| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
- The `deprecate` notation and `iota_add` have been deprecated. All the uses of
the `deprecate` notation have been replaced with the `deprecated` attribute.
- Deprecation aliases in `ssrnat` and `ssrnum` introduced in MathComp 1.11+beta1
have been removed.
- Remove `VDFILE` related hacks from `Makefile.common`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ord1 is in zmodp, but it does not really require the zmodType structure of 'I_n to be stated and proven if we state it with ord0. We still keep the variant in zmodp with 0 instead of ord0 (for readability purposes).
|
|
In particular: rephrased permS0 and permS1 with all_equal_to
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ `odd_add` -> `oddD`
+ `odd_sub` -> `oddB`
+ `take_addn` -> `takeD`
+ `rot_addn` -> `rotD`
+ `nseq_addn` -> `nseqD`
fixes #359
|
|
fixes #418
|
|
- Replace `altP eqP` and `altP (_ =P _)` with `eqVneq`:
The improved `eqVneq` lemma (#351) is redesigned as a comparison predicate and
introduces a hypothesis in the form of `x != y` in the second case. Thus,
`case: (altP eqP)`, `case: (altP (x =P _))` and `case: (altP (x =P y))` idioms
can be replaced with `case: eqVneq`, `case: (eqVneq x)` and
`case: (eqVneq x y)` respectively. This replacement slightly simplifies and
reduces proof scripts.
- use `have [] :=` rather than `case` if it is better.
- `by apply:` -> `exact:`.
- `apply/lem1; apply/lem2` or `apply: lem1; apply: lem2` -> `apply/lem1/lem2`.
- `move/lem1; move/lem2` -> `move/lem1/lem2`.
- Remove `GRing.` prefix if applicable.
- `negbTE` -> `negPf`, `eq_refl` -> `eqxx` and `sym_equal` -> `esym`.
|
|
Replaced the legacy generalised induction idiom with a more robust one
that does not rely on the `{-2}` numerical occurrence selector, using
either new helper lemmas `ubnP` and `ltnSE` or a specific `nat`
induction principle `ltn_ind`.
Added (non-strict in)equality induction helper lemmas
Added `ubnP[lg]?eq` helper lemmas that abstract an integer expression
along with some (in)equality, in preparation for some generalised
induction. Note that while `ubnPleq` is very similar to `ubnP` (indeed
`ubnP M` is basically `ubnPleq M.+1`), `ubnPgeq` is used to remember
that the inductive value remains below the initial one.
Used the change log to give notice to users to update the generalised
induction idioms in their proofs to one of the new forms before
Mathcomp 1.11.
|
|
Also changed eqsVneq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Change the naming of permutation lemmas so they conform to a
consistent policy: `perm_eq` lemmas have a `perm_` (_not_ `perm_eq`)
prefix, or sometimes a `_perm` suffix for lemmas that _prove_ `perm_eq`
using a property when there is also a lemma _using_ `perm_eq` for the
same property. Lemmas that do not concern `perm_eq` do _not_ have
`perm` in their name.
- Change the definition of `permutations` for a time- and space-
back-to-front generation algorithm.
- Add frequency tally operations `tally`, `incr_tally`, `wf_tally` and
`tally_seq`, used by the improved `permutation` algorithm.
- add deprecated aliases for renamed lemmas
|
|
|
|
Like injectivity lemmas, instances of cancellation lemmas (whose
conclusion is `cancel ? ?`, `{in ?, cancel ? ?}`, `pcancel`, or
`ocancel`) are passed to
generic lemmas such as `canRL` or `canLR_in`. Thus such lemmas should
not have trailing on-demand implicits _just before_ the `cancel`
conclusion, as these would be inconvenient to insert (requiring
essentially an explicit eta-expansion).
We therefore use `Arguments` or `Prenex Implicits` directives to make
all such arguments maximally inserted implicits. We don’t, however make
other arguments implicit, so as not to spoil direct instantiation of
the lemmas (in, e.g., `rewrite -[y](invmK injf)`).
We have also tried to do this with lemmas whose statement matches a
`cancel`, i.e., ending in `forall x, g (E[x]) = x` (where pattern
unification will pick up `f = fun x => E[x]`).
We also adjusted implicits of a few stray injectivity
lemmas, and defined constants.
We provide a shorthand for reindexing a bigop with a permutation.
Finally we used the new implicit signatures to simplify proofs that
use injectivity or cancellation lemmas.
|
|
```
Warning: Adding and removing hints in the core database implicitly is
deprecated. Please specify a hint database.
[implicit-core-hint-db,deprecated]
```
|
|
See the discussion here:
https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/242#discussion_r233778114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was emitting a deprecation warning and will soon be removed from Coq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
