summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/coq/Prompt.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/coq/Prompt.v')
-rw-r--r--lib/coq/Prompt.v286
1 files changed, 286 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/coq/Prompt.v b/lib/coq/Prompt.v
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5a82acdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/coq/Prompt.v
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+Require Import Sail.Values.
+Require Import Sail.Prompt_monad.
+Require Export ZArith.Zwf.
+Require Import List.
+Import ListNotations.
+(*
+
+val iter_aux : forall 'rv 'a 'e. integer -> (integer -> 'a -> monad 'rv unit 'e) -> list 'a -> monad 'rv unit 'e
+let rec iter_aux i f xs = match xs with
+ | x :: xs -> f i x >> iter_aux (i + 1) f xs
+ | [] -> return ()
+ end
+
+declare {isabelle} termination_argument iter_aux = automatic
+
+val iteri : forall 'rv 'a 'e. (integer -> 'a -> monad 'rv unit 'e) -> list 'a -> monad 'rv unit 'e
+let iteri f xs = iter_aux 0 f xs
+
+val iter : forall 'rv 'a 'e. ('a -> monad 'rv unit 'e) -> list 'a -> monad 'rv unit 'e
+let iter f xs = iteri (fun _ x -> f x) xs
+
+val foreachM : forall 'a 'rv 'vars 'e.
+ list 'a -> 'vars -> ('a -> 'vars -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e) -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e*)
+Fixpoint foreachM {a rv Vars e} (l : list a) (vars : Vars) (body : a -> Vars -> monad rv Vars e) : monad rv Vars e :=
+match l with
+| [] => returnm vars
+| (x :: xs) =>
+ body x vars >>= fun vars =>
+ foreachM xs vars body
+end.
+
+Fixpoint foreach_ZM_up' {rv e Vars} (from to step off : Z) (n : nat) `{ArithFact (0 <? step)} `{ArithFact (0 <=? off)} (vars : Vars) (body : forall (z : Z) `(ArithFact (from <=? z <=? to)), Vars -> monad rv Vars e) {struct n} : monad rv Vars e.
+exact (
+ if sumbool_of_bool (from + off <=? to) then
+ match n with
+ | O => returnm vars
+ | S n => body (from + off) _ vars >>= fun vars => foreach_ZM_up' rv e Vars from to step (off + step) n _ _ vars body
+ end
+ else returnm vars).
+Defined.
+
+Fixpoint foreach_ZM_down' {rv e Vars} (from to step off : Z) (n : nat) `{ArithFact (0 <? step)} `{ArithFact (off <=? 0)} (vars : Vars) (body : forall (z : Z) `(ArithFact (to <=? z <=? from)), Vars -> monad rv Vars e) {struct n} : monad rv Vars e.
+exact (
+ if sumbool_of_bool (to <=? from + off) then
+ match n with
+ | O => returnm vars
+ | S n => body (from + off) _ vars >>= fun vars => foreach_ZM_down' _ _ _ from to step (off - step) n _ _ vars body
+ end
+ else returnm vars).
+Defined.
+
+Definition foreach_ZM_up {rv e Vars} from to step vars body `{ArithFact (0 <? step)} :=
+ foreach_ZM_up' (rv := rv) (e := e) (Vars := Vars) from to step 0 (S (Z.abs_nat (from - to))) vars body.
+Definition foreach_ZM_down {rv e Vars} from to step vars body `{ArithFact (0 <? step)} :=
+ foreach_ZM_down' (rv := rv) (e := e) (Vars := Vars) from to step 0 (S (Z.abs_nat (from - to))) vars body.
+
+(*declare {isabelle} termination_argument foreachM = automatic*)
+
+Definition genlistM {A RV E} (f : nat -> monad RV A E) (n : nat) : monad RV (list A) E :=
+ let indices := List.seq 0 n in
+ foreachM indices [] (fun n xs => (f n >>= (fun x => returnm (xs ++ [x])))).
