diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins')
45 files changed, 1354 insertions, 1054 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/btauto/refl_btauto.ml b/plugins/btauto/refl_btauto.ml index 2c5b108e55..a0b04ce3b5 100644 --- a/plugins/btauto/refl_btauto.ml +++ b/plugins/btauto/refl_btauto.ml @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ let get_inductive dir s = let glob_ref () = Coqlib.find_reference contrib_name ("Coq" :: dir) s in Lazy.from_fun (fun () -> Globnames.destIndRef (glob_ref ())) -let decomp_term (c : Term.constr) = - Term.kind_of_term (Termops.strip_outer_cast c) +let decomp_term sigma (c : Term.constr) = + Term.kind_of_term (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Termops.strip_outer_cast sigma (EConstr.of_constr c))) let lapp c v = Term.mkApp (Lazy.force c, v) @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ module Bool = struct | Negb of t | Ifb of t * t * t - let quote (env : Env.t) (c : Term.constr) : t = + let quote (env : Env.t) sigma (c : Term.constr) : t = let trueb = Lazy.force trueb in let falseb = Lazy.force falseb in let andb = Lazy.force andb in @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ module Bool = struct let xorb = Lazy.force xorb in let negb = Lazy.force negb in - let rec aux c = match decomp_term c with + let rec aux c = match decomp_term sigma c with | Term.App (head, args) -> if head === andb && Array.length args = 2 then Andb (aux args.(0), aux args.(1)) @@ -179,9 +179,11 @@ module Btauto = struct let print_counterexample p env gl = let var = lapp witness [|p|] in + let var = EConstr.of_constr var in (* Compute an assignment that dissatisfies the goal *) let _, var = Tacmach.pf_reduction_of_red_expr gl (Genredexpr.CbvVm None) var in - let rec to_list l = match decomp_term l with + let var = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr var in + let rec to_list l = match decomp_term (Tacmach.project gl) l with | Term.App (c, _) when c === (Lazy.force CoqList._nil) -> [] | Term.App (c, [|_; h; t|]) @@ -220,7 +222,8 @@ module Btauto = struct Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in let eq = Lazy.force eq in - let t = decomp_term concl in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in + let t = decomp_term (Tacmach.New.project gl) concl in match t with | Term.App (c, [|typ; p; _|]) when c === eq -> (* should be an equality [@eq poly ?p (Cst false)] *) @@ -234,22 +237,25 @@ module Btauto = struct let tac = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let eq = Lazy.force eq in let bool = Lazy.force Bool.typ in - let t = decomp_term concl in + let t = decomp_term sigma concl in match t with | Term.App (c, [|typ; tl; tr|]) when typ === bool && c === eq -> let env = Env.empty () in - let fl = Bool.quote env tl in - let fr = Bool.quote env tr in + let fl = Bool.quote env sigma tl in + let fr = Bool.quote env sigma tr in let env = Env.to_list env in let fl = reify env fl in let fr = reify env fr in let changed_gl = Term.mkApp (c, [|typ; fl; fr|]) in + let changed_gl = EConstr.of_constr changed_gl in Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ Tactics.change_concl changed_gl; - Tactics.apply (Lazy.force soundness); + Tactics.apply (EConstr.of_constr (Lazy.force soundness)); Tactics.normalise_vm_in_concl; try_unification env ] diff --git a/plugins/cc/ccalgo.ml b/plugins/cc/ccalgo.ml index 7347c3c2cd..aa71a45658 100644 --- a/plugins/cc/ccalgo.ml +++ b/plugins/cc/ccalgo.ml @@ -452,8 +452,9 @@ and applist_projection c l = applistc (mkProj (p, hd)) tl) | _ -> applistc c l -let rec canonize_name c = - let func = canonize_name in +let rec canonize_name sigma c = + let c = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c in + let func c = canonize_name sigma (EConstr.of_constr c) in match kind_of_term c with | Const (kn,u) -> let canon_const = constant_of_kn (canonical_con kn) in @@ -497,10 +498,10 @@ let rec inst_pattern subst = function args t let pr_idx_term uf i = str "[" ++ int i ++ str ":=" ++ - Termops.print_constr (constr_of_term (term uf i)) ++ str "]" + Termops.print_constr (EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_term (term uf i))) ++ str "]" let pr_term t = str "[" ++ - Termops.print_constr (constr_of_term t) ++ str "]" + Termops.print_constr (EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_term t)) ++ str "]" let rec add_term state t= let uf=state.uf in @@ -508,8 +509,8 @@ let rec add_term state t= Not_found -> let b=next uf in let trm = constr_of_term t in - let typ = pf_unsafe_type_of state.gls trm in - let typ = canonize_name typ in + let typ = pf_unsafe_type_of state.gls (EConstr.of_constr trm) in + let typ = canonize_name (project state.gls) typ in let new_node= match t with Symb _ | Product (_,_) -> @@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ let add_inst state (inst,int_subst) = begin debug (fun () -> (str "Adding new equality, depth="++ int state.rew_depth) ++ fnl () ++ - (str " [" ++ Termops.print_constr prf ++ str " : " ++ + (str " [" ++ Termops.print_constr (EConstr.of_constr prf) ++ str " : " ++ pr_term s ++ str " == " ++ pr_term t ++ str "]")); add_equality state prf s t end @@ -623,7 +624,7 @@ let add_inst state (inst,int_subst) = begin debug (fun () -> (str "Adding new disequality, depth="++ int state.rew_depth) ++ fnl () ++ - (str " [" ++ Termops.print_constr prf ++ str " : " ++ + (str " [" ++ Termops.print_constr (EConstr.of_constr prf) ++ str " : " ++ pr_term s ++ str " <> " ++ pr_term t ++ str "]")); add_disequality state (Hyp prf) s t end @@ -832,7 +833,8 @@ let complete_one_class state i= let id = new_state_var etyp state in app (Appli(t,Eps id)) (substl [mkVar id] rest) (n-1) in let _c = pf_unsafe_type_of state.gls - (constr_of_term (term state.uf pac.cnode)) in + (EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_term (term state.uf pac.cnode))) in + let _c = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr _c in let _args = List.map (fun i -> constr_of_term (term state.uf i)) pac.args in diff --git a/plugins/cc/cctac.ml b/plugins/cc/cctac.ml index b5ca2f50fc..c9c904e350 100644 --- a/plugins/cc/cctac.ml +++ b/plugins/cc/cctac.ml @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ open Names open Inductiveops open Declarations open Term +open EConstr open Vars open Tacmach open Tactics @@ -39,13 +40,11 @@ let _False = reference ["Init";"Logic"] "False" let _True = reference ["Init";"Logic"] "True" let _I = reference ["Init";"Logic"] "I" -let whd env= - let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.betaiotazeta env in - (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) +let whd env sigma t = + Reductionops.clos_whd_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta env sigma t -let whd_delta env= - let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.all env in - (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) +let whd_delta env sigma t = + Reductionops.clos_whd_flags CClosure.all env sigma t (* decompose member of equality in an applicative format *) @@ -53,12 +52,12 @@ let whd_delta env= let sf_of env sigma c = e_sort_of env (ref sigma) c let rec decompose_term env sigma t= - match kind_of_term (whd env t) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (whd env sigma t) with App (f,args)-> let tf=decompose_term env sigma f in let targs=Array.map (decompose_term env sigma) args in Array.fold_left (fun s t->Appli (s,t)) tf targs - | Prod (_,a,_b) when not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) _b) -> + | Prod (_,a,_b) when noccurn sigma 1 _b -> let b = Termops.pop _b in let sort_b = sf_of env sigma b in let sort_a = sf_of env sigma a in @@ -77,27 +76,27 @@ let rec decompose_term env sigma t= | Ind c -> let (mind,i_ind),u = c in let canon_mind = mind_of_kn (canonical_mind mind) in - let canon_ind = canon_mind,i_ind in (Symb (mkIndU (canon_ind,u))) + let canon_ind = canon_mind,i_ind in (Symb (Constr.mkIndU (canon_ind,u))) | Const (c,u) -> let canon_const = constant_of_kn (canonical_con c) in - (Symb (mkConstU (canon_const,u))) + (Symb (Constr.mkConstU (canon_const,u))) | Proj (p, c) -> let canon_const kn = constant_of_kn (canonical_con kn) in let p' = Projection.map canon_const p in - (Appli (Symb (mkConst (Projection.constant p')), decompose_term env sigma c)) + (Appli (Symb (Constr.mkConst (Projection.constant p')), decompose_term env sigma c)) | _ -> - let t = Termops.strip_outer_cast t in - if closed0 t then Symb t else raise Not_found + let t = Termops.strip_outer_cast sigma t in + if closed0 sigma t then Symb (EConstr.to_constr sigma t) else raise Not_found (* decompose equality in members and type *) -open Globnames +open Termops let atom_of_constr env sigma term = - let wh = (whd_delta env term) in - let kot = kind_of_term wh in + let wh = whd_delta env sigma term in + let kot = EConstr.kind sigma wh in match kot with App (f,args)-> - if is_global (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 + if is_global sigma (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 then `Eq (args.(0), decompose_term env sigma args.(1), decompose_term env sigma args.(2)) @@ -105,14 +104,14 @@ let atom_of_constr env sigma term = | _ -> `Other (decompose_term env sigma term) let rec pattern_of_constr env sigma c = - match kind_of_term (whd env c) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (whd env sigma c) with App (f,args)-> let pf = decompose_term env sigma f in let pargs,lrels = List.split (Array.map_to_list (pattern_of_constr env sigma) args) in PApp (pf,List.rev pargs), List.fold_left Int.Set.union Int.Set.empty lrels - | Prod (_,a,_b) when not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) _b) -> + | Prod (_,a,_b) when noccurn sigma 1 _b -> let b = Termops.pop _b in let pa,sa = pattern_of_constr env sigma a in let pb,sb = pattern_of_constr env sigma b in @@ -131,19 +130,19 @@ let non_trivial = function let patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels term= let f,args= - try destApp (whd_delta env term) with DestKO -> raise Not_found in - if is_global (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 + try destApp sigma (whd_delta env sigma term) with DestKO -> raise Not_found in + if is_global sigma (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 then let patt1,rels1 = pattern_of_constr env sigma args.(1) and patt2,rels2 = pattern_of_constr env sigma args.(2) in let valid1 = if not (Int.equal (Int.Set.cardinal rels1) nrels) then Creates_variables else if non_trivial patt1 then Normal - else Trivial args.(0) + else Trivial (EConstr.to_constr sigma args.(0)) and valid2 = if not (Int.equal (Int.Set.cardinal rels2) nrels) then Creates_variables else if non_trivial patt2 then Normal - else Trivial args.(0) in + else Trivial (EConstr.to_constr sigma args.(0)) in if valid1 != Creates_variables || valid2 != Creates_variables then nrels,valid1,patt1,valid2,patt2 @@ -151,28 +150,28 @@ let patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels term= else raise Not_found let rec quantified_atom_of_constr env sigma nrels term = - match kind_of_term (whd_delta env term) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (whd_delta env sigma term) with Prod (id,atom,ff) -> - if is_global (Lazy.force _False) ff then + if is_global sigma (Lazy.force _False) ff then let patts=patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels atom in `Nrule patts else - quantified_atom_of_constr (Environ.push_rel (RelDecl.LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma (succ nrels) ff + quantified_atom_of_constr (EConstr.push_rel (RelDecl.LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma (succ nrels) ff | _ -> let patts=patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels term in `Rule patts let litteral_of_constr env sigma term= - match kind_of_term (whd_delta env term) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (whd_delta env sigma term) with | Prod (id,atom,ff) -> - if is_global (Lazy.force _False) ff then + if is_global sigma (Lazy.force _False) ff then match (atom_of_constr env sigma atom) with `Eq(t,a,b) -> `Neq(t,a,b) | `Other(p) -> `Nother(p) else begin try - quantified_atom_of_constr (Environ.push_rel (RelDecl.LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma 1 ff + quantified_atom_of_constr (EConstr.push_rel (RelDecl.LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma 1 ff with Not_found -> `Other (decompose_term env sigma term) end @@ -183,9 +182,10 @@ let litteral_of_constr env sigma term= (* store all equalities from the context *) let make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms = + let open Tacmach.New in let env=pf_env gls in - let sigma=sig_sig gls in - let state = empty depth gls in + let sigma=project gls in + let state = empty depth {it = Proofview.Goal.goal (Proofview.Goal.assume gls); sigma } in let pos_hyps = ref [] in let neg_hyps =ref [] in List.iter @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ let make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms = (fun decl -> let id = NamedDecl.get_id decl in begin - let cid=mkVar id in + let cid=Constr.mkVar id in match litteral_of_constr env sigma (NamedDecl.get_type decl) with `Eq (t,a,b) -> add_equality state cid a b | `Neq (t,a,b) -> add_disequality state (Hyp cid) a b @@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ let make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms = neg_hyps:=(cid,nh):: !neg_hyps | `Rule patts -> add_quant state id true patts | `Nrule patts -> add_quant state id false patts - end) (Environ.named_context_of_val (Goal.V82.nf_hyps gls.sigma gls.it)); + end) (Proofview.Goal.hyps gls); begin - match atom_of_constr env sigma (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma (pf_concl gls)) with + match atom_of_constr env sigma (pf_concl gls) with `Eq (t,a,b) -> add_disequality state Goal a b | `Other g -> List.iter @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ let make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms = (* indhyps builds the array of arrays of constructor hyps for (ind largs) *) let build_projection intype (cstr:pconstructor) special default gls= + let open Tacmach.New in let ci= (snd(fst cstr)) in let body=Equality.build_selector (pf_env gls) (project gls) ci (mkRel 1) intype special default in let id=pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "t") gls in @@ -244,6 +245,7 @@ let new_app_global f args k = Tacticals.New.pf_constr_of_global (Lazy.force f) (fun fc -> k (mkApp (fc, args))) let new_refine c = Proofview.V82.tactic (refine c) +let refine c = refine c let assert_before n c = Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> @@ -256,20 +258,23 @@ let refresh_type env evm ty = (Some false) env evm ty let refresh_universes ty k = - Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.s_enter { s_enter = begin fun gl -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let evm = Tacmach.New.project gl in let evm, ty = refresh_type env evm ty in - Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (Refiner.tclEVARS evm)) (k ty) + Sigma.Unsafe.of_pair (k ty, evm) end } +let constr_of_term c = EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_term c) + let rec proof_tac p : unit Proofview.tactic = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let type_of t = Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl t in try (* type_of can raise exceptions *) match p.p_rule with - Ax c -> exact_check c + Ax c -> exact_check (EConstr.of_constr c) | SymAx c -> + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in let l=constr_of_term p.p_lhs and r=constr_of_term p.p_rhs in refresh_universes (type_of l) (fun typ -> @@ -293,7 +298,7 @@ let rec proof_tac p : unit Proofview.tactic = refresh_universes (type_of tf1) (fun typf -> refresh_universes (type_of tx1) (fun typx -> refresh_universes (type_of (mkApp (tf1,[|tx1|]))) (fun typfx -> - let id = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun gls -> pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "f") gls) gl in + let id = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "f") gl in let appx1 = mkLambda(Name id,typf,mkApp(mkRel 1,[|tx1|])) in let lemma1 = app_global _f_equal [|typf;typfx;appx1;tf1;tf2;_M 1|] in let lemma2 = app_global _f_equal [|typx;typfx;tf2;tx1;tx2;_M 1|] in @@ -319,7 +324,7 @@ let rec proof_tac p : unit Proofview.tactic = refresh_universes (type_of ti) (fun intype -> refresh_universes (type_of default) (fun outtype -> let proj = - Tacmach.New.of_old (build_projection intype cstr special default) gl + build_projection intype cstr special default gl in let injt= app_global _f_equal [|intype;outtype;proj;ti;tj;_M 1|] in @@ -328,9 +333,9 @@ let rec proof_tac p : unit Proofview.tactic = end } let refute_tac c t1 t2 p = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt1=constr_of_term t1 and tt2=constr_of_term t2 in - let hid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq")) gl in + let hid = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq") gl in let false_t=mkApp (c,[|mkVar hid|]) in let k intype = let neweq= new_app_global _eq [|intype;tt1;tt2|] in @@ -344,12 +349,12 @@ let refine_exact_check c gl = Tacticals.tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evm) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check c)) gl let convert_to_goal_tac c t1 t2 p = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt1=constr_of_term t1 and tt2=constr_of_term t2 in let k sort = let neweq= new_app_global _eq [|sort;tt1;tt2|] in - let e = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "e")) gl in - let x = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X")) gl in + let e = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "e") gl in + let x = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X") gl in let identity=mkLambda (Name x,sort,mkRel 1) in let endt=app_global _eq_rect [|sort;tt1;identity;c;tt2;mkVar e|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (neweq (assert_before (Name e))) @@ -358,9 +363,9 @@ let convert_to_goal_tac c t1 t2 p = end } let convert_to_hyp_tac c1 t1 c2 t2 p = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt2=constr_of_term t2 in - let h = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "H")) gl in + let h = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "H") gl in let false_t=mkApp (c2,[|mkVar h|]) in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (assert_before (Name h) tt2) [convert_to_goal_tac c1 t1 t2 p; @@ -368,20 +373,22 @@ let convert_to_hyp_tac c1 t1 c2 t2 p = end } let discriminate_tac (cstr,u as cstru) p = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let t1=constr_of_term p.p_lhs and t2=constr_of_term p.p_rhs in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in - let xid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X")) gl in + let xid = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X") gl in let identity = Universes.constr_of_global (Lazy.force _I) in + let identity = EConstr.of_constr identity in let trivial = Universes.constr_of_global (Lazy.force _True) in + let trivial = EConstr.of_constr trivial in let evm = Tacmach.New.project gl in let evm, intype = refresh_type env evm (Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl t1) in let evm, outtype = Evd.new_sort_variable Evd.univ_flexible evm in let outtype = mkSort outtype in let pred = mkLambda(Name xid,outtype,mkRel 1) in - let hid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq")) gl in - let proj = Tacmach.New.of_old (build_projection intype cstru trivial concl) gl in + let hid = Tacmach.New.pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq") gl in + let proj = build_projection intype cstru trivial concl gl in let injt=app_global _f_equal [|intype;outtype;proj;t1;t2;mkVar hid|] in let endt k = @@ -401,13 +408,14 @@ let build_term_to_complete uf meta pac = let real_args = List.map (fun i -> constr_of_term (term uf i)) pac.args in let dummy_args = List.rev (List.init pac.arity meta) in let all_args = List.rev_append real_args dummy_args in - applistc (mkConstructU cinfo.ci_constr) all_args + applist (mkConstructU cinfo.ci_constr, all_args) let cc_tactic depth additionnal_terms = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in Coqlib.check_required_library Coqlib.logic_module_name; let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Reading subgoal ...") in - let state = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun gls -> make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms) gl in + let state = make_prb gl depth additionnal_terms in let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Problem built, solving ...") in let sol = execute true state in let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Computation completed.") in @@ -439,7 +447,7 @@ let cc_tactic depth additionnal_terms = str "\"congruence with (" ++ prlist_with_sep (fun () -> str ")" ++ spc () ++ str "(") - (Termops.print_constr_env env) + (Termops.print_constr_env env sigma) terms_to_complete ++ str ")\"," end ++ @@ -450,10 +458,13 @@ let cc_tactic depth additionnal_terms = let ta=term uf dis.lhs and tb=term uf dis.rhs in match dis.rule with Goal -> proof_tac p - | Hyp id -> refute_tac id ta tb p + | Hyp id -> refute_tac (EConstr.of_constr id) ta tb p | HeqG id -> + let id = EConstr.of_constr id in convert_to_goal_tac id ta tb p | HeqnH (ida,idb) -> + let ida = EConstr.of_constr ida in + let idb = EConstr.of_constr idb in convert_to_hyp_tac ida ta idb tb p end } @@ -489,8 +500,9 @@ let mk_eq f c1 c2 k = end }) let f_equal = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let cut_eq c1 c2 = try (* type_of can raise an exception *) Tacticals.New.tclTHENS @@ -499,9 +511,9 @@ let f_equal = with e when Proofview.V82.catchable_exception e -> Proofview.tclZERO e in Proofview.tclORELSE - begin match kind_of_term concl with - | App (r,[|_;t;t'|]) when Globnames.is_global (Lazy.force _eq) r -> - begin match kind_of_term t, kind_of_term t' with + begin match EConstr.kind sigma concl with + | App (r,[|_;t;t'|]) when is_global sigma (Lazy.force _eq) r -> + begin match EConstr.kind sigma t, EConstr.kind sigma t' with | App (f,v), App (f',v') when Int.equal (Array.length v) (Array.length v') -> let rec cuts i = if i < 0 then Tacticals.New.tclTRY (congruence_tac 1000 []) @@ -512,7 +524,7 @@ let f_equal = | _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () end begin function (e, info) -> match e with - | Type_errors.TypeError _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () + | Pretype_errors.PretypeError _ | Type_errors.TypeError _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () | e -> Proofview.tclZERO ~info e end end } diff --git a/plugins/cc/cctac.mli b/plugins/cc/cctac.mli index 7c1d9f1c07..de6eb982ee 100644 --- a/plugins/cc/cctac.mli +++ b/plugins/cc/cctac.mli @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ (* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) (************************************************************************) -open Term +open EConstr open Proof_type val proof_tac: Ccproof.proof -> unit Proofview.tactic diff --git a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_interp.ml b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_interp.ml index f68c01b18b..828d634d0c 100644 --- a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_interp.ml +++ b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_interp.ml @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ let get_eq_typ info env = typ let interp_constr_in_type typ env sigma c = - fst (understand env sigma (fst c) ~expected_type:(OfType typ))(*FIXME*) + fst (understand env sigma (fst c) ~expected_type:(OfType (EConstr.of_constr typ)))(*FIXME*) let interp_statement interp_it env sigma st = {st_label=st.st_label; @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ let rec match_aliases names constr = function let args,bnames,body = match_aliases qnames body q in st::args,bnames,body -let detype_ground env c = Detyping.detype false [] env Evd.empty c +let detype_ground env c = Detyping.detype false [] env Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr c) let interp_cases info env sigma params (pat:cases_pattern_expr) hyps = let et,pinfo = @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ let interp_cases info env sigma params (pat:cases_pattern_expr) hyps = match st'.st_it with Thesis nam -> {st_it=Thesis nam;st_label=st'.st_label} | This _ -> {st_it = This st.st_it;st_label=st.st_label} in - let thyps = fst (match_hyps blend nam2 (Termops.pop rest1) hyps) in + let thyps = fst (match_hyps blend nam2 (Vars.lift (-1) rest1) hyps) in tparams,{pat_vars=tpatvars; pat_aliases=taliases; pat_constr=pat_pat; diff --git a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml index e19dc86c45..4fe59d755e 100644 --- a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml +++ b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ let tcl_erase_info gls = let special_whd gl= let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.all (pf_env gl) in - (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) + (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t))) let special_nf gl= let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.betaiotazeta (pf_env gl) in @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ let clean_tmp gls = clean_all (tmp_ids gls) gls let assert_postpone id t = - assert_before (Name id) t + assert_before (Name id) (EConstr.of_constr t) (* start a proof *) @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ let add_justification_hyps keep items gls = | _ -> let id=pf_get_new_id local_hyp_prefix gls in keep:=Id.Set.add id !keep; + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (letin_tac None (Names.Name id) c None Locusops.nowhere)) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear_body [id])) gls in tclMAP add_aux items gls @@ -341,7 +342,7 @@ let rec replace_in_list m l = function | c::q -> if Int.equal m (fst c) then l@q else c::replace_in_list m l q let enstack_subsubgoals env se stack gls= - let hd,params = decompose_app (special_whd gls se.se_type) in + let hd,params = decompose_app (special_whd gls (EConstr.of_constr se.se_type)) in match kind_of_term hd with Ind (ind,u as indu) when is_good_inductive env ind -> (* MS: FIXME *) let mib,oib= @@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ let enstack_subsubgoals env se stack gls= let constructor = mkConstructU ((ind,succ i),u) (* constructors numbering*) in let appterm = applist (constructor,params) in - let apptype = prod_applist gentyp params in + let apptype = Term.prod_applist gentyp params in let rc,_ = Reduction.dest_prod env apptype in let rec meta_aux last lenv = function [] -> (last,lenv,[]) @@ -381,6 +382,9 @@ let enstack_subsubgoals env se stack gls= Array.iteri process gentypes | _ -> () +let nf_meta sigma c = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Reductionops.nf_meta sigma (EConstr.of_constr c)) + let rec nf_list evd = function [] -> [] @@ -388,11 +392,12 @@ let rec nf_list evd = if meta_defined evd m then nf_list evd others else - (m,Reductionops.nf_meta evd typ)::nf_list evd others + (m,nf_meta evd typ)::nf_list evd others let find_subsubgoal c ctyp skip submetas gls = let env= pf_env gls in let concl = pf_concl gls in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in let evd = mk_evd ((0,concl)::submetas) gls in let stack = Stack.create () in let max_meta = @@ -408,7 +413,7 @@ let find_subsubgoal c ctyp skip submetas gls = try let unifier = Unification.w_unify env se.se_evd Reduction.CUMUL - ~flags:(Unification.elim_flags ()) ctyp se.se_type in + ~flags:(Unification.elim_flags ()) ctyp (EConstr.of_constr se.se_type) in if n <= 0 then {se with se_evd=meta_assign se.se_meta @@ -423,21 +428,22 @@ let find_subsubgoal c ctyp skip submetas gls = dfs n end in let nse= try dfs skip with Stack.Empty -> raise Not_found in - nf_list nse.se_evd nse.se_meta_list,Reductionops.nf_meta nse.se_evd (mkMeta 0) + nf_list nse.se_evd nse.se_meta_list,nf_meta nse.se_evd (mkMeta 0) let concl_refiner metas body gls = let concl = pf_concl gls in let evd = sig_sig gls in let env = pf_env gls in let sort = family_of_sort (Typing.e_sort_of env (ref evd) concl) in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in let rec aux env avoid subst = function [] -> anomaly ~label:"concl_refiner" (Pp.str "cannot happen") | (n,typ)::rest -> let _A = subst_meta subst typ in - let x = id_of_name_using_hdchar env _A Anonymous in + let x = id_of_name_using_hdchar env evd (EConstr.of_constr _A) Anonymous in let _x = fresh_id avoid x gls in let nenv = Environ.push_named (LocalAssum (_x,_A)) env in - let asort = family_of_sort (Typing.e_sort_of nenv (ref evd) _A) in + let asort = family_of_sort (Typing.e_sort_of nenv (ref evd) (EConstr.of_constr _A)) in let nsubst = (n,mkVar _x)::subst in if List.is_empty rest then asort,_A,mkNamedLambda _x _A (subst_meta nsubst body) @@ -445,7 +451,7 @@ let concl_refiner metas body gls = let bsort,_B,nbody = aux nenv (_x::avoid) ((n,mkVar _x)::subst) rest in let body = mkNamedLambda _x _A nbody in - if occur_term (mkVar _x) _B then + if local_occur_var evd _x (EConstr.of_constr _B) then begin let _P = mkNamedLambda _x _A _B in match bsort,sort with @@ -488,10 +494,11 @@ let thus_tac c ctyp submetas gls = with Not_found -> error "I could not relate this statement to the thesis." in if List.is_empty list then + let proof = EConstr.of_constr proof in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check proof) gls else let refiner = concl_refiner list proof gls in - Tacmach.refine refiner gls + Tacmach.refine (EConstr.of_constr refiner) gls (* general forward step *) @@ -499,7 +506,7 @@ let mk_stat_or_thesis info gls = function This c -> c | Thesis (For _ ) -> error "\"thesis for ...