| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Replace `altP eqP` and `altP (_ =P _)` with `eqVneq`:
The improved `eqVneq` lemma (#351) is redesigned as a comparison predicate and
introduces a hypothesis in the form of `x != y` in the second case. Thus,
`case: (altP eqP)`, `case: (altP (x =P _))` and `case: (altP (x =P y))` idioms
can be replaced with `case: eqVneq`, `case: (eqVneq x)` and
`case: (eqVneq x y)` respectively. This replacement slightly simplifies and
reduces proof scripts.
- use `have [] :=` rather than `case` if it is better.
- `by apply:` -> `exact:`.
- `apply/lem1; apply/lem2` or `apply: lem1; apply: lem2` -> `apply/lem1/lem2`.
- `move/lem1; move/lem2` -> `move/lem1/lem2`.
- Remove `GRing.` prefix if applicable.
- `negbTE` -> `negPf`, `eq_refl` -> `eqxx` and `sym_equal` -> `esym`.
|
|
#283, #285, #286, #288, #296, #330, #334, and #341)
ssrnum related changes:
- Redefine the intermediate structure between `idomainType` and `numDomainType`,
which is `normedDomainType` (normed integral domain without an order).
- Generalize (by using `normedDomainType` or the order structures), relocate
(to order.v), and rename ssrnum related definitions and lemmas.
- Add a compatibility module `Num.mc_1_9` and export it to check compilation.
- Remove the use of the deprecated definitions and lemmas from entire theories.
- Implement factories mechanism to construct several ordered and num structures
from fewer axioms.
order related changes:
- Reorganize the hierarchy of finite lattice structures. Finite lattices have
top and bottom elements except for empty set. Therefore we removed finite
lattice structures without top and bottom.
- Reorganize the theory modules in order.v:
+ `LTheory` (lattice and partial order, without complement and totality)
+ `CTheory` (`LTheory` + complement)
+ `Theory` (all)
- Give a unique head symbol for `Total.mixin_of`.
- Replace reverse and `^r` with converse and `^c` respectively.
- Fix packing and cloning functions and notations.
- Provide more ordered type instances:
Products and lists can be ordered in two different ways: the lexicographical
ordering and the pointwise ordering. Now their canonical instances are not
exported to make the users choose them.
- Export `Order.*.Exports` modules by default.
- Specify the core hint database explicitly in order.v. (see #252)
- Apply 80 chars per line restriction.
General changes:
- Give consistency to shape of formulae and namings of `lt_def` and `lt_neqAle`
like lemmas:
lt_def x y : (x < y) = (y != x) && (x <= y),
lt_neqAle x y : (x < y) = (x != y) && (x <= y).
- Enable notation overloading by using scopes and displays:
+ Define `min` and `max` notations (`minr` and `maxr` for `ring_display`) as
aliases of `meet` and `join` specialized for `total_display`.
+ Provide the `ring_display` version of `le`, `lt`, `ge`, `gt`, `leif`, and
`comparable` notations and their explicit variants in `Num.Def`.
+ Define 3 variants of `[arg min_(i < n | P) F]` and `[arg max_(i < n | P) F]`
notations in `nat_scope` (specialized for nat), `order_scope` (general
version), and `ring_scope` (specialized for `ring_display`).
- Update documents and put CHANGELOG entries.
|
|
Added lemmas `big_enum_cond`, `big_enum` and `big_enumP` to handle more
explicitly big ops iterating over explicit enumerations in a `finType`.
The previous practice was to rely on the convertibility between
`enum A` and `filter A (index_enum T)`, sometimes explicitly via the
`filter_index_enum` equality, more often than not implicitly.
Both are likely to fail after the integration of `finmap`, as the
`choiceType` theory can’t guarantee that the order in selected
enumerations is consistent.
For this reason `big_enum` and the related (but currently unused)
`big_image` lemmas are restricted to the abelian case. The `big_enumP`
lemma can be used to handle enumerations in the non-abelian case, as
explained in the `bigop.v` internal documentation.
The Changelog entry enjoins clients to stop relying on either
`filter_index_enum` and convertibility (though this PR still provides
both), and warns about the restriction of the `big_image` lemma set to
the abelian case, as it it a possible source of incompatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coq currently fails to resolve Miller patterns against open evars
(issue coq/#9663), in particular it fails to unify `T -> ?R` with
`forall x : T, ?dR x` even when `?dR` does not have `x` in its context.
As a result canonical structures and constructor notations for the
new generalised dependent `finfun`s fail for the non-dependent use
cases, which is an unacceptable regression.
This commit mitigates the problem by specialising the canonical
instances and most of the constructor notation to the non-dependent
case, and introducing an alias of the `finfun_of` type that has
canonical instances for the dependent case, to allow experimentation
with that feature.
With this fix the whole `MathComp` library compiles, with a few
minor changes. The change in `integral_char` fixes a performance issue
that appears to be the consequence of insufficient locking of both
`finfun_eqType` and `cfIirr`; this will be explored in a further commit.
|
|
As suggested by @ggonthier
[here](https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/249#pullrequestreview-177938295)
> One of the design ideas for the `Arguments` command was that it would allow
to centralise the documentation of the application of constants.
In that spirit it would be in my opinion better to make as much use of this
as possible, and to document the parameter names whenever possible,
especially that of implicit parameters.
and
[here](https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/253#discussion_r237434163):
> As a general rule, defined functional constants should have maximal prenex
implicit arguments, as this facilitates their use as arguments to functionals,
because this mimics the way function constants are treated in functional
programming languages with Hindley-Milner type inference. Conversely, lemmas and
theorems should have on-demand implicit arguments, possibly interspersed with
explicit ones, as it's fairly common for other lemmas to have universally
quantified premises; also, this makes it easier to specify such arguments with
the apply: tactic. This policy may be amended for lemmas that are used as
functional arguments, such as reflection or cancellation lemmas. Unfortunately
there is currently no easy way to tell Coq to use different defaults for
definitions and lemmas, so MathComp sticks to the on-demand default, as there
are significantly more lemmas than definition, and use the Prenex Implicits to
redress matters in bulk for definitions. However, this is not completely
systematic, and is sometimes omitted for constants that are not used as
functional arguments in the library, or inside the sections in which the
definition occur, since such commands need to be repeated after the section is
closed. Since Arguments commands should document the intended constant usage as
best as possible, they should follow the implicits policy - even in cases such
as this where the Prenex Implicits had been skipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