+
+(*val and_boolM : forall 'rv 'e. monad 'rv bool 'e -> monad 'rv bool 'e -> monad 'rv bool 'e*)
+Definition and_boolM {rv E} (l : monad rv bool E) (r : monad rv bool E) : monad rv bool E :=
+ l >>= (fun l => if l then r else returnm false).
+
+(* We introduce explicit definitions for these proofs so that they can be used in
+ the state monad and program logic rules. They are not currently used in the proof
+ rules because it was more convenient to quantify over them instead. *)
+Definition and_bool_left_proof {P Q R:bool -> Prop} :
+ ArithFactP (P false) ->
+ (forall l r, ArithFactP (P l -> ((l = true -> (Q r)) -> (R (andb l r))))) ->
+ ArithFactP (R false).
+intros [p] [h].
+constructor.
+change false with (andb false false).
+apply h; auto.
+congruence.
+Qed.
+
+Definition and_bool_full_proof {P Q R:bool -> Prop} {r} :
+ ArithFactP (P true) ->
+ ArithFactP (Q r) ->
+ (forall l r, ArithFactP ((P l) -> ((l = true -> (Q r)) -> (R (andb l r))))) ->
+ ArithFactP (R r).
+intros [p] [q] [h].
+constructor.
+change r with (andb true r).
+apply h; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Definition and_boolMP {rv E} {P Q R:bool->Prop} (x : monad rv {b:bool & ArithFactP (P b)} E) (y : monad rv {b:bool & ArithFactP (Q b)} E)
+ `{H:forall l r, ArithFactP ((P l) -> ((l = true -> (Q r)) -> (R (andb l r))))}
+ : monad rv {b:bool & ArithFactP (R b)} E :=
+ x >>= fun '(existT _ x p) => (if x return ArithFactP (P x) -> _ then
+ fun p => y >>= fun '(existT _ y q) => returnm (existT _ y (and_bool_full_proof p q H))
+ else fun p => returnm (existT _ false (and_bool_left_proof p H))) p.
+
+(*val or_boolM : forall 'rv 'e. monad 'rv bool 'e -> monad 'rv bool 'e -> monad 'rv bool 'e*)
+Definition or_boolM {rv E} (l : monad rv bool E) (r : monad rv bool E) : monad rv bool E :=
+ l >>= (fun l => if l then returnm true else r).
+
+
+Definition or_bool_left_proof {P Q R:bool -> Prop} :
+ ArithFactP (P true) ->
+ (forall l r, ArithFactP ((P l) -> (((l = false) -> (Q r)) -> (R (orb l r))))) ->
+ ArithFactP (R true).
+intros [p] [h].
+constructor.
+change true with (orb true false).
+apply h; auto.
+congruence.
+Qed.
+
+Definition or_bool_full_proof {P Q R:bool -> Prop} {r} :
+ ArithFactP (P false) ->
+ ArithFactP (Q r) ->
+ (forall l r, ArithFactP ((P l) -> (((l = false) -> (Q r)) -> (R (orb l r))))) ->
+ ArithFactP (R r).
+intros [p] [q] [h].
+constructor.
+change r with (orb false r).
+apply h; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Definition or_boolMP {rv E} {P Q R:bool -> Prop} (l : monad rv {b : bool & ArithFactP (P b)} E) (r : monad rv {b : bool & ArithFactP (Q b)} E)
+ `{forall l r, ArithFactP ((P l) -> (((l = false) -> (Q r)) -> (R (orb l r))))}
+ : monad rv {b : bool & ArithFactP (R b)} E :=
+ l >>= fun '(existT _ l p) =>
+ (if l return ArithFactP (P l) -> _ then fun p => returnm (existT _ true (or_bool_left_proof p H))
+ else fun p => r >>= fun '(existT _ r q) => returnm (existT _ r (or_bool_full_proof p q H))) p.
+
+Definition build_trivial_ex {rv E} {T:Type} (x:monad rv T E) : monad rv {x : T & ArithFact true} E :=
+ x >>= fun x => returnm (existT _ x (Build_ArithFactP _ eq_refl)).
