From 06cd051d140a183229cd43f0bbae152d6ad8d6ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Barenblat Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:19:26 -0400 Subject: Correct some spelling errors Lintian found some spelling errors in the Debian packaging for coq. Fix them most places they appear in the current source. (Don't change documentation anchor names, as that would invalidate external deeplinks.) This also fixes a bug in coqdoc: prior to this commit, coqdoc would highlight `instanciate` but not `instantiate`. --- doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst | 8 ++++---- doc/tools/Translator.tex | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst index 794804a1f6..26f4ec6242 100644 --- a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst +++ b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ bindings_list`` where ``bindings_list`` may be of two different forms: .. exn:: Not the right number of missing arguments. -.. _occurencessets: +.. _occurrencessets: Occurrence sets and occurrence clauses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ Managing the local context This notation allows specifying which occurrences of :token:`term` have to be substituted in the context. The :n:`in @goal_occurrences` clause is an occurrence clause whose syntax and behavior are described in - :ref:`goal occurences `. + :ref:`goal occurrences `. .. tacv:: set (@ident @binders := @term) {? in @goal_occurrences } @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ analysis on inductive or co-inductive objects (see :ref:`inductive-definitions`) This syntax is used for selecting which occurrences of :token:`term` the case analysis has to be done on. The :n:`in @goal_occurrences` clause is an occurrence clause whose syntax and behavior is described - in :ref:`occurences sets `. + in :ref:`occurrences sets `. .. tacv:: destruct @term {? with @bindings_list } {? as @disj_conj_intro_pattern } {? eqn:@naming_intro_pattern } {? using @term {? with @bindings_list } } {? in @goal_occurrences } edestruct @term {? with @bindings_list } {? as @disj_conj_intro_pattern } {? eqn:@naming_intro_pattern } {? using @term {? with @bindings_list } } {? in @goal_occurrences } @@ -1659,7 +1659,7 @@ analysis on inductive or co-inductive objects (see :ref:`inductive-definitions`) This syntax is used for selecting which occurrences of :n:`@term` the induction has to be carried on. The :n:`in @goal_occurrences` clause is an occurrence clause whose syntax and behavior is described in - :ref:`occurences sets `. If variables or hypotheses not + :ref:`occurrences sets `. If variables or hypotheses not mentioning :n:`@term` in their type are listed in :n:`@goal_occurrences`, those are generalized as well in the statement to prove. diff --git a/doc/tools/Translator.tex b/doc/tools/Translator.tex index 3ee65d6f22..d8ac640f2a 100644 --- a/doc/tools/Translator.tex +++ b/doc/tools/Translator.tex @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ to be applied are separated by a {\tt =>}. to turn implicit only the arguments that are {\em strictly} implicit (or rigid), i.e. that remains inferable whatever the other arguments are. For instance {\tt x} inferable from {\tt P x} is not strictly -inferable since it can disappears if {\tt P} is instanciated by a term +inferable since it can disappears if {\tt P} is instantiated by a term which erases {\tt x}. \begin{transbox} -- cgit v1.2.3