| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix SMT mem_builtin test case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow conversion between int(n) and int in smt_conversion
|
|
We want to ensure simplication can treat these separately so we
don't accidentally simplify away dependencies between reads and write
addresses.
|
|
Only change that should be needed for 99.9% of uses is to change
vector('n, 'ord, bit) to bitvector('n, 'ord), and adding
$ifndef FEATURE_BITVECTOR_TYPE
type bitvector('n, dec) = vector('n, dec, bit)
$endif
for to support any Sail before this
Currently I have all C, Typechecking, and SMT tests passing, as well
as the RISC-V spec building OCaml and C completely unmodified.
|
|
|
|
Generate addresses, kinds, and values separately for read and write
events.
Add an mli interface for jib_smt.ml
|
|
Generate SMT where the memory reads and writes are totally
unconstrained, allowing additional constraints to be added that
restrict the possible reads and writes based on some memory model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously path conditionals for a node were defined as the path
conditional of the immediate dominator (+ a guard for explicit guard
nodes after conditional branches), whereas now they are the path
conditional of the immediate dominator plus an expression
encapsulating all the guards between the immediate dominator and the
node. This is needed as the previous method was incorrect for certain
control flow graphs.
This slows down the generated SMT massively, because it causes the
path conditionals to become huge when the immediate dominator is far
away from the node in question. It also changes computing path
conditionals from O(n) to O(n^2) which is not ideal as our inlined
graphs can become massive. Need to figure out a better way to generate
minimal path conditionals between the immediate dominator and the
node.
I upped the timeout for the SMT tests from 20s to 300s each but this
may still cause a failure in Jenkins because that machine is slow.
|
|
|
|
Jib_compile now has an option that lets it generate real value
literals (VL_real), which we don't want for backends (i.e. C), which
don't support them. Reals are encoded as actual reals in SMT, as there
isn't really any nice way to encode them as bitvectors. Currently we
just have the pure real functions, functions between integers and
reals (i.e. floor, to_real, etc) are not supported for now.
Strings are likewise encoded as SMTLIB strings, for similar reasons.
Jib_smt has ctx.use_real and ctx.use_string which are set when we
generate anything real or string related, so we can keep the logic as
Arrays+Bitvectors for most Sail that doesn't require either.
|
|
As an example:
$counterexample :query exist match_failure
function prop(xs: bits(4)) -> unit = {
match xs {
_ : bits(3) @ 0b0 => ()
}
}
Will return
Solver found counterexample: ok
xs -> 0x1
as we are asking for an input such that a match failure occurs,
meanwhile
$counterexample :query ~(exist match_failure)
function prop(xs: bits(4)) -> unit = {
match xs {
_ : bits(3) @ 0b0 => ()
}
}
will return 0x0 as we are asking for an input such that no match
failure occurs. Note that we can now support properties for
non-boolean functions by not including the return event in the query.
|
|
SMT query now expressed as a logical expression over events, so e.g.
let default_query =
Q_or [Q_and [Q_all Assertion; Q_all Return; Q_not (Q_exist Match)]; Q_exist Overflow]
Checks either an overflow occurred, or the function returned true,
while all assertions held, and no match failures occurred. Currently
there is only the default query but the plan is to make this
user-specifiable in the $property/$counterexample directives.
|
|
Have assert events for assertions and overflow events for potential
integer overflow. Unclear how these should interact... The order in
which such events are applied to the final assertion is potentially
quite important.
Overflow checks and assertions are now path sensitive, as they should
be.
|
|
|
|
Simple parser-combinator style parser for generated models. It's
actually quite tricky to reconstruct the models because we can have:
let x = something
$counterexample
function prop(x: bits(32)) -> bool = ...
where the function argument becomes zx/1 rather than zx/0, which is what
we'd expect for the argument of a property. Might need to do something
smarter with encoding locations into smt names to figure out what SMT
variables correspond to which souce variables exactly. The above
also previously generated incorrect SMT, which has now been fixed.
|
|
Add a new AE_write_ref constructor in the ANF representation to
make writes to register references explicit in Jib_compile
|
|
|
|
If we have e.g.
$property
val prop : ...
let X = 0
function prop(...) = X == ...
then we need to ensure that let X is included when we generate the
property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add some tests for arithmetic operations. Some tests fail in either Z3
or CVC4 currently, due to how overflow is handled.
|
|
Rather than generating SMT from a function called check_sat, now find
any function with a $property directive and generate SMT for it, e.g.
$property
function prop_cap_round_trip(cap: bits(128)) -> bool = {
let cap_rt = capToBits(capBitsToCapability(true, cap));
cap == cap_rt
}
$property
function prop_base_lteq_top(capbits: bits(128)) -> bool = {
let c = capBitsToCapability(true, capbits);
let (base, top) = getCapBounds(c);
let e = unsigned(c.E);
e >= 51 | base <= top
}
The file property.ml has a function for gathering all the properties
in a file, as well as a rewrite-pass for properties with type
quantifiers, which allows us to handle properties like
function prop forall 'n, 'n <= 100. (bv: bits('n)) -> bool = exp
by rewriting to (conceptually)
function prop(bv: bits(MAX_BIT_WIDTH)) -> bool =
if length(bv) > 100 then true else exp
The function return is now automatically negated (i.e. always true =
unsat, sometimes false = sat), which makes sense for quickcheck-type
properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently only works with CVC4, test cases are in test/smt. Can prove
that RISC-V add instruction actually adds values in registers and
that's about it for now.
|