(***********************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* R] : Prop := (n:nat) (Rle (Un (S n)) (Un n)). Definition opp_sui [Un:nat->R] : nat->R := [n:nat]``-(Un n)``. Definition majoree [Un:nat->R] : Prop := (bound (EUn Un)). Definition minoree [Un:nat->R] : Prop := (bound (EUn (opp_sui Un))). (* Toute suite croissante et majoree converge *) (* Preuve inspiree de celle presente dans Rseries *) Lemma growing_cv : (Un:nat->R) (Un_growing Un) -> (majoree Un) -> (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv Un l)). Unfold Un_growing Un_cv;Intros; Generalize (complet (EUn Un) H0 (EUn_noempty Un));Intro H1. Elim H1;Clear H1;Intros;Split with x;Intros. Unfold is_lub in p;Unfold bound in H0;Unfold is_upper_bound in H0 p. Elim H0;Clear H0;Intros;Elim p;Clear p;Intros; Generalize (H3 x0 H0);Intro;Cut (n:nat)(Rle (Un n) x);Intro. Cut (Ex [N:nat] (Rlt (Rminus x eps) (Un N))). Intro;Elim H6;Clear H6;Intros;Split with x1. Intros;Unfold R_dist;Apply (Rabsolu_def1 (Rminus (Un n) x) eps). Unfold Rgt in H1. Apply (Rle_lt_trans (Rminus (Un n) x) R0 eps (Rle_minus (Un n) x (H5 n)) H1). Fold Un_growing in H;Generalize (growing_prop Un n x1 H H7);Intro. Generalize (Rlt_le_trans (Rminus x eps) (Un x1) (Un n) H6 (Rle_sym2 (Un x1) (Un n) H8));Intro; Generalize (Rlt_compatibility (Ropp x) (Rminus x eps) (Un n) H9); Unfold Rminus;Rewrite <-(Rplus_assoc (Ropp x) x (Ropp eps)); Rewrite (Rplus_sym (Ropp x) (Un n));Fold (Rminus (Un n) x); Rewrite Rplus_Ropp_l;Rewrite (let (H1,H2)=(Rplus_ne (Ropp eps)) in H2); Trivial. Cut ~((N:nat)(Rge (Rminus x eps) (Un N))). Intro;Apply (not_all_not_ex nat ([N:nat](Rlt (Rminus x eps) (Un N)))). Red;Intro;Red in H6;Elim H6;Clear H6;Intro; Apply (Rlt_not_ge (Rminus x eps) (Un N) (H7 N)). Red;Intro;Cut (N:nat)(Rle (Un N) (Rminus x eps)). Intro;Generalize (Un_bound_imp Un (Rminus x eps) H7);Intro; Unfold is_upper_bound in H8;Generalize (H3 (Rminus x eps) H8);Intro; Generalize (Rle_minus x (Rminus x eps) H9);Unfold Rminus; Rewrite Ropp_distr1;Rewrite <- Rplus_assoc;Rewrite Rplus_Ropp_r. Rewrite (let (H1,H2)=(Rplus_ne (Ropp (Ropp eps))) in H2); Rewrite Ropp_Ropp;Intro;Unfold Rgt in H1; Generalize (Rle_not eps R0 H1);Intro;Auto. Intro;Elim (H6 N);Intro;Unfold Rle. Left;Unfold Rgt in H7;Assumption. Right;Auto. Apply (H2 (Un n) (Un_in_EUn Un n)). Qed. (* Pour toute suite decroissante, la suite "opposee" est croissante *) Lemma decreasing_growing : (Un:nat->R) (Un_decreasing Un) -> (Un_growing (opp_sui Un)). Intro. Unfold Un_growing opp_sui Un_decreasing. Intros. Apply Rle_Ropp1. Apply H. Qed. (* Toute suite decroissante et minoree converge *) Lemma decreasing_cv : (Un:nat->R) (Un_decreasing Un) -> (minoree Un) -> (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv Un l)). Intros. Cut (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv (opp_sui Un) l)) -> (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv Un l)). Intro. Apply X. Apply growing_cv. Apply decreasing_growing; Assumption. Exact H0. Intro. Elim X; Intros. Apply existTT with ``-x``. Unfold Un_cv in p. Unfold R_dist in p. Unfold opp_sui in p. Unfold Un_cv. Unfold R_dist. Intros. Elim (p eps H1); Intros. Exists x0; Intros. Assert H4 := (H2 n H3). Rewrite <- Rabsolu_Ropp. Replace ``-((Un n)- -x)`` with ``-(Un n)-x``; [Assumption | Ring]. Qed. (***********) Lemma maj_sup : (Un:nat->R) (majoree Un) -> (sigTT R [l:R](is_lub (EUn Un) l)). Intros. Unfold majoree in H. Apply complet. Assumption. Exists (Un O). Unfold EUn. Exists O; Reflexivity. Qed. (**********) Lemma min_inf : (Un:nat->R) (minoree Un) -> (sigTT R [l:R](is_lub (EUn (opp_sui Un)) l)). Intros; Unfold minoree in H. Apply complet. Assumption. Exists ``-(Un O)``. Exists O. Reflexivity. Qed. Definition majorant [Un:nat->R;pr:(majoree Un)] : R := Cases (maj_sup Un pr) of (existTT a b) => a end. Definition minorant [Un:nat->R;pr:(minoree Un)] : R := Cases (min_inf Un pr) of (existTT a b) => ``-a`` end. (* Conservation de la propriete de majoration par extraction *) Lemma maj_ss : (Un:nat->R;k:nat) (majoree Un) -> (majoree [i:nat](Un (plus k i))). Intros. Unfold majoree in H. Unfold bound in H. Elim H; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H0. Unfold majoree. Exists x. