| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
any length with a [None] representation and ensure that this representation
is canonical through the restricted interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
that should be changed anyway.
|
|
slightly more efficient in general.
|
|
They were just passed along in the tactics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the current state without having to use both get, bind and set.
|
|
reasons, some code depends on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
observe non-normalized goals.
|
|
|
|
The removed code isn't used locally and isn't exported in the signature
|
|
With ocaml 4.01, the 'unused open' warning also checks the mli :-)
Beware: some open are reported as useless when compiling with camlp5,
but are necessary for compatibility with camlp4. These open are now
marked with a comment.
|
|
There are currently two other clashs : Lexer and Errors, but for
the moment these ones haven't impacted my experiments with extraction
and compiler-libs, while this Matching issue had. And anyway the new
name is more descriptive, in the spirit of the recent TacticMatching.
|
|
NB: new file miscprint.ml deserves to be part of printing.cma,
but should be part of proofs.cma for the moment, due to use in logic.ml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit also introduces a module Monad to generate monadic combinators (currently, only List.map).
|
|
Impacts MapleMode.
|
|
The prefered style is to use continuation passing style when necessary, or simply passing the goal explicitely in the case of interpretation functions which do not evolve the current goal.
|
|
Make this module deal only with opaque proofs.
Make discharging/substitution invariant more explicit via a third constructor.
|
|
To obtain a.vo one can now:
1) coqtop -quick -compile a
2) coqtop -vi2vo a.vi
To make that possible the .vo structure has been complicated. It is now
made of 5 segments.
| vo | vi | vi2vo | contents
--------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------
lib | Yes | Yes | Yes | libstack (modules, notations,...)
opauqe_univs | No | Yes | Yes | constraints coming from opaque proofs
discharge | No | Yes | No | data needed to close sections
tasks | No | Yes | No | STM tasks to produce proof terms
opaque_proofs | Yes | Yes | Yes | proof terms
--------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------
This means one can load only the strictly necessay parts. Usually one
does not load the tasks segment of a .vi nor the opaque_proof segment of
a .vo, unless one is turning a .vi into a .vo, in which case he load
all the segments.
Optional segments are marshalled as None. But for lib, all segments
are Array.t of:
| type
--------------+---------------------------------------------------------
lib | a list of Libobject.obj (n'importe quoi)
opauqe_univs | Univ.consraints Future.computation
discharge | what Cooking.cook_constr needs
tasks | Stm.tasks (a task is system_state * vernacexpr list)
opaque_proofs | Term.constr Future.computation
--------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------
Invariant: all Future.computation in a vo file (obtained by a vi2vo
compilation or not) have been terminated with Future.join (or
Future.sink). This means they are values (inside a box).
This invariant does not hold for vi files. E.g. opauqe_proofs can be
dangling Future.computation (i.e. NotHere exception). The vi2vo
compilation step will replace them by true values.
Rationale for opaque_univs: in the vi2vo transformation we want to reuse
the lib segment. Hence the missing pieces have to be put on the side,
not inside. Opaque proof terms are already in a separte segment.
Universe constraints are not, hence the new opauqe_univs segment. Such
segment, if present in a .vo file, is always loaded, and
Declare.open_constant will add to the environment the constraints stored
there. For regular constants this is not necessay since the constraints
are already in their enclosing module (and also in the constant_body).
With vi2vo the constraints coming from the proof are not in the
constant_body (hence not in the enclosing module) but there and are
added to the environment explicitly by Declare.open_constant.
Rationale for discharge: vi2vo produces a proof term in its original
context (in the middle of a section). Then it has to discharge the
object. This segment contains the data that is needed in order to do
so. It is morally the input that Lib.close_section passes to Cooking
(via the insane rewinding of libstack, GlobalRecipe, etc chain).
Checksums: the checksum of .vi and a .vo obtain from it is the same.
This means that if if b.vo has been compiled using a.vi, and then
a.vi is compiled into a.vo, Require Import b works (and recursively
loads a.vo).
|
|
I'm trying to avoid unecessary construction of intermediate lists. Interpretation function don't modify the goals, they just need a goal in their
context.
Some care has to be given to the evar maps, though, as we can extract an outdated evar map from a goal (this is probably an undesirable feature, but significantly simplified the compatibility API).
Also, Proofview.Goal.enter{,l} catch exceptions (and transfer the non-critical ones into errors of the tactics monad). So I had to do just that for every "enter" removed (I probably have been overprotective but it's better that way).
Not as trivial a modification as it should, but it will hopefully go over well. It was much needed anyway.
|
|
(excepts list of args that must be constructors
|
|
|
|
|
|
The coercion code was not seeing such flag and always trying
to resolve type classes. In particular open_contr is pretyped
without type classes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
without"
This reverts commit bfe1141026da70d8f59cf47b5fe61ffc20a29f3c.
Conflicts:
proofs/proofview_monad.ml
This is potentially a temporary commit until a final decision is taken on hand-written versus extracted ocaml for the tactic monad. The hand-written implementation has a bug where the + tactical would not behave properly (I tried to find why, but couldn't: the hand-written implementation looks fine, but it isn't. Beats me).
There is a conflict with Pierre-Marie's commit 4832692: Fixing backtrace registering of various tactic-related try-with blocks.
|
|
Proof using can be followed by:
- All : all variables
- Type : all variables occurring in the type
- expr:
- (a b .. c) : set
- expr + expr : set union
- expr - expr : set difference
- -expr : set complement (All - expr)
Exceptions:
- a singleton set can be written without parentheses. This also allows
the implementation of named sets sharing the same name space of
section hyps ans write
- bla - x : where bla is defined as (a b .. x y) elsewhere.
- if expr is just a set, then parentheses can be omitted
This module also implements some AI to tell the user how he could
decorate "Proof" with a "using BLA" clause.
Finally, one can Set Default Proof Using "str" to any string that is
used whenever the "using ..." part is missing. The coding of this
sucks a little since it is the parser that applies the default.
|
|
|
|
Experimental. Turned out to be much harder to implement than I thought. The main
issue is that the reification in the native compiler and the VM is not quite
untyped. Indeed, type annotations for lambdas have to be reconstructed. Hence,
when reifying an application u = t a1 ... an, the type of t has to be known or
reconstructed. It is always possible to do so in plain CIC, when u is in normal
form and its type is known. However, with partial terms this may no longer be
the case, as in: ?1 a1 ... an. So we also compile and evaluate the type of
evars and metas.
This still has to be tested more extensively, but the correction of the kernel
native conversion (on terms without evars or metas) should not be impacted.
Much of this could be reused for the VM.
|
