aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mathcomp/attic/quote.v
blob: ff2d191c990addc585d7ebafe301dbcad53becf0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
(* (c) Copyright 2006-2015 Microsoft Corporation and Inria.                  *)
(* Distributed under the terms of CeCILL-B.                                  *)
Require Import mathcomp.ssreflect.ssreflect.
From mathcomp
Require Import ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq.

Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict Implicit.
Unset Printing Implicit Defensive.

Structure tProp := TProp {tProp_statement :> Prop; _ : tProp_statement}.
Lemma claim : forall tP : tProp, tP. Proof. by case. Qed.
Hint Resolve claim.

Canonical Structure True_tProp := TProp Logic.I.
Canonical Structure eq_tProp T (x : T) := TProp (erefl x).
Canonical Structure true_tProp := @TProp true (erefl _).
Canonical Structure and_tProp (P Q : tProp) :=
  TProp (conj (claim P) (claim Q)).

Structure postProp (P : Prop) := PostProp {postProp_statement :> tProp; _ : P}.
Canonical Structure tProp_postProp P claimP pP :=
  PostProp (@TProp P claimP) (claim pP).

Delimit Scope n_ary_op_scope with QOP.
Delimit Scope quote_scope with QT.

Fixpoint n_ary n T := if n is n'.+1 then T -> n_ary n' T else T.
Notation "n .-ary" := (n_ary n) (at level 2, format "n .-ary") : type_scope.

Module Quotation.

CoInductive n_ary_op T := NaryOp n of n.-ary T.
Notation "f / n" := (@NaryOp _ n f) : n_ary_op_scope.
Definition bind_op T R (op : n_ary_op T) ifun : R :=
  let: NaryOp n f := op in ifun n f.
Definition arity T op := @bind_op T nat op (fun n _ => n).

Structure type := Pack {sort :> Type; sym; _ : sym -> n_ary_op sort}.
Notation QuoteType sf := (Pack sf%QOP).
Definition symop T := let: Pack _ _ ops := T return sym T -> n_ary_op T in ops.

Inductive term S := Var of nat | App of S & seq (term S).

Lemma term_ind' : forall S (P : term S -> Type),
  (forall i, P (Var S i)) ->
  (forall s a, foldr prod True (map P a) -> P (App s a)) ->
  (forall t, P t).
Proof.
move=> S P P_V P_A; pose fix sz (t : term S) :=
  if t is App _ a then (foldr maxn 0 (map sz a)).+1 else 0.
move=> t; elim: {t}(sz t) {-2}t (leqnn (sz t)) => [|n IHn] [i | s a] //=.
rewrite ltnS => sz_a; apply: P_A; elim: a sz_a => //= t a IHa.
by rewrite geq_max; case/andP; move/IHn=> Pt; move/IHa.
Qed.

Bind Scope quote_scope with term.
Notation "''K_' i" := (Var _ i)
  (at level 8, i at level 2, format "''K_' i") : quote_scope.
Notation "''[' s x1 .. xn ]" := (App s (x1%QT :: .. [:: xn%QT] ..))
  (at level 0, s at level 2, x1, xn at level 8,
   format "''[' '[hv' s  x1  ..  xn ']' ]") : quote_scope.
Notation "''[' s ]" := (App s [::])
  (at level 0, s at level 2, format "''[' s ]") : quote_scope.

Section OneType.

Variable T : type.
Implicit Type P : Prop.
Implicit Type tP : tProp.

Definition Env := @id (seq T).

Fixpoint lookup i e : option T :=
  if i is i'.+1 then lookup i' (behead e) else ohead e.

Definition interp_app (iarg : term (sym T) -> option T) :=
  fix loop a n {struct a} : n.-ary T -> option T :=
  if n is n'.+1 return n.-ary T -> option T
  then fun f => if a is t :: a' then obind (loop a' n' \o f) (iarg t) else None
  else fun x => if a is [::] then Some x else None.

Fixpoint interp e t := match t with
 | Var i => lookup i e
 | App s a => bind_op (symop s) (interp_app (interp e) a)
 end.

Fixpoint wf (t : term (sym T)) :=
  match t with
  | App s a => let: NaryOp n _ := symop s in (n == size a) && all wf a
  | Var _ => true
  end.

