From 491cbd6a7cd0a212e28c548789db432b4e64327e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damien George
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:38:54 +0000
Subject: py: Add keyword arg support to enumerate constructor.

Need to have a policy as to how far we go adding keyword support to
built ins.  It's nice to have, and gets better CPython compatibility,
but hurts the micro nature of uPy.

Addresses issue #577.
---
 stmhal/extint.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'stmhal')

diff --git a/stmhal/extint.c b/stmhal/extint.c
index 8041af202..24d51ffb8 100644
--- a/stmhal/extint.c
+++ b/stmhal/extint.c
@@ -302,10 +302,8 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t extint_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const
     // type_in == extint_obj_type
 
     // parse args
-    mp_map_t kw_args;
-    mp_map_init_fixed_table(&kw_args, n_kw, args + n_args);
     mp_arg_val_t vals[PYB_EXTINT_MAKE_NEW_NUM_ARGS];
-    mp_arg_parse_all(n_args, args, &kw_args, PYB_EXTINT_MAKE_NEW_NUM_ARGS, pyb_extint_make_new_args, vals);
+    mp_arg_parse_all_kw_array(n_args, n_kw, args, PYB_EXTINT_MAKE_NEW_NUM_ARGS, pyb_extint_make_new_args, vals);
 
     extint_obj_t *self = m_new_obj(extint_obj_t);
     self->base.type = type_in;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3