto with zarith. - red; romega with *. -Qed. +Proof. intros. zero_or_not b. firstorder. apply Z.mod_divides; auto. Qed. (** * Interaction with "historic" Zdiv *) |