\" is not applicable here." - | Thesis Plain -> pf_concl gls + | Thesis Plain -> EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pf_concl gls) let just_tac _then cut info gls0 = let last_item = @@ -531,7 +538,7 @@ let instr_cut mkstat _thus _then cut gls0 = let c_stat = mkstat info gls0 stat.st_it in let thus_tac gls= if _thus then - thus_tac (mkVar c_id) c_stat [] gls + thus_tac (mkVar c_id) (EConstr.of_constr c_stat) [] gls else tclIDTAC gls in tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_postpone c_id c_stat)) [tclTHEN tcl_erase_info (just_tac _then cut info); @@ -546,7 +553,7 @@ let decompose_eq id gls = let whd = (special_whd gls typ) in match kind_of_term whd with App (f,args)-> - if eq_constr f (Lazy.force _eq) && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 + if Term.eq_constr f (Lazy.force _eq) && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 then (args.(0), args.(1), args.(2)) @@ -577,22 +584,22 @@ let instr_rew _thus rew_side cut gls0 = | Name id -> id,true in let thus_tac new_eq gls= if _thus then - thus_tac (mkVar c_id) new_eq [] gls + thus_tac (mkVar c_id) (EConstr.of_constr new_eq) [] gls else tclIDTAC gls in match rew_side with Lhs -> let new_eq = mkApp(Lazy.force _eq,[|typ;cut.cut_stat.st_it;rhs|]) in tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_postpone c_id new_eq)) [tclTHEN tcl_erase_info - (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (transitivity lhs)) - [just_tac;Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check (mkVar last_id))]); + (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (transitivity (EConstr.of_constr lhs))) + [just_tac;Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check (EConstr.mkVar last_id))]); thus_tac new_eq] gls0 | Rhs -> let new_eq = mkApp(Lazy.force _eq,[|typ;lhs;cut.cut_stat.st_it|]) in tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_postpone c_id new_eq)) [tclTHEN tcl_erase_info - (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (transitivity rhs)) - [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check (mkVar last_id));just_tac]); + (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (transitivity (EConstr.of_constr rhs))) + [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check (EConstr.mkVar last_id));just_tac]); thus_tac new_eq] gls0 @@ -605,7 +612,7 @@ let instr_claim _thus st gls0 = | Name id -> id,true in let thus_tac gls= if _thus then - thus_tac (mkVar id) st.st_it [] gls + thus_tac (mkVar id) (EConstr.of_constr st.st_it) [] gls else tclIDTAC gls in let ninfo1 = {pm_stack= (if _thus then Focus_claim else Claim)::info.pm_stack} in @@ -631,7 +638,7 @@ let assume_tac hyps gls = tclTHEN (push_intro_tac (fun id -> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,st.st_it)))) st.st_label)) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,EConstr.of_constr st.st_it)))) st.st_label)) hyps tclIDTAC gls let assume_hyps_or_theses hyps gls = @@ -641,7 +648,7 @@ let assume_hyps_or_theses hyps gls = tclTHEN (push_intro_tac (fun id -> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,c)))) nam) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,EConstr.of_constr c)))) nam) | Hprop {st_label=nam;st_it=Thesis (tk)} -> tclTHEN (push_intro_tac @@ -653,7 +660,7 @@ let assume_st hyps gls = (fun st -> tclTHEN (push_intro_tac - (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,st.st_it)))) st.st_label)) + (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,EConstr.of_constr st.st_it)))) st.st_label)) hyps tclIDTAC gls let assume_st_letin hyps gls = @@ -662,7 +669,7 @@ let assume_st_letin hyps gls = tclTHEN (push_intro_tac (fun id -> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalDef (id, fst st.st_it, snd st.st_it)))) st.st_label)) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalDef (id, EConstr.of_constr (fst st.st_it), EConstr.of_constr (snd st.st_it))))) st.st_label)) hyps tclIDTAC gls (* suffices *) @@ -672,14 +679,14 @@ let rec metas_from n hyps = _ :: q -> n :: metas_from (succ n) q | [] -> [] -let rec build_product args body = +let rec build_product sigma args body = match args with (Hprop st| Hvar st )::rest -> - let pprod= lift 1 (build_product rest body) in + let pprod= lift 1 (build_product sigma rest body) in let lbody = match st.st_label with Anonymous -> pprod - | Name id -> subst_term (mkVar id) pprod in + | Name id -> subst_var id pprod in mkProd (st.st_label, st.st_it, lbody) | [] -> body @@ -687,19 +694,19 @@ let rec build_applist prod = function [] -> [],prod | n::q -> let (_,typ,_) = destProd prod in - let ctx,head = build_applist (prod_applist prod [mkMeta n]) q in + let ctx,head = build_applist (Term.prod_applist prod [mkMeta n]) q in (n,typ)::ctx,head let instr_suffices _then cut gls0 = let info = get_its_info gls0 in let c_id = pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "_cofact") gls0 in let ctx,hd = cut.cut_stat in - let c_stat = build_product ctx (mk_stat_or_thesis info gls0 hd) in + let c_stat = build_product (project gls0) ctx (mk_stat_or_thesis info gls0 hd) in let metas = metas_from 1 ctx in let c_ctx,c_head = build_applist c_stat metas in let c_term = applist (mkVar c_id,List.map mkMeta metas) in let thus_tac gls= - thus_tac c_term c_head c_ctx gls in + thus_tac c_term (EConstr.of_constr c_head) c_ctx gls in tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_postpone c_id c_stat)) [tclTHENLIST [ assume_tac ctx; @@ -720,7 +727,7 @@ let conjunction_arity id gls = let gentypes= Inductive.arities_of_constructors indu (mib,oib) in let _ = if not (Int.equal (Array.length gentypes) 1) then raise Not_found in - let apptype = prod_applist gentypes.(0) params in + let apptype = Term.prod_applist gentypes.(0) params in let rc,_ = Reduction.dest_prod env apptype in List.length rc | _ -> raise Not_found @@ -756,7 +763,7 @@ let rec consider_match may_intro introduced available expected gls = error "Not enough sub-hypotheses to match statements." (* should tell which ones *) | id::rest_ids,(Hvar st | Hprop st)::rest -> - tclIFTHENELSE (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,st.st_it)))) + tclIFTHENELSE (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_hyp (LocalAssum (id,EConstr.of_constr st.st_it)))) begin match st.st_label with Anonymous -> @@ -772,7 +779,7 @@ let rec consider_match may_intro introduced available expected gls = try conjunction_arity id gls with Not_found -> error "Matching hypothesis not found." in tclTHENLIST - [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar id)); + [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (EConstr.mkVar id)); intron_then nhyps [] (fun l -> consider_match may_intro introduced (List.rev_append l rest_ids) expected)] gls) @@ -780,7 +787,8 @@ let rec consider_match may_intro introduced available expected gls = gls let consider_tac c hyps gls = - match kind_of_term (strip_outer_cast c) with + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in + match EConstr.kind (project gls) (strip_outer_cast (project gls) c) with Var id -> consider_match false [] [id] hyps gls | _ -> @@ -799,29 +807,34 @@ let rec take_tac wits gls = match wits with [] -> tclIDTAC gls | wit::rest -> - let typ = pf_unsafe_type_of gls wit in + let typ = pf_unsafe_type_of gls (EConstr.of_constr wit) in tclTHEN (thus_tac wit typ []) (take_tac rest) gls (* tactics for define *) -let rec build_function args body = +let subst_term sigma c t = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (subst_term sigma c t) + +let rec build_function sigma args body = match args with st::rest -> - let pfun= lift 1 (build_function rest body) in + let pfun= lift 1 (build_function sigma rest body) in let id = match st.st_label with Anonymous -> assert false | Name id -> id in - mkLambda (Name id, st.st_it, subst_term (mkVar id) pfun) + mkLambda (Name id, st.st_it, subst_term sigma (EConstr.mkVar id) (EConstr.of_constr pfun)) | [] -> body let define_tac id args body gls = - let t = build_function args body in + let t = build_function (project gls) args body in + let t = EConstr.of_constr t in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (letin_tac None (Name id) t None Locusops.nowhere) gls (* tactics for reconsider *) let cast_tac id_or_thesis typ gls = + let typ = EConstr.of_constr typ in match id_or_thesis with | This id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (id |> pf_get_hyp gls |> NamedDecl.set_id id |> NamedDecl.set_type typ |> convert_hyp) gls @@ -879,8 +892,8 @@ let start_tree env ind rp = let build_per_info etype casee gls = let concl=pf_concl gls in let env=pf_env gls in - let ctyp=pf_unsafe_type_of gls casee in - let is_dep = dependent casee concl in + let ctyp=pf_unsafe_type_of gls (EConstr.of_constr casee) in + let is_dep = dependent (project gls) (EConstr.of_constr casee) concl in let hd,args = decompose_app (special_whd gls ctyp) in let (ind,u) = try @@ -894,10 +907,12 @@ let build_per_info etype casee gls = | _ -> mind.mind_nparams,None in let params,real_args = List.chop nparams args in let abstract_obj c body = - let typ=pf_unsafe_type_of gls c in - lambda_create env (typ,subst_term c body) in + let typ=pf_unsafe_type_of gls (EConstr.of_constr c) in + lambda_create env (project gls) (typ,Termops.subst_term (project gls) (EConstr.of_constr c) body) in let pred= List.fold_right abstract_obj - real_args (lambda_create env (ctyp,subst_term casee concl)) in + real_args (lambda_create env (project gls) (ctyp,Termops.subst_term (project gls) (EConstr.of_constr casee) concl)) in + let ctyp = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr ctyp in + let pred = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr pred in is_dep, {per_casee=casee; per_ctype=ctyp; @@ -952,8 +967,9 @@ let register_nodep_subcase id= function let suppose_tac hyps gls0 = let info = get_its_info gls0 in let thesis = pf_concl gls0 in + let thesis = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr thesis in let id = pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "subcase_") gls0 in - let clause = build_product hyps thesis in + let clause = build_product (project gls0) hyps thesis in let ninfo1 = {pm_stack=Suppose_case::info.pm_stack} in let old_clauses,stack = register_nodep_subcase id info.pm_stack in let ninfo2 = {pm_stack=stack} in @@ -1087,12 +1103,12 @@ let thesis_for obj typ per_info env= ((Printer.pr_constr_env env Evd.empty obj) ++ spc () ++ str"cannot give an induction hypothesis (wrong inductive type).") in let params,args = List.chop per_info.per_nparams all_args in - let _ = if not (List.for_all2 eq_constr params per_info.per_params) then + let _ = if not (List.for_all2 Term.eq_constr params per_info.per_params) then user_err ~hdr:"thesis_for" ((Printer.pr_constr_env env Evd.empty obj) ++ spc () ++ str "cannot give an induction hypothesis (wrong parameters).") in let hd2 = (applist ((lift (List.length rc) per_info.per_pred),args@[obj])) in - compose_prod rc (Reductionops.whd_beta Evd.empty hd2) + compose_prod rc (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Reductionops.whd_beta Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr hd2))) let rec build_product_dep pat_info per_info args body gls = match args with @@ -1121,7 +1137,7 @@ let rec build_product_dep pat_info per_info args body gls = with Not_found -> snd (st_assoc (Name id) pat_info.pat_aliases) in thesis_for obj typ per_info (pf_env gls) - | Plain -> pf_concl gls in + | Plain -> EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pf_concl gls) in mkProd (st.st_label,ptyp,lbody) | [] -> body @@ -1214,15 +1230,16 @@ let pop_stacks stacks = let hrec_for fix_id per_info gls obj_id = let obj=mkVar obj_id in let typ=pf_get_hyp_typ gls obj_id in + let typ = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr typ in let rc,hd1=decompose_prod typ in let cind,all_args=decompose_app typ in let ind,u = destInd cind in assert (eq_ind ind per_info.per_ind); let params,args= List.chop per_info.per_nparams all_args in assert begin - try List.for_all2 eq_constr params per_info.per_params with + try List.for_all2 Term.eq_constr params per_info.per_params with Invalid_argument _ -> false end; let hd2 = applist (mkVar fix_id,args@[obj]) in - compose_lam rc (Reductionops.whd_beta gls.sigma hd2) + EConstr.of_constr (compose_lam rc (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Reductionops.whd_beta gls.sigma (EConstr.of_constr hd2)))) let warn_missing_case = CWarnings.create ~name:"declmode-missing-case" ~category:"declmode" @@ -1256,21 +1273,23 @@ let rec execute_cases fix_name per_info tacnext args objs nhrec tree gls = let nparams = mind.mind_nparams in let concl=pf_concl gls in let env=pf_env gls in - let ctyp=pf_unsafe_type_of gls casee in + let ctyp=pf_unsafe_type_of gls (EConstr.of_constr casee) in let hd,all_args = decompose_app (special_whd gls ctyp) in let ind', u = destInd hd in let _ = assert (eq_ind ind' ind) in (* just in case *) let params,real_args = List.chop nparams all_args in let abstract_obj c body = - let typ=pf_unsafe_type_of gls c in - lambda_create env (typ,subst_term c body) in + let typ=pf_unsafe_type_of gls (EConstr.of_constr c) in + lambda_create env (project gls) (typ,Termops.subst_term (project gls) (EConstr.of_constr c) body) in let elim_pred = List.fold_right abstract_obj - real_args (lambda_create env (ctyp,subst_term casee concl)) in + real_args (lambda_create env (project gls) (ctyp,Termops.subst_term (project gls) (EConstr.of_constr casee) concl)) in + let elim_pred = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr elim_pred in let case_info = Inductiveops.make_case_info env ind RegularStyle in let gen_arities = Inductive.arities_of_constructors (ind,u) spec in let f_ids typ = let sign = - (prod_assum (prod_applist typ params)) in + (prod_assum (Term.prod_applist typ params)) in + let sign = List.map (fun d -> Termops.map_rel_decl EConstr.of_constr d) sign in find_intro_names sign gls in let constr_args_ids = Array.map f_ids gen_arities in let case_term = @@ -1314,7 +1333,7 @@ let rec execute_cases fix_name per_info tacnext args objs nhrec tree gls = execute_cases fix_name per_info tacnext p_args objs nhrec tree] gls0 in tclTHENSV - (refine case_term) + (refine (EConstr.of_constr case_term)) (Array.mapi branch_tac br) gls | Split_patt (_, _, _) , [] -> anomaly ~label:"execute_cases " (Pp.str "Nothing to split") @@ -1325,6 +1344,7 @@ let rec execute_cases fix_name per_info tacnext args objs nhrec tree gls = let understand_my_constr env sigma c concl = let env = env in + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in let rawc = Detyping.detype false [] env Evd.empty c in let rec frob = function | GEvar _ -> GHole (Loc.ghost,Evar_kinds.QuestionMark Evar_kinds.Expand,Misctypes.IntroAnonymous,None) @@ -1366,14 +1386,14 @@ let end_tac et2 gls = begin match et,ek with _,EK_unknown -> - tclSOLVE [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_elim pi.per_casee)] + tclSOLVE [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_elim (EConstr.of_constr pi.per_casee))] | ET_Case_analysis,EK_nodep -> tclTHEN - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case pi.per_casee)) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (EConstr.of_constr pi.per_casee))) (default_justification (List.map mkVar clauses)) | ET_Induction,EK_nodep -> tclTHENLIST - [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee])); + [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map EConstr.of_constr (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee]))); Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simple_induct (AnonHyp (succ (List.length pi.per_args)))); default_justification (List.map mkVar clauses)] | ET_Case_analysis,EK_dep tree -> @@ -1385,7 +1405,7 @@ let end_tac et2 gls = (initial_instance_stack clauses) [pi.per_casee] 0 tree | ET_Induction,EK_dep tree -> let nargs = (List.length pi.per_args) in - tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee]))) + tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map EConstr.of_constr (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee])))) begin fun gls0 -> let fix_id = @@ -1487,6 +1507,7 @@ let rec postprocess pts instr = | Pend (B_elim ET_Induction) -> begin let pfterm = List.hd (Proof.partial_proof pts) in + let pfterm = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr pfterm in let { it = gls ; sigma = sigma } = Proof.V82.subgoals pts in let env = try Goal.V82.env sigma (List.hd gls) diff --git a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.mli b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.mli index 325969dadb..ba196ff01b 100644 --- a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.mli +++ b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.mli @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ val push_arg : Term.constr -> val hrec_for: Id.t -> Decl_mode.per_info -> Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> - Id.t -> Term.constr + Id.t -> EConstr.constr val consider_match : bool -> diff --git a/plugins/decl_mode/ppdecl_proof.ml b/plugins/decl_mode/ppdecl_proof.ml index 59a0bb5a2d..93b98263e6 100644 --- a/plugins/decl_mode/ppdecl_proof.ml +++ b/plugins/decl_mode/ppdecl_proof.ml @@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ let pr_glob_proof_instr pconstr1 pconstr2 ptac (instr : glob_proof_instr) = instr let pr_proof_instr pconstr1 pconstr2 ptac (instr : proof_instr) = + let pconstr1 c = pconstr1 (EConstr.of_constr c) in + let pconstr2 c = pconstr2 (EConstr.of_constr c) in pr_gen_proof_instr (fun st -> pr_statement pconstr1 st) pconstr2 diff --git a/plugins/derive/derive.ml b/plugins/derive/derive.ml index e39d17b52d..12d7f06603 100644 --- a/plugins/derive/derive.ml +++ b/plugins/derive/derive.ml @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ let start_deriving f suchthat lemma = (* spiwack: I don't know what the rigidity flag does, picked the one that looked the most general. *) let (sigma,f_type_sort) = Evd.new_sort_variable Evd.univ_flexible_alg sigma in - let f_type_type = Term.mkSort f_type_sort in + let f_type_type = EConstr.mkSort f_type_sort in (** create the initial goals for the proof: |- Type ; |- ?1 ; f:=?2 |- suchthat *) let goals = let open Proofview in TCons ( env , sigma , f_type_type , (fun sigma f_type -> TCons ( env , sigma , f_type , (fun sigma ef -> + let f_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr f_type in + let ef = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr ef in let env' = Environ.push_named (LocalDef (f, ef, f_type)) env in let evdref = ref sigma in let suchthat = Constrintern.interp_type_evars env' evdref suchthat in diff --git a/plugins/extraction/extraction.ml b/plugins/extraction/extraction.ml index 2b19c2805f..92ece7ccf9 100644 --- a/plugins/extraction/extraction.ml +++ b/plugins/extraction/extraction.ml @@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ let none = Evd.empty let type_of env c = let polyprop = (lang() == Haskell) in - Retyping.get_type_of ~polyprop env none (strip_outer_cast c) + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Retyping.get_type_of ~polyprop env none (strip_outer_cast none (EConstr.of_constr c))) let sort_of env c = let polyprop = (lang() == Haskell) in - Retyping.get_sort_family_of ~polyprop env none (strip_outer_cast c) + Retyping.get_sort_family_of ~polyprop env none (strip_outer_cast none (EConstr.of_constr c)) (*S Generation of flags and signatures. *) @@ -70,11 +70,17 @@ type scheme = TypeScheme | Default type flag = info * scheme +let whd_all env t = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (whd_all env none (EConstr.of_constr t)) + +let whd_betaiotazeta t = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (whd_betaiotazeta none (EConstr.of_constr t)) + (*s [flag_of_type] transforms a type [t] into a [flag]. Really important function. *) let rec flag_of_type env t : flag = - let t = whd_all env none t in + let t = whd_all env t in match kind_of_term t with | Prod (x,t,c) -> flag_of_type (push_rel (LocalAssum (x,t)) env) c | Sort s when Sorts.is_prop s -> (Logic,TypeScheme) @@ -99,17 +105,20 @@ let is_info_scheme env t = match flag_of_type env t with | (Info, TypeScheme) -> true | _ -> false +let push_rel_assum (n, t) env = + Environ.push_rel (LocalAssum (n, t)) env + (*s [type_sign] gernerates a signature aimed at treating a type application. *) let rec type_sign env c = - match kind_of_term (whd_all env none c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_all env c) with | Prod (n,t,d) -> (if is_info_scheme env t then Keep else Kill Kprop) :: (type_sign (push_rel_assum (n,t) env) d) | _ -> [] let rec type_scheme_nb_args env c = - match kind_of_term (whd_all env none c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_all env c) with | Prod (n,t,d) -> let n = type_scheme_nb_args (push_rel_assum (n,t) env) d in if is_info_scheme env t then n+1 else n @@ -135,7 +144,7 @@ let make_typvar n vl = next_ident_away id' vl let rec type_sign_vl env c = - match kind_of_term (whd_all env none c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_all env c) with | Prod (n,t,d) -> let s,vl = type_sign_vl (push_rel_assum (n,t) env) d in if not (is_info_scheme env t) then Kill Kprop::s, vl @@ -143,7 +152,7 @@ let rec type_sign_vl env c = | _ -> [],[] let rec nb_default_params env c = - match kind_of_term (whd_all env none c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_all env c) with | Prod (n,t,d) -> let n = nb_default_params (push_rel_assum (n,t) env) d in if is_default env t then n+1 else n @@ -214,7 +223,7 @@ let parse_ind_args si args relmax = let rec extract_type env db j c args = - match kind_of_term (whd_betaiotazeta Evd.empty c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_betaiotazeta c) with | App (d, args') -> (* We just accumulate the arguments. *) extract_type env db j d (Array.to_list args' @ args) @@ -297,7 +306,7 @@ and extract_type_app env db (r,s) args = let ml_args = List.fold_right (fun (b,c) a -> if b == Keep then - let p = List.length (fst (splay_prod env none (type_of env c))) in + let p = List.length (fst (splay_prod env none (EConstr.of_constr (type_of env c)))) in let db = iterate (fun l -> 0 :: l) p db in (extract_type_scheme env db c p) :: a else a) @@ -316,12 +325,13 @@ and extract_type_app env db (r,s) args = and extract_type_scheme env db c p = if Int.equal p 0 then extract_type env db 0 c [] else - let c = whd_betaiotazeta Evd.empty c in + let c = whd_betaiotazeta c in match kind_of_term c with | Lambda (n,t,d) -> extract_type_scheme (push_rel_assum (n,t) env) db d (p-1) | _ -> - let rels = fst (splay_prod env none (type_of env c)) in + let rels = fst (splay_prod env none (EConstr.of_constr (type_of env c))) in + let rels = List.map (on_snd EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr) rels in let env = push_rels_assum rels env in let eta_args = List.rev_map mkRel (List.interval 1 p) in extract_type env db 0 (lift p c) eta_args @@ -488,7 +498,7 @@ and extract_really_ind env kn mib = *) and extract_type_cons env db dbmap c i = - match kind_of_term (whd_all env none c) with + match kind_of_term (whd_all env c) with | Prod (n,t,d) -> let env' = push_rel_assum (n,t) env in let db' = (try Int.Map.find i dbmap with Not_found -> 0) :: db in @@ -595,7 +605,8 @@ let rec extract_term env mle mlt c args = | Construct (cp,_) -> extract_cons_app env mle mlt cp args | Proj (p, c) -> - let term = Retyping.expand_projection env (Evd.from_env env) p c [] in + let term = Retyping.expand_projection env (Evd.from_env env) p (EConstr.of_constr c) [] in + let term = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr term in extract_term env mle mlt term args | Rel n -> (* As soon as the expected [mlt] for the head is known, *) @@ -846,8 +857,8 @@ and extract_fix env mle i (fi,ti,ci as recd) mlt = and decompose the term [c] in [n] lambdas, with eta-expansion if needed. *) let decomp_lams_eta_n n m env c t = - let rels = fst (splay_prod_n env none n t) in - let rels = List.map (fun (LocalAssum (id,c) | LocalDef (id,_,c)) -> (id,c)) rels in + let rels = fst (splay_prod_n env none n (EConstr.of_constr t)) in + let rels = List.map (fun (LocalAssum (id,c) | LocalDef (id,_,c)) -> (id,EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c)) rels in let rels',c = decompose_lam c in let d = n - m in (* we'd better keep rels' as long as possible. *) @@ -887,7 +898,7 @@ let extract_std_constant env kn body typ = break user's clever let-ins and partial applications). *) let rels, c = let n = List.length s - and m = nb_lam body in + and m = nb_lam Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr body) (** FIXME *) in if n <= m then decompose_lam_n n body else let s,s' = List.chop m s in diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/formula.ml b/plugins/firstorder/formula.ml index b34a364920..87bac2fe39 100644 --- a/plugins/firstorder/formula.ml +++ b/plugins/firstorder/formula.ml @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ let construct_nhyps ind gls = let ind_hyps nevar ind largs gls= let types= Inductiveops.arities_of_constructors (pf_env gls) ind in let myhyps t = - let t1=prod_applist t largs in + let t1=Term.prod_applist t largs in let t2=snd (decompose_prod_n_assum nevar t1) in fst (decompose_prod_assum t2) in Array.map myhyps types @@ -76,18 +76,21 @@ type kind_of_formula= | Forall of constr*constr | Atom of constr +let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t + let kind_of_formula gl term = let normalize=special_nf gl in let cciterm=special_whd gl term in - match match_with_imp_term cciterm with - Some (a,b)-> Arrow(a,(pop b)) + match match_with_imp_term (project gl) (EConstr.of_constr cciterm) with + Some (a,b)-> Arrow(EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr a,(pop (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr b))) |_-> - match match_with_forall_term cciterm with - Some (_,a,b)-> Forall(a,b) + match match_with_forall_term (project gl) (EConstr.of_constr cciterm) with + Some (_,a,b)-> Forall(EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr a,EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr b) |_-> - match match_with_nodep_ind cciterm with + match match_with_nodep_ind (project gl) (EConstr.of_constr cciterm) with Some (i,l,n)-> - let ind,u=destInd i in + let l = List.map EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr l in + let ind,u=EConstr.destInd (project gl) i in let (mib,mip) = Global.lookup_inductive ind in let nconstr=Array.length mip.mind_consnames in if Int.equal nconstr 0 then @@ -96,7 +99,7 @@ let kind_of_formula gl term = let has_realargs=(n>0) in let is_trivial= let is_constant c = - Int.equal (nb_prod c) mib.mind_nparams in + Int.equal (nb_prod (project gl) (EConstr.of_constr c)) mib.mind_nparams in Array.exists is_constant mip.mind_nf_lc in if Inductiveops.mis_is_recursive (ind,mib,mip) || (has_realargs && not is_trivial) @@ -108,8 +111,8 @@ let kind_of_formula gl term = else Or((ind,u),l,is_trivial) | _ -> - match match_with_sigma_type cciterm with - Some (i,l)-> Exists((destInd i),l) + match match_with_sigma_type (project gl) (EConstr.of_constr cciterm) with + Some (i,l)-> Exists((EConstr.destInd (project gl) i),List.map EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr l) |_-> Atom (normalize cciterm) type atoms = {positive:constr list;negative:constr list} diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml b/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml index eebd974ea8..9dc2a51a61 100644 --- a/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml +++ b/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ let mk_open_instance id idc gl m t= let typ=pf_unsafe_type_of gl idc in (* since we know we will get a product, reduction is not too expensive *) - let (nam,_,_)=destProd (whd_all env evmap typ) in + let (nam,_,_)=destProd (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (whd_all env evmap typ)) in match nam with Name id -> id | Anonymous -> dummy_bvid in @@ -119,19 +119,20 @@ let mk_open_instance id idc gl m t= let Sigma ((c, _), evmap, _) = Evarutil.new_type_evar env evmap Evd.univ_flexible in let evmap = Sigma.to_evar_map evmap in let decl = LocalAssum (Name nid, c) in - aux (n-1) (nid::avoid) (Environ.push_rel decl env) evmap (decl::decls) in + aux (n-1) (nid::avoid) (EConstr.push_rel decl env) evmap (decl::decls) in let evmap, decls = aux m [] env evmap [] in evmap, decls, revt (* tactics *) let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq= + let open EConstr in match inst with Phantom dom-> if lookup (id,None) seq then tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "already done") else - tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut dom)) + tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut (EConstr.of_constr dom))) [tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf; pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> @@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq= pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> fun gl-> let evmap,rc,ot = mk_open_instance id idc gl m t in + let ot = EConstr.of_constr ot in let gt= it_mkLambda_or_LetIn (mkApp(idc,[|ot|])) rc in @@ -160,6 +162,7 @@ let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq= error "Untypable instance, maybe higher-order non-prenex quantification" in tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evmap) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [gt])) gl) else + let t = EConstr.of_constr t in pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [mkApp(idc,[|t|])])) in @@ -172,16 +175,16 @@ let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq= let right_instance_tac inst continue seq= match inst with Phantom dom -> - tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut dom)) + tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut (EConstr.of_constr dom))) [tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf; (fun gls-> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (split (ImplicitBindings - [mkVar (Tacmach.pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1)])) gls); + [EConstr.mkVar (Tacmach.pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1)])) gls); tclSOLVE [wrap 0 true continue (deepen seq)]]; tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic assumption)] | Real ((0,t),_) -> - (tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (split (ImplicitBindings [t]))) + (tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (split (ImplicitBindings [EConstr.of_constr t]))) (tclSOLVE [wrap 0 true continue (deepen seq)])) | Real ((m,t),_) -> tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "not implemented ... yet") diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml b/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml index 7ffc78928d..a60fd4d8f1 100644 --- a/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml +++ b/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml @@ -38,14 +38,14 @@ let wrap n b continue seq gls= []->anomaly (Pp.str "Not the expected number of hyps") | nd::q-> let id = NamedDecl.get_id nd in - if occur_var env id (pf_concl gls) || - List.exists (occur_var_in_decl env id) ctx then + if occur_var env (project gls) id (pf_concl gls) || + List.exists (occur_var_in_decl env (project gls) id) ctx then (aux (i-1) q (nd::ctx)) else - add_formula Hyp (VarRef id) (NamedDecl.get_type nd) (aux (i-1) q (nd::ctx)) gls in + add_formula Hyp (VarRef id) (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (NamedDecl.get_type nd)) (aux (i-1) q (nd::ctx)) gls in let seq1=aux n nc [] in let seq2=if b then - add_formula Concl dummy_id (pf_concl gls) seq1 gls else seq1 in + add_formula Concl dummy_id (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pf_concl gls)) seq1 gls else seq1 in continue seq2 gls let basename_of_global=function @@ -63,12 +63,13 @@ let axiom_tac t seq= with Not_found->tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "No axiom link") let ll_atom_tac a backtrack id continue seq= + let open EConstr in tclIFTHENELSE (try tclTHENLIST [pf_constr_of_global (find_left a seq) (fun left -> pf_constr_of_global id (fun id -> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [mkApp(id, [|left|])]))); + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [(mkApp(id, [|left|]))]))); clear_global id; Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro] with Not_found->tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "No link")) @@ -131,9 +132,9 @@ let ll_ind_tac (ind,u as indu) largs backtrack id continue seq gl= let vars=Array.init p (fun j->mkRel (p-j)) in let capply=mkApp ((lift p cstr),vars) in let head=mkApp ((lift p idc),[|capply|]) in - it_mkLambda_or_LetIn head rc in + EConstr.of_constr (it_mkLambda_or_LetIn head rc) in let lp=Array.length rcs in - let newhyps idc =List.init lp (myterm idc) in + let newhyps idc =List.init lp (myterm (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr idc)) in tclIFTHENELSE (tclTHENLIST [pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (newhyps idc))); @@ -142,8 +143,13 @@ let ll_ind_tac (ind,u as indu) largs backtrack id continue seq gl= (wrap lp false continue seq) backtrack gl let ll_arrow_tac a b c backtrack id continue seq= + let open EConstr in + let open Vars in + let a = EConstr.of_constr a in + let b = EConstr.of_constr b in + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in let cc=mkProd(Anonymous,a,(lift 1 b)) in - let d idc =mkLambda (Anonymous,b, + let d idc = mkLambda (Anonymous,b, mkApp (idc, [|mkLambda (Anonymous,(lift 1 a),(mkRel 2))|])) in tclORELSE (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut c)) @@ -186,11 +192,12 @@ let left_exists_tac ind backtrack id continue seq gls= let ll_forall_tac prod backtrack id continue seq= tclORELSE - (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut prod)) + (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut (EConstr.of_constr prod))) [tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro; pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> (fun gls-> + let open EConstr in let id0=pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1 in let term=mkApp(idc,[|mkVar(id0)|]) in tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [term])) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id0])) gls)); diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/sequent.ml b/plugins/firstorder/sequent.ml index 1248b60a76..fb0c22c2b7 100644 --- a/plugins/firstorder/sequent.ml +++ b/plugins/firstorder/sequent.ml @@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ let extend_with_ref_list l seq gl = let l = expand_constructor_hints l in let f gr (seq,gl) = let gl, c = pf_eapply Evd.fresh_global gl gr in - let typ=(pf_unsafe_type_of gl c) in + let typ=(pf_unsafe_type_of gl (EConstr.of_constr c)) in + let typ = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr typ in (add_formula Hyp gr typ seq gl,gl) in List.fold_right f l (seq,gl) @@ -214,8 +215,9 @@ let extend_with_auto_hints l seq gl= | Res_pf_THEN_trivial_fail (c,_) -> let (c, _, _) = c in (try - let gr = global_of_constr c in + let (gr, _) = Termops.global_of_constr (project gl) c in let typ=(pf_unsafe_type_of gl c) in + let typ = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr typ in seqref:=add_formula Hint gr typ !seqref gl with Not_found->()) | _-> () in diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/unify.ml b/plugins/firstorder/unify.ml index d9ab36ad64..7cbfb8e7de 100644 --- a/plugins/firstorder/unify.ml +++ b/plugins/firstorder/unify.ml @@ -21,7 +21,13 @@ exception UFAIL of constr*constr to the equation set. Raises UFAIL with a pair of terms *) +let strip_outer_cast t = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (strip_outer_cast Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr t)) (** FIXME *) + +let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t + let unif t1 t2= + let evd = Evd.empty in (** FIXME *) let bige=Queue.create () and sigma=ref [] in let bind i t= @@ -38,8 +44,8 @@ let unif t1 t2= Queue.add (t1,t2) bige; try while true do let t1,t2=Queue.take bige in - let nt1=head_reduce (whd_betaiotazeta Evd.empty t1) - and nt2=head_reduce (whd_betaiotazeta Evd.empty t2) in + let nt1=head_reduce (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (whd_betaiotazeta evd (EConstr.of_constr t1))) + and nt2=head_reduce (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (whd_betaiotazeta evd (EConstr.of_constr t2))) in match (kind_of_term nt1),(kind_of_term nt2) with Meta i,Meta j-> if not (Int.equal i j) then @@ -47,13 +53,13 @@ let unif t1 t2= else bind i nt2 | Meta i,_ -> let t=subst_meta !sigma nt2 in - if Int.Set.is_empty (free_rels t) && - not (occur_term (mkMeta i) t) then + if Int.Set.is_empty (free_rels evd (EConstr.of_constr t)) && + not (occur_term evd (EConstr.mkMeta i) (EConstr.of_constr t)) then bind i t else raise (UFAIL(nt1,nt2)) | _,Meta i -> let t=subst_meta !sigma nt1 in - if Int.Set.is_empty (free_rels t) && - not (occur_term (mkMeta i) t) then + if Int.Set.is_empty (free_rels evd (EConstr.of_constr t)) && + not (occur_term evd (EConstr.mkMeta i) (EConstr.of_constr t)) then bind i t else raise (UFAIL(nt1,nt2)) | Cast(_,_,_),_->Queue.add (strip_outer_cast nt1,nt2) bige | _,Cast(_,_,_)->Queue.add (nt1,strip_outer_cast nt2) bige diff --git a/plugins/fourier/fourierR.ml b/plugins/fourier/fourierR.ml index 8e193c753e..e11cbc279a 100644 --- a/plugins/fourier/fourierR.ml +++ b/plugins/fourier/fourierR.ml @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ type hineq={hname:constr; (* le nom de l'hypothèse *) exception NoIneq let ineq1_of_constr (h,t) = + let h = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr h in + let t = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t in match (kind_of_term t) with | App (f,args) -> (match kind_of_term f with @@ -281,6 +283,8 @@ let fourier_lineq lineq1 = (* Defined constants *) let get = Lazy.force +let cget = get +let eget c = EConstr.of_constr (Lazy.force c) let constant = Coqlib.gen_constant "Fourier" (* Standard library *) @@ -373,6 +377,7 @@ let rational_to_real x = (* preuve que 0<n*1/d *) let tac_zero_inf_pos gl (n,d) = + let get = eget in let tacn=ref (apply (get coq_Rlt_zero_1)) in let tacd=ref (apply (get coq_Rlt_zero_1)) in for _i = 1 to n - 1 do @@ -385,6 +390,7 @@ let tac_zero_inf_pos gl (n,d) = (* preuve que 0<=n*1/d *) let tac_zero_infeq_pos gl (n,d)= + let get = eget in let tacn=ref (if n=0 then (apply (get coq_Rle_zero_zero)) else (apply (get coq_Rle_zero_1))) in @@ -399,7 +405,8 @@ let tac_zero_infeq_pos gl (n,d)= (* preuve que 0<(-n)*(1/d) => False *) let tac_zero_inf_false gl (n,d) = - if n=0 then (apply (get coq_Rnot_lt0)) + let get = eget in +if n=0 then (apply (get coq_Rnot_lt0)) else (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (apply (get coq_Rle_not_lt)) (tac_zero_infeq_pos gl (-n,d))) @@ -408,6 +415,7 @@ let tac_zero_inf_false gl (n,d) = (* preuve que 0<=(-n)*(1/d) => False *) let tac_zero_infeq_false gl (n,d) = + let get = eget in (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (apply (get coq_Rlt_not_le_frac_opp)) (tac_zero_inf_pos gl (-n,d))) ;; @@ -415,7 +423,8 @@ let tac_zero_infeq_false gl (n,d) = let exact = exact_check;; let tac_use h = - let tac = exact h.hname in + let get = eget in + let tac = exact (EConstr.of_constr h.hname) in match h.htype with "Rlt" -> tac |"Rle" -> tac @@ -461,14 +470,17 @@ exception GoalDone let rec fourier () = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in Coqlib.check_required_library ["Coq";"fourier";"Fourier"]; - let goal = Termops.strip_outer_cast concl in + let goal = Termops.strip_outer_cast sigma concl in + let goal = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr goal in let fhyp=Id.of_string "new_hyp_for_fourier" in (* si le but est une inéquation, on introduit son contraire, et le but à prouver devient False *) try match (kind_of_term goal) with App (f,args) -> + let get = eget in (match (string_of_R_constr f) with "Rlt" -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN @@ -494,7 +506,7 @@ let rec fourier () = |_-> raise GoalDone with GoalDone -> (* les hypothèses *) - let hyps = List.map (fun (h,t)-> (mkVar h,t)) + let hyps = List.map (fun (h,t)-> (EConstr.mkVar h,t)) (list_of_sign (Proofview.Goal.hyps gl)) in let lineq =ref [] in List.iter (fun h -> try (lineq:=(ineq1_of_constr h)@(!lineq)) @@ -547,6 +559,7 @@ let rec fourier () = !t2 |] in let tc=rational_to_real cres in (* puis sa preuve *) + let get = eget in let tac1=ref (if h1.hstrict then (Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (apply (get coq_Rfourier_lt)) [tac_use h1; @@ -583,28 +596,28 @@ let rec fourier () = then tac_zero_inf_false gl (rational_to_fraction cres) else tac_zero_infeq_false gl (rational_to_fraction cres) in - tac:=(Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (cut ineq) + tac:=(Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (cut (EConstr.of_constr ineq)) [Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (change_concl - (mkAppL [| get coq_not; ineq|] - )) + (EConstr.of_constr (mkAppL [| cget coq_not; ineq|] + ))) (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (apply (if sres then get coq_Rnot_lt_lt else get coq_Rnot_le_le)) (Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (Equality.replace - (mkAppL [|get coq_Rminus;!t2;!t1|] - ) - tc) + (EConstr.of_constr (mkAppL [|cget coq_Rminus;!t2;!t1|] + )) + (EConstr.of_constr tc)) [tac2; (Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (Equality.replace - (mkApp (get coq_Rinv, - [|get coq_R1|])) + (EConstr.of_constr (mkApp (cget coq_Rinv, + [|cget coq_R1|]))) (get coq_R1)) (* en attendant Field, ça peut aider Ring de remplacer 1/1 par 1 ... *) [Tacticals.New.tclORELSE (* TODO : Ring.polynom []*) (Proofview.tclUNIT ()) (Proofview.tclUNIT ()); - Tacticals.New.pf_constr_of_global (get coq_sym_eqT) (fun symeq -> + Tacticals.New.pf_constr_of_global (cget coq_sym_eqT) (fun symeq -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (apply symeq) (apply (get coq_Rinv_1))))] diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index 527f4f0b12..bc64b079c5 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ open Printer open CErrors open Util open Term +open EConstr open Vars open Namegen open Names @@ -18,6 +19,12 @@ open Context.Rel.Declaration module RelDecl = Context.Rel.Declaration +let local_assum (na, t) = + RelDecl.LocalAssum (na, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) + +let local_def (na, b, t) = + RelDecl.LocalDef (na, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr b, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) + (* let msgnl = Pp.msgnl *) (* @@ -95,6 +102,7 @@ let list_chop ?(msg="") n l = with Failure (msg') -> failwith (msg ^ msg') +let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = (* let refl_equal_term = Lazy.force refl_equal in *) @@ -131,16 +139,16 @@ let refine c = let thin l = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear l) -let eq_constr u v = eq_constr_nounivs u v +let eq_constr sigma u v = EConstr.eq_constr_nounivs sigma u v -let is_trivial_eq t = +let is_trivial_eq sigma t = let res = try begin - match kind_of_term t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr f (Lazy.force eq) -> - eq_constr t1 t2 - | App(f,[|t1;a1;t2;a2|]) when eq_constr f (jmeq ()) -> - eq_constr t1 t2 && eq_constr a1 a2 + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 + | App(f,[|t1;a1;t2;a2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 && eq_constr sigma a1 a2 | _ -> false end with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false @@ -148,30 +156,30 @@ let is_trivial_eq t = (* observe (str "is_trivial_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ (if res then str " true" else str " false")); *) res -let rec incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2 = - let c1,arg1 = decompose_app t1 - and c2,arg2 = decompose_app t2 +let rec incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 = + let c1,arg1 = decompose_app sigma t1 + and c2,arg2 = decompose_app sigma t2 in - (not (eq_constr t1 t2)) && - isConstruct c1 && isConstruct c2 && + (not (eq_constr sigma t1 t2)) && + isConstruct sigma c1 && isConstruct sigma c2 && ( - not (eq_constr c1 c2) || - List.exists2 incompatible_constructor_terms arg1 arg2 + not (eq_constr sigma c1 c2) || + List.exists2 (incompatible_constructor_terms sigma) arg1 arg2 ) -let is_incompatible_eq t = +let is_incompatible_eq sigma t = let res = try - match kind_of_term t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr f (Lazy.force eq) -> - incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2 - | App(f,[|u1;t1;u2;t2|]) when eq_constr f (jmeq ()) -> - (eq_constr u1 u2 && - incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2) + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 + | App(f,[|u1;t1;u2;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + (eq_constr sigma u1 u2 && + incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2) | _ -> false with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false in - if res then observe (str "is_incompatible_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t); + if res then observe (str "is_incompatible_eq " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr t); res let change_hyp_with_using msg hyp_id t tac : tactic = @@ -208,40 +216,38 @@ let prove_trivial_eq h_id context (constructor,type_of_term,term) = -let find_rectype env c = - let (t, l) = decompose_app (Reduction.whd_betaiotazeta env c) in - match kind_of_term t with +let find_rectype env sigma c = + let (t, l) = decompose_app sigma (Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta sigma c) in + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Ind ind -> (t, l) | Construct _ -> (t,l) | _ -> raise Not_found -let isAppConstruct ?(env=Global.env ()) t = +let isAppConstruct ?(env=Global.env ()) sigma t = try - let t',l = find_rectype (Global.env ()) t in - observe (str "isAppConstruct : " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ str " -> " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr (applist (t',l))); + let t',l = find_rectype env sigma t in + observe (str "isAppConstruct : " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr t ++ str " -> " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr (applist (t',l))); true with Not_found -> false let nf_betaiotazeta = (* Reductionops.local_strong Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta *) - let clos_norm_flags flgs env sigma t = - CClosure.norm_val (CClosure.create_clos_infos flgs env) (CClosure.inject (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma t)) in - clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty + Reductionops.clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty -let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = +let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:rel_context) x t end_of_type = let nochange ?t' msg = begin - observe (str ("Not treating ( "^msg^" )") ++ pr_lconstr t ++ str " " ++ match t' with None -> str "" | Some t -> Printer.pr_lconstr t ); + observe (str ("Not treating ( "^msg^" )") ++ pr_leconstr t ++ str " " ++ match t' with None -> str "" | Some t -> Printer.pr_leconstr t ); failwith "NoChange"; end in - let eq_constr = Evarconv.e_conv env (ref sigma) in - if not (noccurn 1 end_of_type) + let eq_constr c1 c2 = Evarconv.e_conv env (ref sigma) c1 c2 in + if not (noccurn sigma 1 end_of_type) then nochange "dependent"; (* if end_of_type depends on this term we don't touch it *) - if not (isApp t) then nochange "not an equality"; - let f_eq,args = destApp t in + if not (isApp sigma t) then nochange "not an equality"; + let f_eq,args = destApp sigma t in let constructor,t1,t2,t1_typ = try if (eq_constr f_eq (Lazy.force eq)) @@ -258,36 +264,36 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = else nochange "not an equality" with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> nochange "not an equality" in - if not ((closed0 (fst t1)) && (closed0 (snd t1)))then nochange "not a closed lhs"; + if not ((closed0 sigma (fst t1)) && (closed0 sigma (snd t1)))then nochange "not a closed lhs"; let rec compute_substitution sub t1 t2 = (* observe (str "compute_substitution : " ++ pr_lconstr t1 ++ str " === " ++ pr_lconstr t2); *) - if isRel t2 + if isRel sigma t2 then - let t2 = destRel t2 in + let t2 = destRel sigma t2 in begin try let t1' = Int.Map.find t2 sub in if not (eq_constr t1 t1') then nochange "twice bound variable"; sub with Not_found -> - assert (closed0 t1); + assert (closed0 sigma t1); Int.Map.add t2 t1 sub end - else if isAppConstruct t1 && isAppConstruct t2 + else if isAppConstruct sigma t1 && isAppConstruct sigma t2 then begin - let c1,args1 = find_rectype env t1 - and c2,args2 = find_rectype env t2 + let c1,args1 = find_rectype env sigma t1 + and c2,args2 = find_rectype env sigma t2 in if not (eq_constr c1 c2) then nochange "cannot solve (diff)"; List.fold_left2 compute_substitution sub args1 args2 end else - if (eq_constr t1 t2) then sub else nochange ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reduction.whd_all env t1) t2) "cannot solve (diff)" + if (eq_constr t1 t2) then sub else nochange ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reductionops.whd_all env sigma t1) t2) "cannot solve (diff)" in let sub = compute_substitution Int.Map.empty (snd t1) (snd t2) in let sub = compute_substitution sub (fst t1) (fst t2) in - let end_of_type_with_pop = Termops.pop end_of_type in (*the equation will be removed *) + let end_of_type_with_pop = pop end_of_type in (*the equation will be removed *) let new_end_of_type = (* Ugly hack to prevent Map.fold order change between ocaml-3.08.3 and ocaml-3.08.4 Can be safely replaced by the next comment for Ocaml >= 3.08.4 @@ -309,7 +315,7 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = try let witness = Int.Map.find i sub in if is_local_def decl then anomaly (Pp.str "can not redefine a rel!"); - (Termops.pop end_of_type,ctxt_size,mkLetIn (RelDecl.get_name decl, witness, RelDecl.get_type decl, witness_fun)) + (pop end_of_type,ctxt_size,mkLetIn (RelDecl.get_name decl, witness, RelDecl.get_type decl, witness_fun)) with Not_found -> (mkProd_or_LetIn decl end_of_type, ctxt_size + 1, mkLambda_or_LetIn decl witness_fun) ) @@ -318,9 +324,9 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = context in let new_type_of_hyp = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty new_type_of_hyp in + Reductionops.nf_betaiota sigma new_type_of_hyp in let new_ctxt,new_end_of_type = - decompose_prod_n_assum ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp in let prove_new_hyp : tactic = tclTHEN @@ -353,21 +359,21 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = new_ctxt,new_end_of_type,simpl_eq_tac -let is_property (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = - if isApp t_x +let is_property sigma (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = + if isApp sigma t_x then - let pte,args = destApp t_x in - if isVar pte && Array.for_all closed0 args + let pte,args = destApp sigma t_x in + if isVar sigma pte && Array.for_all (closed0 sigma) args then try - let info = Id.Map.find (destVar pte) ptes_info in + let info = Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_info in info.is_valid full_type_of_hyp with Not_found -> false else false else false -let isLetIn t = - match kind_of_term t with +let isLetIn sigma t = + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | LetIn _ -> true | _ -> false @@ -387,8 +393,9 @@ let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = will break the Guard when trying to save the Lemma. *) let test_var g = - let _,args = destApp (pf_concl g) in - not ((isConstruct args.(arg_num)) || isAppConstruct args.(arg_num)) + let sigma = project g in + let _,args = destApp sigma (pf_concl g) in + not ((isConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) || isAppConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) in let rec do_rewrite eq_ids g = if test_var g @@ -407,30 +414,30 @@ let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = let rec_pte_id = Id.of_string "Hrec" let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = - let coq_False = Coqlib.build_coq_False () in - let coq_True = Coqlib.build_coq_True () in - let coq_I = Coqlib.build_coq_I () in + let coq_False = EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.build_coq_False ()) in + let coq_True = EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.build_coq_True ()) in + let coq_I = EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.build_coq_I ()) in let rec scan_type context type_of_hyp : tactic = - if isLetIn type_of_hyp then + if isLetIn sigma type_of_hyp then let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_hyp context in let reduced_type_of_hyp = nf_betaiotazeta real_type_of_hyp in (* length of context didn't change ? *) let new_context,new_typ_of_hyp = - decompose_prod_n_assum (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp in tclTHENLIST [ h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id); scan_type new_context new_typ_of_hyp ] - else if isProd type_of_hyp + else if isProd sigma type_of_hyp then begin - let (x,t_x,t') = destProd type_of_hyp in + let (x,t_x,t') = destProd sigma type_of_hyp in let actual_real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn t' context in - if is_property ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then + if is_property sigma ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then begin - let pte,pte_args = (destApp t_x) in - let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = (Id.Map.find (destVar pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac in - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let pte,pte_args = (destApp sigma t_x) in + let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = (Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in let prove_new_type_of_hyp = let context_length = List.length context in @@ -467,20 +474,20 @@ let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = scan_type context popped_t' ] end - else if eq_constr t_x coq_False then + else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_False then begin (* observe (str "Removing : "++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) (* str " since it has False in its preconds " *) (* ); *) raise TOREMOVE; (* False -> .. useless *) end - else if is_incompatible_eq t_x then raise TOREMOVE (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) - else if eq_constr t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) + else if is_incompatible_eq sigma t_x then raise TOREMOVE (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) + else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) then (* observe (str "In "++Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) (* str " removing useless precond True" *) (* ); *) - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in @@ -506,15 +513,15 @@ let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = ((* observe_tac "prove_trivial" *) prove_trivial); scan_type context popped_t' ] - else if is_trivial_eq t_x + else if is_trivial_eq sigma t_x then (* t_x := t = t => we remove this precond *) - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in - let hd,args = destApp t_x in + let hd,args = destApp sigma t_x in let get_args hd args = - if eq_constr hd (Lazy.force eq) + if eq_constr sigma hd (Lazy.force eq) then (Lazy.force refl_equal,args.(0),args.(1)) else (jmeq_refl (),args.