From 24ccc118ccfb4c1223cd37bd43c9d26a77851176 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre Letouzey Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:11:23 +0100 Subject: Numeral Notation for nat This parsing/printing method for nat should be just as fast as the previous dedicated code. Moreover, we could now parse large literals as nat numbers, by leaving them in a half-abstract form such as (Nat.of_uint 123456). This form is convertible to the closed (S (S (S ...))) form, so it shouldn't be a big deal for compatibility, except for if some Ltac stuff relies on (S ...) to be present after parsing. Of course, forcing the computation of a (Nat.of_uint ....) may take a while or raise a Stack Overflow. --- theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ theories/Numbers/BinNums.v | 16 ++++----- 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v (limited to 'theories/Numbers') diff --git a/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v b/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..595934ad89 --- /dev/null +++ b/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +(************************************************************************) +(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) +(* Some p + | _ => None + end. + +Definition pos_to_z p := Zpos p. + +Numeral Notation positive pos_of_z pos_to_z : positive_scope. + +(** [N] *) + +Definition n_of_z z := + match z with + | Z0 => Some N0 + | Zpos p => Some (Npos p) + | Zneg _ => None + end. + +Definition n_to_z n := + match n with + | N0 => Z0 + | Npos p => Zpos p + end. + +Numeral Notation N n_of_z n_to_z : N_scope. + +(** [Z] *) + +Definition z_of_z (z:Z) := z. + +Numeral Notation Z z_of_z z_of_z : Z_scope. diff --git a/theories/Numbers/BinNums.v b/theories/Numbers/BinNums.v index d5eb4f2681..3ba9d1f5ed 100644 --- a/theories/Numbers/BinNums.v +++ b/theories/Numbers/BinNums.v @@ -12,15 +12,11 @@ Set Implicit Arguments. -Declare ML Module "positive_syntax_plugin". -Declare ML Module "n_syntax_plugin". -Declare ML Module "z_syntax_plugin". - (** [positive] is a datatype representing the strictly positive integers in a binary way. Starting from 1 (represented by [xH]), one can add a new least significant digit via [xO] (digit 0) or [xI] (digit 1). - Numbers in [positive] can also be denoted using a decimal notation; - e.g. [6%positive] abbreviates [xO (xI xH)] *) + Numbers in [positive] will also be denoted using a decimal notation; + e.g. [6%positive] will abbreviate [xO (xI xH)] *) Inductive positive : Set := | xI : positive -> positive @@ -34,8 +30,8 @@ Arguments xI _%positive. (** [N] is a datatype representing natural numbers in a binary way, by extending the [positive] datatype with a zero. - Numbers in [N] can also be denoted using a decimal notation; - e.g. [6%N] abbreviates [Npos (xO (xI xH))] *) + Numbers in [N] will also be denoted using a decimal notation; + e.g. [6%N] will abbreviate [Npos (xO (xI xH))] *) Inductive N : Set := | N0 : N @@ -49,8 +45,8 @@ Arguments Npos _%positive. An integer is either zero or a strictly positive number (coded as a [positive]) or a strictly negative number (whose opposite is stored as a [positive] value). - Numbers in [Z] can also be denoted using a decimal notation; - e.g. [(-6)%Z] abbreviates [Zneg (xO (xI xH))] *) + Numbers in [Z] will also be denoted using a decimal notation; + e.g. [(-6)%Z] will abbreviate [Zneg (xO (xI xH))] *) Inductive Z : Set := | Z0 : Z -- cgit v1.2.3 From fa0f378c91286d9127777a06b1dc557f695c22ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Gross Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 06:25:22 -0400 Subject: Fix numeral notation for a rebase on top of master Some of this code is cargo-culted or kludged to work. As I understand it, the situation is as follows: There are two sorts of use-cases that need to be supported: 1. A plugin registers an OCaml function as a numeral interpreter. In this case, the function registration must be synchronized with the document state, but the functions should not be marshelled / stored in the .vo. 2. A vernacular registers a Gallina function as a numeral interpreter. In this case, the registration must be synchronized, and the function should be marshelled / stored in the .vo. In case (1), we can compare functions by pointer equality, and we should be able to rely on globally unique keys, even across backtracking. In case (2), we cannot compare functions by pointer equality (because they must be regenerated on unmarshelling when `Require`ing a .vo file), and we also cannot rely on any sort of unique key being both unique and persistent across files. The solution we use here is that we ask clients to provide "unique" keys, and that clients tell us whether or not to overwrite existing registered functions, i.e., to tell us whether or not we should expect interpreter functions to be globally unique under pointer equality. For plugins, a simple string suffices, as long as the string does not clash between different plugins. In the case of vernacular-registered functions, use marshell a description of all of the data used to generate the function, and use that string as a unique key which is expected to persist across files. Because we cannot rely on function-pointer uniqueness here, we tell the interpretation-registration to allow overwriting. ---- Some of this code is response to comments on the PR ---- Some code is to fix an issue that bignums revealed: Both Int31 and bignums registered numeral notations in int31_scope. We now prepend a globally unique identifier when registering numeral notations from OCaml plugins. This is permissible because we don't store the uid information for such notations in .vo files (assuming I'm understanding the code correctly). --- theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v | 45 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) (limited to 'theories/Numbers') diff --git a/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v b/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v index 595934ad89..c7e3999691 100644 --- a/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v +++ b/theories/Numbers/AltBinNotations.v @@ -1,34 +1,35 @@ (************************************************************************) -(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) -(*