diff options
| author | Georges Gonthier | 2018-12-13 12:55:43 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Georges Gonthier | 2018-12-13 12:55:43 +0100 |
| commit | 0b1ea03dafcf36880657ba910eec28ab78ccd018 (patch) | |
| tree | 60a84ff296299226d530dd0b495be24fd7675748 /mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v | |
| parent | fa9b7b19fc0409f3fdfa680e08f40a84594e8307 (diff) | |
Adjust implicits of cancellation lemmas
Like injectivity lemmas, instances of cancellation lemmas (whose
conclusion is `cancel ? ?`, `{in ?, cancel ? ?}`, `pcancel`, or
`ocancel`) are passed to
generic lemmas such as `canRL` or `canLR_in`. Thus such lemmas should
not have trailing on-demand implicits _just before_ the `cancel`
conclusion, as these would be inconvenient to insert (requiring
essentially an explicit eta-expansion).
We therefore use `Arguments` or `Prenex Implicits` directives to make
all such arguments maximally inserted implicits. We don’t, however make
other arguments implicit, so as not to spoil direct instantiation of
the lemmas (in, e.g., `rewrite -[y](invmK injf)`).
We have also tried to do this with lemmas whose statement matches a
`cancel`, i.e., ending in `forall x, g (E[x]) = x` (where pattern
unification will pick up `f = fun x => E[x]`).
We also adjusted implicits of a few stray injectivity
lemmas, and defined constants.
We provide a shorthand for reindexing a bigop with a permutation.
Finally we used the new implicit signatures to simplify proofs that
use injectivity or cancellation lemmas.
Diffstat (limited to 'mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v | 15 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v b/mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v index 2414e13..ec932a1 100644 --- a/mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v +++ b/mathcomp/algebra/ssrnum.v @@ -1457,18 +1457,18 @@ Hint Resolve ltr_opp2 : core. Definition lter_opp2 := (ler_opp2, ltr_opp2). Lemma ler_oppr x y : (x <= - y) = (y <= - x). -Proof. by rewrite (monoRL (@opprK _) ler_opp2). Qed. +Proof. by rewrite (monoRL opprK ler_opp2). Qed. Lemma ltr_oppr x y : (x < - y) = (y < - x). -Proof. by rewrite (monoRL (@opprK _) (lerW_nmono _)). Qed. +Proof. by rewrite (monoRL opprK (lerW_nmono _)). Qed. Definition lter_oppr := (ler_oppr, ltr_oppr). Lemma ler_oppl x y : (- x <= y) = (- y <= x). -Proof. by rewrite (monoLR (@opprK _) ler_opp2). Qed. +Proof. by rewrite (monoLR opprK ler_opp2). Qed. Lemma ltr_oppl x y : (- x < y) = (- y < x). -Proof. by rewrite (monoLR (@opprK _) (lerW_nmono _)). Qed. +Proof. by rewrite (monoLR opprK (lerW_nmono _)). Qed. Definition lter_oppl := (ler_oppl, ltr_oppl). @@ -4797,12 +4797,17 @@ Qed. End ClosedFieldTheory. -Notation "n .-root" := (@nthroot _ n) (at level 2, format "n .-root") : ring_scope. +Notation "n .-root" := (@nthroot _ n) + (at level 2, format "n .-root") : ring_scope. Notation sqrtC := 2.-root. Notation "'i" := (@imaginaryC _) (at level 0) : ring_scope. Notation "'Re z" := (Re z) (at level 10, z at level 8) : ring_scope. Notation "'Im z" := (Im z) (at level 10, z at level 8) : ring_scope. +Arguments conjCK {C} x. +Arguments sqrCK {C} [x] le0x. +Arguments sqrCK_P {C x}. + End Theory. Module RealMixin. |
