| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We renounced to distribute evars to constr and bindings and to let
tactics do the merge. There are now two disciplines:
- the general case is that the holes in tactic arguments are pushed to
the general sigma of the goal so that tactics have no such low-level
tclEVARS, Evd.merge, or check_evars to do:
- what takes tclEVARS and check_evars in charge is now a new
tactical of name tclWITHHOLES (this tactical has a flag to support
tactics in either the "e"- mode and the non "e"- mode);
- the merge of goal evars and holes is now done generically at
interpretation time (in tacinterp) and as a side-effect it also
anticipates the possibility to refer to evars of the goal in the
arguments;
- with this approach, we don't need such constr/open_constr or
bindings/ebindings variants and we can get rid of all ugly
inj_open-style coercions;
- some tactics however needs to have the exact subset of holes known;
this is the case e.g. of "rewrite !c" which morally reevaluates c at
each new rewriting step; this kind of tactics still receive a
specific sigma around their arguments and they have to merge evars
and call tclWITHHOLES by themselves.
Changes so that each specific tactics can take benefit of this generic
support remain to be done.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12603 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12485 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12337 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
user contribs
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11996 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
