| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porting them is still to be done, but at least we don't rely on the wrapper
everywhere.
|
|
Moving code around uncovered this bug.
|
|
|
|
This function was used almost everywhere with the wrapper around.
|
|
same inductive)
Numeral Notations now play better with multiple scopes for the same
inductive. Previously, when multiple numeral notations where defined
for the same inductive, only the last one was considered for
printing. Now, we proceed as follows
1. keep only uninterpreters that produce an output (first
List.map_filter)
2. keep only uninterpretation for scopes that either have a scope
delimiter or are open (second List.map_filter)
3. the final selection is made according to the order of open scopes,
(find_uninterpretation) or or according to the last defined
notation if no appropriate scope is open (head of list at the end)
|
|
As per https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/12197#discussion_r418480525 and
https://gitter.im/coq/coq?at=5ead5c35347bd616304e83ef
|
|
Note that this slightly changes the semantics of backtracking across
`start ltac profiling`.
|
|
Fixes #12196
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
This PR moves `Declare` to `vernac` which will hopefully allow to
unify it with `DeclareDef` and avoid exposing entry internals.
There are many tradeoffs to be made as interface and placement of
tactics is far from clear; I've tried to reach a minimally invasive
compromise:
- moved leminv to `ltac_plugin`; this is unused in the core codebase
and IMO for now it is the best place
- hook added for abstract; this should be cleaned up later
- hook added for scheme declaration; this should be cleaned up later
- separation of hints vernacular and "tactic" part should be also done
later, for now I've introduced a `declareUctx` module to avoid being
invasive there.
In particular this last point strongly suggest that for now, the best
place for `Class_tactics` would be also in `ltac`, but I've avoided
that for now too.
This partially supersedes #10951 for now and helps with #11492 .
|
|
This moves the vernacular part of hints to `vernac`; in particular, it
helps removing the declaration of constants as parts of the `tactic`
folder.
|
|
|
|
(incidentally fixes #7697)
Reviewed-by: Lysxia
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: herbelin
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
This provides linking, appropriate coloring and appropriate hovering
in coqdoc documents.
In particular, this fixes #7697.
|
|
This still needs API cleanup but we defer it to the moment we are
ready to make the internals private.
|
|
If we remove all the legacy proof engine stuff, that would remove the
need for the view on proof almost entirely.
|
|
We place creation and saving of interactive proofs in the same module;
this will allow to make `proof_entry` private, improving invariants
and control over clients, and to reduce the API [for example next
commit will move abstract declaration into this module, removing the
exported ad-hoc `build_constant_by_tactic`]
Next step will be to unify all the common code in the interactive /
non-interactive case; but we need to tweak the handling of obligations
first.
|
|
This actually gets `Pfedit` out of the dependency picture [can be
almost merged with `Proof` now, as it is what it manipulates] and
would allow to reduce the exported low-level API from `Proof_global`,
as `map_fold_proof` is not used anymore.
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matafou
Ack-by: Zimmi48
Ack-by: maximedenes
|
|
|
|
This completes a pure Dune bootstrap of Coq.
There is still the question if we should modify `coqdep` so it does
output a dependency on `Init.Prelude.vo` in certain cases.
TODO: We still double-add `theories` and `plugins` [in coqinit and in
Dune], this should be easy to clean up.
Setting `libs_init_load_path` does give a correct build indeed;
however we still must call this for compatibility?
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
As part of the proof refactoring work I am doing some modifications to
`funind` and indentation of that code is driving me a bit crazy; I'd
much prefer to delegate it to an automatic tool.
|
|
- Provide new helper functions in `Goptions` on the model of
`declare_bool_option_and_ref`;
- Use these helper functions in many parts of the code base
(encapsulates the corresponding references);
- Move almost all options from `declare_string_option` to
`declare_stringopt_option` (only "Warnings" continue to use the
former). This means that these options now support `Unset` to get
back to the default setting. Note that there is a naming
misalignment since `declare_int_option` is similar to
`declare_stringopt_option` and supports `Unset`. When "Warning" is
eventually migrated to support `Unset` as well, we can remove
`declare_string_option` and rename `declare_stringopt_option` to
`declare_string_option`.
- For some vernac options and flags that have an equivalent
command-line option or flag, implement it like the standard `-set`
and `-unset`.
|
|
This corresponds more naturally to the use we make of them, as we don't need
fast indexation but we instead keep pushing terms on top of them.
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