(0),args.(1)) in @@ -597,18 +604,18 @@ let treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_prod continue_tac term dyn_infos = let new_term_value_eq = pf_unsafe_type_of g' (mkVar heq_id) in (* compute the new value of the body *) let new_term_value = - match kind_of_term new_term_value_eq with + match EConstr.kind (project g') new_term_value_eq with | App(f,[| _;_;args2 |]) -> args2 | _ -> observe (str "cannot compute new term value : " ++ pr_gls g' ++ fnl () ++ str "last hyp is" ++ - pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g') Evd.empty new_term_value_eq + pr_leconstr_env (pf_env g') (project g') new_term_value_eq ); anomaly (Pp.str "cannot compute new term value") in let fun_body = mkLambda(Anonymous, pf_unsafe_type_of g' term, - Termops.replace_term term (mkRel 1) dyn_infos.info + Termops.replace_term (project g') term (mkRel 1) dyn_infos.info ) in let new_body = pf_nf_betaiota g' (mkApp(fun_body,[| new_term_value |])) in @@ -691,15 +698,16 @@ let build_proof : tactic = let rec build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos : tactic = fun g -> + let sigma = project g in (* observe (str "proving on " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) term);*) - match kind_of_term dyn_infos.info with + match EConstr.kind sigma dyn_infos.info with | Case(ci,ct,t,cb) -> let do_finalize_t dyn_info' = fun g -> let t = dyn_info'.info in let dyn_infos = {dyn_info' with info = mkCase(ci,ct,t,cb)} in - let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (pf_concl g) in + let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in let type_of_term = pf_unsafe_type_of g t in let term_eq = make_refl_eq (Lazy.force refl_equal) type_of_term t @@ -712,7 +720,7 @@ let build_proof (fun g -> observe_tac "toto" ( tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); (fun g' -> - let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (pf_concl g') in + let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g') (pf_concl g') in let nb_instanciate_partial = g'_nb_prod - g_nb_prod in observe_tac "treat_new_case" (treat_new_case @@ -732,7 +740,7 @@ let build_proof build_proof do_finalize_t {dyn_infos with info = t} g | Lambda(n,t,b) -> begin - match kind_of_term( pf_concl g) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with | Prod _ -> tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) @@ -762,9 +770,9 @@ let build_proof | Const _ | Var _ | Meta _ | Evar _ | Sort _ | Construct _ | Ind _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g | App(_,_) -> - let f,args = decompose_app dyn_infos.info in + let f,args = decompose_app sigma dyn_infos.info in begin - match kind_of_term f with + match EConstr.kind sigma f with | App _ -> assert false (* we have collected all the app in decompose_app *) | Proj _ -> assert false (*FIXME*) | Var _ | Construct _ | Rel _ | Evar _ | Meta _ | Ind _ | Sort _ | Prod _ -> @@ -786,7 +794,7 @@ let build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g | Lambda _ -> let new_term = - Reductionops.nf_beta Evd.empty dyn_infos.info in + Reductionops.nf_beta sigma dyn_infos.info in build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = new_term} g | LetIn _ -> @@ -838,7 +846,7 @@ let build_proof | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion !") and build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g = (* observe (str "proving with "++Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info++ str " on goal " ++ pr_gls g); *) - observe_tac_stream (str "build_proof with " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info ) (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) g + observe_tac_stream (str "build_proof with " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr dyn_infos.info ) (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) g and build_proof_args do_finalize dyn_infos (* f_args' args *) :tactic = fun g -> let (f_args',args) = dyn_infos.info in @@ -904,7 +912,7 @@ let prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info = (fun eq_hyps -> tclTHEN (rewrite_until_var (fix_info.idx) eq_hyps) (fun g -> - let _,pte_args = destApp (pf_concl g) in + let _,pte_args = destApp (project g) (pf_concl g) in let rec_hyp_proof = mkApp(mkVar fix_info.name,array_get_start pte_args) in @@ -925,10 +933,11 @@ let generalize_non_dep hyp g = let to_revert,_ = let open Context.Named.Declaration in Environ.fold_named_context_reverse (fun (clear,keep) decl -> + let decl = map_named_decl EConstr.of_constr decl in let hyp = get_id decl in if Id.List.mem hyp hyps - || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env hyp) keep - || Termops.occur_var env hyp hyp_typ + || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env (project g) hyp) keep + || Termops.occur_var env (project g) hyp hyp_typ || Termops.is_section_variable hyp (* should be dangerous *) then (clear,decl::keep) else (hyp::clear,keep)) @@ -951,11 +960,12 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num (* observe (str "nb_args := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_args)); *) (* observe (str "nb_params := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_params)); *) (* observe (str "rec_args_num := " ++ str (string_of_int (rec_args_num + 1) )); *) - let f_def = Global.lookup_constant (fst (destConst f)) in + let f_def = Global.lookup_constant (fst (destConst evd f)) in let eq_lhs = mkApp(f,Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params + nb_args - i))) in let f_body = Option.get (Global.body_of_constant_body f_def) in - let params,f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n nb_params f_body in - let (_,num),(_,_,bodies) = destFix f_body_with_params in + let f_body = EConstr.of_constr f_body in + let params,f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n evd nb_params f_body in + let (_,num),(_,_,bodies) = destFix evd f_body_with_params in let fnames_with_params = let params = Array.init nb_params (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params - i)) in let fnames = List.rev (Array.to_list (Array.map (fun f -> mkApp(f,params)) fnames)) in @@ -970,13 +980,13 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num let (type_ctxt,type_of_f),evd = let evd,t = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd f in - decompose_prod_n_assum + decompose_prod_n_assum evd (nb_params + nb_args) t,evd in let eqn = mkApp(Lazy.force eq,[|type_of_f;eq_lhs;eq_rhs|]) in let lemma_type = it_mkProd_or_LetIn eqn type_ctxt in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr lemma_type ++ fnl () ++ str "f_body " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr f_body); *) - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst evd f))) in let prove_replacement = tclTHENSEQ [ @@ -1010,10 +1020,10 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num all_funs g = let equation_lemma = try - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f)) (*FIXME*) in + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) (*FIXME*) in mkConst (Option.get finfos.equation_lemma) with (Not_found | Option.IsNone as e) -> - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst !evd f))) in (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we will construct the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) @@ -1022,7 +1032,7 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a let _ = match e with | Option.IsNone -> - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f)) in + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) in update_Function {finfos with equation_lemma = Some (match Nametab.locate (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id) with @@ -1038,11 +1048,12 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id)) in + let res = EConstr.of_constr res in evd:=evd'; let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd res in res in - let nb_intro_to_do = nb_prod (pf_concl g) in + let nb_intro_to_do = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in tclTHEN (tclDO nb_intro_to_do (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) ( @@ -1061,7 +1072,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (* Pp.msgnl (str "princ_type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr princ_type); *) (* Pp.msgnl (str "all_funs "); *) (* Array.iter (fun c -> Pp.msgnl (Printer.pr_lconstr c)) all_funs; *) - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project g) princ_type in let fresh_id = let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps g) in (fun na -> @@ -1090,11 +1101,11 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (CClosure.RedFlags.mkflags [CClosure.RedFlags.fZETA]) (Global.env ()) (Evd.empty) - body + (EConstr.of_constr body) | None -> error ( "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") in let fbody = get_body fnames.(fun_num) in - let f_ctxt,f_body = decompose_lam fbody in + let f_ctxt,f_body = decompose_lam (project g) fbody in let f_ctxt_length = List.length f_ctxt in let diff_params = princ_info.nparams - f_ctxt_length in let full_params,princ_params,fbody_with_full_params = @@ -1129,19 +1140,19 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam princ_params ); observe (str "fbody_with_full_params := " ++ - pr_lconstr fbody_with_full_params + pr_leconstr fbody_with_full_params ); let all_funs_with_full_params = Array.map (fun f -> applist(f, List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) all_funs in let fix_offset = List.length princ_params in let ptes_to_fix,infos = - match kind_of_term fbody_with_full_params with + match EConstr.kind (project g) fbody_with_full_params with | Fix((idxs,i),(names,typess,bodies)) -> let bodies_with_all_params = Array.map (fun body -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (project g) (applist(substl (List.rev (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) body, List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)) ) @@ -1150,14 +1161,14 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let info_array = Array.mapi (fun i types -> - let types = prod_applist types (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in + let types = prod_applist (project g) types (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in { idx = idxs.(i) - fix_offset; name = Nameops.out_name (fresh_id names.(i)); types = types; offset = fix_offset; nb_realargs = List.length - (fst (decompose_lam bodies.(i))) - fix_offset; + (fst (decompose_lam (project g) bodies.(i))) - fix_offset; body_with_param = bodies_with_all_params.(i); num_in_block = i } @@ -1169,7 +1180,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (fun i (acc_map,acc_info) decl -> let pte = RelDecl.get_name decl in let infos = info_array.(i) in - let type_args,_ = decompose_prod infos.types in + let type_args,_ = decompose_prod (project g) infos.types in let nargs = List.length type_args in let f = applist(mkConst fnames.(i), List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_info.params) in let first_args = Array.init nargs (fun i -> mkRel (nargs -i)) in @@ -1179,12 +1190,12 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let body_with_param,num = let body = get_body fnames.(i) in let body_with_full_params = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty ( + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (project g) ( applist(body,List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) in - match kind_of_term body_with_full_params with + match EConstr.kind (project g) body_with_full_params with | Fix((_,num),(_,_,bs)) -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (project g) ( (applist (substl @@ -1245,11 +1256,11 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam in let intros_after_fixes : tactic = fun gl -> - let ctxt,pte_app = (decompose_prod_assum (pf_concl gl)) in - let pte,pte_args = (decompose_app pte_app) in + let ctxt,pte_app = (decompose_prod_assum (project gl) (pf_concl gl)) in + let pte,pte_args = (decompose_app (project gl) pte_app) in try let pte = - try destVar pte + try destVar (project gl) pte with DestKO -> anomaly (Pp.str "Property is not a variable") in let fix_info = Id.Map.find pte ptes_to_fix in @@ -1268,7 +1279,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam nb_rec_hyps = -100; rec_hyps = []; info = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (project g) (applist(fix_body,List.rev_map mkVar args_id)); eq_hyps = [] } @@ -1336,7 +1347,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam eq_hyps = [] } in - let fname = destConst (fst (decompose_app (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in + let fname = destConst (project g) (fst (decompose_app (project g) (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]); let do_prove = @@ -1418,14 +1429,14 @@ let backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs : tactic = let rewrite = tclFIRST (List.map (fun x -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL x)) eqs ) in - let _,hrec_concl = decompose_prod (pf_unsafe_type_of gls (mkVar hrec)) in - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp hrec_concl)) in - let f = (fst (destApp f_app)) in + let _,hrec_concl = decompose_prod (project gls) (pf_unsafe_type_of gls (mkVar hrec)) in + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project gls) hrec_concl)) in + let f = (fst (destApp (project gls) f_app)) in let rec backtrack : tactic = fun g -> - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (pf_concl g))) in - match kind_of_term f_app with - | App(f',_) when eq_constr f' f -> tclIDTAC g + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project g) (pf_concl g))) in + match EConstr.kind (project g) f_app with + | App(f',_) when eq_constr (project g) f' f -> tclIDTAC g | _ -> tclTHEN rewrite backtrack g in backtrack gls @@ -1489,20 +1500,20 @@ let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = gls -let is_valid_hypothesis predicates_name = +let is_valid_hypothesis sigma predicates_name = let predicates_name = List.fold_right Id.Set.add predicates_name Id.Set.empty in let is_pte typ = - if isApp typ + if isApp sigma typ then - let pte,_ = destApp typ in - if isVar pte - then Id.Set.mem (destVar pte) predicates_name + let pte,_ = destApp sigma typ in + if isVar sigma pte + then Id.Set.mem (destVar sigma pte) predicates_name else false else false in let rec is_valid_hypothesis typ = is_pte typ || - match kind_of_term typ with + match EConstr.kind sigma typ with | Prod(_,pte,typ') -> is_pte pte && is_valid_hypothesis typ' | _ -> false in @@ -1512,7 +1523,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen (f_ref,functional_ref,eq_ref) tcc_lemma_ref is_mes rec_arg_num rec_arg_type relation gl = let princ_type = pf_concl gl in - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project gl) princ_type in let fresh_id = let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps gl) in fun na -> @@ -1590,7 +1601,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen let lemma = match !tcc_lemma_ref with | None -> error "No tcc proof !!" - | Some lemma -> lemma + | Some lemma -> EConstr.of_constr lemma in (* let rec list_diff del_list check_list = *) (* match del_list with *) @@ -1650,7 +1661,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_ref)); (* observe_tac "finish" *) (fun gl' -> let body = - let _,args = destApp (pf_concl gl') in + let _,args = destApp (project gl') (pf_concl gl') in Array.last args in let body_info rec_hyps = @@ -1693,7 +1704,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen ) ); - is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis predicates_names + is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis (project gl') predicates_names } in let ptes_info : pte_info Id.Map.t = diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.mli b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.mli index 34ce669672..769d726d70 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.mli @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ open Term val prove_princ_for_struct : Evd.evar_map ref -> bool -> - int -> constant array -> constr array -> int -> Tacmach.tactic + int -> constant array -> EConstr.constr array -> int -> Tacmach.tactic val prove_principle_for_gen : @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ val prove_principle_for_gen : constr option ref -> (* a pointer to the obligation proofs lemma *) bool -> (* is that function uses measure *) int -> (* the number of recursive argument *) - types -> (* the type of the recursive argument *) - constr -> (* the wf relation used to prove the function *) + EConstr.types -> (* the type of the recursive argument *) + EConstr.constr -> (* the wf relation used to prove the function *) Tacmach.tactic diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml index cc699e5d3d..e845db3bc3 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml @@ -23,16 +23,19 @@ let observe s = if do_observe () then Feedback.msg_debug s +let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t + (* Transform an inductive induction principle into a functional one *) let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = - let princ_type_info = compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_type = EConstr.of_constr princ_type in + let princ_type_info = compute_elim_sig Evd.empty princ_type (** FIXME *) in let env = Global.env () in - let env_with_params = Environ.push_rel_context princ_type_info.params env in + let env_with_params = EConstr.push_rel_context princ_type_info.params env in let tbl = Hashtbl.create 792 in - let rec change_predicates_names (avoid:Id.t list) (predicates:Context.Rel.t) : Context.Rel.t = + let rec change_predicates_names (avoid:Id.t list) (predicates:EConstr.rel_context) : EConstr.rel_context = match predicates with | [] -> [] | decl :: predicates -> @@ -53,14 +56,14 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = (* observe (str "princ_infos : " ++ pr_elim_scheme princ_type_info); *) let change_predicate_sort i decl = let new_sort = sorts.(i) in - let args,_ = decompose_prod (RelDecl.get_type decl) in + let args,_ = decompose_prod (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (RelDecl.get_type decl)) in let real_args = if princ_type_info.indarg_in_concl then List.tl args else args in Context.Named.Declaration.LocalAssum (Nameops.out_name (Context.Rel.Declaration.get_name decl), - compose_prod real_args (mkSort new_sort)) + Term.compose_prod real_args (mkSort new_sort)) in let new_predicates = List.map_i @@ -84,6 +87,7 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = | _ -> false in let pre_princ = + let open EConstr in it_mkProd_or_LetIn (it_mkProd_or_LetIn (Option.fold_right @@ -95,6 +99,7 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = ) princ_type_info.branches in + let pre_princ = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr pre_princ in let pre_princ = substl (List.map mkVar ptes_vars) pre_princ in let is_dom c = match kind_of_term c with @@ -110,7 +115,7 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = in let dummy_var = mkVar (Id.of_string "________") in let mk_replacement c i args = - let res = mkApp(rel_to_fun.(i), Array.map Termops.pop (array_get_start args)) in + let res = mkApp(rel_to_fun.(i), Array.map pop (array_get_start args)) in observe (str "replacing " ++ pr_lconstr c ++ str " by " ++ pr_lconstr res); res in @@ -168,25 +173,25 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = let new_env = Environ.push_rel (LocalAssum (x,t)) env in let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove new_env b in if List.exists (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) binders_to_remove_from_b - then (Termops.pop new_b), filter_map (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b + then (pop new_b), filter_map (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) pop binders_to_remove_from_b else ( bind_fun(new_x,new_t,new_b), list_union_eq eq_constr binders_to_remove_from_t - (List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b) + (List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b) ) with | Toberemoved -> (* observe (str "Decl of "++Ppconstr.pr_name x ++ str " is removed "); *) let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove env (substnl [dummy_var] 1 b) in - new_b, List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b + new_b, List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b | Toberemoved_with_rel (n,c) -> (* observe (str "Decl of "++Ppconstr.pr_name x ++ str " is removed "); *) let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove env (substnl [c] n b) in - new_b, list_add_set_eq eq_constr (mkRel n) (List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b) + new_b, list_add_set_eq eq_constr (mkRel n) (List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b) end and compute_new_princ_type_for_letin remove env x v t b = begin @@ -197,25 +202,25 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = let new_env = Environ.push_rel (LocalDef (x,v,t)) env in let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove new_env b in if List.exists (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) binders_to_remove_from_b - then (Termops.pop new_b),filter_map (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b + then (pop new_b),filter_map (eq_constr (mkRel 1)) pop binders_to_remove_from_b else ( mkLetIn(new_x,new_v,new_t,new_b), list_union_eq eq_constr (list_union_eq eq_constr binders_to_remove_from_t binders_to_remove_from_v) - (List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b) + (List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b) ) with | Toberemoved -> (* observe (str "Decl of "++Ppconstr.pr_name x ++ str " is removed "); *) let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove env (substnl [dummy_var] 1 b) in - new_b, List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b + new_b, List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b | Toberemoved_with_rel (n,c) -> (* observe (str "Decl of "++Ppconstr.pr_name x ++ str " is removed "); *) let new_b,binders_to_remove_from_b = compute_new_princ_type remove env (substnl [c] n b) in - new_b, list_add_set_eq eq_constr (mkRel n) (List.map Termops.pop binders_to_remove_from_b) + new_b, list_add_set_eq eq_constr (mkRel n) (List.map pop binders_to_remove_from_b) end and compute_new_princ_type_with_acc remove env e (c_acc,to_remove_acc) = let new_e,to_remove_from_e = compute_new_princ_type remove env e @@ -237,20 +242,21 @@ let compute_new_princ_type_from_rel rel_to_fun sorts princ_type = | Context.Named.Declaration.LocalDef (id,t,b) -> LocalDef (Name (Hashtbl.find tbl id), t, b)) new_predicates) ) - princ_type_info.params + (List.map (fun d -> Termops.map_rel_decl EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr d) princ_type_info.params) let change_property_sort evd toSort princ princName = let open Context.Rel.Declaration in - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig princ in + let princ = EConstr.of_constr princ in + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig evd princ in let change_sort_in_predicate decl = LocalAssum (get_name decl, - let args,ty = decompose_prod (get_type decl) in + let args,ty = decompose_prod (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (get_type decl)) in let s = destSort ty in Global.add_constraints (Univ.enforce_leq (univ_of_sort toSort) (univ_of_sort s) Univ.Constraint.empty); - compose_prod args (mkSort toSort) + Term.compose_prod args (mkSort toSort) ) in let evd,princName_as_constr = @@ -266,11 +272,11 @@ let change_property_sort evd toSort princ princName = (it_mkLambda_or_LetIn init (List.map change_sort_in_predicate princ_info.predicates) ) - princ_info.params + (List.map (fun d -> Termops.map_rel_decl EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr d) princ_info.params) let build_functional_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof old_princ_type sorts funs i proof_tac hook = (* First we get the type of the old graph principle *) - let mutr_nparams = (compute_elim_sig old_princ_type).nparams in + let mutr_nparams = (compute_elim_sig !evd (EConstr.of_constr old_princ_type)).nparams in (* let time1 = System.get_time () in *) let new_principle_type = compute_new_princ_type_from_rel @@ -283,18 +289,18 @@ let build_functional_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof old_prin let new_princ_name = next_ident_away_in_goal (Id.of_string "___________princ_________") [] in - let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd new_principle_type in + let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd (EConstr.of_constr new_principle_type) in let hook = Lemmas.mk_hook (hook new_principle_type) in begin Lemmas.start_proof new_princ_name (Decl_kinds.Global,Flags.is_universe_polymorphism (),(Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Theorem)) !evd - new_principle_type + (EConstr.of_constr new_principle_type) hook ; (* let _tim1 = System.get_time () in *) - ignore (Pfedit.by (Proofview.V82.tactic (proof_tac (Array.map mkConstU funs) mutr_nparams))); + ignore (Pfedit.by (Proofview.V82.tactic (proof_tac (Array.map EConstr.mkConstU funs) mutr_nparams))); (* let _tim2 = System.get_time () in *) (* begin *) (* let dur1 = System.time_difference tim1 tim2 in *) @@ -337,7 +343,7 @@ let generate_functional_principle (evd: Evd.evar_map ref) let evd',s = Evd.fresh_sort_in_family env evd' fam_sort in let name = Indrec.make_elimination_ident base_new_princ_name fam_sort in let evd',value = change_property_sort evd' s new_principle_type new_princ_name in - let evd' = fst (Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd' value) in + let evd' = fst (Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd' (EConstr.of_constr value)) in (* Pp.msgnl (str "new principle := " ++ pr_lconstr value); *) let ce = Declare.definition_entry ~poly:(Flags.is_universe_polymorphism ()) ~univs:(snd (Evd.universe_context evd')) value in ignore( @@ -405,8 +411,9 @@ let get_funs_constant mp dp = (CClosure.RedFlags.mkflags [CClosure.RedFlags.fZETA]) (Global.env ()) (Evd.from_env (Global.env ())) - body + (EConstr.of_constr body) in + let body = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr body in body | None -> error ( "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") in @@ -488,7 +495,7 @@ let make_scheme evd (fas : (pconstant*glob_sort) list) : Safe_typing.private_con in let _ = evd := sigma in let l_schemes = - List.map (Typing.unsafe_type_of env sigma) schemes + List.map (EConstr.of_constr %> Typing.unsafe_type_of env sigma %> EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr) schemes in let i = ref (-1) in let sorts = @@ -616,7 +623,7 @@ let build_scheme fas = in let evd',f = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd f_as_constant in let _ = evd := evd' in - let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd f in + let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd (EConstr.of_constr f) in (destConst f,sort) ) fas @@ -666,7 +673,7 @@ let build_case_scheme fa = Indrec.build_case_analysis_scheme_default env sigma ind sf in let sigma = Sigma.to_evar_map sigma in - let scheme_type = (Typing.unsafe_type_of env sigma ) scheme in + let scheme_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr ((Typing.unsafe_type_of env sigma) (EConstr.of_constr scheme)) in let sorts = (fun (_,_,x) -> Universes.new_sort_in_family (Pretyping.interp_elimination_sort x) diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.mli b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.mli index 3fa2644ca9..45ad332fc5 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.mli @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ val generate_functional_principle : (* The tactic to use to make the proof w.r the number of params *) - (constr array -> int -> Tacmach.tactic) -> + (EConstr.constr array -> int -> Tacmach.tactic) -> unit val compute_new_princ_type_from_rel : constr array -> sorts array -> diff --git a/plugins/funind/g_indfun.ml4 b/plugins/funind/g_indfun.ml4 index 6603a95a84..27a892ca70 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/g_indfun.ml4 +++ b/plugins/funind/g_indfun.ml4 @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ ARGUMENT EXTEND with_names TYPED AS intropattern_opt PRINTED BY pr_intro_as_pat | [] ->[ None ] END - +let functional_induction b c x pat = + Proofview.V82.tactic (functional_induction true c x (Option.map out_disjunctive pat)) TACTIC EXTEND newfunind @@ -106,9 +107,9 @@ TACTIC EXTEND newfunind let c = match cl with | [] -> assert false | [c] -> c - | c::cl -> applist(c,cl) + | c::cl -> EConstr.applist(c,cl) in - Extratactics.onSomeWithHoles (fun x -> Proofview.V82.tactic (functional_induction true c x (Option.map out_disjunctive pat))) princl ] + Extratactics.onSomeWithHoles (fun x -> functional_induction true c x pat) princl ] END (***** debug only ***) TACTIC EXTEND snewfunind @@ -117,9 +118,9 @@ TACTIC EXTEND snewfunind let c = match cl with | [] -> assert false | [c] -> c - | c::cl -> applist(c,cl) + | c::cl -> EConstr.applist(c,cl) in - Extratactics.onSomeWithHoles (fun x -> Proofview.V82.tactic (functional_induction false c x (Option.map out_disjunctive pat))) princl ] + Extratactics.onSomeWithHoles (fun x -> functional_induction false c x pat) princl ] END diff --git a/plugins/funind/glob_term_to_relation.ml b/plugins/funind/glob_term_to_relation.ml index de2e5ea4e2..63bd3848f6 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/glob_term_to_relation.