theory Prompt_monad_lemmas imports Prompt_monad Sail_values_lemmas begin notation bind (infixr "\" 54) abbreviation seq :: "('rv,unit,'e)monad \ ('rv,'b,'e)monad \('rv,'b,'e)monad" (infixr "\" 54) where "m \ n \ m \ (\_. n)" lemma All_bind_dom: "bind_dom (m, f)" by (induction m) (auto intro: bind.domintros) termination bind using All_bind_dom by auto lemmas bind_induct[case_names Done Read_mem Write_memv Read_reg Excl_res Write_ea Barrier Write_reg Fail Exception] = bind.induct lemma bind_return[simp]: "bind (return a) f = f a" by (auto simp: return_def) lemma bind_return_right[simp]: "bind x return = x" by (induction x) (auto simp: return_def) lemma bind_assoc[simp]: "bind (bind m f) g = bind m (\x. bind (f x) g)" by (induction m f arbitrary: g rule: bind.induct) auto lemma bind_assert_True[simp]: "bind (assert_exp True msg) f = f ()" by (auto simp: assert_exp_def) lemma All_try_catch_dom: "try_catch_dom (m, h)" by (induction m) (auto intro: try_catch.domintros) termination try_catch using All_try_catch_dom by auto lemmas try_catch_induct[case_names Done Read_mem Write_memv Read_reg Excl_res Write_ea Barrier Write_reg Fail Exception] = try_catch.induct datatype 'regval event = (* Request to read memory *) e_read_mem read_kind "bitU list" nat "memory_byte list" | e_read_tag "bitU list" bitU (* Write is imminent, at address lifted, of size nat *) | e_write_ea write_kind "bitU list" nat (* Request the result of store-exclusive *) | e_excl_res bool (* Request to write memory at last signalled address. Memory value should be 8 times the size given in ea signal *) | e_write_memv "memory_byte list" bool | e_write_tag "bitU list" bitU bool (* Tell the system to dynamically recalculate dependency footprint *) | e_footprint (* Request a memory barrier *) | e_barrier " barrier_kind " (* Request to read register *) | e_read_reg string 'regval (* Request to write register *) | e_write_reg string 'regval | e_undefined bool | e_print string inductive_set T :: "(('rv, 'a, 'e) monad \ 'rv event \ ('rv, 'a, 'e) monad) set" where Read_mem: "((Read_mem rk addr sz k), e_read_mem rk addr sz v, k v) \ T" | Read_tag: "((Read_tag addr k), e_read_tag addr v, k v) \ T" | Write_ea: "((Write_ea wk addr sz k), e_write_ea wk addr sz, k) \ T" | Excl_res: "((Excl_res k), e_excl_res r, k r) \ T" | Write_memv: "((Write_memv v k), e_write_memv v r, k r) \ T" | Write_tag: "((Write_tag a v k), e_write_tag a v r, k r) \ T" | Footprint: "((Footprint k), e_footprint, k) \ T" | Barrier: "((Barrier bk k), e_barrier bk, k) \ T" | Read_reg: "((Read_reg r k), e_read_reg r v, k v) \ T" | Write_reg: "((Write_reg r v k), e_write_reg r v, k) \ T" | Undefined : "((Undefined k), e_undefined v, k v) \ T" | Print: "((Print msg k), e_print msg, k) \ T" inductive_set Traces :: "(('rv, 'a, 'e) monad \ 'rv event list \ ('rv, 'a, 'e) monad) set" where Nil: "(s, [], s) \ Traces" | Step: "\(s, e, s'') \ T; (s'', t, s') \ Traces\ \ (s, e # t, s') \ Traces" declare Traces.intros[intro] declare T.intros[intro] declare prod.splits[split] lemmas Traces_ConsI = T.intros[THEN Step, rotated] inductive_cases Traces_NilE[elim]: "(s, [], s') \ Traces" inductive_cases Traces_ConsE[elim]: "(s, e # t, s') \ Traces" lemma Traces_cases: fixes m :: "('rv, 'a, 'e) monad" assumes Run: "(m, t, m') \ Traces" obtains (Nil) a where "m = m'" and "t = []" | (Read_mem) rk addr s k t' v where "m = Read_mem rk addr s k" and "t = e_read_mem rk addr s v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Read_tag) addr