| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
- The `deprecate` notation and `iota_add` have been deprecated. All the uses of
the `deprecate` notation have been replaced with the `deprecated` attribute.
- Deprecation aliases in `ssrnat` and `ssrnum` introduced in MathComp 1.11+beta1
have been removed.
- Remove `VDFILE` related hacks from `Makefile.common`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Replace `altP eqP` and `altP (_ =P _)` with `eqVneq`:
The improved `eqVneq` lemma (#351) is redesigned as a comparison predicate and
introduces a hypothesis in the form of `x != y` in the second case. Thus,
`case: (altP eqP)`, `case: (altP (x =P _))` and `case: (altP (x =P y))` idioms
can be replaced with `case: eqVneq`, `case: (eqVneq x)` and
`case: (eqVneq x y)` respectively. This replacement slightly simplifies and
reduces proof scripts.
- use `have [] :=` rather than `case` if it is better.
- `by apply:` -> `exact:`.
- `apply/lem1; apply/lem2` or `apply: lem1; apply: lem2` -> `apply/lem1/lem2`.
- `move/lem1; move/lem2` -> `move/lem1/lem2`.
- Remove `GRing.` prefix if applicable.
- `negbTE` -> `negPf`, `eq_refl` -> `eqxx` and `sym_equal` -> `esym`.
|
|
New lemmas:
- meet_l, meet_r, join_l, join_r.
Renamings:
- Order.BLatticeTheory.lexUl -> disjoint_lexUl,
- Order.BLatticeTheory.lexUr -> disjoint_lexUr,
- Order.TBLatticeTheory.lexIl -> cover_leIxl,
- Order.TBLatticeTheory.lexIr -> cover_leIxr.
Use `Order.TTheory` instead of `Order.Theory` if applicable
|
|
#283, #285, #286, #288, #296, #330, #334, and #341)
ssrnum related changes:
- Redefine the intermediate structure between `idomainType` and `numDomainType`,
which is `normedDomainType` (normed integral domain without an order).
- Generalize (by using `normedDomainType` or the order structures), relocate
(to order.v), and rename ssrnum related definitions and lemmas.
- Add a compatibility module `Num.mc_1_9` and export it to check compilation.
- Remove the use of the deprecated definitions and lemmas from entire theories.
- Implement factories mechanism to construct several ordered and num structures
from fewer axioms.
order related changes:
- Reorganize the hierarchy of finite lattice structures. Finite lattices have
top and bottom elements except for empty set. Therefore we removed finite
lattice structures without top and bottom.
- Reorganize the theory modules in order.v:
+ `LTheory` (lattice and partial order, without complement and totality)
+ `CTheory` (`LTheory` + complement)
+ `Theory` (all)
- Give a unique head symbol for `Total.mixin_of`.
- Replace reverse and `^r` with converse and `^c` respectively.
- Fix packing and cloning functions and notations.
- Provide more ordered type instances:
Products and lists can be ordered in two different ways: the lexicographical
ordering and the pointwise ordering. Now their canonical instances are not
exported to make the users choose them.
- Export `Order.*.Exports` modules by default.
- Specify the core hint database explicitly in order.v. (see #252)
- Apply 80 chars per line restriction.
General changes:
- Give consistency to shape of formulae and namings of `lt_def` and `lt_neqAle`
like lemmas:
lt_def x y : (x < y) = (y != x) && (x <= y),
lt_neqAle x y : (x < y) = (x != y) && (x <= y).
- Enable notation overloading by using scopes and displays:
+ Define `min` and `max` notations (`minr` and `maxr` for `ring_display`) as
aliases of `meet` and `join` specialized for `total_display`.
+ Provide the `ring_display` version of `le`, `lt`, `ge`, `gt`, `leif`, and
`comparable` notations and their explicit variants in `Num.Def`.
+ Define 3 variants of `[arg min_(i < n | P) F]` and `[arg max_(i < n | P) F]`
notations in `nat_scope` (specialized for nat), `order_scope` (general
version), and `ring_scope` (specialized for `ring_display`).
- Update documents and put CHANGELOG entries.
|
|
Replaced the legacy generalised induction idiom with a more robust one
that does not rely on the `{-2}` numerical occurrence selector, using
either new helper lemmas `ubnP` and `ltnSE` or a specific `nat`
induction principle `ltn_ind`.
Added (non-strict in)equality induction helper lemmas
Added `ubnP[lg]?eq` helper lemmas that abstract an integer expression
along with some (in)equality, in preparation for some generalised
induction. Note that while `ubnPleq` is very similar to `ubnP` (indeed
`ubnP M` is basically `ubnPleq M.+1`), `ubnPgeq` is used to remember
that the inductive value remains below the initial one.