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/glob_term_to_relation.ml @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ let add_pat_variables pat typ env : Environ.env = | PatVar(_,na) -> Environ.push_rel (RelDecl.LocalAssum (na,typ)) env | PatCstr(_,c,patl,na) -> let Inductiveops.IndType(indf,indargs) = - try Inductiveops.find_rectype env (Evd.from_env env) typ + try Inductiveops.find_rectype env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr typ) with Not_found -> assert false in let constructors = Inductiveops.get_constructors env indf in @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ let rec pattern_to_term_and_type env typ = function constr in let Inductiveops.IndType(indf,indargs) = - try Inductiveops.find_rectype env (Evd.from_env env) typ + try Inductiveops.find_rectype env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr typ) with Not_found -> assert false in let constructors = Inductiveops.get_constructors env indf in @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ let rec pattern_to_term_and_type env typ = function Array.to_list (Array.init (cst_narg - List.length patternl) - (fun i -> Detyping.detype false [] env (Evd.from_env env) csta.(i)) + (fun i -> Detyping.detype false [] env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr csta.(i))) ) in let patl_as_term = @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ let rec build_entry_lc env funnames avoid rt : glob_constr build_entry_return = The "value" of this branch is then simply [res] *) let rt_as_constr,ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) rt in - let rt_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) rt_as_constr in + let rt_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr rt_as_constr) in let res_raw_type = Detyping.detype false [] env (Evd.from_env env) rt_typ in let res = fresh_id args_res.to_avoid "_res" in let new_avoid = res::args_res.to_avoid in @@ -611,7 +611,8 @@ let rec build_entry_lc env funnames avoid rt : glob_constr build_entry_return = *) let v_res = build_entry_lc env funnames avoid v in let v_as_constr,ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) v in - let v_type = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) v_as_constr in + let v_type = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr v_as_constr) in + let v_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr v_type in let new_env = match n with Anonymous -> env @@ -627,7 +628,7 @@ let rec build_entry_lc env funnames avoid rt : glob_constr build_entry_return = build_entry_lc_from_case env funnames make_discr el brl avoid | GIf(_,b,(na,e_option),lhs,rhs) -> let b_as_constr,ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) b in - let b_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) b_as_constr in + let b_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr b_as_constr) in let (ind,_) = try Inductiveops.find_inductive env (Evd.from_env env) b_typ with Not_found -> @@ -659,7 +660,7 @@ let rec build_entry_lc env funnames avoid rt : glob_constr build_entry_return = nal in let b_as_constr,ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) b in - let b_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) b_as_constr in + let b_typ = Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr b_as_constr) in let (ind,_) = try Inductiveops.find_inductive env (Evd.from_env env) b_typ with Not_found -> @@ -706,7 +707,7 @@ and build_entry_lc_from_case env funname make_discr let types = List.map (fun (case_arg,_) -> let case_arg_as_constr,ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) case_arg in - Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) case_arg_as_constr + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Typing.unsafe_type_of env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.of_constr case_arg_as_constr)) ) el in (****** The next works only if the match is not dependent ****) @@ -753,7 +754,7 @@ and build_entry_lc_from_case_term env types funname make_discr patterns_to_preve List.fold_right (fun id acc -> let typ_of_id = - Typing.unsafe_type_of env_with_pat_ids (Evd.from_env env) (mkVar id) + Typing.unsafe_type_of env_with_pat_ids (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.mkVar id) in let raw_typ_of_id = Detyping.detype false [] @@ -801,13 +802,14 @@ and build_entry_lc_from_case_term env types funname make_discr patterns_to_preve List.map3 (fun pat e typ_as_constr -> let this_pat_ids = ids_of_pat pat in + let typ_as_constr = EConstr.of_constr typ_as_constr in let typ = Detyping.detype false [] new_env (Evd.from_env env) typ_as_constr in let pat_as_term = pattern_to_term pat in List.fold_right (fun id acc -> if Id.Set.mem id this_pat_ids then (Prod (Name id), - let typ_of_id = Typing.unsafe_type_of new_env (Evd.from_env env) (mkVar id) in + let typ_of_id = Typing.unsafe_type_of new_env (Evd.from_env env) (EConstr.mkVar id) in let raw_typ_of_id = Detyping.detype false [] new_env (Evd.from_env env) typ_of_id in @@ -952,7 +954,7 @@ let rec rebuild_cons env nb_args relname args crossed_types depth rt = in mkGProd(n,t,new_b),id_to_exclude with Continue -> - let jmeq = Globnames.IndRef (fst (destInd (jmeq ()))) in + let jmeq = Globnames.IndRef (fst (EConstr.destInd Evd.empty (jmeq ()))) in let ty',ctx = Pretyping.understand env (Evd.from_env env) ty in let ind,args' = Inductive.find_inductive env ty' in let mib,_ = Global.lookup_inductive (fst ind) in @@ -966,7 +968,7 @@ let rec rebuild_cons env nb_args relname args crossed_types depth rt = (List.map (fun p -> Detyping.detype false [] env (Evd.from_env env) - p) params)@(Array.to_list + (EConstr.of_constr p)) params)@(Array.to_list (Array.make (List.length args' - nparam) (mkGHole ())))) @@ -984,6 +986,7 @@ let rec rebuild_cons env nb_args relname args crossed_types depth rt = let ty' = snd (Util.List.chop nparam ty) in List.fold_left2 (fun acc var_as_constr arg -> + let arg = EConstr.of_constr arg in if isRel var_as_constr then let na = RelDecl.get_name (Environ.lookup_rel (destRel var_as_constr) env) in @@ -1121,7 +1124,8 @@ let rec rebuild_cons env nb_args relname args crossed_types depth rt = let evd = (Evd.from_env env) in let t',ctx = Pretyping.understand env evd t in let evd = Evd.from_ctx ctx in - let type_t' = Typing.unsafe_type_of env evd t' in + let type_t' = Typing.unsafe_type_of env evd (EConstr.of_constr t') in + let type_t' = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr type_t' in let new_env = Environ.push_rel (LocalDef (n,t',type_t')) env in let new_b,id_to_exclude = rebuild_cons new_env @@ -1272,7 +1276,8 @@ let do_build_inductive let evd,env = Array.fold_right2 (fun id c (evd,env) -> - let evd,t = Typing.type_of env evd (mkConstU c) in + let evd,t = Typing.type_of env evd (EConstr.mkConstU c) in + let t = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t in evd, Environ.push_named (LocalAssum (id,t)) (* try *) diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml index 99b04898ba..a7489fb7b4 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ open CErrors open Util open Names open Term +open EConstr open Pp open Indfun_common open Libnames @@ -14,37 +15,39 @@ open Sigma.Notations module RelDecl = Context.Rel.Declaration -let is_rec_info scheme_info = +let is_rec_info sigma scheme_info = let test_branche min acc decl = acc || ( let new_branche = - it_mkProd_or_LetIn mkProp (fst (decompose_prod_assum (RelDecl.get_type decl))) in - let free_rels_in_br = Termops.free_rels new_branche in + it_mkProd_or_LetIn mkProp (fst (decompose_prod_assum sigma (RelDecl.get_type decl))) in + let free_rels_in_br = Termops.free_rels sigma new_branche in let max = min + scheme_info.Tactics.npredicates in Int.Set.exists (fun i -> i >= min && i< max) free_rels_in_br ) in List.fold_left_i test_branche 1 false (List.rev scheme_info.Tactics.branches) -let choose_dest_or_ind scheme_info = - Tactics.induction_destruct (is_rec_info scheme_info) false +let choose_dest_or_ind scheme_info args = + Proofview.tclBIND Proofview.tclEVARMAP (fun sigma -> + Tactics.induction_destruct (is_rec_info sigma scheme_info) false args) let functional_induction with_clean c princl pat = let res = - let f,args = decompose_app c in fun g -> + let sigma = Tacmach.project g in + let f,args = decompose_app sigma c in let princ,bindings, princ_type,g' = match princl with | None -> (* No principle is given let's find the good one *) begin - match kind_of_term f with + match EConstr.kind sigma f with | Const (c',u) -> let princ_option = let finfo = (* we first try to find out a graph on f *) try find_Function_infos c' with Not_found -> user_err (str "Cannot find induction information on "++ - Printer.pr_lconstr (mkConst c') ) + Printer.pr_leconstr (mkConst c') ) in match Tacticals.elimination_sort_of_goal g with | InProp -> finfo.prop_lemma @@ -72,15 +75,17 @@ let functional_induction with_clean c princl pat = (* mkConst(const_of_id princ_name ),g (\* FIXME *\) *) with Not_found -> (* This one is neither defined ! *) user_err (str "Cannot find induction principle for " - ++Printer.pr_lconstr (mkConst c') ) + ++Printer.pr_leconstr (mkConst c') ) in - (princ,NoBindings, Tacmach.pf_unsafe_type_of g' princ,g') + let princ = EConstr.of_constr princ in + (princ,NoBindings,Tacmach.pf_unsafe_type_of g' princ,g') | _ -> raise (UserError(None,str "functional induction must be used with a function" )) end | Some ((princ,binding)) -> princ,binding,Tacmach.pf_unsafe_type_of g princ,g in - let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let sigma = Tacmach.project g' in + let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig (Tacmach.project g') princ_type in let args_as_induction_constr = let c_list = if princ_infos.Tactics.farg_in_concl @@ -94,7 +99,7 @@ let functional_induction with_clean c princl pat = let princ' = Some (princ,bindings) in let princ_vars = List.fold_right - (fun a acc -> try Id.Set.add (destVar a) acc with DestKO -> acc) + (fun a acc -> try Id.Set.add (destVar sigma a) acc with DestKO -> acc) args Id.Set.empty in @@ -243,7 +248,8 @@ let derive_inversion fix_names = let evd,c = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident id)) in - evd, destConst c::l + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in + evd, destConst evd c::l ) fix_names (evd',[]) @@ -263,7 +269,8 @@ let derive_inversion fix_names = (Global.env ()) evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident (mk_rel_id id))) in - evd,(fst (destInd id))::l + let id = EConstr.of_constr id in + evd,(fst (destInd evd id))::l ) fix_names (evd',[]) @@ -330,7 +337,7 @@ let error_error names e = let generate_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) pconstants on_error is_general do_built (fix_rec_l:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list) recdefs interactive_proof - (continue_proof : int -> Names.constant array -> Term.constr array -> int -> + (continue_proof : int -> Names.constant array -> EConstr.constr array -> int -> Tacmach.tactic) : unit = let names = List.map (function (((_, name),_),_,_,_,_),_ -> name) fix_rec_l in let fun_bodies = List.map2 prepare_body fix_rec_l recdefs in @@ -368,7 +375,8 @@ let generate_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) pconstants on_error let evd = ref (Evd.from_env env) in let evd',uprinc = Evd.fresh_global env !evd princ in let _ = evd := evd' in - let princ_type = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true env evd uprinc in + let princ_type = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true env evd (EConstr.of_constr uprinc) in + let princ_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr princ_type in Functional_principles_types.generate_functional_principle evd interactive_proof @@ -403,7 +411,8 @@ let register_struct is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexp let evd,c = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident fname)) in - evd,((destConst c)::l) + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in + evd,((destConst evd c)::l) ) (Evd.from_env (Global.env ()),[]) fixpoint_exprl @@ -417,7 +426,8 @@ let register_struct is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexp let evd,c = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident fname)) in - evd,((destConst c)::l) + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in + evd,((destConst evd c)::l) ) (Evd.from_env (Global.env ()),[]) fixpoint_exprl @@ -427,7 +437,7 @@ let register_struct is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexp let generate_correction_proof_wf f_ref tcc_lemma_ref is_mes functional_ref eq_ref rec_arg_num rec_arg_type nb_args relation - (_: int) (_:Names.constant array) (_:Term.constr array) (_:int) : Tacmach.tactic = + (_: int) (_:Names.constant array) (_:EConstr.constr array) (_:int) : Tacmach.tactic = Functional_principles_proofs.prove_principle_for_gen (f_ref,functional_ref,eq_ref) tcc_lemma_ref is_mes rec_arg_num rec_arg_type relation @@ -835,7 +845,7 @@ let make_graph (f_ref:global_reference) = | ConstRef c -> begin try c,Global.lookup_constant c with Not_found -> - raise (UserError (None,str "Cannot find " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr (mkConst c)) ) + raise (UserError (None,str "Cannot find " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr (mkConst c)) ) end | _ -> raise (UserError (None, str "Not a function reference") ) in diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli index 1c27bdface..ba89fe4a78 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ val do_generate_principle : val functional_induction : bool -> - Term.constr -> - (Term.constr * Term.constr bindings) option -> + EConstr.constr -> + (EConstr.constr * EConstr.constr bindings) option -> Tacexpr.or_and_intro_pattern option -> Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> Proof_type.goal list Evd.sigma diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun_common.ml b/plugins/funind/indfun_common.ml index a45effb167..2889d8d03a 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun_common.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun_common.ml @@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ let find_reference sl s = let dp = Names.DirPath.make (List.rev_map Id.of_string sl) in Nametab.locate (make_qualid dp (Id.of_string s)) -let eq = lazy(coq_constant "eq") -let refl_equal = lazy(coq_constant "eq_refl") +let eq = lazy(EConstr.of_constr (coq_constant "eq")) +let refl_equal = lazy(EConstr.of_constr (coq_constant "eq_refl")) (*****************************************************************) (* Copy of the standart save mechanism but without the much too *) @@ -475,13 +475,13 @@ exception ToShow of exn let jmeq () = try Coqlib.check_required_library Coqlib.jmeq_module_name; - Coqlib.gen_constant "Function" ["Logic";"JMeq"] "JMeq" + EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant "Function" ["Logic";"JMeq"] "JMeq") with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> raise (ToShow e) let jmeq_refl () = try Coqlib.check_required_library Coqlib.jmeq_module_name; - Coqlib.gen_constant "Function" ["Logic";"JMeq"] "JMeq_refl" + EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant "Function" ["Logic";"JMeq"] "JMeq_refl") with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> raise (ToShow e) let h_intros l = @@ -489,10 +489,10 @@ let h_intros l = let h_id = Id.of_string "h" let hrec_id = Id.of_string "hrec" -let well_founded = function () -> (coq_constant "well_founded") -let acc_rel = function () -> (coq_constant "Acc") -let acc_inv_id = function () -> (coq_constant "Acc_inv") -let well_founded_ltof = function () -> (Coqlib.coq_constant "" ["Arith";"Wf_nat"] "well_founded_ltof") +let well_founded = function () -> EConstr.of_constr (coq_constant "well_founded") +let acc_rel = function () -> EConstr.of_constr (coq_constant "Acc") +let acc_inv_id = function () -> EConstr.of_constr (coq_constant "Acc_inv") +let well_founded_ltof = function () -> EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.coq_constant "" ["Arith";"Wf_nat"] "well_founded_ltof") let ltof_ref = function () -> (find_reference ["Coq";"Arith";"Wf_nat"] "ltof") let evaluable_of_global_reference r = (* Tacred.evaluable_of_global_reference (Global.env ()) *) @@ -501,8 +501,45 @@ let evaluable_of_global_reference r = (* Tacred.evaluable_of_global_reference (G | VarRef id -> EvalVarRef id | _ -> assert false;; -let list_rewrite (rev:bool) (eqs: (constr*bool) list) = +let list_rewrite (rev:bool) (eqs: (EConstr.constr*bool) list) = tclREPEAT (List.fold_right (fun (eq,b) i -> tclORELSE (Proofview.V82.of_tactic ((if b then Equality.rewriteLR else Equality.rewriteRL) eq)) i) (if rev then (List.rev eqs) else eqs) (tclFAIL 0 (mt())));; + +let decompose_lam_n sigma n = + let open EConstr in + if n < 0 then CErrors.error "decompose_lam_n: integer parameter must be positive"; + let rec lamdec_rec l n c = + if Int.equal n 0 then l,c + else match EConstr.kind sigma c with + | Lambda (x,t,c) -> lamdec_rec ((x,t)::l) (n-1) c + | Cast (c,_,_) -> lamdec_rec l n c + | _ -> CErrors.error "decompose_lam_n: not enough abstractions" + in + lamdec_rec [] n + +let lamn n env b = + let open EConstr in + let rec lamrec = function + | (0, env, b) -> b + | (n, ((v,t)::l), b) -> lamrec (n-1, l, mkLambda (v,t,b)) + | _ -> assert false + in + lamrec (n,env,b) + +(* compose_lam [xn:Tn;..;x1:T1] b = [x1:T1]..[xn:Tn]b *) +let compose_lam l b = lamn (List.length l) l b + +(* prodn n [xn:Tn;..;x1:T1;Gamma] b = (x1:T1)..(xn:Tn)b *) +let prodn n env b = + let open EConstr in + let rec prodrec = function + | (0, env, b) -> b + | (n, ((v,t)::l), b) -> prodrec (n-1, l, mkProd (v,t,b)) + | _ -> assert false + in + prodrec (n,env,b) + +(* compose_prod [xn:Tn;..;x1:T1] b = (x1:T1)..(xn:Tn)b *) +let compose_prod l b = prodn (List.length l) l b diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun_common.mli b/plugins/funind/indfun_common.mli index e5c756f564..5836d65190 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun_common.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun_common.mli @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ val chop_rprod_n : int -> Glob_term.glob_constr -> (Name.t*Glob_term.glob_constr) list * Glob_term.glob_constr val def_of_const : Term.constr -> Term.constr -val eq : Term.constr Lazy.t -val refl_equal : Term.constr Lazy.t +val eq : EConstr.constr Lazy.t +val refl_equal : EConstr.constr Lazy.t val const_of_id: Id.t -> Globnames.global_reference(* constantyes *) -val jmeq : unit -> Term.constr -val jmeq_refl : unit -> Term.constr +val jmeq : unit -> EConstr.constr +val jmeq_refl : unit -> EConstr.constr val save : bool -> Id.t -> Safe_typing.private_constants Entries.definition_entry -> Decl_kinds.goal_kind -> unit Lemmas.declaration_hook CEphemeron.key -> unit @@ -107,10 +107,15 @@ val is_strict_tcc : unit -> bool val h_intros: Names.Id.t list -> Proof_type.tactic val h_id : Names.Id.t val hrec_id : Names.Id.t -val acc_inv_id : Term.constr Util.delayed +val acc_inv_id : EConstr.constr Util.delayed val ltof_ref : Globnames.global_reference Util.delayed -val well_founded_ltof : Term.constr Util.delayed -val acc_rel : Term.constr Util.delayed -val well_founded : Term.constr Util.delayed +val well_founded_ltof : EConstr.constr Util.delayed +val acc_rel : EConstr.constr Util.delayed +val well_founded : EConstr.constr Util.delayed val evaluable_of_global_reference : Globnames.global_reference -> Names.evaluable_global_reference -val list_rewrite : bool -> (Term.constr*bool) list -> Proof_type.tactic +val list_rewrite : bool -> (EConstr.constr*bool) list -> Proof_type.tactic + +val decompose_lam_n : Evd.evar_map -> int -> EConstr.t -> + (Names.Name.t * EConstr.t) list * EConstr.t +val compose_lam : (Names.Name.t * EConstr.t) list -> EConstr.t -> EConstr.t +val compose_prod : (Names.Name.t * EConstr.t) list -> EConstr.t -> EConstr.t diff --git a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml index c8b4e48337..8f1420940b 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ open CErrors open Util open Names open Term +open EConstr open Vars open Pp open Globnames @@ -108,11 +109,11 @@ let thin ids gl = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear ids) gl let make_eq () = try - Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq ()) + EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq ())) with _ -> assert false let make_eq_refl () = try - Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq_refl ()) + EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq_refl ())) with _ -> assert false @@ -131,11 +132,12 @@ let make_eq_refl () = let generate_type evd g_to_f f graph i = (*i we deduce the number of arguments of the function and its returned type from the graph i*) let evd',graph = - Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Globnames.IndRef (fst (destInd graph))) + Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Globnames.IndRef (fst (destInd !evd graph))) in + let graph = EConstr.of_constr graph in evd:=evd'; let graph_arity = Typing.e_type_of (Global.env ()) evd graph in - let ctxt,_ = decompose_prod_assum graph_arity in + let ctxt,_ = decompose_prod_assum !evd graph_arity in let fun_ctxt,res_type = match ctxt with | [] | [_] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Not a valid context") @@ -193,7 +195,7 @@ let generate_type evd g_to_f f graph i = WARNING: while convertible, [type_of body] and [type] can be non equal *) let find_induction_principle evd f = - let f_as_constant,u = match kind_of_term f with + let f_as_constant,u = match EConstr.kind !evd f with | Const c' -> c' | _ -> error "Must be used with a function" in @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ let find_induction_principle evd f = | None -> raise Not_found | Some rect_lemma -> let evd',rect_lemma = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Globnames.ConstRef rect_lemma) in + let rect_lemma = EConstr.of_constr rect_lemma in let evd',typ = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd' rect_lemma in evd:=evd'; rect_lemma,typ @@ -246,15 +249,15 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes \[fun (x_1:t_1)\ldots(x_n:t_n)=> fun fv => fun res => res = fv \rightarrow graph\ x_1\ldots x_n\ res\] *) (* we the get the definition of the graphs block *) - let graph_ind,u = destInd graphs_constr.(i) in + let graph_ind,u = destInd evd graphs_constr.(i) in let kn = fst graph_ind in let mib,_ = Global.lookup_inductive graph_ind in (* and the principle to use in this lemma in $\zeta$ normal form *) let f_principle,princ_type = schemes.(i) in let princ_type = nf_zeta princ_type in - let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig evd princ_type in (* The number of args of the function is then easily computable *) - let nb_fun_args = nb_prod (pf_concl g) - 2 in + let nb_fun_args = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) - 2 in let args_names = generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "x") [] nb_fun_args in let ids = args_names@(pf_ids_of_hyps g) in (* Since we cannot ensure that the functional principle is defined in the @@ -271,13 +274,13 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes (fun decl -> List.map (fun id -> Loc.ghost, IntroNaming (IntroIdentifier id)) - (generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "y") ids (List.length (fst (decompose_prod_assum (RelDecl.get_type decl))))) + (generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "y") ids (List.length (fst (decompose_prod_assum evd (RelDecl.get_type decl))))) ) branches in (* before building the full intro pattern for the principle *) let eq_ind = make_eq () in - let eq_construct = mkConstructUi (destInd eq_ind, 1) in + let eq_construct = mkConstructUi (destInd evd eq_ind, 1) in (* The next to referencies will be used to find out which constructor to apply in each branch *) let ind_number = ref 0 and min_constr_number = ref 0 in @@ -306,17 +309,18 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes List.fold_right (fun hid acc -> let type_of_hid = pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar hid) in - match kind_of_term type_of_hid with + let sigma = project g in + match EConstr.kind sigma type_of_hid with | Prod(_,_,t') -> begin - match kind_of_term t' with + match EConstr.kind sigma t' with | Prod(_,t'',t''') -> begin - match kind_of_term t'',kind_of_term t''' with + match EConstr.kind sigma t'',EConstr.kind sigma t''' with | App(eq,args), App(graph',_) when - (eq_constr eq eq_ind) && - Array.exists (Constr.eq_constr_nounivs graph') graphs_constr -> + (EConstr.eq_constr sigma eq eq_ind) && + Array.exists (EConstr.eq_constr_nounivs sigma graph') graphs_constr -> (args.(2)::(mkApp(mkVar hid,[|args.(2);(mkApp(eq_construct,[|args.(0);args.(2)|]))|])) ::acc) | _ -> mkVar hid :: acc @@ -399,8 +403,8 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes match ctxt with | [] | [_] | [_;_] -> anomaly (Pp.str "bad context") | hres::res::decl::ctxt -> - let res = Termops.it_mkLambda_or_LetIn - (Termops.it_mkProd_or_LetIn concl [hres;res]) + let res = EConstr.it_mkLambda_or_LetIn + (EConstr.it_mkProd_or_LetIn concl [hres;res]) (LocalAssum (RelDecl.get_name decl, RelDecl.get_type decl) :: ctxt) in res @@ -467,7 +471,7 @@ let generalize_dependent_of x hyp g = tclMAP (function | LocalAssum (id,t) when not (Id.equal id hyp) && - (Termops.occur_var (pf_env g) x t) -> tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id])) (thin [id]) + (Termops.occur_var (pf_env g) (project g) x t) -> tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id])) (thin [id]) | _ -> tclIDTAC ) (pf_hyps g) @@ -491,43 +495,44 @@ let rec intros_with_rewrite g = and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = fun g -> let eq_ind = make_eq () in - match kind_of_term (pf_concl g) with + let sigma = project g in + match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with | Prod(_,t,t') -> begin - match kind_of_term t with - | App(eq,args) when (eq_constr eq eq_ind) -> + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | App(eq,args) when (EConstr.eq_constr sigma eq eq_ind) -> if Reductionops.is_conv (pf_env g) (project g) args.(1) args.(2) then let id = pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "y") g in tclTHENSEQ [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id); thin [id]; intros_with_rewrite ] g - else if isVar args.(1) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(1)) (pf_env g)) + else if isVar sigma args.(1) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar sigma args.(1)) (pf_env g)) then tclTHENSEQ[ - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))]); - tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))] ((destVar args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) ))) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar sigma args.(1)))]); + tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar sigma args.(1)))] ((destVar sigma args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) ))) (pf_ids_of_hyps g); intros_with_rewrite ] g - else if isVar args.(2) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(2)) (pf_env g)) + else if isVar sigma args.(2) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar sigma args.(2)) (pf_env g)) then tclTHENSEQ[ - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))]); - tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))] ((destVar args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) ))) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar sigma args.