| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Should it be removed? The underlying
`universe_subst -> constr -> constr`
seems like it could be useful for plugins but where would the
substitution be from?
|
|
|
|
Uses internal to Refiner remain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
clear_hyps remain with no alternative
|
|
In #6092, `global_reference` was moved to `kernel`. It makes sense to
go further and use the current kernel style for names.
This has a good effect on the dependency graph, as some core modules
don't depend on library anymore.
A question about providing equality for the GloRef module remains, as
there are two different notions of equality for constants. In that
sense, `KerPair` seems suspicious and at some point it should be
looked at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
`Vernacexpr` lives conceptually higher than `proof`, however,
datatypes for bullets and goal selectors are in `Vernacexpr`.
In particular, we move:
- `proof_bullet`: to `Proof_bullet`
- `goal_selector`: to a new file `Goal_select`
|
|
|
|
We add a [SelectAlreadyFocused] constructor to [goal_selector] (read
"!") which causes a failure when there's not exactly 1 goal and
otherwise is a noop.
Then [Set Default Goal Selector "!".] puts us in "strict focusing"
mode where we can only run tactics if we have only one goal or use a
selector.
Closes #6689.
|
|
|
|
`hint_info_expr`, `hint_info_gen` do conceptually belong to the
typeclasses modules and should be able to be used without a dependency
on the concrete vernacular syntax.
|
|
- Be more precise when trying to clear an hypothesis which
occurs implicitly in a global constant.
- Warns if destruct/induction cannot clear an hypothesis occurring
implicitly in a global.
In the first case, the change in situation
Section A. Variable a:nat. Definition b:=a=a. Goal b=b. clear a.
is:
- before: "a is used in conclusion"
- after: "a is used implicitly in b in conclusion"
In the second case:
Section A. Variable a:nat. Definition b:=a=a. Goal b=b. destruct a.
produces a warning: "Cannot remove a, it is used implicitly in b".
|
|
Normalization sounds like it should be semantically noop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We bootstrap the circular evar_map <-> econstr dependency by moving
the internal EConstr.API module to Evd.MiniEConstr. Then we make the
Evd functions use econstr.
|
|
contains evars
|
|
LTAC's `fix` and `cofix` do require access to the proof object inside
the tactic monad when used without a name. This is a bit inconvenient
as we aim to make the handling of the proof object purely functional.
Alternatives have been discussed in #7196, and it seems that
deprecating the nameless forms may have the best cost/benefit ratio,
so opening this PR for discussion.
See also #6171.
|
|
This tactic was introduced by aba4b19 in 2009 and never documented. Its main
purpose was backward compatibility, and as such it ought to be deprecated.
|
|
This is more efficient in general, because Termops.dependent doesn't take
advantage of the knowledge of its pattern argument.
|
|
We solve some modularity and type duplication problems by moving types
to a better place. In particular:
- We move tactics types from `Misctypes` to `Tactics` as this is their
proper module an single user [with LTAC].
- We deprecate aliases in `Tacexpr` to such tactic types.
cc: #6512
|
|
tclTHENFIRST/tclTHENLAST, informative version of shelve unifiable
|
|
We forbid calling `EConstr.to_constr` on terms that are not evar-free,
as to progress towards enforcing the invariant that `Constr.t` is
evar-free. [c.f. #6308]
Due to compatibility constraints we provide an optional parameter to
`to_constr`, `abort` which can be used to overcome this restriction
until we fix all parts of the code.
Now, grepping for `~abort:false` should return the questionable
parts of the system.
Not a lot of places had to be fixed, some comments:
- problems with the interface due to `Evd/Constr` [`Evd.define` being
the prime example] do seem real!
- inductives also look bad with regards to `Constr/EConstr`.
- code in plugins needs work.
A notable user of this "feature" is `Obligations/Program` that seem to
like to generate kernel-level entries with free evars, then to scan
them and workaround this problem by generating constants.
|
|
We use a lower level function that accesses the proof without raising an
anomaly. This is a direct candidate for backport, so I used a V82 API but
eventually this API should be cleaned up.
|
|
Design choice: Failing with an anomaly or with a catchable Ltac error
"Fail": we fail with a Fail as it was the case with the related
constrained version of tclTHENFIRST/tclTHENLAST.
|
|
- The case 0 makes the code of intros until (and in particular of
Detyping.lookup_quantified_hypothesis_as_displayed more complicated).
- The introduction pattern "*" is compositional while "until 0" is not.
|
|
The `reference` type contains some ad-hoc locations in its
constructors, but there is no reason not to handle them with the
standard attribute container provided by `CAst.t`.
An orthogonal topic to this commit is whether the `reference` type
should contain a location or not at all.
It seems that many places would become a bit clearer by splitting
`reference` into non-located `reference` and `lreference`, however
some other places become messier so we maintain the current status-quo
for now.
|
|
We continue with the work of #402 and #6745 and update most of the
remaining parts of the AST:
- module declarations
- intro patterns
- top-level sentences
Now, parsed documents should be full annotated by `CAst` nodes.
|
|
Previously [fun x : Ind@{i} => x : Ind@{j}] with Ind some cumulative
inductive would try to generate a constraint [i = j] and use
cumulativity only if this resulted in an inconsistency. This is
confusingly different from the behaviour with [Type] and means
cumulativity can only be used to lift between universes related by
strict inequalities. (This isn't a kernel restriction so there might
be some workaround to send the kernel the right constraints, but
not in a nice way.)
See modified test for more details of what is now possible.
Technical notes:
When universe constraints were inferred by comparing the shape of
terms without reduction, cumulativity was not used and so too-strict
equality constraints were generated. Then in order to use cumulativity
we had to make this comparison fail to fall back to full conversion.
When unifiying 2 instances of a cumulative inductive type, if there
are any Irrelevant universes we try to unify them if they are
flexible.
|
|
|
|
Tactic-in-term can be called from within a tactic itself. We have to
preserve the preexisting future_goals (if called from pretyping) and
we have to inform of the existence of pending goals, using
future_goals which is the only way to tell it in the absence of being
part of an encapsulating proofview.
This fixes #6313.
Conversely, future goals, created by pretyping, can call ltac:(giveup) or
ltac:(shelve), and this has to be remembered. So, we do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UState normalize -> minimize, Evd nf_constraints -> minimize_universes
|
|
|
|
Following up on #6791, we the option "Discriminate Introduction".
|
|
Following up on #6791, we the option "Shrink Abstract".
|
|
|
