| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notations
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Ack-by: jfehrle
|
|
Closes GH-8482.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The numerals lexed are now [0-9][0-9_]* ([.][0-9_]+)? ([eE][+-]?[0-9][0-9_]*)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: gshen42 <gan.shen@outlook.com>
|
|
|
|
- Refine some `@term` into `@type`
|
|
- Refine some `@term` into `@type`
|
|
- Put "Section mechanism" example earlier
|
|
|
|
- More consistent code indentation
- Nest command variants properly
- Make `Context` explanation a bit less terse, with more links
- Typesetting bits, add some :cmd: links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix semantic conflict between #9389 and #9654.
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Ack-by: jashug
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: Zimmi48
Ack-by: vbgl
Reviewed-by: cpitclaudel
|
|
This is intended to be separate from handling of implicit binders.
The remaining uses of declare_manual_implicits satisfy a lot of
assertions, giving the possibility of simplifying the interface in the
future.
Two disabled warnings are added for things that currently pass silently.
Currently only Mtac passes non-maximal implicits to
declare_manual_implicits with the force-usage flag set. When implicit
arguments don't have to be named, should move Mtac over to
set_implicits.
|
|
By default Coq warnings are made fatal when building the manual.
If you want to show a command resulting in a warning, use the warn
option.
Preexisting warnings are either fixed or marked as expected.
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: gares
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: cpitclaudel
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
|
|
The conclusion of W-Ind,
"\WF{E;~\ind{p}{Γ_I}{Γ_C}}{Γ}", is changed to
"\WF{E;~\ind{p}{Γ_I}{Γ_C}}{}" because
local contexts should be empty when
inductive definition is defined globally.
This is consistent with W-Global-Assum and W-Global-Def.
The side condition "c_i ∉ Γ ∪ E" which I changed previous commit is
changed again to "c_i ∉ E" because I guess that it tries to
avoid name conflicts to the local contexts in the conclusion.
However, the condition is useless after the local contexts is empty.
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: mattam82
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
binders.
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Ack-by: gares
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mostly in the pattern
~~~
.. coqtop:: in
Theorem foo : bla.
Theorem bar : blah. (* nested proof error *)
~~~
|
|
|
|
Also quoted parts are emphasized as coq-8.7.2-reference-manual.pdf.
And two "x:T" are quoted.
|
|
Use LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK (U+201C) and
RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK (U+201D) instead of
QUOTATION MARK (U+0022).
QUOTATION MARK is formatted as same form both for
opening and closing quotation mark.
|
|
|
|
Since the type of "c" is "I_p ...", the constructor should
return the value of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fixpoint typing rule section, a type of constructor is described
twice:
- ∀ p_1:P_1,~… ∀ p_r :P_r,~∀ x_1:T_1,~… ∀ x_r:T_r,~(I_j~p_1 … p_r~t_1 … t_s)
- ∀ p_1:P_1,~…,∀ p_r :P_r,~∀ y_1:B_1,~… ∀ y_k:B_k,~(I~a_1 … a_k)
Both seems invalid.
The former require that the number of parameters and
the number of (non-parameter) constructor argumets is same.
The latter require that the number of (non-parameter) constructor
argumets and the number of inductive type arguments (including paramters) is
same.
Also, "k" is already used for the number of inductive types in
a inductive definition.
So, I changed the number of (non-parameter) constructor
argumets to "m". I choose "m" because "m" is used for the purpose
in the description for iota-reduction of destructors.
Also, I changed the inductive type parameters and arguments of latter
consistent with the former.
|
|
In the description of destructors,
"Type of branches" section and "Typing rule" section shares
the definition of "r" (and "s" from previous commit).
However actual parameters are p_1...p_r in the former section and
q_1...q_r in the latter section.
I guess it's because the latter section uses
p_1...p_l in other purpose: index of constructor for a inductive type.
So, I change the parameter p_1...p_r to q_1...q_r in the former section
to consistent with the latter section.
|
|
In the description of destuctors,
"Type of branches" section uses "p" as the number of arguments.
It is confusing because "p" is used as the number of parameters.
After the section, "Typing rule." section uses "s" without definition as
I q1...qr t1...ts.
It seems that it is the number of arguments.
So, I changed "p" to "s".
"s" is also confusing with sorts, though.
|
|
In Cic admissible rules section, c and c' are exchanged at
https://github.com/coq/coq/commit/8654b03544f0efe4b418a0afdc871ff84784ff83 .
But the exchange is not complete.
This commit complete it.
|