(2)))]); + tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar sigma args.(2)))] ((destVar sigma args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) ))) (pf_ids_of_hyps g); intros_with_rewrite ] g - else if isVar args.(1) + else if isVar sigma args.(1) then let id = pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "y") g in tclTHENSEQ [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id); - generalize_dependent_of (destVar args.(1)) id; + generalize_dependent_of (destVar sigma args.(1)) id; tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkVar id))); intros_with_rewrite ] g - else if isVar args.(2) + else if isVar sigma args.(2) then let id = pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "y") g in tclTHENSEQ [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id); - generalize_dependent_of (destVar args.(2)) id; + generalize_dependent_of (destVar sigma args.(2)) id; tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL (mkVar id))); intros_with_rewrite ] @@ -541,7 +546,7 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = intros_with_rewrite ] g end - | Ind _ when eq_constr t (Coqlib.build_coq_False ()) -> + | Ind _ when EConstr.eq_constr sigma t (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.build_coq_False ())) -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic tauto g | Case(_,_,v,_) -> tclTHENSEQ[ @@ -579,7 +584,7 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = let rec reflexivity_with_destruct_cases g = let destruct_case () = try - match kind_of_term (snd (destApp (pf_concl g))).(2) with + match EConstr.kind (project g) (snd (destApp (project g) (pf_concl g))).(2) with | Case(_,_,v,_) -> tclTHENSEQ[ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case v); @@ -596,8 +601,8 @@ let rec reflexivity_with_destruct_cases g = match sc with None -> tclIDTAC g | Some id -> - match kind_of_term (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar id)) with - | App(eq,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr eq eq_ind -> + match EConstr.kind (project g) (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar id)) with + | App(eq,[|_;t1;t2|]) when EConstr.eq_constr (project g) eq eq_ind -> if Equality.discriminable (pf_env g) (project g) t1 t2 then Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.discrHyp id) g else if Equality.injectable (pf_env g) (project g) t1 t2 @@ -655,18 +660,18 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = *) let lemmas = Array.map - (fun (_,(ctxt,concl)) -> nf_zeta (Termops.it_mkLambda_or_LetIn concl ctxt)) + (fun (_,(ctxt,concl)) -> nf_zeta (EConstr.it_mkLambda_or_LetIn concl ctxt)) lemmas_types_infos in (* We get the constant and the principle corresponding to this lemma *) let f = funcs.(i) in - let graph_principle = nf_zeta schemes.(i) in + let graph_principle = nf_zeta (EConstr.of_constr schemes.(i)) in let princ_type = pf_unsafe_type_of g graph_principle in - let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_infos = Tactics.compute_elim_sig (project g) princ_type in (* Then we get the number of argument of the function and compute a fresh name for each of them *) - let nb_fun_args = nb_prod (pf_concl g) - 2 in + let nb_fun_args = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) - 2 in let args_names = generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "x") [] nb_fun_args in let ids = args_names@(pf_ids_of_hyps g) in (* and fresh names for res H and the principle (cf bug bug #1174) *) @@ -684,7 +689,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = (fun decl -> List.map (fun id -> id) - (generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "y") ids (nb_prod (RelDecl.get_type decl))) + (generate_fresh_id (Id.of_string "y") ids (nb_prod (project g) (RelDecl.get_type decl))) ) branches in @@ -695,7 +700,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = let rewrite_tac j ids : tactic = let graph_def = graphs.(j) in let infos = - try find_Function_infos (fst (destConst funcs.(j))) + try find_Function_infos (fst (destConst (project g) funcs.(j))) with Not_found -> error "No graph found" in if infos.is_general @@ -721,7 +726,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = thin ids ] else - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst f)))]) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst (project g) f)))]) in (* The proof of each branche itself *) let ind_number = ref 0 in @@ -752,6 +757,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = g in let params_names = fst (List.chop princ_infos.nparams args_names) in + let open EConstr in let params = List.map mkVar params_names in tclTHENSEQ [ tclMAP (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id)) (args_names@[res;hres]); @@ -791,10 +797,10 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( in let type_info = (type_of_lemma_ctxt,type_of_lemma_concl) in graphs_constr.(i) <- graph; - let type_of_lemma = Termops.it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_lemma_concl type_of_lemma_ctxt in + let type_of_lemma = EConstr.it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_lemma_concl type_of_lemma_ctxt in let _ = Typing.e_type_of (Global.env ()) evd type_of_lemma in let type_of_lemma = nf_zeta type_of_lemma in - observe (str "type_of_lemma := " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (Global.env ()) !evd type_of_lemma); + observe (str "type_of_lemma := " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr_env (Global.env ()) !evd type_of_lemma); type_of_lemma,type_info ) funs_constr @@ -813,7 +819,7 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( Array.of_list (List.map (fun entry -> - (fst (fst(Future.force entry.Entries.const_entry_body)), Option.get entry.Entries.const_entry_type ) + (EConstr.of_constr (fst (fst(Future.force entry.Entries.const_entry_body))), EConstr.of_constr (Option.get entry.Entries.const_entry_type )) ) (make_scheme evd (Array.map_to_list (fun const -> const,GType []) funs)) ) @@ -844,7 +850,8 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( (* let lem_cst = fst (destConst (Constrintern.global_reference lem_id)) in *) let _,lem_cst_constr = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident lem_id)) in - let (lem_cst,_) = destConst lem_cst_constr in + let lem_cst_constr = EConstr.of_constr lem_cst_constr in + let (lem_cst,_) = destConst !evd lem_cst_constr in update_Function {finfo with correctness_lemma = Some lem_cst}; ) @@ -858,17 +865,17 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( let type_info = (type_of_lemma_ctxt,type_of_lemma_concl) in graphs_constr.(i) <- graph; let type_of_lemma = - Termops.it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_lemma_concl type_of_lemma_ctxt + EConstr.it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_lemma_concl type_of_lemma_ctxt in let type_of_lemma = nf_zeta type_of_lemma in - observe (str "type_of_lemma := " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr type_of_lemma); + observe (str "type_of_lemma := " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr type_of_lemma); type_of_lemma,type_info ) funs_constr graphs_constr in - let (kn,_) as graph_ind,u = (destInd graphs_constr.(0)) in + let (kn,_) as graph_ind,u = (destInd !evd graphs_constr.(0)) in let mib,mip = Global.lookup_inductive graph_ind in let sigma, scheme = (Indrec.build_mutual_induction_scheme (Global.env ()) !evd @@ -904,7 +911,8 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( let finfo = find_Function_infos (fst f_as_constant) in let _,lem_cst_constr = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident lem_id)) in - let (lem_cst,_) = destConst lem_cst_constr in + let lem_cst_constr = EConstr.of_constr lem_cst_constr in + let (lem_cst,_) = destConst !evd lem_cst_constr in update_Function {finfo with completeness_lemma = Some lem_cst} ) funs) @@ -919,10 +927,11 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme functional_induction (funs: pconstant list) ( if the type of hypothesis has not this form or if we cannot find the completeness lemma then we do nothing *) let revert_graph kn post_tac hid g = + let sigma = project g in let typ = pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar hid) in - match kind_of_term typ with - | App(i,args) when isInd i -> - let ((kn',num) as ind'),u = destInd i in + match EConstr.kind sigma typ with + | App(i,args) when isInd sigma i -> + let ((kn',num) as ind'),u = destInd sigma i in if MutInd.equal kn kn' then (* We have generated a graph hypothesis so that we must change it if we can *) let info = @@ -970,14 +979,15 @@ let revert_graph kn post_tac hid g = let functional_inversion kn hid fconst f_correct : tactic = fun g -> let old_ids = List.fold_right Id.Set.add (pf_ids_of_hyps g) Id.Set.empty in + let sigma = project g in let type_of_h = pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar hid) in - match kind_of_term type_of_h with - | App(eq,args) when eq_constr eq (make_eq ()) -> + match EConstr.kind sigma type_of_h with + | App(eq,args) when EConstr.eq_constr sigma eq (make_eq ()) -> let pre_tac,f_args,res = - match kind_of_term args.(1),kind_of_term args.(2) with - | App(f,f_args),_ when eq_constr f fconst -> + match EConstr.kind sigma args.(1),EConstr.kind sigma args.(2) with + | App(f,f_args),_ when EConstr.eq_constr sigma f fconst -> ((fun hid -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_symmetry (Locusops.onHyp hid))),f_args,args.(2)) - |_,App(f,f_args) when eq_constr f fconst -> + |_,App(f,f_args) when EConstr.eq_constr sigma f fconst -> ((fun hid -> tclIDTAC),f_args,args.(1)) | _ -> (fun hid -> tclFAIL 1 (mt ())),[||],args.(2) in @@ -1022,23 +1032,24 @@ let invfun qhyp f g = Proofview.V82.of_tactic begin Tactics.try_intros_until (fun hid -> Proofview.V82.tactic begin fun g -> + let sigma = project g in let hyp_typ = pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar hid) in - match kind_of_term hyp_typ with - | App(eq,args) when eq_constr eq (make_eq ()) -> + match EConstr.kind sigma hyp_typ with + | App(eq,args) when EConstr.eq_constr sigma eq (make_eq ()) -> begin - let f1,_ = decompose_app args.(1) in + let f1,_ = decompose_app sigma args.(1) in try - if not (isConst f1) then failwith ""; - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f1)) in + if not (isConst sigma f1) then failwith ""; + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst sigma f1)) in let f_correct = mkConst(Option.get finfos.correctness_lemma) and kn = fst finfos.graph_ind in functional_inversion kn hid f1 f_correct g with | Failure "" | Option.IsNone | Not_found -> try - let f2,_ = decompose_app args.(2) in - if not (isConst f2) then failwith ""; - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f2)) in + let f2,_ = decompose_app sigma args.(2) in + if not (isConst sigma f2) then failwith ""; + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst sigma f2)) in let f_correct = mkConst(Option.get finfos.correctness_lemma) and kn = fst finfos.graph_ind in diff --git a/plugins/funind/merge.ml b/plugins/funind/merge.ml index 19c2ed4178..44aacaf45e 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/merge.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/merge.ml @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ module RelDecl = Context.Rel.Declaration (** {2 Useful operations on constr and glob_constr} *) +let pop c = Vars.lift (-1) c let rec popn i c = if i<=0 then c else pop (popn (i-1) c) (** Substitutions in constr *) @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ let prNamedRLDecl s lc = let showind (id:Id.t) = let cstrid = Constrintern.global_reference id in - let ind1,cstrlist = Inductiveops.find_inductive (Global.env()) Evd.empty cstrid in + let ind1,cstrlist = Inductiveops.find_inductive (Global.env()) Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr cstrid) in let mib1,ib1 = Inductive.lookup_mind_specif (Global.env()) (fst ind1) in List.iter (fun decl -> print_string (string_of_name (Context.Rel.Declaration.get_name decl) ^ ":"); @@ -776,6 +777,7 @@ let merge_inductive_body (shift:merge_infos) avoid (oib1:one_inductive_body) let mkrawcor nme avoid typ = (* first replace rel 1 by a varname *) let substindtyp = substitterm 0 (mkRel 1) (mkVar nme) typ in + let substindtyp = EConstr.of_constr substindtyp in Detyping.detype false (Id.Set.elements avoid) (Global.env()) Evd.empty substindtyp in let lcstr1: glob_constr list = Array.to_list (Array.map (mkrawcor ind1name avoid) oib1.mind_user_lc) in @@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ let glob_constr_list_to_inductive_expr prms1 prms2 mib1 mib2 shift let mkProd_reldecl (rdecl:Context.Rel.Declaration.t) (t2:glob_constr) = match rdecl with | LocalAssum (nme,t) -> + let t = EConstr.of_constr t in let traw = Detyping.detype false [] (Global.env()) Evd.empty t in GProd (Loc.ghost,nme,Explicit,traw,t2) | LocalDef _ -> assert false @@ -975,23 +978,24 @@ let funify_branches relinfo nfuns branch = | Rel i -> let reali = i-shift in (reali>=0 && reali<relinfo.nbranches) | _ -> false in (* FIXME: *) - LocalDef (Anonymous,mkProp,mkProp) + LocalDef (Anonymous,EConstr.mkProp,EConstr.mkProp) let relprinctype_to_funprinctype relprinctype nfuns = - let relinfo = compute_elim_sig relprinctype in + let relprinctype = EConstr.of_constr relprinctype in + let relinfo = compute_elim_sig Evd.empty (** FIXME*) relprinctype in assert (not relinfo.farg_in_concl); assert (relinfo.indarg_in_concl); (* first remove indarg and indarg_in_concl *) let relinfo_noindarg = { relinfo with indarg_in_concl = false; indarg = None; - concl = remove_last_arg (pop relinfo.concl); } in + concl = EConstr.of_constr (remove_last_arg (pop (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr relinfo.concl))); } in (* the nfuns last induction arguments are functional ones: remove them *) let relinfo_argsok = { relinfo_noindarg with nargs = relinfo_noindarg.nargs - nfuns; (* args is in reverse order, so remove fst *) args = remove_n_fst_list nfuns relinfo_noindarg.args; - concl = popn nfuns relinfo_noindarg.concl + concl = EConstr.of_constr (popn nfuns (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr relinfo_noindarg.concl)); } in let new_branches = List.map (funify_branches relinfo_argsok nfuns) relinfo_argsok.branches in diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml index e00fa528ad..0a288c76e1 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml @@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ (* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) (************************************************************************) +module CVars = Vars + open Term +open EConstr open Vars open Namegen open Environ @@ -42,17 +45,22 @@ open Indfun_common open Sigma.Notations open Context.Rel.Declaration +let local_assum (na, t) = + LocalAssum (na, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) + +let local_def (na, b, t) = + LocalDef (na, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr b, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) (* Ugly things which should not be here *) let coq_constant m s = - Coqlib.coq_constant "RecursiveDefinition" m s + EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.coq_constant "RecursiveDefinition" m s) let arith_Nat = ["Arith";"PeanoNat";"Nat"] let arith_Lt = ["Arith";"Lt"] let coq_init_constant s = - Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "RecursiveDefinition" Coqlib.init_modules s + EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "RecursiveDefinition" Coqlib.init_modules s) let find_reference sl s = let dp = Names.DirPath.make (List.rev_map Id.of_string sl) in @@ -76,12 +84,12 @@ let def_of_const t = ) |_ -> assert false -let type_of_const t = - match (kind_of_term t) with +let type_of_const sigma t = + match (EConstr.kind sigma t) with | Const sp -> (* FIXME discarding universe constraints *) Typeops.type_of_constant_in (Global.env()) sp - |_ -> assert false + |_ -> assert false let constr_of_global x = fst (Universes.unsafe_constr_of_global x) @@ -100,9 +108,7 @@ let nf_zeta env = let nf_betaiotazeta = (* Reductionops.local_strong Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta *) - let clos_norm_flags flgs env sigma t = - CClosure.norm_val (CClosure.create_clos_infos flgs env) (CClosure.inject (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma t)) in - clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty + Reductionops.clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty @@ -118,7 +124,7 @@ let pf_get_new_ids idl g = [] let compute_renamed_type gls c = - rename_bound_vars_as_displayed (*no avoid*) [] (*no rels*) [] + rename_bound_vars_as_displayed (project gls) (*no avoid*) [] (*no rels*) [] (pf_unsafe_type_of gls c) let h'_id = Id.of_string "h'" let teq_id = Id.of_string "teq" @@ -149,7 +155,7 @@ let coq_O = function () -> (coq_init_constant "O") let coq_S = function () -> (coq_init_constant "S") let lt_n_O = function () -> (coq_constant arith_Nat "nlt_0_r") let max_ref = function () -> (find_reference ["Recdef"] "max") -let max_constr = function () -> (constr_of_global (delayed_force max_ref)) +let max_constr = function () -> EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_global (delayed_force max_ref)) let coq_conj = function () -> find_reference Coqlib.logic_module_name "conj" let f_S t = mkApp(delayed_force coq_S, [|t|]);; @@ -168,7 +174,8 @@ let simpl_iter clause = clause (* Others ugly things ... *) -let (value_f:constr list -> global_reference -> constr) = +let (value_f:Constr.constr list -> global_reference -> Constr.constr) = + let open Term in fun al fterm -> let d0 = Loc.ghost in let rev_x_id_l = @@ -201,7 +208,7 @@ let (value_f:constr list -> global_reference -> constr) = let body = fst (understand env (Evd.from_env env) glob_body)(*FIXME*) in it_mkLambda_or_LetIn body context -let (declare_f : Id.t -> logical_kind -> constr list -> global_reference -> global_reference) = +let (declare_f : Id.t -> logical_kind -> Constr.constr list -> global_reference -> global_reference) = fun f_id kind input_type fterm_ref -> declare_fun f_id kind (value_f input_type fterm_ref);; @@ -303,9 +310,9 @@ let tclUSER_if_not_mes concl_tac is_mes names_to_suppress = (* [check_not_nested forbidden e] checks that [e] does not contains any variable of [forbidden] *) -let check_not_nested forbidden e = +let check_not_nested sigma forbidden e = let rec check_not_nested e = - match kind_of_term e with + match EConstr.kind sigma e with | Rel _ -> () | Var x -> if Id.List.mem x forbidden @@ -329,7 +336,7 @@ let check_not_nested forbidden e = try check_not_nested e with UserError(_,p) -> - user_err ~hdr:"_" (str "on expr : " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr e ++ str " " ++ p) + user_err ~hdr:"_" (str "on expr : " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr e ++ str " " ++ p) (* ['a info] contains the local information for traveling *) type 'a infos = @@ -376,15 +383,17 @@ type journey_info = -let rec add_vars forbidden e = - match kind_of_term e with +let add_vars sigma forbidden e = + let rec aux forbidden e = + match EConstr.kind sigma e with | Var x -> x::forbidden - | _ -> Term.fold_constr add_vars forbidden e - + | _ -> EConstr.fold sigma aux forbidden e + in + aux forbidden e let treat_case forbid_new_ids to_intros finalize_tac nb_lam e infos : tactic = fun g -> - let rev_context,b = decompose_lam_n nb_lam e in + let rev_context,b = decompose_lam_n (project g) nb_lam e in let ids = List.fold_left (fun acc (na,_) -> let pre_id = match na with @@ -406,17 +415,17 @@ let treat_case forbid_new_ids to_intros finalize_tac nb_lam e infos : tactic = (fun g' -> let ty_teq = pf_unsafe_type_of g' (mkVar heq) in let teq_lhs,teq_rhs = - let _,args = try destApp ty_teq with DestKO -> assert false in + let _,args = try destApp (project g') ty_teq with DestKO -> assert false in args.(1),args.(2) in - let new_b' = Termops.replace_term teq_lhs teq_rhs new_b in + let new_b' = Termops.replace_term (project g') teq_lhs teq_rhs new_b in let new_infos = { infos with info = new_b'; eqs = heq::infos.eqs; forbidden_ids = if forbid_new_ids - then add_vars infos.forbidden_ids new_b' + then add_vars (project g') infos.forbidden_ids new_b' else infos.forbidden_ids } in finalize_tac new_infos g' @@ -425,8 +434,9 @@ let treat_case forbid_new_ids to_intros finalize_tac nb_lam e infos : tactic = ) ] g -let rec travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac (expr_info:constr infos) = - match kind_of_term expr_info.info with +let rec travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac (expr_info:constr infos) g = + let sigma = project g in + match EConstr.kind sigma expr_info.info with | CoFix _ | Fix _ -> error "Function cannot treat local fixpoint or cofixpoint" | Proj _ -> error "Function cannot treat projections" | LetIn(na,b,t,e) -> @@ -435,24 +445,24 @@ let rec travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac (expr_info:constr infos) = jinfo.letiN (na,b,t,e) expr_info continuation_tac in travel jinfo new_continuation_tac - {expr_info with info = b; is_final=false} + {expr_info with info = b; is_final=false} g end | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion !") | Prod _ -> begin try - check_not_nested (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) expr_info.info; - jinfo.otherS () expr_info continuation_tac expr_info + check_not_nested sigma (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) expr_info.info; + jinfo.otherS () expr_info continuation_tac expr_info g with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> - user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain a recursive call to " ++ pr_id expr_info.f_id) + user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain a recursive call to " ++ pr_id expr_info.f_id) end | Lambda(n,t,b) -> begin try - check_not_nested (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) expr_info.info; - jinfo.otherS () expr_info continuation_tac expr_info + check_not_nested sigma (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) expr_info.info; + jinfo.otherS () expr_info continuation_tac expr_info g with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> - user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain a recursive call to " ++ pr_id expr_info.f_id) + user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain a recursive call to " ++ pr_id expr_info.f_id) end | Case(ci,t,a,l) -> begin @@ -463,15 +473,15 @@ let rec travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac (expr_info:constr infos) = travel jinfo continuation_tac_a {expr_info with info = a; is_main_branch = false; - is_final = false} + is_final = false} g end | App _ -> - let f,args = decompose_app expr_info.info in - if eq_constr f (expr_info.f_constr) - then jinfo.app_reC (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac expr_info + let f,args = decompose_app sigma expr_info.info in + if EConstr.eq_constr sigma f (expr_info.f_constr) + then jinfo.app_reC (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac expr_info g else begin - match kind_of_term f with + match EConstr.kind sigma f with | App _ -> assert false (* f is coming from a decompose_app *) | Const _ | Construct _ | Rel _ | Evar _ | Meta _ | Ind _ | Sort _ | Prod _ | Var _ -> @@ -479,15 +489,15 @@ let rec travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac (expr_info:constr infos) = let new_continuation_tac = jinfo.apP (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac in travel_args jinfo - expr_info.is_main_branch new_continuation_tac new_infos - | Case _ -> user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain an applied match (See Limitation in Section 2.3 of refman)") - | _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "travel_aux : unexpected "++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info) + expr_info.is_main_branch new_continuation_tac new_infos g + | Case _ -> user_err ~hdr:"Recdef.travel" (str "the term " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info ++ str " can not contain an applied match (See Limitation in Section 2.3 of refman)") + | _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "travel_aux : unexpected "++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info) end - | Cast(t,_,_) -> travel jinfo continuation_tac {expr_info with info=t} + | Cast(t,_,_) -> travel jinfo continuation_tac {expr_info with info=t} g | Const _ | Var _ | Meta _ | Evar _ | Sort _ | Construct _ | Ind _ -> let new_continuation_tac = jinfo.otherS () expr_info continuation_tac in - new_continuation_tac expr_info + new_continuation_tac expr_info g and travel_args jinfo is_final continuation_tac infos = let (f_args',args) = infos.info in match args with @@ -504,27 +514,28 @@ and travel_args jinfo is_final continuation_tac infos = {infos with info=arg;is_final=false} and travel jinfo continuation_tac expr_info = observe_tac - (str jinfo.message ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info) + (str jinfo.message ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info) (travel_aux jinfo continuation_tac expr_info) (* Termination proof *) let rec prove_lt hyple g = + let sigma = project g in begin try - let (varx,varz) = match decompose_app (pf_concl g) with - | _, x::z::_ when isVar x && isVar z -> x, z + let (varx,varz) = match decompose_app sigma (pf_concl g) with + | _, x::z::_ when isVar sigma x && isVar sigma z -> x, z | _ -> assert false in let h = List.find (fun id -> - match decompose_app (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar id)) with - | _, t::_ -> eq_constr t varx + match decompose_app sigma (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar id)) with + | _, t::_ -> EConstr.eq_constr sigma t varx | _ -> false ) hyple in let y = - List.hd (List.tl (snd (decompose_app (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar h))))) in + List.hd (List.tl (snd (decompose_app sigma (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar h))))) in observe_tclTHENLIST (str "prove_lt1")[ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (mkApp(le_lt_trans (),[|varx;y;varz;mkVar h|]))); observe_tac (str "prove_lt") (prove_lt hyple) @@ -640,12 +651,13 @@ let terminate_others _ expr_info continuation_tac infos = ] else continuation_tac infos -let terminate_letin (na,b,t,e) expr_info continuation_tac info = +let terminate_letin (na,b,t,e) expr_info continuation_tac info g = + let sigma = project g in let new_e = subst1 info.info e in let new_forbidden = let forbid = try - check_not_nested (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) b; + check_not_nested sigma (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) b; true with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false in @@ -656,7 +668,7 @@ let terminate_letin (na,b,t,e) expr_info continuation_tac info = | Name id -> id::info.forbidden_ids else info.forbidden_ids in - continuation_tac {info with info = new_e; forbidden_ids = new_forbidden} + continuation_tac {info with info = new_e; forbidden_ids = new_forbidden} g let pf_type c tac gl = let evars, ty = Typing.type_of (pf_env gl) (project gl) c in @@ -683,7 +695,7 @@ let mkDestructEq : (fun decl -> let open Context.Named.Declaration in let id = get_id decl in - if Id.List.mem id not_on_hyp || not (Termops.occur_term expr (get_type decl)) + if Id.List.mem id not_on_hyp || not (Termops.occur_term (project g) expr (get_type decl)) then None else Some id) hyps in let to_revert_constr = List.rev_map mkVar to_revert in let type_of_expr = pf_unsafe_type_of g expr in @@ -695,16 +707,18 @@ let mkDestructEq : (fun g2 -> let changefun patvars = { run = fun sigma -> let redfun = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] in - redfun.Reductionops.e_redfun (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2) + let Sigma (c, sigma, p) = redfun.Reductionops.e_redfun (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2) in + Sigma (c, sigma, p) } in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (change_in_concl None changefun) g2); Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case expr)]), to_revert let terminate_case next_step (ci,a,t,l) expr_info continuation_tac infos g = + let sigma = project g in let f_is_present = try - check_not_nested (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) a; + check_not_nested