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Apply H0. Elim H1; Intros. Exists (plus k x1); Assumption. Qed. (* Conservation de la propriete de minoration par extraction *) Lemma min_ss : (Un:nat->R;k:nat) (minoree Un) -> (minoree [i:nat](Un (plus k i))). Intros. Unfold minoree in H. Unfold bound in H. Elim H; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H0. Unfold minoree. Exists x. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Apply H0. Elim H1; Intros. Exists (plus k x1); Assumption. Qed. Definition suite_majorant [Un:nat->R;pr:(majoree Un)] : nat -> R := [i:nat](majorant [k:nat](Un (plus i k)) (maj_ss Un i pr)). Definition suite_minorant [Un:nat->R;pr:(minoree Un)] : nat -> R := [i:nat](minorant [k:nat](Un (plus i k)) (min_ss Un i pr)). (**********) Lemma Rle_Rle_eq : (a,b:R) ``a<=b`` -> ``b<=a`` -> ``a==b``. Intros. Case (total_order_T a b); Intro. Elim s; Intros. Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? (Rlt_le_trans ? ? ? a0 H0)). Assumption. Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? (Rlt_le_trans ? ? ? r H)). Qed. (* La suite des majorants est decroissante *) Lemma Wn_decreasing : (Un:nat->R;pr:(majoree Un)) (Un_decreasing (suite_majorant Un pr)). Intros. Unfold Un_decreasing. Intro. Unfold suite_majorant. Assert H := (maj_sup [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k)) (maj_ss Un (S n) pr)). Assert H0 := (maj_sup [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (maj_ss Un n pr)). Elim H; Intros. Elim H0; Intros. Cut (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (maj_ss Un (S n) pr)) == x; [Intro Maj1; Rewrite Maj1 | Idtac]. Cut (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr)) == x0; [Intro Maj2; Rewrite Maj2 | Idtac]. Unfold is_lub in p. Unfold is_lub in p0. Elim p; Intros. Apply H2. Elim p0; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H3. Apply H3. Elim H5; Intros. Exists (plus (1) x2). Replace (plus n (plus (S O) x2)) with (plus (S n) x2). Assumption. Replace (S n) with (plus (1) n); [Ring | Ring]. Cut (is_lub (EUn [k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p0; Unfold is_lub in H1. Elim p0; Intros; Elim H1; Intros. Assert H6 := (H5 x0 H2). Assert H7 := (H3 (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr)) H4). Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold majorant. Case (maj_sup [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (maj_ss Un n pr)). Trivial. Cut (is_lub (EUn [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (maj_ss Un (S n) pr))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p; Unfold is_lub in H1. Elim p; Intros; Elim H1; Intros. Assert H6 := (H5 x H2). Assert H7 := (H3 (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (maj_ss Un (S n) pr)) H4). Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold majorant. Case (maj_sup [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k)) (maj_ss Un (S n) pr)). Trivial. Qed. (* La suite des minorants est croissante *) Lemma Vn_growing : (Un:nat->R;pr:(minoree Un)) (Un_growing (suite_minorant Un pr)). Intros. Unfold Un_growing. Intro. Unfold suite_minorant. Assert H := (min_inf [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k)) (min_ss Un (S n) pr)). Assert H0 := (min_inf [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (min_ss Un n pr)). Elim H; Intros. Elim H0; Intros. Cut (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (min_ss Un (S n) pr)) == ``-x``; [Intro Maj1; Rewrite Maj1 | Idtac]. Cut (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr)) == ``-x0``; [Intro Maj2; Rewrite Maj2 | Idtac]. Unfold is_lub in p. Unfold is_lub in p0. Elim p; Intros. Apply Rle_Ropp1. Apply H2. Elim p0; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H3. Apply H3. Elim H5; Intros. Exists (plus (1) x2). Unfold opp_sui in H6. Unfold opp_sui. Replace (plus n (plus (S O) x2)) with (plus (S n) x2). Assumption. Replace (S n) with (plus (1) n); [Ring | Ring]. Cut (is_lub (EUn (opp_sui [k:nat](Un (plus n k)))) (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr)))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p0; Unfold is_lub in H1. Elim p0; Intros; Elim H1; Intros. Assert H6 := (H5 x0 H2). Assert H7 := (H3 (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr))) H4). Rewrite <- (Ropp_Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr))). Apply eq_Ropp; Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold minorant. Case (min_inf [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (min_ss Un n pr)). Intro; Rewrite Ropp_Ropp. Trivial. Cut (is_lub (EUn (opp_sui [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k)))) (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (min_ss Un (S n) pr)))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p; Unfold is_lub in H1. Elim p; Intros; Elim H1; Intros. Assert H6 := (H5 x H2). Assert H7 := (H3 (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (min_ss Un (S n) pr))) H4). Rewrite <- (Ropp_Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k))) (min_ss Un (S n) pr))). Apply eq_Ropp; Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold minorant. Case (min_inf [k:nat](Un (plus (S n) k)) (min_ss Un (S n) pr)). Intro; Rewrite Ropp_Ropp. Trivial. Qed. (* Encadrement Vn,Un,Wn *) Lemma Vn_Un_Wn_order : (Un:nat->R;pr1:(majoree Un);pr2:(minoree Un)) (n:nat) ``((suite_minorant Un pr2) n)<=(Un n)<=((suite_majorant Un pr1) n)``. Intros. Split. Unfold suite_minorant. Cut (sigTT R [l:R](is_lub (EUn (opp_sui [i:nat](Un (plus n i)))) l)). Intro. Elim X; Intros. Replace (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr2)) with ``-x``. Unfold is_lub in p. Elim p; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H. Rewrite <- (Ropp_Ropp (Un n)). Apply Rle_Ropp1. Apply H. Exists O. Unfold opp_sui. Replace (plus n O) with n; [Reflexivity | Ring]. Cut (is_lub (EUn (opp_sui [k:nat](Un (plus n k)))) (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr2)))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p; Unfold is_lub in H. Elim p; Intros; Elim H; Intros. Assert H4 := (H3 x H0). Assert H5 := (H1 (Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr2))) H2). Rewrite <- (Ropp_Ropp (minorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (min_ss Un n pr2))). Apply eq_Ropp; Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold minorant. Case (min_inf [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (min_ss Un n pr2)). Intro; Rewrite Ropp_Ropp. Trivial. Apply min_inf. Apply min_ss; Assumption. Unfold suite_majorant. Cut (sigTT R [l:R](is_lub (EUn [i:nat](Un (plus n i))) l)). Intro. Elim X; Intros. Replace (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr1)) with ``x``. Unfold is_lub in p. Elim p; Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H. Apply H. Exists O. Replace (plus n O) with n; [Reflexivity | Ring]. Cut (is_lub (EUn [k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr1))). Intro. Unfold is_lub in p; Unfold is_lub in