| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
We unify information about constants so it is shared among all the
paths [interactive, NI, obligations].
IMHO the current setup looks pretty good, with information split into
a per-constant record `CInfo.t` and variables affecting mutual
definitions at once, which live in `Info.t`.
Main information outside our `Info` record is `opaque`, which is
provided at different moments in several cases.
There are a few nits regarding interactive proofs, which will go away
in the next commits.
|
|
This is in preparation for the next commit which will clean-up the
current API flow in `Declare`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This improves the interface, and allows even more sealing of the API.
This is yet work in progress.
|
|
The module is now a stub. We choose to be explicit on the parameters
for now, this will improve in next commits with the refactoring of
proof / constant information.
|
|
At this point the record in lemmas was just a stub; next commit will
stop exposing the internals of mutual information, and pave the way
for the refactoring of `Info.t` handling in the Declare interface.
|
|
Current backtraces for tactics leave a bit to desire, for example
given the program:
```coq
Lemma u n : n + 0 = n.
rewrite plus_O_n.
```
the backtrace stops at:
```
Found no subterm matching "0 + ?M160" in the current goal.
Called from file "proofs/proof.ml", line 381, characters 4-42
Called from file "tactics/pfedit.ml", line 102, characters 31-58
Called from file "plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg", line 378, characters 8-84
```
Backtrace information `?info` is as of today optional in some tactics,
such as `tclZERO`, it doesn't cost a lot however to reify backtrace
information indeed in `tclZERO` and provide backtraces for all tactic
errors. The cost should be small if we are not in debug mode.
The backtrace for the failed rewrite is now:
```
Found no subterm matching "0 + ?M160" in the current goal.
Raised at file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1827, characters 14-73
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1929, characters 17-53
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1948, characters 22-72
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 2020, characters 14-56
Re-raised at file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 2021, characters 66-73
Called from file "proofs/clenv.ml", line 254, characters 12-58
Called from file "proofs/clenvtac.ml", line 95, characters 16-53
Called from file "engine/proofview.ml", line 1110, characters 40-46
Called from file "engine/proofview.ml", line 1115, characters 10-34
Re-raised at file "clib/exninfo.ml", line 82, characters 4-38
Called from file "proofs/proof.ml", line 381, characters 4-42
Called from file "tactics/pfedit.ml", line 102, characters 31-58
Called from file "plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg", line 378, characters 8-84
```
which IMO is much better.
|
|
This is extracted from #9710, where we need the environment anyway to compute
iota rules on inductive types with let-bindings. The commit is self-contained,
so I think it could go directly in to save me a few rebases.
Furthermore, this is also related to #11707. Assuming we split cbn from the
other reduction machine, this allows to merge the "local" machine with
the general one, since after this PR they will have the same type. One less
reduction machine should make people happy.
|
|
The API in `DeclareDef` should become the recommended API in `Declare`.
This greatly reduces the exposure of internals; we still have a large
offender in `Lemmas` but that will be taken care of in the next
commit; effectively removing quite some chunks from `declare.mli`.
This PR originally introduced a dependency cycle due to:
- `Declare`: uses `Vernacexpr.decl_notation list`
- `Vernacexpr`: uses `ComHint.hint_expr`
- `ComHint`: uses `Declare.declare_constant`
This is a real cycle in the sense that `ComHint` would have also move
to `DeclareDef` in the medium term.
There were quite a few ways to solve it, we have chosen to
move the hints ast to `Vernacexpr` as it is not very invasive
and seems consistent with the current style.
Alternatives, which could be considered at a later stage are for
example moving the notations AST to `Metasyntax`, having `Declare` not
to depend on `Vernacexpr` [which seems actually a good thing to do in
the medium term], reworking notation support more deeply...
|
|
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: herbelin
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
If we remove all the legacy proof engine stuff, that would remove the
need for the view on proof almost entirely.
|
|
This corresponds more naturally to the use we make of them, as we don't need
fast indexation but we instead keep pushing terms on top of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
|
|
Instead of various termops and globnames aliases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no users in Coq but maybe some plugin wants it so don't
completely remove it
|
|
Some calls are actually guarded by a check that the scheme is already in
the cache. There is no reason to generate dummy side-effects in that case.
|
|
The proposed replacements are not satisfying because they are more
complicated to use. Following the discussion in #8713, we decide to
remove the deprecation warning for these commands.
|
|
We also remove trailing whitespace.
Script used:
```bash
for i in `find . -name '*.ml' -or -name '*.mli' -or -name '*.mlg'`; do expand -i "$i" | sponge "$i"; sed -e's/[[:space:]]*$//' -i.bak "$i"; done
```
|
|
We can now do `#[refine] Instance : Bla := bli.` to enter proof mode
with `bli` as a starting refinement.
