| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The numerals lexed are now [0-9][0-9_]* ([.][0-9_]+)? ([eE][+-]?[0-9][0-9_]*)?
|
|
Rather than integers '[0-9]+', numeral constant can now be parsed
according to the regexp '[0-9]+ ([.][0-9]+)? ([eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?'.
This can be used in one of the two following ways:
- using the function `Notation.register_rawnumeral_interpreter` in an OCaml plugin
- using `Numeral Notation` with the type `decimal` added to `Decimal.v`
See examples of each use case in the next two commits.
|
|
In anticipation of an extension from natural numbers to other numeral
constants.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #9844
|
|
Fixes #9840
|
|
It is important to fully normalize the term, *including inductive
parameters of constructors*; see https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/9840
for details on what goes wrong if this does not happen, e.g., from using
the vm rather than cbv.
Supersedes / closes #9655
|
|
(warn if bar is a nonprimitive projection)
|
|
Reviewed-by: herbelin
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kernel should be mostly correct, higher levels do random stuff at
times.
|
|
Note currently it's impossible to define inductives in SProp because
indtypes.ml and the pretyper aren't fully plugged.
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Ack-by: jashug
|
|
It used to simply remember the normal form of the type of the constructor.
This is somewhat problematic as this is ambiguous in presence of
let-bindings. Rather, we store this data in a fully expanded way, relying
on rel_contexts.
Probably fixes a crapload of bugs with inductive types containing
let-bindings, but it seems that not many were reported in the bugtracker.
|
|
This is intended to be separate from handling of implicit binders.
The remaining uses of declare_manual_implicits satisfy a lot of
assertions, giving the possibility of simplifying the interface in the
future.
Two disabled warnings are added for things that currently pass silently.
Currently only Mtac passes non-maximal implicits to
declare_manual_implicits with the force-usage flag set. When implicit
arguments don't have to be named, should move Mtac over to
set_implicits.
|
|
Reviewed-by: vbgl
|
|
This is because it can raise Not_found in depth and we need to catch
it at the right time.
|
|
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: herbelin
Ack-by: jashug
|
|
Ack-by: ppedrot
|
|
I think the usage looks cleaner this way.
|
|
|
|
projections.
This was due to an involuntary capture of a variable name.
|
|
"registered" sounds like it existed before the command.
This could use assumption_message which is currently the same, but I
don't think it has the right semantic.
|
|
We remove all calls to `Flags.is_program_mode` except one (to compute
the default value of the attribute). Everything else is passed
explicitely, and we remove the special logic in the interpretation loop
to set/unset the flag.
This is especially important since the value of the flag has an impact on
proof modes, so on the separation of parsing and execution phases.
|
|
This work makes it possible to take advantage of a compact
representation for integers in the entire system, as opposed to only
in some reduction machines. It is useful for heavily computational
applications, where even constructing terms is not possible without such
a representation.
Concretely, it replaces part of the retroknowledge machinery with
a primitive construction for integers in terms, and introduces a kind of
FFI which maps constants to operators (on integers). Properties of these
operators are expressed as explicit axioms, whereas they were hidden in
the retroknowledge-based approach.
This has been presented at the Coq workshop and some Coq Working Groups,
and has been used by various groups for STM trace checking,
computational analysis, etc.
Contributions by Guillaume Bertholon and Pierre Roux <Pierre.Roux@onera.fr>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Grégoire <Benjamin.Gregoire@inria.fr>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Laporte <Vincent.Laporte@fondation-inria.fr>
|
|
|
|
- The head of "in" was wrongly considered binding
- Aliases in the "in" pattern were not taken into account
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Georges Gonthier for noticing it.
Expanding a few Pervasives.compare at this occasion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
workers
|
|
pattern variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comments.
|
|
These modules do actually belong there.
We have to slightly reorganize printers, removing a couple of
duplicated ones in the way.
|
|
This is a pre-requisite to use automated formatting tools such as
`ocamlformat`, also, there were quite a few places where the comments
had basically no effect, thus it was confusing for the developer.
p.s: Reading some comments was a lot of fun :)
|
|
Rename Univ.Level.{Qualid -> UGlobal}, remove Univ.Level.Id.
Remove the ability to split the argument of `Univ.Level.Level` into a
dirpath*int pair (except by going through string hacks like
detyping/pretyping(/funind) does).
Id.of_string_soft to turn unnamed universes into qualid is pushed up
to detyping. (TODO some followup PR clean up more)
This makes it pointless to have an opaque type for ints in
Univ.Level: it would only be used as argument to
Univ.Level.UGlobal.make, ie
~~~
open Univ.Level
let x = UGlobal.make dp (Id.make n)
(* vs *)
let x = UGlobal.make dp n
~~~
Remaining places which create levels from ints are various hacks (eg
the dummy in inductive.ml, the Type.n universes in ugraph
sort_universes) and univgen.
UnivGen does have an opaque type for ints used as univ ids since they
get manipulated by the stm.
NB: build breaks due to ocamldep issue if UGlobal is named Global instead.
|
|
Remote counters were trying to build universe levels (as opposed to
simple integers), but did not have access to the right dirpath at
construction time. We fix it by constructing the level only at use time,
and we introduce some abstractions for qualified and unqualified level
names.
|
|
|
|
Namely, it does not explicitly open a scope, but we remember that we
don't need the %type delimiter when in type position.
|
|
We shall need it for changing the semantics of type_scope.
|
|
|
|
This modifies the strategy in previous commits so that priorities are
as before in case of non-open scopes with delimiters.
Additionally, we document the rare situation of overlapping
applicative notations (maybe this is too rare and ad hoc to be worth
being documented though).
|