H. Elim p; Intros; Elim H; Intros. Assert H4 := (H3 x H0). Assert H5 := (H1 (majorant ([k:nat](Un (plus n k))) (maj_ss Un n pr1)) H2). Apply Rle_Rle_eq; Assumption. Unfold majorant. Case (maj_sup [k:nat](Un (plus n k)) (maj_ss Un n pr1)). Intro; Trivial. Apply maj_sup. Apply maj_ss; Assumption. Qed. (* La suite des minorants est majoree *) Lemma min_maj : (Un:nat->R;pr1:(majoree Un);pr2:(minoree Un)) (majoree (suite_minorant Un pr2)). Intros. Assert H := (Vn_Un_Wn_order Un pr1 pr2). Unfold majoree. Unfold bound. Unfold majoree in pr1. Unfold bound in pr1. Elim pr1; Intros. Exists x. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H0. Elim H1; Intros. Rewrite H2. Apply Rle_trans with (Un x1). Assert H3 := (H x1); Elim H3; Intros; Assumption. Apply H0. Exists x1; Reflexivity. Qed. (* La suite des majorants est minoree *) Lemma maj_min : (Un:nat->R;pr1:(majoree Un);pr2:(minoree Un)) (minoree (suite_majorant Un pr1)). Intros. Assert H := (Vn_Un_Wn_order Un pr1 pr2). Unfold minoree. Unfold bound. Unfold minoree in pr2. Unfold bound in pr2. Elim pr2; Intros. Exists x. Unfold is_upper_bound. Intros. Unfold is_upper_bound in H0. Elim H1; Intros. Rewrite H2. Apply Rle_trans with ((opp_sui Un) x1). Assert H3 := (H x1); Elim H3; Intros. Unfold opp_sui; Apply Rle_Ropp1. Assumption. Apply H0. Exists x1; Reflexivity. Qed. (* Toute suite de Cauchy est majoree *) Lemma cauchy_maj : (Un:nat->R) (Cauchy_crit Un) -> (majoree Un). Intros. Unfold majoree. Apply cauchy_bound. Assumption. Qed. (**********) Lemma cauchy_opp : (Un:nat->R) (Cauchy_crit Un) -> (Cauchy_crit (opp_sui Un)). Intro. Unfold Cauchy_crit. Unfold R_dist. Intros. Elim (H eps H0); Intros. Exists x; Intros. Unfold opp_sui. Rewrite <- Rabsolu_Ropp. Replace ``-( -(Un n)- -(Un m))`` with ``(Un n)-(Un m)``; [Apply H1; Assumption | Ring]. Qed. (* Toute suite de Cauchy est minoree *) Lemma cauchy_min : (Un:nat->R) (Cauchy_crit Un) -> (minoree Un). Intros. Unfold minoree. Assert H0 := (cauchy_opp ? H). Apply cauchy_bound. Assumption. Qed. (* La suite des majorants converge *) Lemma maj_cv : (Un:nat->R;pr:(Cauchy_crit Un)) (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv (suite_majorant Un (cauchy_maj Un pr)) l)). Intros. Apply decreasing_cv. Apply Wn_decreasing. Apply maj_min. Apply cauchy_min. Assumption. Qed. (* La suite des minorants converge *) Lemma min_cv : (Un:nat->R;pr:(Cauchy_crit Un)) (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv (suite_minorant Un (cauchy_min Un pr)) l)). Intros. Apply growing_cv. Apply Vn_growing. Apply min_maj. Apply cauchy_maj. Assumption. Qed. (**********) Lemma cond_eq : (x,y:R) ((eps:R)``0``(Rabsolu (x-y)) x==y. Intros. Case (total_order_T x y); Intro. Elim s; Intro. Cut ``0``r1>=r2``. Intros r1 r2 ; Generalize (total_order r1 r2) ; Unfold Rge. Tauto. Qed. (* On peut approcher la borne sup de toute suite majoree *) Lemma approx_maj : (Un:nat->R;pr:(majoree Un)) (eps:R) ``0 (EX k : nat | ``(Rabsolu ((majorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``). Intros. Pose P := [k:nat]``(Rabsolu ((majorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``. Unfold P. Cut (EX k:nat | (P k)) -> (EX k:nat | ``(Rabsolu ((majorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``). Intros. Apply H0. Apply not_all_not_ex. Red; Intro. 2:Unfold P; Trivial. Unfold P in H1. Cut (n:nat)``(Rabsolu ((majorant Un pr)-(Un n))) >= eps``. Intro. Cut (is_lub (EUn Un) (majorant Un pr)). Intro. Unfold is_lub in H3. Unfold is_upper_bound in H3. Elim H3; Intros. Cut (n:nat)``eps<=(majorant Un pr)-(Un n)``. Intro. Cut (n:nat)``(Un n)<=(majorant Un pr)-eps``. Intro. Cut ((x:R)(EUn Un x)->``x <= (majorant Un pr)-eps``). Intro. Assert H9 := (H5 ``(majorant Un pr)-eps`` H8). Cut ``eps<=0``. Intro. Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? (Rlt_le_trans ? ? ? H H10)). Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with ``(majorant Un pr)-eps``. Rewrite Rplus_Or. Replace ``(majorant Un pr)-eps+eps`` with (majorant Un pr); [Assumption | Ring]. Intros. Unfold EUn in H8. Elim H8; Intros. Rewrite H9; Apply H7. Intro. Assert H7 := (H6 n). Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with ``eps-(Un n)``. Replace ``eps-(Un n)+(Un n)`` with ``eps``. Replace ``eps-(Un n)+((majorant Un pr)-eps)`` with ``(majorant Un pr)-(Un n)``. Assumption. Ring. Ring. Intro. Assert H6 := (H2 n). Rewrite Rabsolu_right in H6. Apply Rle_sym2. Assumption. Apply Rle_sym1. Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with (Un n). Rewrite Rplus_Or; Replace ``(Un n)+((majorant Un pr)-(Un n))`` with (majorant Un pr); [Apply H4 | Ring]. Exists n; Reflexivity. Unfold majorant. Case (maj_sup Un pr). Trivial. Intro. Assert H2 := (H1 n). Apply not_Rlt; Assumption. Qed. (* On peut approcher la borne inf de toute suite minoree *) Lemma approx_min : (Un:nat->R;pr:(minoree Un)) (eps:R) ``0 (EX k :nat | ``(Rabsolu ((minorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``). Intros. Pose P := [k:nat]``(Rabsolu ((minorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``. Unfold P. Cut (EX k:nat | (P k)) -> (EX k:nat | ``(Rabsolu ((minorant Un pr)-(Un k))) < eps``). Intros. Apply H0. Apply not_all_not_ex. Red; Intro. 2:Unfold P; Trivial. Unfold P in H1. Cut (n:nat)``(Rabsolu ((minorant Un pr)-(Un n))) >= eps``. Intro. Cut (is_lub (EUn (opp_sui Un)) ``-(minorant Un pr)``). Intro. Unfold is_lub in H3. Unfold is_upper_bound in H3. Elim H3; Intros. Cut (n:nat)``eps<=(Un n)-(minorant Un pr)``. Intro. Cut (n:nat)``((opp_sui Un) n)<=-(minorant Un pr)-eps``. Intro. Cut ((x:R)(EUn (opp_sui Un) x)->``x <= -(minorant Un pr)-eps``). Intro. Assert H9 := (H5 ``-(minorant Un pr)-eps`` H8). Cut ``eps<=0``. Intro. Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? (Rlt_le_trans ? ? ? H H10)). Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with ``-(minorant Un pr)-eps``. Rewrite Rplus_Or. Replace ``-(minorant Un pr)-eps+eps`` with ``-(minorant Un pr)``; [Assumption | Ring]. Intros. Unfold EUn in H8. Elim H8; Intros. Rewrite H9; Apply H7. Intro. Assert H7 := (H6 n). Unfold opp_sui. Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with ``eps+(Un n)``. Replace ``eps+(Un n)+ -(Un n)`` with ``eps``. Replace ``eps+(Un n)+(-(minorant Un pr)-eps)`` with ``(Un n)-(minorant Un pr)``. Assumption. Ring. Ring. Intro. Assert H6 := (H2 n). Rewrite Rabsolu_left1 in H6. Apply Rle_sym2. Replace ``(Un n)-(minorant Un pr)`` with `` -((minorant Un pr)-(Un n))``; [Assumption | Ring]. Apply Rle_anti_compatibility with ``-(minorant Un pr)``. Rewrite Rplus_Or; Replace ``-(minorant Un pr)+((minorant Un pr)-(Un n))`` with ``-(Un n)``. Apply H4. Exists n; Reflexivity. Ring. Unfold minorant. Case (min_inf Un pr). Intro. Rewrite Ropp_Ropp. Trivial. Intro. Assert H2 := (H1 n). Apply not_Rlt; Assumption. Qed. (****************************************************) (* R est complet : *) (* Toute suite de Cauchy de (R,| |) converge *) (* *) (* Preuve a l'aide des suites adjacentes Vn et Wn *) (****************************************************) Theorem R_complet : (Un:nat->R) (Cauchy_crit Un) -> (sigTT R [l:R](Un_cv Un l)). Intros. Pose Vn := (suite_minorant Un (cauchy_min Un H)). Pose Wn := (suite_majorant Un (cauchy_maj Un H)). Assert H0 := (maj_cv Un H). Fold Wn in H0. Assert H1 := (min_cv Un H). Fold Vn in H1. Elim H0; Intros. Elim H1; Intros. Cut x==x0. Intros. Apply existTT with x. Rewrite <- H2 in p0. Unfold Un_cv. Intros. Unfold Un_cv in p; Unfold Un_cv in p0. Cut ``0