Fixpoint eval x0 e t :=
  match t with
  | Var i => nth x0 e i
  | App s a =>
    odflt x0 (bind_op (symop s) (interp_app (fun x => Some (eval x0 e x)) a))
  end.

Lemma interp_wf_eval : forall y0 e t y,
  interp e t = Some y -> wf t /\ eval y0 e t = y.
Proof.
move=> y0 e t; elim/term_ind': t => [i|s a IHa] y /=.
  by elim: i e => [|i IHi] [|z e] //=; [case | elim: i {IHi} | apply: IHi].
case: symop => /= n x1.
elim: n x1 a IHa => [|n IHn] x1 [|f a] //=; first by move=> _  [].
by case: (interp e f) => //= x []; case/(_ x)=> // -> ->; apply: IHn.
Qed.

Definition var_val := @id T.
Definition op_val := var_val.

Structure form e t P := Form {fval; _ : P -> interp e t = Some fval}.
Lemma formP : forall e t tP f, interp e t = Some (@fval e t tP f).
Proof. by move=> e t tP [x <-]. Qed.

Structure store i x P := Store {stval; _ : P -> lookup i stval = Some x}.
Canonical Structure head_store x e :=
  @Store 0 x True (Env (x :: Env e)) (fun _ => erefl _).
Lemma tail_store_subproof : forall i x y e tP s,
  e = @stval i x tP s -> lookup i.+1 (y :: e) = Some x.
Proof. by move=> i x y _ tP [e /= <- //] ->. Qed.
Canonical Structure tail_store i x y e tP s :=
  Store (@tail_store_subproof i x y e tP s).

Lemma var_form_subproof : forall i x P (s : store i x P),
  P -> interp (stval s) 'K_i = Some (var_val x).
Proof. by move=> i x P []. Qed.
Canonical Structure var_form i x P s := Form (@var_form_subproof i x P s).

Lemma op_form_subproof : forall e t tP (f : form e t tP) x,
  x = @fval e t tP f -> interp e t = Some (op_val x).
Proof. by move=> e t tP f _ ->; apply: formP. Qed.

Canonical Structure op_form e t tP f x :=
  Form (@op_form_subproof e t tP f x).

Section OpForm.

Variables (s : sym T) (e : seq T).

Fixpoint OpForm_type a xa fa n :=
  if n is n'.+1 then
    forall x t tP f, OpForm_type (t :: a) (x :: xa) (@fval e t tP f :: fa) n'
  else form e (App s (rev a)) (map op_val (rev xa) = rev fa).

Definition OpForm_rechyp a (xa fa : seq T) n (x : n.-ary T) :=
  forall a', map op_val (rev xa) = rev fa ->
  interp e (App s (catrev a' a)) = interp_app (interp e) a' x.

Definition OpForm_rectype a xa fa n (x : n.-ary T) :=
  OpForm_rechyp a xa fa x -> OpForm_type a xa fa n.

Definition OpForm_basetype P x a :=
  (P -> interp e (App s a) = Some x) -> form e (App s a) P.

Lemma OpForm_recproof : forall a xa fa n (x1 : n.+1.-ary T),
  forall x t tP f, OpForm_rechyp a xa fa x1 ->
  OpForm_rechyp (t :: a) (x :: xa) (@fval e t tP f :: fa) (x1 x).
Proof.
move=> a xa fa n x1 x t tP f IHx a'; move/(_ (t :: a')): IHx => /=.
rewrite !map_id (formP f) /= => IHx; case/(can_inj (@revK _)) => -> eq_xa.
by rewrite {}IHx ?eq_xa.
Qed.

Fixpoint OpForm_rec a xa fa n : forall x, @OpForm_rectype a xa fa n x :=
  if n is _.+1 return forall x, @OpForm_rectype a xa fa n x then
  fun _ IHx _ _ _ _ => OpForm_rec (OpForm_recproof IHx) else
  fun x IHx =>
    (if rev a is (t :: a') as rev_a return OpForm_basetype _ _ rev_a then
     fun IHx => Form IHx else fun IHx => Form IHx) (IHx [::]).

Lemma OpForm_subproof : bind_op (symop s) (OpForm_rechyp [::] [::] [::]).
Proof. by case def_s: (symop s) => [n x] a _; rewrite /= def_s. Qed.

