| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No reason not to collapse inner applications with explicit arguments.
This is compatible with the ad hoc encoding of @f as GApp(f,[])/NApp(f,[]).
|
|
underline, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove forward reference to lexer.
|
|
Proof General requires minor changes to make the diffs visible, but this code
shouldn't break the existing version of PG.
Diffs are computed for the hypotheses and conclusion of the first goal between
the old and new proofs. Strings are split into tokens using the Coq lexer,
then the list of tokens are diffed using the Myers algorithm. A fixup routine
(Pp_diff.shorten_diff_span) shortens the span of the diff result in some cases.
Diffs can be enabled with the Coq commmand "Set Diffs on|off|removed." or
"-diffs on|off|removed" on the OS command line. The "on" option shows only the
new item with added text, while "removed" shows each modified item twice--once
with the old value showing removed text and once with the new value showing
added text.
The highlights use 4 tags to specify the color and underline/strikeout.
These are "diffs.added", "diffs.removed", "diffs.added.bg" and "diffs.removed.bg".
The first two are for added or removed text; the last two are for
unmodified parts of a modified item.
Diffs that span multiple strings in the Pp are tagged with "start.diff.*" and
"end.diff.*", but only on the first and last strings of the span.
|
|
|
|
(e.g. for debugging)
|
|
case of missing record field
|
|
|
|
As stated in the manual, the fourier tactic is subsumed by lra.
|
|
While we were adding a new field into `QuestionMark`, we
decided to go ahead and refactor the constructor to hold
an actual record. This record now holds the name, obligations, and
whether the evar represents a missing record field.
This is used to provide better error messages on missing record
fields.
|
|
For now we only copy the templates, but we could do more fancy stuff.
This helps to be compatible with build systems that take care of these
files automatically, see:
https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/6857#discussion_r202096579
|
|
We use a more abstract representation for accumulators in the native
compilation scheme, that requires less fiddling with low-level implementation
details. It might be slower though.
|
|
We make it possible to deprecate tactics defined by `Ltac`, `Tactic
Notation` or ML.
For the first two variants, we anticipate the syntax of attributes:
`#[deprecated(since = "XX", note = "YY")]`
In ML, the syntax is:
```
let reflexivity_depr =
let open CWarnings in
{ since = "8.5"; note = "Use admit instead." }
TACTIC EXTEND reflexivity DEPRECATED reflexivity_depr
[ "reflexivity" ] -> [ Tactics.intros_reflexivity ]
END
```
A warning is shown at the point where the tactic is used (either
a direct call or when defining another tactic):
Tactic `foo` is deprecated since XX. YY
YY is typically meant to be "Use bar instead.".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This gives user control on the transparent state of a hint db. Can
override defaults more easily (report by J. H. Jourdan).
For "core", declare that variables can be unfolded, but no constants
(ensures compatibility with previous auto which allowed conv on closed
terms)
Document Hint Variables
|
|
|
|
format).
|
|
In some cases, Format's inner boxes inside an outer box act as break
hints, even though there are already "better" break hints in the outer
box.
We work around this "feature" by not inserting a box around the
default printing rule for a notation if there is no effective break
points in the box.
See https://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=7804 for the related
OCaml discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We fix the issue by removing terms of the substitutions which have
free variables and are thus not interpretable in the context of the
"ltac:" subterm.
This remains rather ad hoc, since, in an expression "Notation f x :=
ltac:(foo)", we interpret "x" at calling time of "foo" rather than at
use time of "x" in foo, even if "x" is not necessary.
We could also imagine that binders in the ltac expressions are then
interpreted but that would start to be (very) complicated.
Note that this will presumably "fix" ltac2 quotations at the same
time.
|
|
subtyping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When launched through PATH argv.(0) is just the command name.
eg "coqtop -compile foo.v" -> argv.(0) = "coqtop"
Using executable_name also follows symlinks but this isn't tested to
avoid messing with windows. Running Coq through a symlink is not as
important as PATH anyways.
|
|
When inferring [u <= v+k] I replaced the exception and instead add
[u <= v]. This is trivially sound and it doesn't seem possible to have
the one without the other (except specially for [Set <= v+k] which was
already handled).
I don't know an example where this used to fail and now succeeds (the
point was to remove an anomaly, but the example
~~~
Module Type SG. Definition DG := Type. End SG.
Module MG : SG. Definition DG := Type : Type. Fail End MG.
~~~
now fails with universe inconsistency.
Fix #7695 (soundness bug!).
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that lifting a term with a negative index is not equivalent to
strengthening it by applying to a dummy substitution. This looks suspicious
at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The test isn't quite the one in #7421 because that use of algebraic
universes is wrong.
|
|
to "match").
|
|
|
|
|