| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
obligation ones.
Ack-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
in favor of "simple_intropattern"
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: gares
|
|
|
|
We had to move the private opaque constraints out of the constant declaration
into the opaque table. The API is not very pretty yet due to a pervasive
confusion between monomorphic global constraints and polymorphic local ones,
but once we get rid of futures in the kernel this should be magically solved.
|
|
This way both `Lemmas` and `DeclareObl` can depend on it, removing one
more difficulty on the unification of terminators.
|
|
This is to prevent confusion with the terminology used in the grammar
of tactic in the reference manual: "intropattern" in Tactic Notation
and TACTIC EXTEND is actually bound to simple_intropattern and not to
what is called intropattern in the reference manual
After some deprecation phase, "intropattern" could be added back to
mean the "intropattern" of the reference manual.
Note that "simple_intropattern" is actually already available in
"Tactic Notation" with the correct meaning as an entry. Only
"intropattern" is misguiding.
|
|
subsequent work.
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
Ack-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: gares
|
|
|
|
We move the role data into the evarmap instead.
|
|
The stm.ml changes show that for the other classifications either the
vernac_when was ignored, or there was an assert on it forcing it to be
Now or Later depending on the vernac_type.
One may also note that the classification used in top_printers
`VtQuery,VtNow` would have failed those asserts...
|
|
The main idea of this PR is to distinguish the types of "proof object"
`Proof_global.t` and the type of "proof object associated to a
constant, the new `Lemmas.t`.
This way, we can move the terminator setup to the higher layer in
`vernac`, which is the one that really knows about constants, paving
the way for further simplification and in particular for a unified
handling of constant saving by removal of the control inversion here.
Terminators are now internal to `Lemmas`, as it is the only part of
the code applying them.
As a consequence, proof nesting is now handled by `Lemmas`, and
`Proof_global.t` is just a single `Proof.t` plus some environmental
meta-data.
We are also enable considerable simplification in a future PR, as this
patch makes `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` essentially the same, so we
should expect to handle them under a unified interface.
|
|
Formerly, knowing if a declaration was to be discharged, to be global
but invisible at import, or to be global but visible at import was
obtained by combining the parser-level information (i.e. use of
Variable/Hypothesis/Let vs use of Axiom/Parameter/Definition/..., use
of Local vs Global) with the result of testing whether there were open
sections.
We change the meaning of the Discharge flag: it does not tell anymore
that it was syntactically a Variable/Hypothesis/Let, but tells the
expected semantics of the declaration (issuing a warning in the
parser-to-interpreter step if the semantics is not the one suggested
by the syntax). In particular, the interpretation/command engine
becomes independent of the parser.
The new "semantic" type is:
type import_status = ImportDefaultBehavior | ImportNeedQualified
type locality = Discharge | Global of import_status
In the process, we found a couple of inconsistencies in the treatment
of the locality status. See bug #8722 and test file LocalDefinition.v.
|
|
Type's argument
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: gares
Reviewed-by: mattam82
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eg ![proof] becomes STATE proof
This commits still supports the old ![]
so there is redundancy:
~~~
VERNAC EXTEND Foo STATE proof
| ...
VERNAC EXTEND Foo
| ![proof] ...
~~~
with the ![] form being local to the rule and the STATE form
applying to the whole EXTEND except for the rules with a ![].
|
|
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body
has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option`
The other specifiers are for the following body types:
~~~
![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate`
![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option`
![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate`
![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit`
![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit`
~~~
The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a
section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning.
The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently
they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't
have to be classified QUERY.
![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I
don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future.
For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old
meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing
plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us
where it's used.
|
|
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla ->
Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and
the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the
vernacentries/mlg level.
Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a
followup PR).
We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in
mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack.
Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
|
|
Conversely, Type existential variables now (explicitly) cover the Set
case.