sigma (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids) a; false with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> true @@ -718,7 +732,7 @@ let terminate_case next_step (ci,a,t,l) expr_info continuation_tac infos g = let destruct_tac,rev_to_thin_intro = mkDestructEq [expr_info.rec_arg_id] a' g in let to_thin_intro = List.rev rev_to_thin_intro in - observe_tac (str "treating cases (" ++ int (Array.length l) ++ str")" ++ spc () ++ Printer.pr_lconstr a') + observe_tac (str "treating cases (" ++ int (Array.length l) ++ str")" ++ spc () ++ Printer.pr_leconstr a') (try (tclTHENS destruct_tac @@ -727,16 +741,17 @@ let terminate_case next_step (ci,a,t,l) expr_info continuation_tac infos g = with | UserError(Some "Refiner.thensn_tac3",_) | UserError(Some "Refiner.tclFAIL_s",_) -> - (observe_tac (str "is computable " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr new_info.info) (next_step continuation_tac {new_info with info = nf_betaiotazeta new_info.info} ) + (observe_tac (str "is computable " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr new_info.info) (next_step continuation_tac {new_info with info = nf_betaiotazeta new_info.info} ) )) g -let terminate_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac _ = - List.iter (check_not_nested (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids)) +let terminate_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac _ g = + let sigma = project g in + List.iter (check_not_nested sigma (expr_info.f_id::expr_info.forbidden_ids)) args; begin try - let v = List.assoc_f (List.equal Constr.equal) args expr_info.args_assoc in + let v = List.assoc_f (List.equal (EConstr.eq_constr sigma)) args expr_info.args_assoc in let new_infos = {expr_info with info = v} in observe_tclTHENLIST (str "terminate_app_rec")[ continuation_tac new_infos; @@ -750,7 +765,7 @@ let terminate_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac _ = ] else tclIDTAC - ] + ] g with Not_found -> observe_tac (str "terminate_app_rec not found") (tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_elim (mkApp(mkVar expr_info.ih,Array.of_list args)))) @@ -807,7 +822,7 @@ let terminate_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac _ = ); ] ]) - ]) + ]) g end let terminate_info = @@ -829,8 +844,9 @@ let equation_case next_step (ci,a,t,l) expr_info continuation_tac infos = observe_tac (str "equation case") (terminate_case next_step (ci,a,t,l) expr_info continuation_tac infos) let rec prove_le g = + let sigma = project g in let x,z = - let _,args = decompose_app (pf_concl g) in + let _,args = decompose_app sigma (pf_concl g) in (List.hd args,List.hd (List.tl args)) in tclFIRST[ @@ -840,11 +856,11 @@ let rec prove_le g = try let matching_fun = pf_is_matching g - (Pattern.PApp(Pattern.PRef (reference_of_constr (le ())),[|Pattern.PVar (destVar x);Pattern.PMeta None|])) in + (Pattern.PApp(Pattern.PRef (reference_of_constr (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (le ()))),[|Pattern.PVar (destVar sigma x);Pattern.PMeta None|])) in let (h,t) = List.find (fun (_,t) -> matching_fun t) (pf_hyps_types g) in let y = - let _,args = decompose_app t in + let _,args = decompose_app sigma t in List.hd (List.tl args) in observe_tclTHENLIST (str "prove_le")[ @@ -862,11 +878,12 @@ let rec make_rewrite_list expr_info max = function observe_tac (str "make_rewrite_list") (tclTHENS (observe_tac (str "rewrite heq on " ++ pr_id p ) ( (fun g -> + let sigma = project g in let t_eq = compute_renamed_type g (mkVar hp) in let k,def = - let k_na,_,t = destProd t_eq in - let _,_,t = destProd t in - let def_na,_,_ = destProd t in + let k_na,_,t = destProd sigma t_eq in + let _,_,t = destProd sigma t in + let def_na,_,_ = destProd sigma t in Nameops.out_name k_na,Nameops.out_name def_na in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (general_rewrite_bindings false Locus.AllOccurrences @@ -874,7 +891,7 @@ let rec make_rewrite_list expr_info max = function (mkVar hp, ExplicitBindings[Loc.ghost,NamedHyp def, expr_info.f_constr;Loc.ghost,NamedHyp k, - (f_S max)]) false) g) ) + f_S max]) false) g) ) ) [make_rewrite_list expr_info max l; observe_tclTHENLIST (str "make_rewrite_list")[ (* x < S max proof *) @@ -888,11 +905,12 @@ let make_rewrite expr_info l hp max = (observe_tac (str "make_rewrite") (make_rewrite_list expr_info max l)) (observe_tac (str "make_rewrite") (tclTHENS (fun g -> + let sigma = project g in let t_eq = compute_renamed_type g (mkVar hp) in let k,def = - let k_na,_,t = destProd t_eq in - let _,_,t = destProd t in - let def_na,_,_ = destProd t in + let k_na,_,t = destProd sigma t_eq in + let _,_,t = destProd sigma t in + let def_na,_,_ = destProd sigma t in Nameops.out_name k_na,Nameops.out_name def_na in observe_tac (str "general_rewrite_bindings") @@ -901,7 +919,7 @@ let make_rewrite expr_info l hp max = (mkVar hp, ExplicitBindings[Loc.ghost,NamedHyp def, expr_info.f_constr;Loc.ghost,NamedHyp k, - (f_S (f_S max))]) false)) g) + f_S (f_S max)]) false)) g) [observe_tac(str "make_rewrite finalize") ( (* tclORELSE( h_reflexivity) *) (observe_tclTHENLIST (str "make_rewrite")[ @@ -918,7 +936,7 @@ let make_rewrite expr_info l hp max = ])) ; observe_tclTHENLIST (str "make_rewrite1")[ (* x < S (S max) proof *) - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (delayed_force le_lt_SS)); + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (EConstr.of_constr (delayed_force le_lt_SS))); observe_tac (str "prove_le (3)") prove_le ] ]) @@ -976,23 +994,24 @@ let rec intros_values_eq expr_info acc = let equation_others _ expr_info continuation_tac infos = if expr_info.is_final && expr_info.is_main_branch then - observe_tac (str "equation_others (cont_tac +intros) " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info) + observe_tac (str "equation_others (cont_tac +intros) " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info) (tclTHEN (continuation_tac infos) - (observe_tac (str "intros_values_eq equation_others " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info) (intros_values_eq expr_info []))) - else observe_tac (str "equation_others (cont_tac) " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr expr_info.info) (continuation_tac infos) + (observe_tac (str "intros_values_eq equation_others " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info) (intros_values_eq expr_info []))) + else observe_tac (str "equation_others (cont_tac) " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr expr_info.info) (continuation_tac infos) let equation_app f_and_args expr_info continuation_tac infos = if expr_info.is_final && expr_info.is_main_branch then ((observe_tac (str "intros_values_eq equation_app") (intros_values_eq expr_info []))) else continuation_tac infos -let equation_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac info = +let equation_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac info g = + let sigma = project g in begin try - let v = List.assoc_f (List.equal Constr.equal) args expr_info.args_assoc in + let v = List.assoc_f (List.equal (EConstr.eq_constr sigma)) args expr_info.args_assoc in let new_infos = {expr_info with info = v} in - observe_tac (str "app_rec found") (continuation_tac new_infos) + observe_tac (str "app_rec found") (continuation_tac new_infos) g with Not_found -> if expr_info.is_final && expr_info.is_main_branch then @@ -1000,12 +1019,12 @@ let equation_app_rec (f,args) expr_info continuation_tac info = [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkApp (expr_info.f_terminate,Array.of_list args))); continuation_tac {expr_info with args_assoc = (args,delayed_force coq_O)::expr_info.args_assoc}; observe_tac (str "app_rec intros_values_eq") (intros_values_eq expr_info []) - ] + ] g else observe_tclTHENLIST (str "equation_app_rec1")[ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkApp (expr_info.f_terminate,Array.of_list args))); observe_tac (str "app_rec not_found") (continuation_tac {expr_info with args_assoc = (args,delayed_force coq_O)::expr_info.args_assoc}) - ] + ] g end let equation_info = @@ -1024,6 +1043,8 @@ let prove_eq = travel equation_info (* [compute_terminate_type] computes the type of the Definition f_terminate from the type of f_F *) let compute_terminate_type nb_args func = + let open Term in + let open CVars in let _,a_arrow_b,_ = destLambda(def_of_const (constr_of_global func)) in let rev_args,b = decompose_prod_n nb_args a_arrow_b in let left = @@ -1036,6 +1057,7 @@ let compute_terminate_type nb_args func = ) in let right = mkRel 5 in + let delayed_force c = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (delayed_force c) in let equality = mkApp(delayed_force eq, [|lift 5 b; left; right|]) in let result = (mkProd ((Name def_id) , lift 4 a_arrow_b, equality)) in let cond = mkApp(delayed_force lt, [|(mkRel 2); (mkRel 1)|]) in @@ -1048,7 +1070,7 @@ let compute_terminate_type nb_args func = delayed_force nat, (mkProd (Name k_id, delayed_force nat, mkArrow cond result))))|])in - let value = mkApp(constr_of_global (delayed_force coq_sig_ref), + let value = mkApp(constr_of_global (Util.delayed_force coq_sig_ref), [|b; (mkLambda (Name v_id, b, nb_iter))|]) in compose_prod rev_args value @@ -1132,25 +1154,27 @@ let termination_proof_header is_mes input_type ids args_id relation -let rec instantiate_lambda t l = +let rec instantiate_lambda sigma t l = match l with | [] -> t | a::l -> - let (_, _, body) = destLambda t in - instantiate_lambda (subst1 a body) l + let (_, _, body) = destLambda sigma t in + instantiate_lambda sigma (subst1 a body) l let whole_start (concl_tac:tactic) nb_args is_mes func input_type relation rec_arg_num : tactic = begin fun g -> + let sigma = project g in let ids = Termops.ids_of_named_context (pf_hyps g) in let func_body = (def_of_const (constr_of_global func)) in - let (f_name, _, body1) = destLambda func_body in + let func_body = EConstr.of_constr func_body in + let (f_name, _, body1) = destLambda sigma func_body in let f_id = match f_name with | Name f_id -> next_ident_away_in_goal f_id ids | Anonymous -> anomaly (Pp.str "Anonymous function") in - let n_names_types,_ = decompose_lam_n nb_args body1 in + let n_names_types,_ = decompose_lam_n sigma nb_args body1 in let n_ids,ids = List.fold_left (fun (n_ids,ids) (n_name,_) -> @@ -1164,7 +1188,7 @@ let whole_start (concl_tac:tactic) nb_args is_mes func input_type relation rec_a n_names_types in let rec_arg_id = List.nth n_ids (rec_arg_num - 1) in - let expr = instantiate_lambda func_body (mkVar f_id::(List.map mkVar n_ids)) in + let expr = instantiate_lambda sigma func_body (mkVar f_id::(List.map mkVar n_ids)) in termination_proof_header is_mes input_type @@ -1206,17 +1230,17 @@ let get_current_subgoals_types () = let { Evd.it=sgs ; sigma=sigma } = Proof.V82.subgoals p in sigma, List.map (Goal.V82.abstract_type sigma) sgs -let build_and_l l = +let build_and_l sigma l = let and_constr = Coqlib.build_coq_and () in let conj_constr = coq_conj () in let mk_and p1 p2 = - Term.mkApp(and_constr,[|p1;p2|]) in + mkApp(EConstr.of_constr and_constr,[|p1;p2|]) in let rec is_well_founded t = - match kind_of_term t with + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Prod(_,_,t') -> is_well_founded t' | App(_,_) -> - let (f,_) = decompose_app t in - eq_constr f (well_founded ()) + let (f,_) = decompose_app sigma t in + EConstr.eq_constr sigma f (well_founded ()) | _ -> false in @@ -1233,7 +1257,7 @@ let build_and_l l = let c,tac,nb = f pl in mk_and p1 c, tclTHENS - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (constr_of_global conj_constr))) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_global conj_constr)))) [tclIDTAC; tac ],nb+1 @@ -1247,16 +1271,16 @@ let is_rec_res id = String.equal (String.sub id_name 0 (String.length rec_res_name)) rec_res_name with Invalid_argument _ -> false -let clear_goals = +let clear_goals sigma = let rec clear_goal t = - match kind_of_term t with + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Prod(Name id as na,t',b) -> let b' = clear_goal b in - if noccurn 1 b' && (is_rec_res id) - then Termops.pop b' + if noccurn sigma 1 b' && (is_rec_res id) + then Vars.lift (-1) b' else if b' == b then t else mkProd(na,t',b') - | _ -> Term.map_constr clear_goal t + | _ -> EConstr.map sigma clear_goal t in List.map clear_goal @@ -1264,9 +1288,9 @@ let clear_goals = let build_new_goal_type () = let sigma, sub_gls_types = get_current_subgoals_types () in (* Pp.msgnl (str "sub_gls_types1 := " ++ Util.prlist_with_sep (fun () -> Pp.fnl () ++ Pp.fnl ()) Printer.pr_lconstr sub_gls_types); *) - let sub_gls_types = clear_goals sub_gls_types in + let sub_gls_types = clear_goals sigma sub_gls_types in (* Pp.msgnl (str "sub_gls_types2 := " ++ Pp.prlist_with_sep (fun () -> Pp.fnl () ++ Pp.fnl ()) Printer.pr_lconstr sub_gls_types); *) - let res = build_and_l sub_gls_types in + let res = build_and_l sigma sub_gls_types in sigma, res let is_opaque_constant c = @@ -1287,7 +1311,7 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp anomaly (Pp.str "open_new_goal with an unamed theorem") in let na = next_global_ident_away name [] in - if Termops.occur_existential gls_type then + if Termops.occur_existential sigma gls_type then CErrors.error "\"abstract\" cannot handle existentials"; let hook _ _ = let opacity = @@ -1298,7 +1322,7 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp | _ -> anomaly ~label:"equation_lemma" (Pp.str "not a constant") in let lemma = mkConst (Names.Constant.make1 (Lib.make_kn na)) in - ref_ := Some lemma ; + ref_ := Some (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr lemma); let lid = ref [] in let h_num = ref (-1) in let env = Global.env () in @@ -1324,8 +1348,9 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp ); ] gls) (fun g -> - match kind_of_term (pf_concl g) with - | App(f,_) when eq_constr f (well_founded ()) -> + let sigma = project g in + match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with + | App(f,_) when EConstr.eq_constr sigma f (well_founded ()) -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Auto.h_auto None [] (Some [])) g | _ -> incr h_num; @@ -1368,7 +1393,7 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp (fun c -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [intros; - Simple.apply (fst (interp_constr (Global.env()) Evd.empty c)) (*FIXME*); + Simple.apply (EConstr.of_constr (fst (interp_constr (Global.env()) Evd.empty c))) (*FIXME*); Tacticals.New.tclCOMPLETE Auto.default_auto ]) ) @@ -1385,7 +1410,7 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp let com_terminate tcc_lemma_name - tcc_lemma_ref + (tcc_lemma_ref : Constr.t option ref) is_mes fonctional_ref input_type @@ -1398,7 +1423,7 @@ let com_terminate let (evmap, env) = Lemmas.get_current_context() in Lemmas.start_proof thm_name (Global, false (* FIXME *), Proof Lemma) ~sign:(Environ.named_context_val env) - ctx (compute_terminate_type nb_args fonctional_ref) hook; + ctx (EConstr.of_constr (compute_terminate_type nb_args fonctional_ref)) hook; ignore (by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac (str "starting_tac") tac_start))); ignore (by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac (str "whole_start") (whole_start tac_end nb_args is_mes fonctional_ref @@ -1422,9 +1447,11 @@ let com_terminate let start_equation (f:global_reference) (term_f:global_reference) (cont_tactic:Id.t list -> tactic) g = + let sigma = project g in let ids = pf_ids_of_hyps g in let terminate_constr = constr_of_global term_f in - let nargs = nb_prod (type_of_const terminate_constr) in + let terminate_constr = EConstr.of_constr terminate_constr in + let nargs = nb_prod (project g) (EConstr.of_constr (type_of_const sigma terminate_constr)) in let x = n_x_id ids nargs in observe_tac (str "start_equation") (observe_tclTHENLIST (str "start_equation") [ h_intros x; @@ -1436,8 +1463,9 @@ let start_equation (f:global_reference) (term_f:global_reference) let (com_eqn : int -> Id.t -> global_reference -> global_reference -> global_reference - -> constr -> unit) = + -> Constr.constr -> unit) = fun nb_arg eq_name functional_ref f_ref terminate_ref equation_lemma_type -> + let open CVars in let opacity = match terminate_ref with | ConstRef c -> is_opaque_constant c @@ -1450,20 +1478,20 @@ let (com_eqn : int -> Id.t -> (Lemmas.start_proof eq_name (Global, false, Proof Lemma) ~sign:(Environ.named_context_val env) evmap - equation_lemma_type + (EConstr.of_constr equation_lemma_type) (Lemmas.mk_hook (fun _ _ -> ())); ignore (by (Proofview.V82.tactic (start_equation f_ref terminate_ref (fun x -> prove_eq (fun _ -> tclIDTAC) {nb_arg=nb_arg; - f_terminate = constr_of_global terminate_ref; - f_constr = f_constr; + f_terminate = EConstr.of_constr (constr_of_global terminate_ref); + f_constr = EConstr.of_constr f_constr; concl_tac = tclIDTAC; func=functional_ref; - info=(instantiate_lambda - (def_of_const (constr_of_global functional_ref)) - (f_constr::List.map mkVar x) + info=(instantiate_lambda Evd.empty + (EConstr.of_constr (def_of_const (constr_of_global functional_ref))) + (EConstr.of_constr f_constr::List.map mkVar x) ); is_main_branch = true; is_final = true; @@ -1489,19 +1517,25 @@ let (com_eqn : int -> Id.t -> let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num eq generate_induction_principle using_lemmas : unit = + let open Term in + let open CVars in let env = Global.env() in let evd = ref (Evd.from_env env) in let function_type = interp_type_evars env evd type_of_f in + let function_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr function_type in let env = push_named (Context.Named.Declaration.LocalAssum (function_name,function_type)) env in (* Pp.msgnl (str "function type := " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr function_type); *) let ty = interp_type_evars env evd ~impls:rec_impls eq in + let ty = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr ty in let evm, nf = Evarutil.nf_evars_and_universes !evd in - let equation_lemma_type = nf_betaiotazeta (nf ty) in + let equation_lemma_type = nf_betaiotazeta (EConstr.of_constr (nf ty)) in let function_type = nf function_type in + let equation_lemma_type = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr equation_lemma_type in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type := " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr equation_lemma_type ++ fnl ()); *) let res_vars,eq' = decompose_prod equation_lemma_type in let env_eq' = Environ.push_rel_context (List.map (fun (x,y) -> LocalAssum (x,y)) res_vars) env in - let eq' = nf_zeta env_eq' eq' in + let eq' = nf_zeta env_eq' (EConstr.of_constr eq') in + let eq' = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr eq' in let res = (* Pp.msgnl (str "res_var :=" ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (push_rel_context (List.map (function (x,t) -> (x,None,t)) res_vars) env) eq'); *) (* Pp.msgnl (str "rec_arg_num := " ++ str (string_of_int rec_arg_num)); *) @@ -1554,7 +1588,7 @@ let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num and functional_ref = destConst (constr_of_global functional_ref) and eq_ref = destConst (constr_of_global eq_ref) in generate_induction_principle f_ref tcc_lemma_constr - functional_ref eq_ref rec_arg_num rec_arg_type (nb_prod res) relation; + functional_ref eq_ref rec_arg_num (EConstr.of_constr rec_arg_type) (nb_prod evm (EConstr.of_constr res)) (EConstr.of_constr relation); if Flags.is_verbose () then msgnl (h 1 (Ppconstr.pr_id function_name ++ spc () ++ str"is defined" )++ fnl () ++ @@ -1567,8 +1601,8 @@ let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num tcc_lemma_name tcc_lemma_constr is_mes functional_ref - rec_arg_type - relation rec_arg_num + (EConstr.of_constr rec_arg_type) + (EConstr.of_constr relation) rec_arg_num term_id using_lemmas (List.length res_vars) diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.mli b/plugins/funind/recdef.mli index f60eedbe6e..9c1081b9d2 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.mli @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ bool -> int -> Constrexpr.constr_expr -> (Term.pconstant -> Term.constr option ref -> Term.pconstant -> - Term.pconstant -> int -> Term.types -> int -> Term.constr -> 'a) -> Constrexpr.constr_expr list -> unit + Term.pconstant -> int -> EConstr.types -> int -> EConstr.constr -> 'a) -> Constrexpr.constr_expr list -> unit diff --git a/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml b/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml index e4b58a56f9..5b56fb35bf 100644 --- a/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml +++ b/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ open Pp open Mutils open Goptions +module Term = EConstr + (** * Debug flag *) @@ -330,6 +332,8 @@ struct open Coqlib open Term + open Constr + open EConstr (** * Location of the Coq libraries. @@ -373,6 +377,7 @@ struct * ZMicromega.v *) + let gen_constant_in_modules s m n = EConstr.of_constr (gen_constant_in_modules s m n) let init_constant = gen_constant_in_modules "ZMicromega" init_modules let constant = gen_constant_in_modules "ZMicromega" coq_modules let bin_constant = gen_constant_in_modules "ZMicromega" bin_module @@ -599,12 +604,12 @@ struct (* A simple but useful getter function *) - let get_left_construct term = - match Term.kind_of_term term with - | Term.Construct((_,i),_) -> (i,[| |]) - | Term.App(l,rst) -> - (match Term.kind_of_term l with - | Term.Construct((_,i),_) -> (i,rst) + let get_left_construct sigma term = + match EConstr.kind sigma term with + | Constr.Construct((_,i),_) -> (i,[| |]) + | Constr.App(l,rst) -> + (match EConstr.kind sigma l with + | Constr.Construct((_,i),_) -> (i,rst) | _ -> raise ParseError ) | _ -> raise ParseError @@ -613,11 +618,11 @@ struct (* parse/dump/print from numbers up to expressions and formulas *) - let rec parse_nat term = - let (i,c) = get_left_construct term in + let rec parse_nat sigma term = + let (i,c) = get_left_construct sigma term in match i with | 1 -> Mc.O - | 2 -> Mc.S (parse_nat (c.(0))) + | 2 -> Mc.S (parse_nat sigma (c.(0))) | i -> raise ParseError let pp_nat o n = Printf.fprintf o "%i" (CoqToCaml.nat n) @@ -627,11 +632,11 @@ struct | Mc.O -> Lazy.force coq_O | Mc.S p -> Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_S,[| dump_nat p |]) - let rec parse_positive term = - let (i,c) = get_left_construct term in + let rec parse_positive sigma term = + let (i,c) = get_left_construct sigma term in match i with - | 1 -> Mc.XI (parse_positive c.(0)) - | 2 -> Mc.XO (parse_positive c.(0)) + | 1 -> Mc.XI (parse_positive sigma c.(0)) + | 2 -> Mc.XO (parse_positive sigma c.(0)) | 3 -> Mc.XH | i -> raise ParseError @@ -661,12 +666,12 @@ struct let dump_pair t1 t2 dump_t1 dump_t2 (x,y) = Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_pair,[| t1 ; t2 ; dump_t1 x ; dump_t2 y|]) - let parse_z term = - let (i,c) = get_left_construct term in + let parse_z sigma term = + let (i,c) = get_left_construct sigma term in match i with | 1 -> Mc.Z0 - | 2 -> Mc.Zpos (parse_positive c.(0)) - | 3 -> Mc.Zneg (parse_positive c.(0)) + | 2 -> Mc.Zpos (parse_positive sigma c.(0)) + | 3 -> Mc.Zneg (parse_positive sigma c.(0)) | i -> raise ParseError let dump_z x = @@ -686,10 +691,10 @@ struct Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_Qmake, [| dump_z q.Micromega.qnum ; dump_positive q.Micromega.qden|]) - let parse_q term = - match Term.kind_of_term term with - | Term.App(c, args) -> if Constr.equal c (Lazy.force coq_Qmake) then - {Mc.qnum = parse_z args.(0) ; Mc.qden = parse_positive args.(1) } + let parse_q sigma term = + match EConstr.kind sigma term with + | Constr.App(c, args) -> if EConstr.eq_constr sigma c (Lazy.force coq_Qmake) then + {Mc.qnum = parse_z sigma args.(0) ; Mc.qden = parse_positive sigma args.(1) } else raise ParseError | _ -> raise ParseError @@ -719,27 +724,27 @@ struct | Mc.CInv t -> Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_CInv, [| dump_Rcst t |]) | Mc.COpp t -> Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_COpp, [| dump_Rcst t |]) - let rec parse_Rcst term = - let (i,c) = get_left_construct term in + let rec parse_Rcst sigma term = + let (i,c) = get_left_construct sigma term in match i with | 1 -> Mc.C0 | 2 -> Mc.C1 - | 3 -> Mc.CQ (parse_q c.(0)) - | 4 -> Mc.CPlus(parse_Rcst c.(0), parse_Rcst c.(1)) - | 5 -> Mc.CMinus(parse_Rcst c.(0), parse_Rcst c.(1)) - | 6 -> Mc.CMult(parse_Rcst c.(0), parse_Rcst c.(1)) - | 7 -> Mc.CInv(parse_Rcst c.(0)) - | 8 -> Mc.COpp(parse_Rcst c.(0)) + | 3 -> Mc.CQ (parse_q sigma c.(0)) + | 4 -> Mc.CPlus(parse_Rcst sigma c.(0), parse_Rcst sigma c.(1)) + | 5 -> Mc.CMinus(parse_Rcst sigma c.(0), parse_Rcst sigma c.(1)) + | 6 -> Mc.CMult(parse_Rcst sigma c.(0), parse_Rcst sigma c.(1)) + | 7 -> Mc.CInv(parse_Rcst sigma c.(0)) + | 8 -> Mc.COpp(parse_Rcst sigma c.(0)) | _ -> raise ParseError - let rec parse_list parse_elt term = - let (i,c) = get_left_construct term in + let rec parse_list sigma parse_elt term = + let (i,c) = get_left_construct sigma term in match i with | 1 -> [] - | 2 -> parse_elt c.(1) :: parse_list parse_elt c.(2) + | 2 -> parse_elt sigma c.(1) :: parse_list sigma parse_elt c.(2) | i -> raise ParseError let rec dump_list typ dump_elt l = @@ -872,9 +877,9 @@ struct dump_op o ; dump_expr typ dump_constant e2|]) - let assoc_const x l = + let assoc_const sigma x l = try - snd (List.find (fun (x',y) -> Constr.equal x (Lazy.force x')) l) + snd (List.find (fun (x',y) -> EConstr.eq_constr sigma x (Lazy.force x')) l) with Not_found -> raise ParseError @@ -898,35 +903,37 @@ struct let has_typ gl t1 typ = let ty = Retyping.get_type_of (Tacmach.pf_env gl) (Tacmach.project gl) t1 in - Constr.equal ty typ + EConstr.eq_constr (Tacmach.project gl) ty typ let is_convertible gl t1 t2 = Reductionops.is_conv (Tacmach.pf_env gl) (Tacmach.project gl) t1 t2 let parse_zop gl (op,args) = - match kind_of_term op with - | Const (x,_) -> (assoc_const op zop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in + match EConstr.kind sigma op with + | Const (x,_) -> (assoc_const sigma op zop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) | Ind((n,0),_) -> - if Constr.equal op (Lazy.force coq_Eq) && is_convertible gl args.(0) (Lazy.force coq_Z) + if EConstr.eq_constr sigma op (Lazy.force coq_Eq) && is_convertible gl args.(0) (Lazy.force coq_Z) then (Mc.OpEq, args.(1), args.(2)) else raise ParseError | _ -> failwith "parse_zop" let parse_rop gl (op,args) = - match kind_of_term op with - | Const (x,_) -> (assoc_const op rop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in + match EConstr.kind sigma op with + | Const (x,_) -> (assoc_const sigma op rop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) | Ind((n,0),_) -> - if Constr.equal op (Lazy.force coq_Eq) && is_convertible gl args.(0) (Lazy.force coq_R) + if EConstr.eq_constr sigma op (Lazy.force coq_Eq) && is_convertible gl args.(0) (Lazy.force coq_R) then (Mc.OpEq, args.(1), args.(2)) else raise ParseError | _ -> failwith "parse_zop" let parse_qop gl (op,args) = - (assoc_const op qop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) + (assoc_const (Tacmach.project gl) op qop_table, args.(0) , args.(1)) - let is_constant t = (* This is an approx *) - match kind_of_term t with + let is_constant sigma t = (* This is an approx *) + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Construct(i,_) -> true | _ -> false @@ -936,9 +943,9 @@ struct | Power | Ukn of string - let assoc_ops x l = + let assoc_ops sigma x l = try - snd (List.find (fun (x',y) -> Constr.equal x (Lazy.force x')) l) + snd (List.find (fun (x',y) -> EConstr.eq_constr sigma x (Lazy.force x')) l) with Not_found -> Ukn "Oups" @@ -950,12 +957,12 @@ struct struct type t = constr list - let compute_rank_add env v = + let compute_rank_add env sigma v = let rec _add env n v = match env with | [] -> ([v],n) | e::l -> - if eq_constr e v + if eq_constr sigma e v then (env,n) else let (env,n) = _add l ( n+1) v in @@ -963,13 +970,13 @@ struct let (env, n) = _add env 1 v in (env, CamlToCoq.positive n) - let get_rank env v = + let get_rank env sigma v = let rec _get_rank env n = match env with | [] -> raise (Invalid_argument "get_rank") | e::l -> - if eq_constr e v + if eq_constr sigma e v then n else _get_rank l (n+1) in _get_rank env 1 @@ -985,9 +992,9 @@ struct * This is the big generic function for expression parsers. *) - let parse_expr parse_constant parse_exp ops_spec env term = + let parse_expr sigma parse_constant parse_exp ops_spec env term = if debug - then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "parse_expr: " ++ Printer.prterm term); + then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "parse_expr: " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr term); (* let constant_or_variable env term = @@ -998,7 +1005,7 @@ struct (Mc.PEX n , env) in *) let parse_variable env term = - let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env term in + let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env sigma term in (Mc.PEX n , env) in let rec parse_expr env term = @@ -1009,12 +1016,12 @@ struct try (Mc.PEc (parse_constant term) , env) with ParseError -> - match kind_of_term term with + match EConstr.kind sigma term with | App(t,args) -> ( - match kind_of_term t with + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Const c -> - ( match assoc_ops t ops_spec with + ( match assoc_ops sigma t ops_spec with | Binop f -> combine env f (args.