| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added lemmas `big_enum_cond`, `big_enum` and `big_enumP` to handle more
explicitly big ops iterating over explicit enumerations in a `finType`.
The previous practice was to rely on the convertibility between
`enum A` and `filter A (index_enum T)`, sometimes explicitly via the
`filter_index_enum` equality, more often than not implicitly.
Both are likely to fail after the integration of `finmap`, as the
`choiceType` theory can’t guarantee that the order in selected
enumerations is consistent.
For this reason `big_enum` and the related (but currently unused)
`big_image` lemmas are restricted to the abelian case. The `big_enumP`
lemma can be used to handle enumerations in the non-abelian case, as
explained in the `bigop.v` internal documentation.
The Changelog entry enjoins clients to stop relying on either
`filter_index_enum` and convertibility (though this PR still provides
both), and warns about the restriction of the `big_image` lemma set to
the abelian case, as it it a possible source of incompatibility.
|
|
Replaced the legacy generalised induction idiom with a more robust one
that does not rely on the `{-2}` numerical occurrence selector, using
either new helper lemmas `ubnP` and `ltnSE` or a specific `nat`
induction principle `ltn_ind`.
Added (non-strict in)equality induction helper lemmas
Added `ubnP[lg]?eq` helper lemmas that abstract an integer expression
along with some (in)equality, in preparation for some generalised
induction. Note that while `ubnPleq` is very similar to `ubnP` (indeed
`ubnP M` is basically `ubnPleq M.+1`), `ubnPgeq` is used to remember
that the inductive value remains below the initial one.
Used the change log to give notice to users to update the generalised
induction idioms in their proofs to one of the new forms before
Mathcomp 1.11.
|
|
Use `{pred T}` systematically for generic _collective_ boolean
predicate.
Use `PredType` to construct `predType` instances.
Instrument core `ssreflect` files to replicate these and other new
features introduces by coq/coq#9555 (`nonPropType` interface,
`simpl_rel` that simplifies with `inE`).
|
|
|
|
Moved set argument before predicate argument for mingroup and maxgroup
because Coq only displays notation with identifier parameters that are
both bound and free if there is at least one free occurrence to the
left of the binder.
|
|
Like injectivity lemmas, instances of cancellation lemmas (whose
conclusion is `cancel ? ?`, `{in ?, cancel ? ?}`, `pcancel`, or
`ocancel`) are passed to
generic lemmas such as `canRL` or `canLR_in`. Thus such lemmas should
not have trailing on-demand implicits _just before_ the `cancel`
conclusion, as these would be inconvenient to insert (requiring
essentially an explicit eta-expansion).
We therefore use `Arguments` or `Prenex Implicits` directives to make
all such arguments maximally inserted implicits. We don’t, however make
other arguments implicit, so as not to spoil direct instantiation of
the lemmas (in, e.g., `rewrite -[y](invmK injf)`).
We have also tried to do this with lemmas whose statement matches a
`cancel`, i.e., ending in `forall x, g (E[x]) = x` (where pattern
unification will pick up `f = fun x => E[x]`).
We also adjusted implicits of a few stray injectivity
lemmas, and defined constants.
We provide a shorthand for reindexing a bigop with a permutation.
Finally we used the new implicit signatures to simplify proofs that
use injectivity or cancellation lemmas.
|
|
```
Warning: Adding and removing hints in the core database implicitly is
deprecated. Please specify a hint database.
[implicit-core-hint-db,deprecated]
```
|
|
This increases performance 10% - 15% for Coq v8.6.1 - v8.9.dev.
Tested on a Debain-based 16-core build server and
a Macbook Pro laptop with 2,3 GHz Intel Core i5.
| | Compilation time, old | Compilation | Speedup |
| | (mathcomp commit 967088a6f87) | time, new | |
| Coq 8.6.1 | 10min 33s | 9min 10s | 15% |
| Coq 8.7.2 | 10min 12s | 8min 50s | 15% |
| Coq 8.8.2 | 9min 39s | 8min 32s | 13% |
| Coq 8.9.dev(05d827c800544) | 9min 12s | 8min 16s | 11% |
| | | | |
It seems Coq at some point fixed the problem `_ : Type` was
supposed to solve.
|
|
As suggested by @ggonthier
[here](https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/249#pullrequestreview-177938295)
> One of the design ideas for the `Arguments` command was that it would allow
to centralise the documentation of the application of constants.
In that spirit it would be in my opinion better to make as much use of this
as possible, and to document the parameter names whenever possible,
especially that of implicit parameters.
and
[here](https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/253#discussion_r237434163):
> As a general rule, defined functional constants should have maximal prenex
implicit arguments, as this facilitates their use as arguments to functionals,
because this mimics the way function constants are treated in functional
programming languages with Hindley-Milner type inference. Conversely, lemmas and
theorems should have on-demand implicit arguments, possibly interspersed with
explicit ones, as it's fairly common for other lemmas to have universally
quantified premises; also, this makes it easier to specify such arguments with
the apply: tactic. This policy may be amended for lemmas that are used as
functional arguments, such as reflection or cancellation lemmas. Unfortunately
there is currently no easy way to tell Coq to use different defaults for
definitions and lemmas, so MathComp sticks to the on-demand default, as there
are significantly more lemmas than definition, and use the Prenex Implicits to
redress matters in bulk for definitions. However, this is not completely
systematic, and is sometimes omitted for constants that are not used as
functional arguments in the library, or inside the sections in which the
definition occur, since such commands need to be repeated after the section is
closed. Since Arguments commands should document the intended constant usage as
best as possible, they should follow the implicits policy - even in cases such
as this where the Prenex Implicits had been skipped.
|
|
See the discussion here:
https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/242#discussion_r233778114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was emitting a deprecation warning and will soon be removed from Coq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
complex and algC.
The definitions of 'i, conjC, Re, Im, n.-root, sqrtC and their theory
have been moved to the numClosedFieldType structure in ssrnum.
This covers boths the uses in algC and complex.v. To that end the
numClosedFieldType structure has been enriched with conjugation and 'i.
Note that 'i can be deduced from the property of algebraic closure and is
only here to let the user chose which definitional equality should hold
on 'i. Same thing for conjC that could be written `|x|^+2/x, the only
nontrivial (up to my knowledge) property is the fact that conjugation
is a ring morphism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
