(***********************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* split. (* eqke is stricter than eqk *) Lemma eqke_eqk : forall x x', eqke x x' -> eqk x x'. Proof. unfold eqk, eqke; intuition. Qed. (* eqk, eqke are equalities *) Instance eqk_equiv : Equivalence eqk. Proof. constructor; eauto. Qed. Instance eqke_equiv : Equivalence eqke. Proof. constructor. auto. red; unfold eqke; intuition. red; unfold eqke; intuition; [ eauto | congruence ]. Qed. Hint Resolve (@Equivalence_Reflexive _ _ eqk_equiv). Hint Resolve (@Equivalence_Transitive _ _ eqk_equiv). Hint Immediate (@Equivalence_Symmetric _ _ eqk_equiv). Hint Resolve (@Equivalence_Reflexive _ _ eqke_equiv). Hint Resolve (@Equivalence_Transitive _ _ eqke_equiv). Hint Immediate (@Equivalence_Symmetric _ _ eqke_equiv). Lemma InA_eqke_eqk : forall x m, InA eqke x m -> InA eqk x m. Proof. unfold eqke; induction 1; intuition. Qed. Hint Resolve InA_eqke_eqk. Lemma InA_eqk : forall p q m, eqk p q -> InA eqk p m -> InA eqk q m. Proof. intros. rewrite <- H; auto. Qed. Definition MapsTo (k:key)(e:elt):= InA eqke (k,e). Definition In k m := exists e:elt, MapsTo k e m. Hint Unfold MapsTo In. (* An alternative formulation for [In k l] is [exists e, InA eqk (k,e) l] *) Lemma In_alt : forall k l, In k l <-> exists e, InA eqk (k,e) l. Proof. firstorder. exists x; auto. induction H. destruct y. exists e; auto. destruct IHInA as [e H0]. exists e; auto. Qed. Global Instance MapsTo_compat : Proper (eq==>Logic.eq==>Logic.eq==>iff) MapsTo. Proof. intros x x' Hxx' e e' Hee' l l' Hll'; subst. unfold MapsTo. assert (EQN : eqke (x,e') (x',e')) by (compute;auto). rewrite EQN; intuition. Qed. Lemma MapsTo_eq : forall l x y e, eq x y -> MapsTo x e l -> MapsTo y e l. Proof. intros; rewrite <- H; auto. Qed. Global Instance In_compat : Proper (eq==>Logic.eq==>iff) In. Proof. intros x x' Hxx' l l' Hll'; subst l. unfold In. split; intros (e,He); exists e. rewrite <- Hxx'; auto. rewrite Hxx'; auto. Qed. Lemma In_eq : forall l x y, eq x y -> In x l -> In y l. Proof. intros; rewrite <- H; auto. Qed. Lemma In_inv : forall k k' e l, In k ((k',e) :: l) -> eq k k' \/ In k l. Proof. inversion 1. inversion_clear H0; eauto. destruct H1; simpl in *; intuition. Qed. Lemma In_inv_2 : forall k k' e e' l, InA eqk (k, e) ((k', e') :: l) -> ~ eq k k' -> InA eqk (k, e) l. Proof. inversion_clear 1; compute in H0; intuition. Qed. Lemma In_inv_3 : forall x x' l, InA eqke x (x' :: l) -> ~ eqk x x' -> InA eqke x l. Proof. inversion_clear 1; compute in H0; intuition. Qed. End Elt. Hint Resolve In_inv_2 In_inv_3. (* TODO: (re-)populate with more hints after failed attempt of Global Hint *) End KeyDecidableType.