+
+(*val bool_of_bitU_fail : forall 'rv 'e. bitU -> monad 'rv bool 'e*)
+Definition bool_of_bitU_fail {rv E} (b : bitU) : monad rv bool E :=
+match b with
+ | B0 => returnm false
+ | B1 => returnm true
+ | BU => Fail "bool_of_bitU"
+end.
+
+Definition bool_of_bitU_nondet {rv E} (b : bitU) : monad rv bool E :=
+match b with
+ | B0 => returnm false
+ | B1 => returnm true
+ | BU => choose_bool "bool_of_bitU"
+end.
+
+Definition bools_of_bits_nondet {rv E} (bits : list bitU) : monad rv (list bool) E :=
+ foreachM bits []
+ (fun b bools =>
+ bool_of_bitU_nondet b >>= fun b =>
+ returnm (bools ++ [b])).
+
+Definition of_bits_nondet {rv A E} `{Bitvector A} (bits : list bitU) : monad rv A E :=
+ bools_of_bits_nondet bits >>= fun bs =>
+ returnm (of_bools bs).
+
+Definition of_bits_fail {rv A E} `{Bitvector A} (bits : list bitU) : monad rv A E :=
+ maybe_fail "of_bits" (of_bits bits).
+
+(* For termination of recursive functions. We don't name assertions, so use
+ the type class mechanism to find it. *)
+Definition _limit_reduces {_limit} (_acc:Acc (Zwf 0) _limit) `{ArithFact (_limit >=? 0)} : Acc (Zwf 0) (_limit - 1).
+refine (Acc_inv _acc _).
+destruct H.
+unbool_comparisons.
+red.
+omega.
+Defined.
+
+(* A version of well-foundedness of measures with a guard to ensure that
+ definitions can be reduced without inspecting proofs, based on a coq-club
+ thread featuring Barras, Gonthier and Gregoire, see
+ https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2007-07/msg00014.html *)
+
+Fixpoint pos_guard_wf {A:Type} {R:A -> A -> Prop} (p:positive) : well_founded R -> well_founded R :=
+ match p with
+ | xH => fun wfR x => Acc_intro x (fun y _ => wfR y)
+ | xO p' => fun wfR x => let F := pos_guard_wf p' in Acc_intro x (fun y _ => F (F
+wfR) y)
+ | xI p' => fun wfR x => let F := pos_guard_wf p' in Acc_intro x (fun y _ => F (F
+wfR) y)
+ end.
+
+Definition Zwf_guarded (z:Z) : Acc (Zwf 0) z :=
+ Acc_intro _ (fun y H => match z with
+ | Zpos p => pos_guard_wf p (Zwf_well_founded _) _
+ | Zneg p => pos_guard_wf p (Zwf_well_founded _) _
+ | Z0 => Zwf_well_founded _ _
+ end).
+
+(*val whileM : forall 'rv 'vars 'e. 'vars -> ('vars -> monad 'rv bool 'e) ->
+ ('vars -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e) -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e*)
+Fixpoint whileMT' {RV Vars E} limit (vars : Vars) (cond : Vars -> monad RV bool E) (body : Vars -> monad RV Vars E) (acc : Acc (Zwf 0) limit) : monad RV Vars E.
+exact (
+ if Z_ge_dec limit 0 then
+ cond vars >>= fun cond_val =>
+ if cond_val then
+ body vars >>= fun vars => whileMT' _ _ _ (limit - 1) vars cond body (_limit_reduces acc)
+ else returnm vars
+ else Fail "Termination limit reached").
+Defined.
+
+Definition whileMT {RV Vars E} (vars : Vars) (measure : Vars -> Z) (cond : Vars -> monad RV bool E) (body : Vars -> monad RV Vars E) : monad RV Vars E :=
+ let limit := measure vars in
+ whileMT' limit vars cond body (Zwf_guarded limit).
+
+(*val untilM : forall 'rv 'vars 'e. 'vars -> ('vars -> monad 'rv bool 'e) ->
+ ('vars -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e) -> monad 'rv 'vars 'e*)
+Fixpoint untilMT' {RV Vars E} limit (vars : Vars) (cond : Vars -> monad RV bool E) (body : Vars -> monad RV Vars E) (acc : Acc (Zwf 0) limit) : monad RV Vars E.
