| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in case of side effects)
Also:
Fix #4781
Fix #4496
|
|
|
|
The warning can be avoided with the attributes, (or just disable the
warning itself I guess).
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit implements the following intro patterns:
Temporary "=> +"
"move=> + stuff" ==== "move=> tmp stuff; move: tmp"
It preserves the original name.
"=>" can be chained to force generalization as in
"move=> + y + => x z"
Tactics as views "=> /ltac:(tactic)"
Supports notations, eg "Notation foo := ltac:(bla bla bla). .. => /foo".
Limited to views on the right of "=>", views that decorate a tactic
as move or case are not supported to be tactics.
Dependent "=> >H"
move=> >H ===== move=> ???? H, with enough ? to
name H the first non-dependent assumption (LHS of the first arrow).
TC isntances are skipped.
Block intro "=> [^ H] [^~ H]"
after "case" or "elim" or "elim/v" it introduces in one go
all new assumptions coming from the eliminations. The names are
picked from the inductive type declaration or the elimination principle
"v" in "elim/v" and are appended/prepended the seed "H"
The implementation makes crucial use of the goal_with_state feature of
the tactic monad. For example + schedules a generalization to be performed
at the end of the intro pattern and [^ .. ] reads the name seeds from
the state (that is filled in by case and elim).
|
|
|
|
workers
|
|
- deprecate the old 5-tuple accessor in favor of a view record,
- move `name` and `kind` proof data from `Proof_global` to `Proof`,
this will prove useful in subsequent functionalizations of the
interface, in particular this is what abstract, which lives in the
monads, needs in order no to access global state.
- Note that `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` are redundant anyways.
|
|
This should improve correctness and will be needed for the PRs that
remove global access to the proof state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These modules do actually belong there.
We have to slightly reorganize printers, removing a couple of
duplicated ones in the way.
|
|
This is a pre-requisite to use automated formatting tools such as
`ocamlformat`, also, there were quite a few places where the comments
had basically no effect, thus it was confusing for the developer.
p.s: Reading some comments was a lot of fun :)
|
|
|
|
Also remove a few undocumented settings
|
|
We make `declaration_hook`s optional arguments everywhere, and thus we
avoid some "fake" functions having to be passed.
This identifies positively the code really using hooks [funind,
rewrite, coercions, program, and canonicals] and helps moving toward
some hope of reification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As per https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8965#issuecomment-441440779
|
|
|
|
Users can now register string notations for custom inductives.
Much of the code and documentation was copied from numeral notations.
I chose to use a 256-constructor inductive for primitive string syntax
because (a) it is easy to convert between character codes and
constructors, and (b) it is more efficient than the existing `ascii`
type.
Some choices about proofs of the new `byte` type were made based on
efficiency. For example, https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8517 means
that we cannot simply use `Scheme Equality` for this type, and I have
taken some care to ensure that the proofs of decidable equality and
conversion are fast. (Unfortunately, the `Init/Byte.v` file is the
slowest one in the prelude (it takes a couple of seconds to build), and
I'm not sure where the slowness is.)
In String.v, some uses of `0` as a `nat` were replaced by `O`, because
the file initially refused to check interactively otherwise (it
complained that `0` could not be interpreted in `string_scope` before
loading `Coq.Strings.String`).
There is unfortunately a decent amount of code duplication between
numeral notations and string notations.
I have not put too much thought into chosing names; most names have been
chosen to be similar to numeral notations, though I chose the name
`byte` from
https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8483#issuecomment-421671785.
Unfortunately, this feature does not support declaring string syntax for
`list ascii`, unless that type is wrapped in a record or other inductive
type. This is not a fundamental limitation; it should be relatively
easy for someone who knows the API of the reduction machinery in Coq to
extend both this and numeral notations to support any type whose hnf
starts with an inductive type. (The reason for needing an inductive
type to bottom out at is that this is how the plugin determines what
constructors are the entry points for printing the given notation.
However, see also https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8964 for
complications that are more likely to arise if inductive type families
are supported.)
N.B. I generated the long lists of constructors for the `byte` type with
short python scripts.
Closes #8853
|
|
We remove a few aliases present in the lower layers
[`Genintern/Tactypes`] from `Tacexpr`.
IMHO this enlarges the API for no good purpose, and difficults
analysis.
|
|
- remove duplicate type definitions `gram_assoc`, `gram_position`,
- make global `warning_verbose` variable into a parameter.
|
|
write_function
|
|
|
|
This is needed in order to serialize ssreflect programs properly,
similar to #6795.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We remove the `Proof_types` file which was a trivial stub, we also
cleanup a few layers of aliases.
This is not a lot but every little step helps.
|
|
This makes the make-based build system stop linking to Camlp5's
gramlib and instead links to our own gramlib.
We use the style done in the packing of `Stdlib` in OCaml 4.07.
As to introduce a minimal amount of noise in history we use an
autogenerated `gramlib__pack` directory.
Co-authored-by: Gaëtan Gilbert <gaetan.gilbert@skyskimmer.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is documented in dev/doc/changes.md.
|
|
|
|
We group the extension API and datatypes under `Vernacextend`.
This means that the base plugin dependency is now `coq.vernac` from
`coq.stm`.
This is quite important as for example the LSP server won't like to
link the STM in.
LTAC still depends on the STM by means of the ltac_profile part tho.
The next step could be to move the extension point below `Vernacexpr`.
|
