aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/plugins/derive/g_derive.mlg
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-06-04coqpp: add new ![] specifiers for structured proof interactionGaëtan Gilbert
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option` The other specifiers are for the following body types: ~~~ ![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate` ![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option` ![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate` ![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit` ![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit` ~~~ The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning. The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't have to be classified QUERY. ![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future. For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us where it's used.
2019-06-04Proof_global: pass only 1 pstate when we don't want the proof stackGaëtan Gilbert
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla -> Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the vernacentries/mlg level. Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a followup PR). We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack. Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
2019-03-27[plugins] [derive] Adapt to removal of imperative proof state.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
2019-01-24[STM] explicit handling of parsing statesEnrico Tassi
DAG nodes hold now a system state and a parsing state. The latter is always passed to the parser. This paves the way to decoupling the effect of commands on the parsing state and the system state, and hence never force to interpret, say, Notation. Handling proof modes is now done explicitly in the STM, not by interpreting VernacStartLemma. Similarly Notation execution could be split in two phases in order to obtain a parsing state without fully executing it (that requires executing all commands before it). Co-authored-by: Maxime Dénès <maxime.denes@inria.fr> Co-authored-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
2018-11-17[vernacextend] Consolidate extension points APIEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We group the extension API and datatypes under `Vernacextend`. This means that the base plugin dependency is now `coq.vernac` from `coq.stm`. This is quite important as for example the LSP server won't like to link the STM in. LTAC still depends on the STM by means of the ltac_profile part tho. The next step could be to move the extension point below `Vernacexpr`.
2018-10-02Make the coqpp VERNAC EXTEND behave as the non-FUNCTIONAL camlp5 one.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2018-10-02Port g_derive to coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Unluckily this is the only file that contains a VERNAC EXTEND and no ARGUMENT EXTEND, which are not handled yet.