| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
|
|
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See CEP#44 for futher details.
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Closes #12177.
|
|
This makes it show the shape of the induction hypothesis in the second
goal instead of just saying "subgoal 2 is S n <= S n".
|
|
highlighting from #12169
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
The parsing rules defining classes of lexemes in language
configuration expect a Coq document and are not relevant in the
message and proof window. Thus backtracking on this part of #12169.
Keeping the highlighting style though.
|
|
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
|
|
Ack-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: gares
|
|
accelerate it
Reviewed-by: herbelin
|
|
NoDup_Permutation_bis
Reviewed-by: herbelin
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: jfehrle
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
line -sprop-cumulative
Reviewed-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
Ack-by: Zimmi48
Ack-by: anton-trunov
Reviewed-by: herbelin
|
|
Reviewed-by: herbelin
|
|
|
|
Ack-by: Zimmi48
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: ppedrot
|
|
|
|
entries with a global rule
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Théo Zimmermann <theo.zimmi@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, it would be intuitive that `Require Import Ltac` is an
equivalent for Ltac of `Require Import Ltac2.Ltac2`.
Also declaring the classic proof mode.
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libraries chapter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beyond.
|
|
Ack-by: SkySkimmer
Reviewed-by: maximedenes
|
|
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
|