Similarly for Prop and SProp.
|
|
We consistently use:
- UUnknown: to mean a rigid anonymous universe
(written Type in instances and Type as a sort)
[was formerly encoded as [] in Type's argument]
- UAnonymous: to mean a flexible anonymous universe
(written _ in instances and Type@{_} as a sort)
[was formerly encoded as [None] in Type's argument]
- UNamed: to mean a named universe or universe expression
(written id or qualid in instances and Type@{id} or Type@{qualid} or more
generally Type@{id+n}, Type@{qualid+n}, Type@{max(...)} as a sort)
There is a little change of syntax: "_" in a "max" list of universes
(e.g. "Type@{max(_,id+1)}" is not anymore allowed. But it was
trivially satisfiable by unifying the flexible universe with a
neighbor of the list and the syntax is anyway not documented.
There is a little change of semantics: if I do id@{Type} for an
abbreviation "id := Type", it will consider a rigid variable rather
than a flexible variable as before.
|
|
|
|
We simply pass them as arguments, now that they are not called by the
kernel anymore.
The checker definitely needs to access the opaque proofs. In order not to
touch the API at all, I added a hook there, but it could also be provided
as an additional argument, at the cost of changing all the upwards callers.
|
|
|
|
This lets us avoid passing ~ontop to do_definition and co, and after #10050
to even more functions.
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
|
|
The current situation is a mess, some functions set it by default, but other
no. Making it mandatory ensures that the expected value is the correct one.
|
|
Some of them are significant so presumably it will take a bit of
effort to fix overlays.
I left out the removal of `nf_enter` for now as MTac2 needs some
serious porting in order to avoid it.
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
We have some discrepancy with the package names for plugins in the
META / Dune case. This PR fixes it.
At some point there was a need for plugin package names having to be
named as their directories.
I think this is not true anymore, but taking the "dir_name ==
package_name" convention just in case.
|
|
This has been a mess for quite a while, we try to improve it.
|
|
We make clearer which arguments are optional and which are mandatory.
Some of these representations are tricky because of small differences
between Program and Function, which share the same infrastructure.
As a side-effect of this cleanup, Program Fixpoint can now be used with
e.g. {measure (m + n) R}. Previously, parentheses were required around
R.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In that case the terminator and proof object have to be supplied in
the ?proof argument, or else we get an anomaly.
Co-authored-by: Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr>
|
|
|
|
This should make https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/9129 easier.
|
|
Kernel should be mostly correct, higher levels do random stuff at
times.
|
|
Note currently it's impossible to define inductives in SProp because
indtypes.ml and the pretyper aren't fully plugged.
|
|
Ack-by: gares
Ack-by: herbelin
Ack-by: mattam82
Ack-by: ppedrot
|
|
Supersedes #8718.
|
|
Parameters had to be removed in cases_pattern_of_glob_constr.
|
|
I think the usage looks cleaner this way.
|
|
Now the main functions are unify (solves the problems entirely) and
unify_delay and unify_leq (which might leave some unsolved constraints).
Deprecated the_conv_x and the_conv_x_leq (which were misnommers as they
do unification not conversion).
|
|
We remove all calls to `Flags.is_program_mode` except one (to compute
the default value of the attribute). Everything else is passed
explicitely, and we remove the special logic in the interpretation loop
to set/unset the flag.
This is especially important since the value of the flag has an impact on
proof modes, so on the separation of parsing and execution phases.
|
|
This work makes it possible to take advantage of a compact
representation for integers in the entire system, as opposed to only
in some reduction machines. It is useful for heavily computational
applications, where even constructing terms is not possible without such
a representation.
Concretely, it replaces part of the retroknowledge machinery with
a primitive construction for integers in terms, and introduces a kind of
FFI which maps constants to operators (on integers). Properties of these
operators are expressed as explicit axioms, whereas they were hidden in
the retroknowledge-based approach.
This has been presented at the Coq workshop and some Coq Working Groups,
and has been used by various groups for STM trace checking,
computational analysis, etc.
Contributions by Guillaume Bertholon and Pierre Roux <Pierre.Roux@onera.fr>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Grégoire <Benjamin.Gregoire@inria.fr>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Laporte <Vincent.Laporte@fondation-inria.fr>
|