+exact (
+ if Z_ge_dec limit 0 then
+ body vars >>= fun vars =>
+ cond vars >>= fun cond_val =>
+ if cond_val then returnm vars else untilMT' _ _ _ (limit - 1) vars cond body (_limit_reduces acc)
+ else Fail "Termination limit reached").
+Defined.
+
+Definition untilMT {RV Vars E} (vars : Vars) (measure : Vars -> Z) (cond : Vars -> monad RV bool E) (body : Vars -> monad RV Vars E) : monad RV Vars E :=
+ let limit := measure vars in
+ untilMT' limit vars cond body (Zwf_guarded limit).
+
+(*let write_two_regs r1 r2 vec =
+ let is_inc =
+ let is_inc_r1 = is_inc_of_reg r1 in
+ let is_inc_r2 = is_inc_of_reg r2 in
+ let () = ensure (is_inc_r1 = is_inc_r2)
+ "write_two_regs called with vectors of different direction" in
+ is_inc_r1 in
+
+ let (size_r1 : integer) = size_of_reg r1 in
+ let (start_vec : integer) = get_start vec in
+ let size_vec = length vec in
+ let r1_v =
+ if is_inc
+ then slice vec start_vec (size_r1 - start_vec - 1)
+ else slice vec start_vec (start_vec - size_r1 - 1) in
+ let r2_v =
+ if is_inc
+ then slice vec (size_r1 - start_vec) (size_vec - start_vec)
+ else slice vec (start_vec - size_r1) (start_vec - size_vec) in
+ write_reg r1 r1_v >> write_reg r2 r2_v*)
+
+Definition choose_bools {RV E} (descr : string) (n : nat) : monad RV (list bool) E :=
+ genlistM (fun _ => choose_bool descr) n.
+
+Definition choose {RV A E} (descr : string) (xs : list A) : monad RV A E :=
+ (* Use sufficiently many nondeterministically chosen bits and convert into an
+ index into the list *)
+ choose_bools descr (List.length xs) >>= fun bs =>
+ let idx := ((nat_of_bools bs) mod List.length xs)%nat in
+ match List.nth_error xs idx with
+ | Some x => returnm x
+ | None => Fail ("choose " ++ descr)
+ end.
+
+Definition internal_pick {rv a e} (xs : list a) : monad rv a e :=
+ choose "internal_pick" xs.
+
+Fixpoint undefined_word_nat {rv e} n : monad rv (Word.word n) e :=
+ match n with
+ | O => returnm Word.WO
+ | S m =>
+ choose_bool "undefined_word_nat" >>= fun b =>
+ undefined_word_nat m >>= fun t =>
+ returnm (Word.WS b t)
+ end.
+
+Definition undefined_bitvector {rv e} n `{ArithFact (n >=? 0)} : monad rv (mword n) e :=
+ undefined_word_nat (Z.to_nat n) >>= fun w =>
+ returnm (word_to_mword w).
+
+(* If we need to build an existential after a monadic operation, assume that
+ we can do it entirely from the type. *)
+
+Definition build_ex_m {rv e} {T:Type} (x:monad rv T e) {P:T -> Prop} `{H:forall x, ArithFactP (P x)} : monad rv {x : T & ArithFactP (P x)} e :=
+ x >>= fun y => returnm (existT _ y (H y)).
+
+Definition projT1_m {rv e} {T:Type} {P:T -> Prop} (x: monad rv {x : T & P x} e) : monad rv T e :=
+ x >>= fun y => returnm (projT1 y).
+
+Definition derive_m {rv e} {T:Type} {P Q:T -> Prop} (x : monad rv {x : T & ArithFactP (P x)} e) `{forall x, ArithFactP (P x) -> ArithFactP (Q x)} : monad rv {x : T & (ArithFactP (Q x))} e :=
+ x >>= fun y => returnm (build_ex (projT1 y)).