Definition OpForm :=
  (let: (op/n)%QOP as op_n := symop s
   return (bind_op op_n _ : Prop) -> @OpForm_type _ _ _ (arity op_n) in
   @OpForm_rec _ _ _ n op)
   OpForm_subproof.

End OpForm.

Section GenSimp.

Variable simp : seq T -> term (sym T) -> option T.

Definition simp_axiom := forall e t x y,
  interp e t = Some x -> simp e t = Some y -> x = y.

Hypothesis simpP : simp_axiom.

Structure closed := Closed {closed_val :> seq T}.
Canonical Structure head_closed := Closed (Env [::]).
Canonical Structure tail_closed x (ce : closed) := Closed (x :: ce).
Inductive close : seq T -> Prop := Close (ce : closed) : close ce.
Canonical Structure close_tProp ce := TProp (Close ce).

Lemma simp_form : forall e t y ptP,
  forall f : form (Env e) t
      (@postProp_statement (close (Env e) /\ simp e t = Some y) ptP),
  fval f = y.
Proof.
by move=> e t y [tP [_ def_y]] [x /= def_x]; apply: simpP def_y; apply: def_x.
Qed.

End GenSimp.

Definition Econs := Cons.
Definition Etag of nat := @idfun.
Definition Enil := Nil.

Fixpoint simp_env {T'} e i :=
  if e is x :: e' then omap (Econs (Etag i x)) (simp_env e' i.+1)
  else Some (Enil T').

Notation "' 'K_' i := x" := (Etag i x)
  (at level 200, format "' 'K_' i  :=  x") : quote_tag_scope.
Arguments Scope Econs [type_scope quote_tag_scope _].

Notation "[ 'env' d1 ; .. ; d_n ]" := (Econs d1 .. (Econs d_n (Enil _)) ..)
  (at level 0, format "[ 'env' '['  d1 ; '/'  .. ; '/'  d_n ] ']'")
   : quote_scope.

Notation "[ 'env' ]" := (Enil _)
  (at level 0, format "[ 'env' ]") : quote_scope.

Lemma unquote_default : false -> T. Proof. by []. Qed.
Definition unquote e t :=
  if interp e t is Some x as ox return ox -> T then fun _ => x else
  unquote_default.

Arguments Scope unquote [quote_scope quote_scope _].

Lemma end_unquote : true. Proof. by []. Qed.
Definition simp_quote e t :=
  obind (fun e' =>
   (if interp e' t as b return (b -> _) -> _ then
      fun wf_t' => Some (unquote (wf_t' end_unquote))
   else fun _ => None) id)
  (simp_env e 0).

Lemma simp_quoteP : simp_axiom simp_quote.
Proof.
rewrite /simp_quote => e t x y def_x.
suff ->: simp_env e 0 = Some e by rewrite /unquote /= def_x; case.
by elim: e {def_x} 0 => //= z e IHe i; rewrite IHe.
Qed.

Definition quote := simp_form simp_quoteP.

End OneType.

End Quotation.

Canonical Structure Quotation.head_store.
Canonical Structure Quotation.tail_store.
Canonical Structure Quotation.var_form.
Canonical Structure Quotation.op_form.
Canonical Structure Quotation.head_closed.
Canonical Structure Quotation.tail_closed.
Canonical Structure Quotation.close_tProp.

Notation QuoteType sf := (Quotation.Pack sf%QOP).
Notation "f / n" := (@Quotation.NaryOp _ n f) : n_ary_op_scope.

Notation OpForm := Quotation.OpForm.

Notation "''K_' i" := (Quotation.Var _ i)
  (at level 8, i at level 2, format "''K_' i") : quote_scope.
Notation "''[' s x1 .. xn ]" :=
  (Quotation.App s (x1%QT :: .. [:: xn%QT] ..))
  (at level 0, s at level 2, x1, xn at level 8,
   format "''[' s '[hv'  x1 '/'  .. '/'  xn ']' ]") : quote_scope.
Notation "''[' s ]" := (Quotation.App s [::])
  (at level 0, s at level 2, format "''[' s ]") : quote_scope.
Notation "' 'K_' i := x" := (Quotation.Etag i x)
  (at level 200, format "' 'K_' i  :=  x") : quote_tag_scope.
Arguments Scope Quotation.Econs [type_scope quote_tag_scope _].
Notation "[ 'env' d1 ; .. ; d_n ]" :=
  (Quotation.Econs d1 .. (Quotation.Econs d_n (Quotation.Enil _)) ..)
  (at level 0, format "[ 'env' '['  d1 ; '/'  .. ; '/'  d_n ] ']'")
   : quote_scope.
Notation "[ 'env' ]" := (Quotation.Enil _)
  (at level 0, format "[ 'env' ]") : quote_scope.

