| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As noted in GitHub discussion, it is a good idea to make `poly` always
explicit, this PR does remove last case of `?(poly=false)` in the
codebase.
|
|
These are only needed when closing / admitting a proof.
|
|
|
|
This is more in-line with attributes and the rest of the API, and
makes some code significantly clearer (as in `foo true false false`,
etc...)
|
|
We split `{goal,declaration,assumption}_kind` into their
components. This makes sense as each part of this triple is handled by
a different layer, namely:
- `polymorphic` status: necessary for the lower engine layers;
- `locality`: only used in `vernac` top-level constants
- `kind`: merely used for cosmetic purposes [could indeed be removed /
pushed upwards]
We also profit from this refactoring to add some named parameters to
the top-level definition API which is quite parameter-hungry.
More refactoring is possible and will come in further commits, in
particular this is a step towards unifying the definition / lemma save path.
|
|
|
|
This information is already present on `Proof.t`, so we extract it
form there.
Moreover, this information is essential to the lower-level proof, as
opposed to the "kind" information which is only relevant to the vernac
layer; we will move it thus to its proper layer in subsequent commits.
|
|
This was already in the base proof object however not forwarded by
`close_proof`. thus it had to be stored twice.
There are more cases like this, like `poly`, all are covered by
subsequent commits.
|
|
Key information about an interactive lemma proof was stored as a
closure on an ad-hoc hook, then later made available to the hook
closing actions.
Instead, we put this information in the lemma state and incorporate
these declarations into the normal save path.
We prepare to put the information about rec_thms in the state too.
|
|
This allows to desynchronize the kernel-facing API from the proof-facing one.
|
|
obligation ones.
Ack-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes the type of terminator simpler, progressing towards its
total reification.
|
|
We move the role data into the evarmap instead.
|
|
We rename modify to map [more in line with the rest of the system] and
make the endline function specific, as it is only used in one case.
|
|
The main idea of this PR is to distinguish the types of "proof object"
`Proof_global.t` and the type of "proof object associated to a
constant, the new `Lemmas.t`.
This way, we can move the terminator setup to the higher layer in
`vernac`, which is the one that really knows about constants, paving
the way for further simplification and in particular for a unified
handling of constant saving by removal of the control inversion here.
Terminators are now internal to `Lemmas`, as it is the only part of
the code applying them.
As a consequence, proof nesting is now handled by `Lemmas`, and
`Proof_global.t` is just a single `Proof.t` plus some environmental
meta-data.
We are also enable considerable simplification in a future PR, as this
patch makes `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` essentially the same, so we
should expect to handle them under a unified interface.
|
|
Reviewed-by: aspiwack
Ack-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Formerly, knowing if a declaration was to be discharged, to be global
but invisible at import, or to be global but visible at import was
obtained by combining the parser-level information (i.e. use of
Variable/Hypothesis/Let vs use of Axiom/Parameter/Definition/..., use
of Local vs Global) with the result of testing whether there were open
sections.
We change the meaning of the Discharge flag: it does not tell anymore
that it was syntactically a Variable/Hypothesis/Let, but tells the
expected semantics of the declaration (issuing a warning in the
parser-to-interpreter step if the semantics is not the one suggested
by the syntax). In particular, the interpretation/command engine
becomes independent of the parser.
The new "semantic" type is:
type import_status = ImportDefaultBehavior | ImportNeedQualified
type locality = Discharge | Global of import_status
In the process, we found a couple of inconsistencies in the treatment
of the locality status. See bug #8722 and test file LocalDefinition.v.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla ->
Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and
the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the
vernacentries/mlg level.
Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a
followup PR).
We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in
mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack.
Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
|
|
We remove unused parts of the API, almost all of them belonging to the
legacy engine. This was detected using coverage testing.
The list is provisional and should be subject to change, let's see
what CI says.
|
|
We get rid of the future wrappers, as all callers are immediately forcing
the result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: gares
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: gares
Ack-by: herbelin
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
|
|
Doesn't seem to matter in practice, but it doesn't hurt either.
|
|
|
|
This prevents having to call global functions, for no good reason.
We also seize the opportunity to name the check argument.
|
|
|
|
Some of them are significant so presumably it will take a bit of
effort to fix overlays.
I left out the removal of `nf_enter` for now as MTac2 needs some
serious porting in order to avoid it.
|
|
The [int] is incorrect for list focusing, we could work a bit harder
to fix that. It's only used for pluralisation in the error message "no
such goal(s)" so we could also ignore the issue.
|
|
We add the information on the proper layer by catching the low-level
exception.
|
|
We perform some cleanup and remove dependency of `proofs/` on
`interp/`, which seems logical.
In fact, `interp` + `parsing` are quite self-contained, so if there is
interest we could also make tactics to depend directly on proofs.
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
We change the API; after some thinking the tradeoff is clear in favor
of the more radical functional option from the start.
We also guarante the existence of a proof is by typing now,
so exceptions `NoCurrentProof` and `NoSuchGoal` are gone.
TODO: Review what's going on with focusing now.
|
|
|
|
Kernel should be mostly correct, higher levels do random stuff at
times.
|
|
Ack-by: gares
Ack-by: herbelin
Ack-by: mattam82
Ack-by: ppedrot
|
|
I think the usage looks cleaner this way.
|
|
In order to do so we place the polymorphic status and name in the
read-only part of the monad.
Note the added comments, as well as the fact that almost no part of
tactics depends on `proofs` nor `interp`, thus they should be placed
just after pretyping.
Gaëtan Gilbert noted that ideally, abstract should not depend on the
polymorphic status, should we be able to defer closing of the
constant, however this will require significant effort.
Also, we may deprecate nameless abstract, thus rending both of the
changes this PR need unnecessary.
|
|
|
