| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Some code in typeclasses was even breaking the invariant that
use_polymorphic_flag should not be called twice, but that code was
morally dead it seems, so we remove it.
|
|
Typeclasses.typeclass
|
|
|
|
We fix quite a few types, and perform some cleanup wrt to the
evar_map, in particular we prefer to thread it now as otherwise
it may become trickier to check when we are using the correct one.
Thanks to @SkySkimmer for lots of comments and bug-finding.
|
|
New module introduced in OCaml 4.05 I think, can create problems when
linking with the OCaml toplevel for `Drop`.
|
|
|
|
There don't really bring anything, we also correct some minor nits
with the printing function.
|
|
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
|
|
This will allow to merge back `Names` with `API.Names`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This essentially means storing the abstract universe context in the typeclass
data, and abstracting it when necessary.
|
|
We return the abstract context instead of an arbitrary instantiation.
|
|
Instead of returning either an instance or the set of constraints, we rather
return the corresponding abstracted context. We also push back all uses of
abstraction-breaking calls from these functions out of the kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also giving the proper local flag to the hint registration, even on a
Global instance, since the instance discharge manage itself the
redefinition of a hint.
|
|
|
|
It stores both universe constraints and subtyping information for
blocks of inductive declarations.
At this stage the there is no inference or checking implemented. The
subtyping information simply encodes equality of levels for the condition of
subtyping.
|
|
This is the continuation of #244, we now deprecate `CErrors.error`,
the single entry point in Coq is `user_err`.
The rationale is to allow for easier grepping, and to ease a future
cleanup of error messages. In particular, we would like to
systematically classify all error messages raised by Coq and be sure
they are properly documented.
We restore the two functions removed in #244 to improve compatibility,
but mark them deprecated.
|
|
Inspired by https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5229 , which
this PR solves, I propose to remove support for non-synchronous
options.
It seems the few uses of `optsync = false` we legacy and shouldn't
have any impact.
Moreover, non synchronous options may create particularly tricky
situations as for instance, they won't be propagated to workers.
|
|
The transition has been done a bit brutally. I think we can still save a
lot of useless normalizations here and there by providing the right API
in EConstr. Nonetheless, this is a first step.
|
|
|
|
This removes quite a few unsafe casts. Unluckily, I had to reintroduce
the old non-module based names for these data structures, because I could
not reproduce easily the same hierarchy in EConstr.
|
|
This allows the decoupling of the notions of context containing kernel
terms and context containing tactic-level terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to a priority, cleanup the interfaces for passing this
information as well. The pattern, if given, takes priority over the
inferred one.
We only allow Existing Instances gr ... gr | pri. for now, without
pattern, as before.
Make the API compatible to 8.5 as well.
|
|
|
|
This legacy function is still used by destruct, and is a hotspot in various
examples from the wild. We hijack the check from Typeclass and perform a
double check at once not to mark unresolvable evars in vain a lot.
|
|
|
|
"Context.Named.{to,of}_rel_decl"
|
|
mainly concerning referring to "Context.{Rel,Named}.get_{id,value,type}" functions.
If multiple modules define a function with a same name, e.g.:
Context.{Rel,Named}.get_type
those calls were prefixed with a corresponding prefix
to make sure that it is obvious which function is being called.
|
|
more cleanups
|
|
module)
For the moment, there is an Error module in compilers-lib/ocamlbytecomp.cm(x)a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally, rel-context was represented as:
Context.rel_context = Names.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Rel.t = LocalAssum of Names.Name.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Name.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Originally, named-context was represented as:
Context.named_context = Names.Id.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Named.t = LocalAssum of Names.Id.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Id.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Motivation:
(1) In "tactics/hipattern.ml4" file we define "test_strict_disjunction"
function which looked like this:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [_,None,c] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
Suppose that you do not know about rel-context and named-context.
(that is the case of people who just started to read the source code)
Merlin would tell you that the type of the value you are destructing
by "match" is:
'a * 'b option * Constr.t (* worst-case scenario *)
or
Named.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t (* best-case scenario (?) *)
To me, this is akin to wearing an opaque veil.
It is hard to figure out the meaning of the values you are looking at.
In particular, it is hard to discover the connection between the value
we are destructing above and the datatypes and functions defined
in the "kernel/context.ml" file.
In this case, the connection is there, but it is not visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now consider, what happens when the reader see the same function
presented in the following form:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [LocalAssum (_,c)] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
If the reader haven't seen "LocalAssum" before, (s)he can use Merlin
to jump to the corresponding definition and learn more.
In this case, the connection is there, and it is directly visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
(2) Also, if we already have the concepts such as:
- local declaration
- local assumption
- local definition
and we describe these notions meticulously in the Reference Manual,
then it is a real pity not to reinforce the connection
of the actual code with the abstract description we published.
|
|
This patch was proposed by JH in bug report #4547.
|
