| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body
has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option`
The other specifiers are for the following body types:
~~~
![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate`
![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option`
![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate`
![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit`
![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit`
~~~
The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a
section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning.
The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently
they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't
have to be classified QUERY.
![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I
don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future.
For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old
meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing
plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us
where it's used.
|
|
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla ->
Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and
the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the
vernacentries/mlg level.
Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a
followup PR).
We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in
mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack.
Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
|
|
Using pstate makes no sense for printing global stuff
|
|
This clean-up removes the dependency of the current proof mode (and hence
the parsing state) on unification.
The current proof mode can now be known simply by parsing and elaborating
attributes. We give access to attributes from the classifier for this purpose.
We remove the infamous `VtUnknown` code path in the STM which is known to
be buggy.
Fixes #3632 #3890 #4638.
|
|
We add state handling to tactics.
TODO:
- [rewrite] `add_morphism_infer` creates problems as it opens a proof.
- [g_obligations] with_tac
|
|
This should make https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/9129 easier.
|
|
DAG nodes hold now a system state and a parsing state.
The latter is always passed to the parser.
This paves the way to decoupling the effect of commands on the parsing
state and the system state, and hence never force to interpret, say,
Notation.
Handling proof modes is now done explicitly in the STM, not by interpreting
VernacStartLemma.
Similarly Notation execution could be split in two phases in order to obtain a
parsing state without fully executing it (that requires executing all
commands before it).
Co-authored-by: Maxime Dénès <maxime.denes@inria.fr>
Co-authored-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
|
|
We remove a few aliases present in the lower layers
[`Genintern/Tactypes`] from `Tacexpr`.
IMHO this enlarges the API for no good purpose, and difficults
analysis.
|
|
|
|
We group the extension API and datatypes under `Vernacextend`.
This means that the base plugin dependency is now `coq.vernac` from
`coq.stm`.
This is quite important as for example the LSP server won't like to
link the STM in.
LTAC still depends on the STM by means of the ltac_profile part tho.
The next step could be to move the extension point below `Vernacexpr`.
|
|
I think for instance the new code in this diff is cleaner and more
systematic:
~~~diff
VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND VernacDeclareTacticDefinition
-| [ "Ltac" ne_ltac_tacdef_body_list_sep(l, "with") ] => {
+| #[ deprecation; locality; ] [ "Ltac" ne_ltac_tacdef_body_list_sep(l, "with") ] => {
VtSideff (List.map (function
| TacticDefinition ({CAst.v=r},_) -> r
| TacticRedefinition (qid,_) -> qualid_basename qid) l), VtLater
} -> {
- let deprecation, locality = Attributes.(parse Notations.(deprecation ++ locality) atts) in
Tacentries.register_ltac (Locality.make_module_locality locality) ?deprecation l;
}
END
~~~
|
|
|
|
Commands need to request the attributes they use, with the API
encouraging them to error on unsupported attributes.
|
|
|
|
Almost all of ml4 were removed in the process. The only remaining files
are in the test-suite and probably need a bit of fiddling with coq_makefile,
and there only two really remaning ml4 files containing code.
|
