| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The shelve tactic puts all the focused goals out of sight. They can be later recalled by the Unshelve command.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@17013 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
It is highlighted in yellow in Coqide.
The unsafe status is tracked throughout the execution of tactics such that
nested calls to admit are caught.
Many function (mainly those building constr with tactics such as typeclass
related stuff, and Function, and a few other like eauto's use of Hint Extern)
drop the unsafe status. This is unfortunate, but a lot of refactoring would
be in order.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16977 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
state out of one we were threading all the way along. This should be
safer, as one cannot forego side effects accidentally by manipulating
explicitly the [sigma] container.
Still, this patch raised the issue of badly used evar maps. There
is an ad-hoc workaround (i.e. a hack) in Rewrite to handle the
fact it uses evar maps in an unorthodox way.
Likewise, that mean we have to revert all contrib patches that added
effect threading...
There was also a dubious use of side effects in their toplevel handling,
that duplicates them, leading to the need of a rather unsafe List.uniquize
afterwards. It should be investigaged.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16850 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
The process_transaction function adds a new edge to the Dag without
executing the transaction (when possible).
The observe id function runs the transactions necessary to reach to the
state id. Transaction being on a merged branch are not executed but
stored into a future.
The finish function calls observe on the tip of the current branch.
Imperative modifications to the environment made by some tactics are
now explicitly declared by the tactic and modeled as let-in/beta-redexes
at the root of the proof term. An example is the abstract tactic.
This is the work described in the Coq Workshop 2012 paper.
Coq is compile with thread support from now on.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16674 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16463 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15846 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15715 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15577 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
If you are focused on 3 subgoals, and unfocusing would reveal 2 extra
subgoals, and unfocusing again would reveal 4 extra subgoals, then coqtop
will tell you:
3 focused subgoals (unfocused: 2-4)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15508 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15375 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
not fully unfocused (in the style of the Guarded command).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15104 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
i.e.: after a brace is open, one can use the bullets again without clashing with
bullets outside the brace. In particular, one can nest bullets with arbitrary
depth (by interleaving them with occasional braces).
Also fixed a typo introduced in my previous commit which caused bullets
and braces to behave just like regular focuses.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15073 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
changes of the handling of unfocusing errors.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15010 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
of a proof into goals.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14973 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14972 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
New vernacular "Proof using idlist" to declare the variables
to be discharged at the end of the current proof. The system
checks that the set of declared variables is a superset of
the set of actually used variables.
It can be combined in a single line with "Proof with":
Proof with .. using ..
Proof using .. with ..
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14789 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
during the proof together with information whether they were (partially)
instantiated and if it's the case the list of existential variables that were
used to that effect.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14721 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
the uid returned by Goal.uid.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14467 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
We can now have script like
assert P.
{ destruct n.
- solve_case1.
- solve_case2.
}
solve_goal
However there is an undesirable interaction with Focus (which we might, anyway, consider deprecated in favour of {}). Indeed, for compatibility with v8.3, Unfocus is called implicitely after each proof command if there is no focused goal. And the new behaviour of bullets is to allow arbitrary unfocusing command "pass trough" them. As a result, a script like
Focus.
split
- solves_first_goal
will result in a fully unfocused proof.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14262 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Some toplevel commands (for instance the experimental bullets) are
composed of several atomic commands, the failure of one must imply
the failure of the whole toplevel command. This commit introduces
a system of transaction to that effect.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14087 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14086 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Everything seems to work fine in CoqIDE (except escape/return and the daimon which are not entirely ported).
However, there is some problem causing proof general to fail when using goto or evaluate buffer (evaluate next phrase works fine though), as well as coqc.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13817 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13323 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- Many of them were broken, some of them after Pierre B's rework
of mli for ocamldoc, but not only (many bad annotation, many files
with no svn property about Id, etc)
- Useless for those of us that work with git-svn (and a fortiori
in a forthcoming git-only setting)
- Even in svn, they seem to be of little interest
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12972 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
This is a fairly large commit (around 140 files and 7000 lines of code
impacted), it will cause some troubles for sure (I've listed the know
regressions below, there is bound to be more).
At this state of developpement it brings few features to the user, as
the old tactics were
ported with no change. Changes are on the side of the developer mostly.
Here comes a list of the major changes. I will stay brief, but the code
is hopefully well documented so that it is reasonably easy to infer the
details from it.
Feature developer-side:
* Primitives for a "real" refine tactic (generating a goal for each
evar).
* Abstract type of tactics, goals and proofs
* Tactics can act on several goals (formally all the focused goals). An
interesting consequence of this is that the tactical (. ; [ . | ... ])
can be separated in two
tacticals (. ; .) and ( [ . | ... ] ) (although there is a conflict for
this particular syntax). We can also imagine a tactic to reorder the
goals.
* Possibility for a tactic to pass a value to following tactics (a
typical example is
an intro function which tells the following tactics which name it
introduced).
* backtracking primitives for tactics (it is now possible to implement a
tactical '+'
with (a+b);c equivalent to (a;c+b;c) (itself equivalent to
(a;c||b;c)). This is a valuable
tool to implement tactics like "auto" without nowing of the
implementation of tactics.
* A notion of proof modes, which allows to dynamically change the parser
for tactics. It is controlled at user level with the keywords Set
Default Proof Mode (this is the proof mode which is loaded at the start
of each proof) and Proof Mode (switches the proof mode of the current
proof) to control them.
* A new primitive Evd.fold_undefined which operates like an Evd.fold,
except it only goes through the evars whose body is Evar_empty. This is
a common operation throughout the code,
some of the fold-and-test-if-empty occurences have been replaced by
fold_undefined. For now,
it is only implemented as a fold-and-test, but we expect to have some
optimisations coming some day, as there can be a lot of evars in an
evar_map with this new implementation (I've observed a couple of
thousands), whereas there are rarely more than a dozen undefined ones.
Folding being a linear operation, this might result in a significant
speed-up.
* The declarative mode has been moved into the plugins. This is made
possible by the proof mode feature. I tried to document it so that it
can serve as a tutorial for a tactic mode plugin.
Features user-side:
* Unfocus does not go back to the root of the proof if several Focus-s
have been performed.
It only goes back to the point where it was last focused.
* experimental (non-documented) support of keywords
BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
BeginSubproof focuses on first goal, one can unfocus only with
EndSubproof, and only
if the proof is completed for that goal.
* experimental (non-documented) support for bullets ('+', '-' and '*')
they act as hierarchical BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
First time one uses '+' (for instance) it focuses on first goal, when
the subproof is
completed, one can use '+' again which unfocuses and focuses on next
first goal.
Meanwhile, one cas use '*' (for instance) to focus more deeply.
Known regressions:
* The xml plugin had some functions related to proof trees. As the
structure of proof changed significantly, they do not work anymore.
* I do not know how to implement info or show script in this new engine.
Actually I don't even know what they were suppose to actually mean in
earlier versions either. I wager they would require some calm thinking
before going back to work.
* Declarative mode not entirely working (in particular proofs by
induction need to be restored).
* A bug in the inversion tactic (observed in some contributions)
* A bug in Program (observed in some contributions)
* Minor change in the 'old' type of tactics causing some contributions
to fail.
* Compilation time takes about 10-15% longer for unknown reasons (I
suspect it might be linked to the fact that I don't perform any
reduction at QED-s, and also to some linear operations on evar_map-s
(see Evd.fold_undefined above)).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12961 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10252 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
parfaitement en cours) de la nouvelle machinerie de preuves.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10251 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
