| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We do that by using constr_with_bindings rather than
open_constr_with_bindings (+ extra call to typeclasses in
"specialize"). If my understanding is right, the only effect would be
to succeed more in cases where it was failing (in
inh_conv_coerce_to_gen). In particular, "specialize" and
"contradiction" already have a WITHHOLES test for rejecting pending
holes.
Incidentally, this answers enhancement #5153.
|
|
This fixes an inconsistency introduced in 554a6c806 (svn r12603) where
both interp_constr_with_bindings and interp_open_constr_with_bindings
were going through interp_open_constr (no type classes so as to not to
commit too early on irreversible choices, accepting unresolved holes).
We fix this by having interp_constr_with_bindings going to
interp_constr (using type classes and failing on unresolved evars).
The external impact is that any TACTIC EXTEND which refers to
constr_with_binding has now to decide whether it intends it to use
what the name suggest (using type classes and to fail if evars remain
unresolved), thus keeping constr_with_binding, or the actual behavior
which requires to use open_constr_with_bindings for strict
compatibility.
|
|
|
|
As requested in
https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/386#issuecomment-302358542
|
|
tricks available to users
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
batch mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This changes the produced terms a bit, eg
Axiom T : Type.
Lemma foo : true = false -> T.
Proof. congruence. Qed.
used to produce
fun H : true = false =>
let Heq := H : true = false in
@eq_rect Type True (fun X : Type => X) I T
(@f_equal bool Type (fun t : bool => if t then True else T) true false Heq)
now produces
fun H : true = false =>
let Heq : true = false := H in
let H0 : False := @eq_ind bool true (fun e : bool => if e then True else False) I false Heq in
False_rect T H0
i.e. instead of proving [True = T] by [f_equal] then transporting [I]
across this identity, it now proves [False] by [eq_ind] then uses exfalso.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following @gasche idea, and the original intention of #402, we switch
the main parsing AST of Coq from `'a Loc.located` to `'a CAst.ast`
which is private and record-based.
This provides significantly clearer code for the AST, and is robust
wrt attributes.
|
|
`internal_ghost` was an artifact to ease porting of the ml4 rules. Now
that the location is optional we can finally get rid of it.
|
|
This completes the Loc.ghost removal, the idea is to gear the API
towards optional, but uniform, location handling.
We don't print <unknown> anymore in the case there is no location.
This is what the test suite expects.
The old printing logic for located items was a bit inconsistent as
it sometimes printed <unknown> and other times it printed nothing as
the caller checked for `is_ghost` upstream.
|
|
Now it is a private field, locations are optional.
|
|
One case missing due the TACTIC EXTEND macro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue the uniformization pass. No big news here, trying to be
minimally invasive.
|
|
This is the second patch, which is a bit more invasive. We reasoning
is similar to the previous patch.
Code is not as clean as it could as we would need to convert
`glob_constr` to located too, then a few parts could just map the
location.
|
|
This is first of a series of patches, converting `constrexpr` pattern
data type from ad-hoc location handling to `Loc.located`.
Along Coq, we can find two different coding styles for handling
objects with location information: one style uses `'a Loc.located`,
whereas other data structures directly embed `Loc.t` in their
constructors.
Handling all located objects uniformly would be very convenient, and
would allow optimizing certain cases, in particular making located
smarter when there is no location information, as it is the case for
all terms coming from the kernel.
`git grep 'Loc.t \*'` gives an overview of the remaining work to do.
We've also added an experimental API for `located` to the `Loc`
module, `Loc.tag` should be used to add locations objects, making it
explicit in the code when a "located" object is created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current implementation was still using continuation passing-style, and
furthermore was triggering a focus on the goals. We take advantage of the
tactic features instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