Arguments Scope Quotation.unquote [_ quote_scope quote_scope _].
Notation unquote e t := (@Quotation.unquote _ e t%QT _).

CoInductive bool_sym := bTrue | bAnd.
Canonical Structure bool_quoteType :=
  QuoteType (fun s => match s with bTrue => true/0 | bAnd => andb/2 end).
Canonical Structure and_form := Eval hnf in OpForm bAnd.
Canonical Structure true_form := Eval hnf in OpForm bTrue.

Lemma try_bquote : forall b1 b2 b3,
  false && b1 && (b2 && true && b3) && (b2 && b1 && b2) = false && b2.
Proof.
move=> b1 b2 b3.
Time rewrite Quotation.quote.
Time rewrite !Quotation.quote.
by [].
Qed.

Fixpoint bstore s bt := match bt with
| 'K_i => set_nth false s i true
| '[bAnd t1 t2] => bstore (bstore s t1) t2
| _ => s
end%QT.

Fixpoint bread ot i s := match s with
| [::] => odflt '[bTrue] ot
| true :: s' => bread (Some (oapp (fun t => '[bAnd t 'K_i]) 'K_i ot)) i.+1 s'
| false :: s' => bread ot i.+1 s'
end%QT.

Fixpoint bnormed t i := match t with
| '[bAnd t' 'K_j] => bnormed t' 1
| 'K_j => i > 0
| '[bTrue] => i == 0
| _ => false
end%QT.

Definition bsimp_fn e t :=
  if bnormed t 0 then None else
  Quotation.interp e (bread None 0 (bstore [::] t)).

Lemma bsimpP : Quotation.simp_axiom bsimp_fn.
Proof.
pose oand ob1 ob2 := obind (fun b1 => omap (andb b1) ob2) ob1.
have [oaC oaA oaI]: [/\ commutative oand, associative oand & idempotent oand].
  by split; do 6?case=> //.
have oa1: left_id (Some true) oand by case=> [[]|].
rewrite /bsimp_fn => e t b b'; case: bnormed => //=.
set ie := Quotation.interp e; set s := [::] => def_b.
pose ir j s := ie (bread None j s).
suff{b'} storeP: ir 0 (bstore s t) = oand (ir 0 s) (Some b).
  by rewrite [ie _]storeP => [[]].
elim/Quotation.term_ind': t s => [i | op a IHa] /= s in b def_b *; last first.
  case: op def_b; first by case: a {IHa} => //= <-; rewrite oaC oa1.
  case: a IHa => //= t1; rewrite /ie /= -/ie; case: (ie _) => //= b1 [] //= t2.
  case: (ie t2) => //= b2 [] //= [IHb1 [IHb2 _]] [<-].
  by rewrite (IHb2 _ b2) // (IHb1 _ b1) // -oaA.
have irT: forall s' j, ir j (true :: s') = oand (ie 'K_j)%QT (ir j.+1 s').
  rewrite /ir /= => s' j; move: s' j ('K_j)%QT.
  by elim=> [|[|] s' IHs] j u; first 1 [rewrite oaC oa1] || rewrite !IHs -?oaA.
rewrite -{}def_b -{2}[i]addn0; elim: i 0 s => [|i IHi] j.
  case=> [|bj s]; first by rewrite oa1.
  by case: bj; rewrite !irT oaC // -oaA oaI.
rewrite addSnnS; case=> [|[|] s]; last exact: IHi.
  by rewrite /= -set_nth_nil [ir _ _]IHi.
by rewrite !irT IHi oaA.
Qed.

Definition bsimp := Quotation.simp_form bsimpP.

Lemma try_bsimp : forall b1 b2 b3,
  true && b1 && (b2 && b3) && (b2 && b1 && b2) = b1 && b2 && true && b3.
Proof.
move=> b1 b2 b3.
Time rewrite bsimp.
Time rewrite !bsimp.
by [].
Qed.