| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Not very optimized though (if we apply convert_hyp on any hyp, a new
evar will be generated for every different hyp...).
|
|
being able to export hints without tactics, vm, etc. to come with.
Some functions moved to the new proof engine.
|
|
This solution is a bit dumb, but I guess does what one expects.
Each decl mode proof commands stays in proof mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
will name the goal id; writing ?[?id] will use the first
fresh name available based with prefix id.
Tactics intro, rename, change, ... from logic.ml now preserve goal
name; cut preserves goal name on its main premise.
|
|
(but deactivated still).
Set Keyed Unification to activate the option, which changes
subterm selection to _always_ use full conversion _after_ finding a
subterm whose head/key matches the key of the term we're looking for.
This applies to rewrite and higher-order unification in
apply/elim/destruct.
Most proof scripts already abide by these semantics. For those that
don't, it's usually only a matter of using:
Declare Equivalent Keys f g.
This make keyed unification consider f and g to match as keys.
This takes care of most cases of abbreviations: typically Def foo :=
bar and rewriting with a bar-headed lhs in a goal mentioning foo works
once they're set equivalent.
For canonical structures, these hints should be automatically declared.
For non-global-reference headed terms, the key is the constructor name
(Sort, Prod...). Evars and metas are no keys.
INCOMPATIBILITIES:
In FMapFullAVL, a Function definition doesn't go through with keyed
unification on.
|
|
so as to reproduce correctly the reduction behavior of existing
projections, i.e. delta + iota. Make [projection] an abstract datatype
in Names.ml, most of the patch is about using that abstraction.
Fix unification.ml which tried canonical projections too early in
presence of primitive projections.
|
|
as "||" is actually redefined in "plugins/micromega/sos_lib.ml".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contortions in internalization/externalization. It uses a fully typed
version of detyping, requiring the environment, to move from
primitive projection applications to regular applications of
the eta-expanded version. The kernel is unchanged, and only
constrMatching needs compatibility code now.
|
|
of resulution for goals whose head is "ref". + means the argument
is an input and shouldn't contain an evar, otherwise resolution
fails. This generalizes the Typeclasses Strict Resolution option
which prevents resolution to fire on underconstrained typeclass
constraints, now the criterion can be applied to specific parameters.
Also cleanup auto/eauto code, uncovering a potential backwards
compatibility issue: in cases the goal contains existentials, we
never use the discrimination net in auto/eauto. We should try to
set this on once the contribs are stabilized (the stdlib goes through
when the dnet is used in these cases).
|
|
|
|
instances still to do). Using heuristics to name after the quantifier
name it comes. Also added a "sigma" to almost all printing functions.
|
|
More information, less pmp.
|
|
Left a README, just in case someone will discover the remnants of it
decades from now.
|
|
|
|
1. Proofview.Goal.enter into Proofview.Goal.nf_enter.
2. Proofview.Goal.raw_enter into Proofview.Goal.enter.
3. Proofview.Goal.goals -> Proofview.Goals.nf_goals
4. Proofview.Goal.raw_goals -> Proofview.Goals.goals
5. Ftactic.goals -> Ftactic.nf_goals
6. Ftactic.raw_goals -> Ftactic.goals
This is more uniform with the other functions of Coq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dead code formerly used by the now defunct [autoinstances].
|
|
Involves changing the [mind_finite] field in the kernel from a bool to the trivalued type [Decl_kinds.recursivity_kind]. This is why so many files are (unfortunately) affected. It would not be very surprising if some bug was introduced.
|
|
Now kernel/indtypes builds the corresponding terms (has to be trusted)
while translate_constant just binds a constant name to the
already entered projection body, avoiding the dubious "check"
of user given terms. "case" Pattern-matching on primitive records is
now disallowed, and the default scheme is implemented using
projections and eta (all elimination tactics now use projections
as well). Elaborate "let (x, y) := p in t" using let bindings
for the projections of p too.
|
|
to match on a primitive projection application c.(p) using "?f _", binding f
to (fun x => x.(p)) with the correct typing.
|
|
It's possible that I should have removed more "allows", as many
instances of "foo allows to bar" could have been replaced by "foo bars"
(e.g., "[Qed] allows to check and save a complete proof term" could be
"[Qed] checks and saves a complete proof term"), but not always (e.g.,
"the optional argument allows to ignore universe polymorphism" should
not be "the optional argument ignores universe polymorphism" but "the
optional argument allows the caller to instruct Coq to ignore universe
polymorphism" or something similar).
|
|
|
|
Based on suggestion by @gasche.
|
|
I'm not quite sure why, but I'm pretty sure it's not. Rather, in
"allowing for foo" and "allowing to foo", "foo" modifies the sense in
which someting is allowed, rather than it being "foo" that's allowed.
"Allowing fooing" generally works, though it can sound a bit awkward.
"Allowing one to foo" (or "Allowing {him,her,it,Coq} to foo") is always
acceptable, in-as-much as it's ok to use "one".
I haven't touched the older instances of it in the CHANGES file.
|
|
|
|
can be given with second H bound by the first one.
Not very satisfied by passing closure to tactics.ml, but otherwise
tactics would have to be aware of glob_constr.
|
|
"pat/term" for "apply term on current_hyp as pat".
|
|
scheme, redundancies, possibility of chaining a tactic knowing the
name of introduced hypothesis, new proof engine).
|
|
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
|
|
- made "apply" tactics of type Proofview.tactic, as well as other inner
functions about elim and assert
- used same hypothesis naming policy for intros and internal_cut (towards a
reorganization of intro patterns)
- "apply ... in H as pat" now supports any kind of introduction
pattern (doc not changed)
|
|
Also taking advantage of the change to rename it into TacML. Ultimately
should allow ML tactic to return values.
|
|
change of printing format of forall (need more thinking).
|
|
hypothesis when using it in apply or rewrite (prefix ">",
undocumented), and a modifier to explicitly keep it in induction or
destruct (prefix "!", reminiscent of non-linerarity).
Also added undocumented option "Set Default Clearing Used Hypotheses"
which makes apply and rewrite default to erasing the hypothesis they
use (if ever their argument is indeed an hypothesis of the context).
|
|
subgoals and the role of the "by tac" clause swapped.
|
|
a dependent elimination principle for Prop arguments.
|
|
par: distributes the goals among a number of workers given
by -async-proofs-tac-j (defaults to 2).
|
|
Since [idtac] can, now, be used even if no goal is left, this error message which assumed that the goal was still open would run at every call of the [ring] tactic. Which lead to comically many nonsensical messages on the console during Coq's compilation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Thanks to G. Melquiond for pointing out that 'abstract' already performs type-checking
|
