diff options
| author | Megan Wachs | 2021-03-18 16:47:58 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub | 2021-03-18 16:47:58 -0700 |
| commit | f1ad5b58e8a749d558758288d03ce75bf6b8ff9c (patch) | |
| tree | 2150d6f41a55f81c9f4cf3b037b715cb75ea617f /docs/src/explanations/motivation.md | |
| parent | 2a56c6540e914611ac12647e157aec4c5c595758 (diff) | |
Reorganize website docs (#1806)
Updates to chisel3 documentation for website:
* guard code examples with mdoc and fix errors encountered along the way
* move some website content here vs splitting the content across two repos
* Bring in the interval-types and loading memories content so that it will be visible from the website
* remove all references to the wiki (deprecated)
* Remove reference to Wiki from the README
* fix tabbing and compile of chisel3-vs-chisel2 section
* Appendix: faqs now guarded and compile
* FAQs: move to resources section
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/src/explanations/motivation.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/src/explanations/motivation.md | 44 |
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/src/explanations/motivation.md b/docs/src/explanations/motivation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..afe02a7b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/src/explanations/motivation.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +--- +layout: docs +title: "Motivation" +section: "chisel3" +--- + +# Motivation -- "Why Chisel?" + +We were motivated to develop a new hardware language by years of +struggle with existing hardware description languages in our research +projects and hardware design courses. _Verilog_ and _VHDL_ were developed +as hardware _simulation_ languages, and only later did they become +a basis for hardware _synthesis_. Much of the semantics of these +languages are not appropriate for hardware synthesis and, in fact, +many constructs are simply not synthesizable. Other constructs are +non-intuitive in how they map to hardware implementations, or their +use can accidentally lead to highly inefficient hardware structures. +While it is possible to use a subset of these languages and still get +acceptable results, they nonetheless present a cluttered and confusing +specification model, particularly in an instructional setting. + +However, our strongest motivation for developing a new hardware +language is our desire to change the way that electronic system design +takes place. We believe that it is important to not only teach +students how to design circuits, but also to teach them how to design +*circuit generators* ---programs that automatically generate +designs from a high-level set of design parameters and constraints. +Through circuit generators, we hope to leverage the hard work of +design experts and raise the level of design abstraction for everyone. +To express flexible and scalable circuit construction, circuit +generators must employ sophisticated programming techniques to make +decisions concerning how to best customize their output circuits +according to high-level parameter values and constraints. While +Verilog and VHDL include some primitive constructs for programmatic +circuit generation, they lack the powerful facilities present in +modern programming languages, such as object-oriented programming, +type inference, support for functional programming, and reflection. + +Instead of building a new hardware design language from scratch, we +chose to embed hardware construction primitives within an existing +language. We picked Scala not only because it includes the +programming features we feel are important for building circuit +generators, but because it was specifically developed as a base for +domain-specific languages. |
