diff options
| author | Prashanth Mundkur | 2018-07-11 21:04:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Prashanth Mundkur | 2018-07-11 21:04:43 -0700 |
| commit | 8d95266216f3249e40c01977065600a4363ea42e (patch) | |
| tree | 9b55700edff27136925ba4dbe8e369f969ff31e2 /riscv | |
| parent | 374de34cbb22da437f856ac39154aabe72a651bb (diff) | |
Add fixme note about riscv jalr.
Diffstat (limited to 'riscv')
| -rw-r--r-- | riscv/riscv.sail | 8 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/riscv/riscv.sail b/riscv/riscv.sail index ca30f4b4..548091e2 100644 --- a/riscv/riscv.sail +++ b/riscv/riscv.sail @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ function clause execute (RISCV_JALR(imm, rs1, rd)) = { /* write rd before anything else to prevent unintended strength */ X(rd) = nextPC; /* compatible with JALR, C.JR and C.JALR */ let newPC : xlenbits = X(rs1) + EXTS(imm); +/* RMEM FIXME: For the sequential model, the above definition doesn't work directly + if rs1 = rd. We would effectively have to keep a regfile for reads and another for + writes, and swap on instruction fetch. This could perhaps be optimized in + some manner, but for now, we just reorder the previous two lines to improve simulator + performance in the sequential model, as below: + let newPC : xlenbits = X(rs1) + EXTS(imm); + X(rd) = nextPC; /* compatible with JALR, C.JR and C.JALR +*/ nextPC = newPC[63..1] @ 0b0; true } |
