From 449a4f1bde0560320ce8318ed39a5303d788dcae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugo Herbelin
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:33:29 +0100
Subject: Test for closed #2713 and #2876.

---
 test-suite/bugs/closed/2713.v | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 test-suite/bugs/closed/2876.v | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test-suite/bugs/closed/2713.v
 create mode 100644 test-suite/bugs/closed/2876.v

diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/closed/2713.v b/test-suite/bugs/closed/2713.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b5fc74bfa7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/bugs/closed/2713.v
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Set Implicit Arguments.
+
+Definition pred_le A (P Q : A->Prop) := 
+  forall x, P x -> Q x.
+
+Lemma pred_le_refl : forall A (P:A->Prop),
+  pred_le P P.
+Proof. unfold pred_le. auto. Qed.
+
+Hint Resolve pred_le_refl.
+
+Lemma test : 
+  forall (P1 P2:nat->Prop), 
+  (forall Q, pred_le (fun a => P1 a /\ P2 a) Q -> True) ->
+   True.
+Proof. intros. eapply H. eauto. (* used to work *)
+       apply pred_le_refl. Qed.
diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/closed/2876.v b/test-suite/bugs/closed/2876.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a66ee6b3fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/bugs/closed/2876.v
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Lemma test_bug : forall (R:nat->nat->Prop) n m m' (P: Prop),
+  P ->
+  (P -> R n m) ->
+  (P -> R n m') ->
+  (forall u, R n u -> u = u -> True) -> 
+  True.
+Proof.
+  intros * HP H1 H2 H3. eapply H3. 
+  eauto. (* H1 is used, but H2 should be used since it is the last hypothesis *)
+  auto.
+Qed.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3