From 8ef1be1aead0dbcc2d3cc46a7e5eaa02f9ad6069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugo Herbelin
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:51:03 +0200
Subject: Unification failure: don't give preference to a "beyond capabilities"
 error.

This is actually a bit ad hoc at this stage in the sense that this is
specifically to prefer an informative first-order unification failure
over the currently always uninformative failure coming from
second-order unification.

When second-order unification shall be able to give more information,
one may consider alternative strategies, even maybe reporting not just
one but the list of failures in all (interesting) branches.
---
 test-suite/output/unifconstraints.out | 8 ++++++++
 test-suite/output/unifconstraints.v   | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

(limited to 'test-suite')

diff --git a/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.out b/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.out
index ae84603622..2fadd747b7 100644
--- a/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.out
+++ b/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.out
@@ -63,3 +63,11 @@ unification constraint:
    True /\ True /\ True \/
    veeryyyyyyyyyyyyloooooooooooooonggidentifier =
    veeryyyyyyyyyyyyloooooooooooooonggidentifier
+The command has indeed failed with message:
+In environment
+P : nat -> Type
+x : nat
+h : P x
+Unable to unify "P x" with "?P x"
+(unable to find a well-typed instantiation for "?P": cannot ensure that
+"nat -> Type" is a subtype of "nat -> Prop").
diff --git a/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.v b/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.v
index b9413a4ac2..179dec3fb0 100644
--- a/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.v
+++ b/test-suite/output/unifconstraints.v
@@ -20,3 +20,9 @@ Goal forall n m : nat, True /\ True /\ True \/
   3:clear m.
   Show.
 Admitted.
+Unset Printing Existential Instances.
+
+(* Check non regression of error message (the example can eventually
+   improve though and succeed) *)
+
+Fail Check fun P (x:nat) (h:P x) => exist _ x (h : P x).
-- 
cgit v1.2.3