| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
thunks. Move from [lazy] to [delayed] in subtac.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13227 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
checking function was used instead of a test of existence in the context.
Also restricted constr_of_id which had no reason to interpret a
posteriori an already interpreted identifier as a global
reference. Consequently adapted funind.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13135 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
This is a fairly large commit (around 140 files and 7000 lines of code
impacted), it will cause some troubles for sure (I've listed the know
regressions below, there is bound to be more).
At this state of developpement it brings few features to the user, as
the old tactics were
ported with no change. Changes are on the side of the developer mostly.
Here comes a list of the major changes. I will stay brief, but the code
is hopefully well documented so that it is reasonably easy to infer the
details from it.
Feature developer-side:
* Primitives for a "real" refine tactic (generating a goal for each
evar).
* Abstract type of tactics, goals and proofs
* Tactics can act on several goals (formally all the focused goals). An
interesting consequence of this is that the tactical (. ; [ . | ... ])
can be separated in two
tacticals (. ; .) and ( [ . | ... ] ) (although there is a conflict for
this particular syntax). We can also imagine a tactic to reorder the
goals.
* Possibility for a tactic to pass a value to following tactics (a
typical example is
an intro function which tells the following tactics which name it
introduced).
* backtracking primitives for tactics (it is now possible to implement a
tactical '+'
with (a+b);c equivalent to (a;c+b;c) (itself equivalent to
(a;c||b;c)). This is a valuable
tool to implement tactics like "auto" without nowing of the
implementation of tactics.
* A notion of proof modes, which allows to dynamically change the parser
for tactics. It is controlled at user level with the keywords Set
Default Proof Mode (this is the proof mode which is loaded at the start
of each proof) and Proof Mode (switches the proof mode of the current
proof) to control them.
* A new primitive Evd.fold_undefined which operates like an Evd.fold,
except it only goes through the evars whose body is Evar_empty. This is
a common operation throughout the code,
some of the fold-and-test-if-empty occurences have been replaced by
fold_undefined. For now,
it is only implemented as a fold-and-test, but we expect to have some
optimisations coming some day, as there can be a lot of evars in an
evar_map with this new implementation (I've observed a couple of
thousands), whereas there are rarely more than a dozen undefined ones.
Folding being a linear operation, this might result in a significant
speed-up.
* The declarative mode has been moved into the plugins. This is made
possible by the proof mode feature. I tried to document it so that it
can serve as a tutorial for a tactic mode plugin.
Features user-side:
* Unfocus does not go back to the root of the proof if several Focus-s
have been performed.
It only goes back to the point where it was last focused.
* experimental (non-documented) support of keywords
BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
BeginSubproof focuses on first goal, one can unfocus only with
EndSubproof, and only
if the proof is completed for that goal.
* experimental (non-documented) support for bullets ('+', '-' and '*')
they act as hierarchical BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
First time one uses '+' (for instance) it focuses on first goal, when
the subproof is
completed, one can use '+' again which unfocuses and focuses on next
first goal.
Meanwhile, one cas use '*' (for instance) to focus more deeply.
Known regressions:
* The xml plugin had some functions related to proof trees. As the
structure of proof changed significantly, they do not work anymore.
* I do not know how to implement info or show script in this new engine.
Actually I don't even know what they were suppose to actually mean in
earlier versions either. I wager they would require some calm thinking
before going back to work.
* Declarative mode not entirely working (in particular proofs by
induction need to be restored).
* A bug in the inversion tactic (observed in some contributions)
* A bug in Program (observed in some contributions)
* Minor change in the 'old' type of tactics causing some contributions
to fail.
* Compilation time takes about 10-15% longer for unknown reasons (I
suspect it might be linked to the fact that I don't perform any
reduction at QED-s, and also to some linear operations on evar_map-s
(see Evd.fold_undefined above)).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12961 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- made the new "subst'" the default by renaming it "subst";
- renamed old "subst" into "simple subst";
- add option for non-rewriting of dependent proofs in general_rewrite and co
- kept use of dependent proofs in the "subst" call of "functional
induction", in spite it introduced incompatibilities (in Compcert).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12578 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12485 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- Cleaning and uniformisation in command.ml:
- For better modularity and better visibility, two files got isolated
out of command.ml:
- lemmas.ml is about starting and saving a proof
- indschemes.ml is about declaring inductive schemes
- Decomposition of the functions of command.ml into a functional part
and the imperative part
- Inductive schemes:
- New architecture in ind_tables.ml for registering scheme builders,
and for sharing and generating on demand inductive schemes
- Adding new automatically generated equality schemes (file eqschemes.ml)
- "_congr" for equality types (completing here commit 12273)
- "_rew_forward" (similar to vernac-level eq_rect_r), "_rew_forward_dep",
"_rew_backward" (similar to eq_rect), "_rew_backward_dep" for
rewriting schemes (warning, rew_forward_dep cannot be stated following
the standard Coq pattern for inductive types: "t=u" cannot be the
last argument of the scheme)
- "_case", "_case_nodep", "_case_dep" for case analysis schemes
- Preliminary step towards discriminate and injection working on any
equality-like type (e.g. eq_true)
- Restating JMeq_congr under the canonical form of congruence schemes
- Renamed "Set Equality Scheme" into "Set Equality Schemes"
- Added "Set Rewriting Schemes", "Set Case Analysis Schemes"
- Activation of the automatic generation of boolean equality lemmas
- Partial debug and error messages improvements for the generation of
boolean equality and decidable equality
- Added schemes for making dependent rewrite working (unfortunately with
not a fully satisfactory design - see file eqschemes.ml)
- Some names of ML function made more regular (see dev/doc/changes.txt)
- Incidentally, added a flush to obsolete Local/Global syntax warning
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12481 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
not refreshed late enough).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12369 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12337 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
(uniformisation of function names, classification). One of the most
visible change is the renaming of section_path into full_path (the
use of name section was obsolete due to the module system, but I
don't know if the new name is the best chosen one - especially it
remains some "sp" here and there).
- Simplification of the interface of classify_object (first argument dropped).
- Simplification of the code for vernac keyword "End".
- Other small cleaning or dead code removal.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12265 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
user contribs
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11996 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
