From 4a6a94d60f258bbcbf843af0c60d4c7d810750aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:17:49 +0200
Subject: [state] Consolidate state handling in Vernacstate

After #12504 , we can encapsulate and consolidate low-level state
logic in `Vernacstate`, removing `States` which is now a stub.

There is hope to clean up some stuff regarding the handling of
low-level proof state, by moving both `Evarutil.meta_counter` and
`Evd.evar_counter_summary` into the proof state itself [obligations
state is taken care in #11836] , but this will take some time.
---
 plugins/ltac/tacentries.ml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'plugins/ltac')

diff --git a/plugins/ltac/tacentries.ml b/plugins/ltac/tacentries.ml
index e6c59f446d..f8c25d5dd0 100644
--- a/plugins/ltac/tacentries.ml
+++ b/plugins/ltac/tacentries.ml
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ let register_ltac local ?deprecation tacl =
   in
   (* STATE XXX: Review what is going on here. Why does this needs
      protection? Why is not the STM level protection enough? Fishy *)
-  let defs = States.with_state_protection defs () in
+  let defs = Vernacstate.System.protect defs () in
   let iter (def, tac) = match def with
   | NewTac id ->
     Tacenv.register_ltac false local id tac ?deprecation;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3