Used the change log to give notice to users to update the generalised
induction idioms in their proofs to one of the new forms before
Mathcomp 1.11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Modified the definition of sort to work on any type
* Other Generalizations, fixes and CHANGELOG entry
* Add stability lemmas for `path.sort`
- Inverse the comparison in `merge` and swap arguments of it everywhere.
- Add `sort_rec1` and `sortE` to simplify inductive proofs on `sort`.
- Add `seq.mask_filter`, `mem2E`, `path_mask`, `path_filter`, and `sorted_mask`.
- Generalize `sorted_filter`, `homo_path_in`, `mono_path_in`, `homo_sorted_in`,
and `mono_sorted_in` to non-`eqType`s.
- Add the following lemmas to state the stability of `path.merge` and `path.sort`.
sorted_merge
: forall (T : Type) (leT : rel T),
transitive leT ->
forall s t : seq T, sorted leT (s ++ t) -> merge leT s t = s ++ t
merge_stable_path
: forall (T : Type) (leT leT' : rel T),
total leT ->
forall (x : T) (s1 s2 : seq T),
all (fun y : T => all (leT' y) s2) s1 ->
path [rel x0 y | leT x0 y && (leT y x0 ==> leT' x0 y)] x s1 ->
path [rel x0 y | leT x0 y && (leT y x0 ==> leT' x0 y)] x s2 ->
path [rel x0 y | leT x0 y && (leT y x0 ==> leT' x0 y)] x
(merge leT s1 s2)
merge_stable_sorted
: forall (T : Type) (leT leT' : rel T),
total leT ->
forall s1 s2 : seq T,
all (fun x : T => all (leT' x) s2) s1 ->
sorted [rel x y | leT x y && (leT y x ==> leT' x y)] s1 ->
sorted [rel x y | leT x y && (leT y x ==> leT' x y)] s2 ->
sorted [rel x y | leT x y && (leT y x ==> leT' x y)] (merge leT s1 s2)
sorted_sort
: forall (T : Type) (leT : rel T),
transitive leT -> forall s : seq T, sorted leT s -> sort leT s = s
sort_stable
: forall (T : Type) (leT leT' : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT' ->
forall s : seq T,
sorted leT' s ->
sorted [rel x y | leT x y && (leT y x ==> leT' x y)] (sort leT s)
filter_sort
: forall (T : Type) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT ->
forall (p : pred T) (s : seq T),
[seq x <- sort leT s | p x] = sort leT [seq x <- s | p x]
mask_sort
: forall (T : Type) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT ->
forall (s : seq T) (m : bitseq),
{m_s : bitseq | mask m_s (sort leT s) = sort leT (mask m s)}
mask_sort'
: forall (T : Type) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT ->
forall (s : seq T) (m : bitseq),
sorted leT (mask m s) ->
{m_s : bitseq | mask m_s (sort leT s) = mask m s}
subseq_sort
: forall (T : eqType) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT -> {homo sort leT : t s / subseq t s}
subseq_sort'
: forall (T : eqType) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT ->
forall t s : seq T, subseq t s -> sorted leT t -> subseq t (sort leT s)
mem2_sort
: forall (T : eqType) (leT : rel T),
total leT -> transitive leT ->
forall (s : seq T) (x y : T),
leT x y -> mem2 s x y -> mem2 (sort leT s) x y
* Avoid some eta-expansions
* Get the proper fix of `order_path_min` and remove `sort_map_in`
* Update documentation and CHANGELOG entries
|
|
Also changed eqsVneq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like injectivity lemmas, instances of cancellation lemmas (whose
conclusion is `cancel ? ?`, `{in ?, cancel ? ?}`, `pcancel`, or
`ocancel`) are passed to
generic lemmas such as `canRL` or `canLR_in`. Thus such lemmas should
not have trailing on-demand implicits _just before_ the `cancel`
conclusion, as these would be inconvenient to insert (requiring
essentially an explicit eta-expansion).
We therefore use `Arguments` or `Prenex Implicits` directives to make
all such arguments maximally inserted implicits. We don’t, however make
other arguments implicit, so as not to spoil direct instantiation of
the lemmas (in, e.g., `rewrite -[y](invmK injf)`).
We have also tried to do this with lemmas whose statement matches a
`cancel`, i.e., ending in `forall x, g (E[x]) = x` (where pattern
unification will pick up `f = fun x => E[x]`).
We also adjusted implicits of a few stray injectivity
lemmas, and defined constants.
We provide a shorthand for reindexing a bigop with a permutation.
Finally we used the new implicit signatures to simplify proofs that
use injectivity or cancellation lemmas.
|
|
```
Warning: Adding and removing hints in the core database implicitly is
deprecated. Please specify a hint database.
[implicit-core-hint-db,deprecated]
```
|
|
See the discussion here:
https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/pull/242#discussion_r233778114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