If `bli` is enough to define the instance we still enter proof mode,
keeping things nicely predictable for the stm.
|
|
This source of slowness has been observed in VST, but it is probably
pervasive. Most of the unification problems are not mentioning evars,
it is thus useless to compute the set of frozen evars upfront.
We also seize the opportunity to reverse the flag, because it is always
used negatively.
|
|
Not pretty, but it had to be done some day, as `Globnames` seems to be
on the way out.
I have taken the opportunity to reduce the number of `open` in the
codebase.
The qualified style would indeed allow us to use a bit nicer names
`GlobRef.Inductive` instead of `IndRef`, etc... once we have the
tooling to do large-scale refactoring that could be tried.
|
|
We can use logical kind for the same purpose, which is mainly
dumpglob, so `goal_object_kind` was never matched against, making this
transformation safe.
|
|
They are clearly not at the same importance level, thus we use a named
parameter and isolate the kinds as to allow further improvements and
refactoring.
|
|
We move the bulk of `Decl_kinds` to a better place [namely
`interp/decls`] and refactor the use of this information quite a bit.
The information seems to be used almost only for `Dumpglob`, so it
certainly should end there to achieve a cleaner core.
Note the previous commits, as well as the annotations regarding the
dubious use of the "variable" data managed by the `Decls` file.
IMO this needs more work, but this should be a good start.
|
|
We turn the hook parameter into a record, making more explicit the
capture of data in hooks as they only take one parameter now
This is a fine-tuning but provides some small advantages, and allows
us to tweak the hook type with less breakage.
|
|
It was never used actually.
|
|
This is more in-line with attributes and the rest of the API, and
makes some code significantly clearer (as in `foo true false false`,
etc...)
|
|
We split `{goal,declaration,assumption}_kind` into their
components. This makes sense as each part of this triple is handled by
a different layer, namely:
- `polymorphic` status: necessary for the lower engine layers;
- `locality`: only used in `vernac` top-level constants
- `kind`: merely used for cosmetic purposes [could indeed be removed /
pushed upwards]
We also profit from this refactoring to add some named parameters to
the top-level definition API which is quite parameter-hungry.
More refactoring is possible and will come in further commits, in
particular this is a step towards unifying the definition / lemma save path.
|
|
This information is already present on `Proof.t`, so we extract it
form there.
Moreover, this information is essential to the lower-level proof, as
opposed to the "kind" information which is only relevant to the vernac
layer; we will move it thus to its proper layer in subsequent commits.
|
|
Lemmas.info was a bit out of hand, as well as the parameters to the
`start_*` family. Most of the info is not needed and should hopefully
remain constrained to special cases, most callers only set the hook,
and obligations should be better served by a `start_obligation`
function soon.
|
|
This allows to desynchronize the kernel-facing API from the proof-facing one.
|
|
obligation ones.
Ack-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
This way both `Lemmas` and `DeclareObl` can depend on it, removing one
more difficulty on the unification of terminators.
|
|
The main idea of this PR is to distinguish the types of "proof object"
`Proof_global.t` and the type of "proof object associated to a
constant, the new `Lemmas.t`.
This way, we can move the terminator setup to the higher layer in
`vernac`, which is the one that really knows about constants, paving
the way for further simplification and in particular for a unified
handling of constant saving by removal of the control inversion here.
Terminators are now internal to `Lemmas`, as it is the only part of
the code applying them.
As a consequence, proof nesting is now handled by `Lemmas`, and
`Proof_global.t` is just a single `Proof.t` plus some environmental
meta-data.
We are also enable considerable simplification in a future PR, as this
patch makes `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` essentially the same, so we
should expect to handle them under a unified interface.
|
|
Formerly, knowing if a declaration was to be discharged, to be global
but invisible at import, or to be global but visible at import was
obtained by combining the parser-level information (i.e. use of
Variable/Hypothesis/Let vs use of Axiom/Parameter/Definition/..., use
of Local vs Global) with the result of testing whether there were open
sections.
We change the meaning of the Discharge flag: it does not tell anymore
that it was syntactically a Variable/Hypothesis/Let, but tells the
expected semantics of the declaration (issuing a warning in the
parser-to-interpreter step if the semantics is not the one suggested
by the syntax). In particular, the interpretation/command engine
becomes independent of the parser.
The new "semantic" type is:
type import_status = ImportDefaultBehavior | ImportNeedQualified
type locality = Discharge | Global of import_status
In the process, we found a couple of inconsistencies in the treatment
of the locality status. See bug #8722 and test file LocalDefinition.v.
|
