| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is the new pipeline, and the old pipeline. Most of what they
share in common is the (very large) library of lemmas about `Z`.
As per the discussion in
https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8064#issuecomment-413474176 through
https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8064#issuecomment-413793143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And fixing a problem with nested proofs.
|
|
|
|
2) Changing the diff setting from the menu should reprint the proof.
3) Generate a warning message if the user enters a "Set Diffs xx" command.
4) Tweak display names for diffs in View menu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As was previously done for the CI, this means that there are no more
principal / secondary code owners. All the member of the team can
choose to review and self-assign any documentation PR that is not
their own.
|
|
382ee49
but stm/workerLoop.mli was not removed as it should have been. Hasta la vista.
|
|
I have never seen this build fail without the 64-bit Windows build
failing as well. So it is just a waste of time to test it on every
pull request and we are short in Windows test machines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extensions and interpretation scopes' of the Reference Manual.
|
|
interpretation scopes' of the Reference Manual.
|
|
|
|
|