k t' v where "m = Read_tag addr k" and "t = e_read_tag addr v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Write_memv) val k t' v where "m = Write_memv val k" and "t = e_write_memv val v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Write_tag) a val k t' v where "m = Write_tag a val k" and "t = e_write_tag a val v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Barrier) bk k t' v where "m = Barrier bk k" and "t = e_barrier bk # t'" and "(k, t', m') \ Traces" | (Read_reg) reg k t' v where "m = Read_reg reg k" and "t = e_read_reg reg v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Excl_res) k t' v where "m = Excl_res k" and "t = e_excl_res v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Write_ea) wk addr s k t' where "m = Write_ea wk addr s k" and "t = e_write_ea wk addr s # t'" and "(k, t', m') \ Traces" | (Footprint) k t' where "m = Footprint k" and "t = e_footprint # t'" and "(k, t', m') \ Traces" | (Write_reg) reg v k t' where "m = Write_reg reg v k" and "t = e_write_reg reg v # t'" and "(k, t', m') \ Traces" | (Undefined) v k t' where "m = Undefined k" and "t = e_undefined v # t'" and "(k v, t', m') \ Traces" | (Print) msg k t' where "m = Print msg k" and "t = e_print msg # t'" and "(k, t', m') \ Traces" proof (use Run in \cases m t m' set: Traces\) case Nil then show ?thesis by (auto intro: that(1)) next case (Step e m'' t') from \(m, e, m'') \ T\ and \t = e # t'\ and \(m'', t', m') \ Traces\ show ?thesis by (cases m e m'' rule: T.cases; elim that; blast) qed abbreviation Run :: "('rv, 'a, 'e) monad \ 'rv event list \ 'a \ bool" where "Run s t a \ (s, t, Done a) \ Traces" lemma Run_appendI: assumes "(s, t1, s') \ Traces" and "Run s' t2 a" shows "Run s (t1 @ t2) a" proof (use assms in \induction t1 arbitrary: s\) case (Cons e t1) then show ?case by (elim Traces_ConsE) auto qed auto lemma bind_DoneE: assumes "bind m f = Done a" obtains a' where "m = Done a'" and "f a' = Done a" using assms by (auto elim: bind.elims) lemma bind_T_cases: assumes "(bind m f, e, s') \ T" obtains (Done) a where "m = Done a" | (Bind) m' where "s' = bind m' f" and "(m, e, m') \ T" using assms by (cases; blast elim: bind.elims) lemma Run_bindE: fixes m :: "('rv, 'b, 'e) monad" and a :: 'a assumes "Run (bind m f) t a" obtains tm am tf where "t = tm @ tf" and "Run m tm am" and "Run (f am) tf a" proof (use assms in \induction "bind m f" t "Done a :: ('rv, 'a, 'e) monad" arbitrary: m rule: Traces.induct\) case Nil obtain am where "m = Done am" and "f am = Done a" using Nil(1) by (elim bind_DoneE) then show ?case by (intro Nil(2)) auto next case (Step e s'' t m) show thesis using Step(1) proof (cases rule: bind_T_cases) case (Done am) then show ?thesis using Step(1,2) by (intro Step(4)[of "[]" "e # t" am]) auto next case (Bind m') show ?thesis proof (rule Step(3)[OF Bind(1)]) fix tm tf am assume "t = tm @ tf" and "Run m' tm am" and "Run (f am) tf a" then show thesis using Bind by (intro Step(4)[of "e # tm" tf am]) auto qed qed qed lemma Run_DoneE: assumes "Run (Done a) t a'" obtains "t = []" and "a' = a" using assms by (auto elim: Traces.cases T.cases) lemma Run_Done_iff_Nil[simp]: "Run (Done a) t a' \ t = [] \ a' = a" by (auto elim: Run_DoneE) lemma bind_cong[fundef_cong]: assumes m: "m1 = m2" and f: "\t a. Run m2 t a \ f1 a = f2 a" shows "bind m1 f1 = bind m2 f2" unfolding m using f by (induction m2 f1 arbitrary: f2 rule: bind.induct; unfold bind.simps; blast) end