(0),args.(1)) | Opp -> let (expr,env) = parse_expr env args.(0) in (Mc.PEopp expr, env) @@ -1026,12 +1033,12 @@ struct (power , env) with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> (* if the exponent is a variable *) - let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env term in (Mc.PEX n, env) + let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env sigma term in (Mc.PEX n, env) end | Ukn s -> if debug then (Printf.printf "unknown op: %s\n" s; flush stdout;); - let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env term in (Mc.PEX n, env) + let (env,n) = Env.compute_rank_add env sigma term in (Mc.PEX n, env) ) | _ -> parse_variable env term ) @@ -1074,60 +1081,60 @@ struct (* coq_Rdiv , (fun x y -> Mc.CMult(x,Mc.CInv y)) ;*) ] - let rec rconstant term = - match Term.kind_of_term term with + let rec rconstant sigma term = + match EConstr.kind sigma term with | Const x -> - if Constr.equal term (Lazy.force coq_R0) + if EConstr.eq_constr sigma term (Lazy.force coq_R0) then Mc.C0 - else if Constr.equal term (Lazy.force coq_R1) + else if EConstr.eq_constr sigma term (Lazy.force coq_R1) then Mc.C1 else raise ParseError | App(op,args) -> begin try (* the evaluation order is important in the following *) - let f = assoc_const op rconst_assoc in - let a = rconstant args.(0) in - let b = rconstant args.(1) in + let f = assoc_const sigma op rconst_assoc in + let a = rconstant sigma args.(0) in + let b = rconstant sigma args.(1) in f a b with ParseError -> match op with - | op when Constr.equal op (Lazy.force coq_Rinv) -> - let arg = rconstant args.(0) in + | op when EConstr.eq_constr sigma op (Lazy.force coq_Rinv) -> + let arg = rconstant sigma args.(0) in if Mc.qeq_bool (Mc.q_of_Rcst arg) {Mc.qnum = Mc.Z0 ; Mc.qden = Mc.XH} then raise ParseError (* This is a division by zero -- no semantics *) else Mc.CInv(arg) - | op when Constr.equal op (Lazy.force coq_IQR) -> Mc.CQ (parse_q args.(0)) - | op when Constr.equal op (Lazy.force coq_IZR) -> Mc.CZ (parse_z args.(0)) + | op when EConstr.eq_constr sigma op (Lazy.force coq_IQR) -> Mc.CQ (parse_q sigma args.(0)) + | op when EConstr.eq_constr sigma op (Lazy.force coq_IZR) -> Mc.CZ (parse_z sigma args.(0)) | _ -> raise ParseError end | _ -> raise ParseError - let rconstant term = + let rconstant sigma term = if debug - then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "rconstant: " ++ Printer.prterm term ++ fnl ()); - let res = rconstant term in + then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "rconstant: " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr term ++ fnl ()); + let res = rconstant sigma term in if debug then (Printf.printf "rconstant -> %a\n" pp_Rcst res ; flush stdout) ; res - let parse_zexpr = parse_expr - zconstant + let parse_zexpr sigma = parse_expr sigma + (zconstant sigma) (fun expr x -> - let exp = (parse_z x) in + let exp = (parse_z sigma x) in match exp with | Mc.Zneg _ -> Mc.PEc Mc.Z0 | _ -> Mc.PEpow(expr, Mc.Z.to_N exp)) zop_spec - let parse_qexpr = parse_expr - qconstant + let parse_qexpr sigma = parse_expr sigma + (qconstant sigma) (fun expr x -> - let exp = parse_z x in + let exp = parse_z sigma x in match exp with | Mc.Zneg _ -> begin @@ -1139,21 +1146,22 @@ struct Mc.PEpow(expr,exp)) qop_spec - let parse_rexpr = parse_expr - rconstant + let parse_rexpr sigma = parse_expr sigma + (rconstant sigma) (fun expr x -> - let exp = Mc.N.of_nat (parse_nat x) in + let exp = Mc.N.of_nat (parse_nat sigma x) in Mc.PEpow(expr,exp)) rop_spec let parse_arith parse_op parse_expr env cstr gl = + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in if debug - then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "parse_arith: " ++ Printer.prterm cstr ++ fnl ()); - match kind_of_term cstr with + then Feedback.msg_debug (Pp.str "parse_arith: " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr cstr ++ fnl ()); + match EConstr.kind sigma cstr with | App(op,args) -> let (op,lhs,rhs) = parse_op gl (op,args) in - let (e1,env) = parse_expr env lhs in - let (e2,env) = parse_expr env rhs in + let (e1,env) = parse_expr sigma env lhs in + let (e2,env) = parse_expr sigma env rhs in ({Mc.flhs = e1; Mc.fop = op;Mc.frhs = e2},env) | _ -> failwith "error : parse_arith(2)" @@ -1191,6 +1199,7 @@ struct *) let parse_formula gl parse_atom env tg term = + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in let parse_atom env tg t = try @@ -1200,33 +1209,33 @@ struct let is_prop term = let sort = Retyping.get_sort_of (Tacmach.pf_env gl) (Tacmach.project gl) term in - Term.is_prop_sort sort in + Sorts.is_prop sort in let rec xparse_formula env tg term = - match kind_of_term term with + match EConstr.kind sigma term with | App(l,rst) -> (match rst with - | [|a;b|] when eq_constr l (Lazy.force coq_and) -> + | [|a;b|] when eq_constr sigma l (Lazy.force coq_and) -> let f,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg a in let g,env, tg = xparse_formula env tg b in mkformula_binary mkC term f g,env,tg - | [|a;b|] when eq_constr l (Lazy.force coq_or) -> + | [|a;b|] when eq_constr sigma l (Lazy.force coq_or) -> let f,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg a in let g,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg b in mkformula_binary mkD term f g,env,tg - | [|a|] when eq_constr l (Lazy.force coq_not) -> + | [|a|] when eq_constr sigma l (Lazy.force coq_not) -> let (f,env,tg) = xparse_formula env tg a in (N(f), env,tg) - | [|a;b|] when eq_constr l (Lazy.force coq_iff) -> + | [|a;b|] when eq_constr sigma l (Lazy.force coq_iff) -> let f,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg a in let g,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg b in mkformula_binary mkIff term f g,env,tg | _ -> parse_atom env tg term) - | Prod(typ,a,b) when not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) b)-> + | Prod(typ,a,b) when Vars.noccurn sigma 1 b -> let f,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg a in let g,env,tg = xparse_formula env tg b in mkformula_binary mkI term f g,env,tg - | _ when eq_constr term (Lazy.force coq_True) -> (TT,env,tg) - | _ when eq_constr term (Lazy.force coq_False) -> (FF,env,tg) + | _ when eq_constr sigma term (Lazy.force coq_True) -> (TT,env,tg) + | _ when eq_constr sigma term (Lazy.force coq_False) -> (FF,env,tg) | _ when is_prop term -> X(term),env,tg | _ -> raise ParseError in @@ -1246,10 +1255,10 @@ struct xdump f - let prop_env_of_formula form = + let prop_env_of_formula sigma form = let rec doit env = function | TT | FF | A(_,_,_) -> env - | X t -> fst (Env.compute_rank_add env t) + | X t -> fst (Env.compute_rank_add env sigma t) | C(f1,f2) | D(f1,f2) | I(f1,_,f2) -> doit (doit env f1) f2 | N f -> doit env f in @@ -1380,14 +1389,22 @@ let dump_rexpr = lazy *) -let rec make_goal_of_formula dexpr form = +let prodn n env b = + let rec prodrec = function + | (0, env, b) -> b + | (n, ((v,t)::l), b) -> prodrec (n-1, l, mkProd (v,t,b)) + | _ -> assert false + in + prodrec (n,env,b) + +let make_goal_of_formula sigma dexpr form = let vars_idx = List.mapi (fun i v -> (v, i+1)) (ISet.elements (var_env_of_formula form)) in (* List.iter (fun (v,i) -> Printf.fprintf stdout "var %i has index %i\n" v i) vars_idx ;*) - let props = prop_env_of_formula form in + let props = prop_env_of_formula sigma form in let vars_n = List.map (fun (_,i) -> (Names.id_of_string (Printf.sprintf "__x%i" i)) , dexpr.interp_typ) vars_idx in let props_n = List.mapi (fun i _ -> (Names.id_of_string (Printf.sprintf "__p%i" (i+1))) , Term.mkProp) props in @@ -1428,7 +1445,7 @@ let rec make_goal_of_formula dexpr form = | I(x,_,y) -> mkArrow (xdump pi xi x) (xdump (pi+1) (xi+1) y) | N(x) -> mkArrow (xdump pi xi x) (Lazy.force coq_False) | A(x,_,_) -> dump_cstr xi x - | X(t) -> let idx = Env.get_rank props t in + | X(t) -> let idx = Env.get_rank props sigma t in mkRel (pi+idx) in let nb_vars = List.length vars_n in @@ -1437,13 +1454,13 @@ let rec make_goal_of_formula dexpr form = (* Printf.fprintf stdout "NBProps : %i\n" nb_props ;*) let subst_prop p = - let idx = Env.get_rank props p in + let idx = Env.get_rank props sigma p in mkVar (Names.id_of_string (Printf.sprintf "__p%i" idx)) in let form' = map_prop subst_prop form in - (Term.prodn nb_props (List.map (fun (x,y) -> Names.Name x,y) props_n) - (Term.prodn nb_vars (List.map (fun (x,y) -> Names.Name x,y) vars_n) + (prodn nb_props (List.map (fun (x,y) -> Names.Name x,y) props_n) + (prodn nb_vars (List.map (fun (x,y) -> Names.Name x,y) vars_n) (xdump (List.length vars_n) 0 form)), List.rev props_n, List.rev var_name_pos,form') @@ -1517,19 +1534,19 @@ let rec apply_ids t ids = | [] -> t | i::ids -> apply_ids (Term.mkApp(t,[| Term.mkVar i |])) ids -let coq_Node = lazy - (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" - [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Node") -let coq_Leaf = lazy - (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" - [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Leaf") -let coq_Empty = lazy - (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" - [["Coq" ; "micromega" ;"VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Empty") - -let coq_VarMap = lazy - (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" - [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"] ; ["VarMap"]] "t") +let coq_Node = + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" + [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Node")) +let coq_Leaf = + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" + [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Leaf")) +let coq_Empty = + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" + [["Coq" ; "micromega" ;"VarMap"];["VarMap"]] "Empty")) + +let coq_VarMap = + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" + [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"] ; ["VarMap"]] "t")) let rec dump_varmap typ m = @@ -1687,7 +1704,8 @@ let rec mk_topo_order le l = | (Some v,l') -> v :: (mk_topo_order le l') -let topo_sort_constr l = mk_topo_order Termops.dependent l +let topo_sort_constr l = + mk_topo_order (fun c t -> Termops.dependent Evd.empty (** FIXME *) (EConstr.of_constr c) (EConstr.of_constr t)) l (** @@ -1903,7 +1921,7 @@ let micromega_tauto negate normalise unsat deduce spec prover env polys1 polys2 let formula_typ = (Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_Cstr, [|spec.coeff|])) in let ff = dump_formula formula_typ (dump_cstr spec.typ spec.dump_coeff) ff in - Feedback.msg_notice (Printer.prterm ff); + Feedback.msg_notice (Printer.pr_leconstr ff); Printf.fprintf stdout "cnf : %a\n" (pp_cnf (fun o _ -> ())) cnf_ff end; @@ -1928,7 +1946,7 @@ let micromega_tauto negate normalise unsat deduce spec prover env polys1 polys2 let formula_typ = (Term.mkApp( Lazy.force coq_Cstr,[| spec.coeff|])) in let ff' = dump_formula formula_typ (dump_cstr spec.typ spec.dump_coeff) ff' in - Feedback.msg_notice (Printer.prterm ff'); + Feedback.msg_notice (Printer.pr_leconstr ff'); Printf.fprintf stdout "cnf : %a\n" (pp_cnf (fun o _ -> ())) cnf_ff' end; @@ -1962,6 +1980,7 @@ let micromega_gen spec dumpexpr prover tac = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let gl = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun x -> x) gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in let concl = Tacmach.pf_concl gl in let hyps = Tacmach.pf_hyps_types gl in try @@ -1973,7 +1992,7 @@ let micromega_gen match micromega_tauto negate normalise unsat deduce spec prover env hyps concl gl with | None -> Tacticals.New.tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str " Cannot find witness") | Some (ids,ff',res') -> - let (arith_goal,props,vars,ff_arith) = make_goal_of_formula dumpexpr ff' in + let (arith_goal,props,vars,ff_arith) = make_goal_of_formula sigma dumpexpr ff' in let intro (id,_) = Tactics.introduction id in let intro_vars = Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST (List.map intro vars) in @@ -1986,7 +2005,7 @@ let micromega_gen micromega_order_change spec res' (Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_list, [|spec.proof_typ|])) env' ff_arith ] in - let goal_props = List.rev (prop_env_of_formula ff') in + let goal_props = List.rev (prop_env_of_formula sigma ff') in let goal_vars = List.map (fun (_,i) -> List.nth env (i-1)) vars in @@ -2046,8 +2065,8 @@ let micromega_order_changer cert env ff = [ ("__ff", ff, Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_Formula, [|formula_typ |])); ("__varmap", vm, Term.mkApp - (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" - [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"] ; ["VarMap"]] "t", [|typ|])); + (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "VarMap" + [["Coq" ; "micromega" ; "VarMap"] ; ["VarMap"]] "t"), [|typ|])); ("__wit", cert, cert_typ) ] (Tacmach.pf_concl gl))); @@ -2070,6 +2089,7 @@ let micromega_genr prover tac = } in Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let gl = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun x -> x) gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.project gl in let concl = Tacmach.pf_concl gl in let hyps = Tacmach.pf_hyps_types gl in @@ -2088,7 +2108,7 @@ let micromega_genr prover tac = (List.filter (fun (n,_) -> List.mem n ids) hyps) concl in let ff' = abstract_wrt_formula ff' ff in - let (arith_goal,props,vars,ff_arith) = make_goal_of_formula (Lazy.force dump_rexpr) ff' in + let (arith_goal,props,vars,ff_arith) = make_goal_of_formula sigma (Lazy.force dump_rexpr) ff' in let intro (id,_) = Tactics.introduction id in let intro_vars = Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST (List.map intro vars) in @@ -2100,7 +2120,7 @@ let micromega_genr prover tac = let tac_arith = Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ intro_props ; intro_vars ; micromega_order_changer res' env' ff_arith ] in - let goal_props = List.rev (prop_env_of_formula ff') in + let goal_props = List.rev (prop_env_of_formula sigma ff') in let goal_vars = List.map (fun (_,i) -> List.nth env (i-1)) vars in diff --git a/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4 b/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4 index 5f906a8dad..a6749c3474 100644 --- a/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4 +++ b/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4 @@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ DECLARE PLUGIN "nsatz_plugin" DECLARE PLUGIN "nsatz_plugin" TACTIC EXTEND nsatz_compute -| [ "nsatz_compute" constr(lt) ] -> [ Nsatz.nsatz_compute lt ] +| [ "nsatz_compute" constr(lt) ] -> [ Nsatz.nsatz_compute (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr lt) ] END diff --git a/plugins/nsatz/nsatz.ml b/plugins/nsatz/nsatz.ml index 36bce780bd..cc0c4277e5 100644 --- a/plugins/nsatz/nsatz.ml +++ b/plugins/nsatz/nsatz.ml @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ let nsatz lpol = let return_term t = let a = mkApp(gen_constant "CC" ["Init";"Logic"] "refl_equal",[|tllp ();t|]) in + let a = EConstr.of_constr a in generalize [a] let nsatz_compute t = diff --git a/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml b/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml index 1afc6500b7..adf9269587 100644 --- a/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml +++ b/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ open Util open Names open Nameops open Term +open EConstr open Tacticals open Tacmach open Tactics @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ open OmegaSolver (* Added by JCF, 09/03/98 *) let elim_id id = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> simplest_elim (Tacmach.New.pf_global id gl) end } let resolve_id id gl = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (pf_global gl id)) gl @@ -172,8 +173,8 @@ let tag_hypothesis,tag_of_hyp, hyp_of_tag, clear_tags = let hide_constr,find_constr,clear_constr_tables,dump_tables = let l = ref ([]:(constr * (Id.t * Id.t * bool)) list) in (fun h id eg b -> l := (h,(id,eg,b)):: !l), - (fun h -> - try List.assoc_f eq_constr_nounivs h !l with Not_found -> failwith "find_contr"), + (fun sigma h -> + try List.assoc_f (eq_constr_nounivs sigma) h !l with Not_found -> failwith "find_contr"), (fun () -> l := []), (fun () -> !l) @@ -197,6 +198,7 @@ let coq_modules = init_modules @arith_modules @ [logic_dir] @ zarith_base_modules @ [["Coq"; "omega"; "OmegaLemmas"]] +let gen_constant_in_modules n m s = EConstr.of_constr (gen_constant_in_modules n m s) let init_constant = gen_constant_in_modules "Omega" init_modules let constant = gen_constant_in_modules "Omega" coq_modules @@ -348,11 +350,18 @@ let coq_not_iff = lazy (constant "not_iff") let coq_not_not = lazy (constant "not_not") let coq_imp_simp = lazy (constant "imp_simp") let coq_iff = lazy (constant "iff") +let coq_not = lazy (init_constant "not") +let coq_and = lazy (init_constant "and") +let coq_or = lazy (init_constant "or") +let coq_eq = lazy (init_constant "eq") +let coq_ex = lazy (init_constant "ex") +let coq_False = lazy (init_constant "False") +let coq_True = lazy (init_constant "True") (* uses build_coq_and, build_coq_not, build_coq_or, build_coq_ex *) (* For unfold *) -let evaluable_ref_of_constr s c = match kind_of_term (Lazy.force c) with +let evaluable_ref_of_constr s c = match EConstr.kind Evd.empty (Lazy.force c) with | Const (kn,u) when Tacred.is_evaluable (Global.env()) (EvalConstRef kn) -> EvalConstRef kn | _ -> anomaly ~label:"Coq_omega" (Pp.str (s^" is not an evaluable constant")) @@ -364,21 +373,21 @@ let sp_Zle = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "Z.le" coq_Zle) let sp_Zgt = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "Z.gt" coq_Zgt) let sp_Zge = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "Z.ge" coq_Zge) let sp_Zlt = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "Z.lt" coq_Zlt) -let sp_not = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "not" (lazy (build_coq_not ()))) +let sp_not = lazy (evaluable_ref_of_constr "not" coq_not) let mk_var v = mkVar (Id.of_string v) let mk_plus t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, [| t1; t2 |]) let mk_times t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zmult, [| t1; t2 |]) let mk_minus t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zminus, [| t1;t2 |]) -let mk_eq t1 t2 = mkApp (Universes.constr_of_global (build_coq_eq ()), +let mk_eq t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_eq, [| Lazy.force coq_Z; t1; t2 |]) let mk_le t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zle, [| t1; t2 |]) let mk_gt t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zgt, [| t1; t2 |]) let mk_inv t = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zopp, [| t |]) -let mk_and t1 t2 = mkApp (build_coq_and (), [| t1; t2 |]) -let mk_or t1 t2 = mkApp (build_coq_or (), [| t1; t2 |]) -let mk_not t = mkApp (build_coq_not (), [| t |]) -let mk_eq_rel t1 t2 = mkApp (Universes.constr_of_global (build_coq_eq ()), +let mk_and t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_and, [| t1; t2 |]) +let mk_or t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_or, [| t1; t2 |]) +let mk_not t = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not, [| t |]) +let mk_eq_rel t1 t2 = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_eq, [| Lazy.force coq_comparison; t1; t2 |]) let mk_inj t = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Z_of_nat, [| t |]) @@ -420,22 +429,23 @@ type result = the term parts that we manipulate, but rather Var's. Said otherwise: all constr manipulated here are closed *) -let destructurate_prop t = - let c, args = decompose_app t in - match kind_of_term c, args with - | _, [_;_;_] when is_global (build_coq_eq ()) c -> Kapp (Eq,args) +let destructurate_prop sigma t = + let eq_constr c1 c2 = eq_constr sigma c1 c2 in + let c, args = decompose_app sigma t in + match EConstr.kind sigma c, args with + | _, [_;_;_] when eq_constr (Lazy.force coq_eq) c -> Kapp (Eq,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_neq) -> Kapp (Neq,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zne) -> Kapp (Zne,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zle) -> Kapp (Zle,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zlt) -> Kapp (Zlt,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zge) -> Kapp (Zge,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zgt) -> Kapp (Zgt,args) - | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (build_coq_and ()) -> Kapp (And,args) - | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (build_coq_or ()) -> Kapp (Or,args) + | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_and) -> Kapp (And,args) + | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_or) -> Kapp (Or,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_iff) -> Kapp (Iff, args) - | _, [_] when eq_constr c (build_coq_not ()) -> Kapp (Not,args) - | _, [] when eq_constr c (build_coq_False ()) -> Kapp (False,args) - | _, [] when eq_constr c (build_coq_True ()) -> Kapp (True,args) + | _, [_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_not) -> Kapp (Not,args) + | _, [] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_False) -> Kapp (False,args) + | _, [] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_True) -> Kapp (True,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_le) -> Kapp (Le,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_lt) -> Kapp (Lt,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_ge) -> Kapp (Ge,args) @@ -451,16 +461,18 @@ let destructurate_prop t = | Prod (Name _,_,_),[] -> error "Omega: Not a quantifier-free goal" | _ -> Kufo -let destructurate_type t = - let c, args = decompose_app t in - match kind_of_term c, args with +let destructurate_type sigma t = + let eq_constr c1 c2 = eq_constr sigma c1 c2 in + let c, args = decompose_app sigma t in + match EConstr.kind sigma c, args with | _, [] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Z) -> Kapp (Z,args) | _, [] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_nat) -> Kapp (Nat,args) | _ -> Kufo -let destructurate_term t = - let c, args = decompose_app t in - match kind_of_term c, args with +let destructurate_term sigma t = + let eq_constr c1 c2 = eq_constr sigma c1 c2 in + let c, args = decompose_app sigma t in + match EConstr.kind sigma c, args with | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zplus) -> Kapp (Zplus,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zmult) -> Kapp (Zmult,args) | _, [_;_] when eq_constr c (Lazy.force coq_Zminus) -> Kapp (Zminus,args) @@ -480,15 +492,16 @@ let destructurate_term t = | Var id,[] -> Kvar id | _ -> Kufo -let recognize_number t = +let recognize_number sigma t = + let eq_constr c1 c2 = eq_constr sigma c1 c2 in let rec loop t = - match decompose_app t with + match decompose_app sigma t with | f, [t] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_xI) -> one + two * loop t | f, [t] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_xO) -> two * loop t | f, [] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_xH) -> one | _ -> failwith "not a number" in - match decompose_app t with + match decompose_app sigma t with | f, [t] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_Zpos) -> loop t | f, [t] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_Zneg) -> neg (loop t) | f, [] when eq_constr f (Lazy.force coq_Z0) -> zero @@ -504,9 +517,9 @@ type constr_path = | P_ARITY | P_ARG -let context operation path (t : constr) = +let context sigma operation path (t : constr) = let rec loop i p0 t = - match (p0,kind_of_term t) with + match (p0,EConstr.kind sigma t) with | (p, Cast (c,k,t)) -> mkCast (loop i p c,k,t) | ([], _) -> operation i t | ((P_APP n :: p), App (f,v)) -> @@ -517,7 +530,7 @@ let context operation path (t : constr) = let v' = Array.copy v in v'.(n) <- loop i p v'.(n); (mkCase (ci,q,c,v')) | ((P_ARITY :: p), App (f,l)) -> - appvect (loop i p f,l) + mkApp (loop i p f,l) | ((P_ARG :: p), App (f,v)) -> let v' = Array.copy v in v'.(0) <- loop i p v'.(0); mkApp (f,v') @@ -542,8 +555,8 @@ let context operation path (t : constr) = in loop 1 path t -let occurrence path (t : constr) = - let rec loop p0 t = match (p0,kind_of_term t) with +let occurrence sigma path (t : constr) = + let rec loop p0 t = match (p0,EConstr.kind sigma t) with | (p, Cast (c,_,_)) -> loop p c | ([], _) -> t | ((P_APP n :: p), App (f,v)) -> loop p v.(pred n) @@ -562,13 +575,13 @@ let occurrence path (t : constr) = in loop path t -let abstract_path typ path t = +let abstract_path sigma typ path t = let term_occur = ref (mkRel 0) in - let abstract = context (fun i t -> term_occur:= t; mkRel i) path t in + let abstract = context sigma (fun i t -> term_occur:= t; mkRel i) path t in mkLambda (Name (Id.of_string "x"), typ, abstract), !term_occur let focused_simpl path gl = - let newc = context (fun i t -> pf_nf gl t) (List.rev path) (pf_concl gl) in + let newc = context (project gl) (fun i t -> pf_nf gl t) (List.rev path) (pf_concl gl) in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_concl_no_check newc DEFAULTcast) gl let focused_simpl path = focused_simpl path @@ -631,7 +644,7 @@ let mkNewMeta () = mkMeta (Evarutil.new_meta()) let clever_rewrite_base_poly typ p result theorem gl = let full = pf_concl gl in - let (abstracted,occ) = abstract_path typ (List.rev p) full in + let (abstracted,occ) = abstract_path (project gl) typ (List.rev p) full in let t = applist (mkLambda @@ -662,8 +675,8 @@ let clever_rewrite_gen_nat p result (t,args) = let clever_rewrite p vpath t gl = let full = pf_concl gl in - let (abstracted,occ) = abstract_path (Lazy.force coq_Z) (List.rev p) full in - let vargs = List.map (fun p -> occurrence p occ) vpath in + let (abstracted,occ) = abstract_path (project gl) (Lazy.force coq_Z) (List.rev p) full in + let vargs = List.map (fun p -> occurrence (project gl) p occ) vpath in let t' = applist(t, (vargs @ [abstracted])) in exact (applist(t',[mkNewMeta()])) gl @@ -907,10 +920,10 @@ let rec negate p = function | Oz i -> [focused_simpl p],Oz(neg i) | Oufo c -> [], Oufo (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zopp, [| c |])) -let rec transform p t = +let rec transform sigma p t = let default isnat t' = try - let v,th,_ = find_constr t' in + let v,th,_ = find_constr sigma t' in [clever_rewrite_base p (mkVar v) (mkVar th)], Oatom v with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> let v = new_identifier_var () @@ -918,29 +931,29 @@ let rec transform p t = hide_constr t' v th isnat; [clever_rewrite_base p (mkVar v) (mkVar th)], Oatom v in - try match destructurate_term t with + try match destructurate_term sigma t with | Kapp(Zplus,[t1;t2]) -> - let tac1,t1' = transform (P_APP 1 :: p) t1 - and tac2,t2' = transform (P_APP 2 :: p) t2 in + let tac1,t1' = transform sigma (P_APP 1 :: p) t1 + and tac2,t2' = transform sigma (P_APP 2 :: p) t2 in let tac,t' = shuffle p (t1',t2') in tac1 @ tac2 @ tac, t' | Kapp(Zminus,[t1;t2]) -> let tac,t = - transform p + transform sigma p (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, [| t1; (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zopp, [| t2 |])) |])) in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold sp_Zminus) :: tac,t | Kapp(Zsucc,[t1]) -> - let tac,t = transform p (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, + let tac,t = transform sigma p (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, [| t1; mk_integer one |])) in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold sp_Zsucc) :: tac,t | Kapp(Zpred,[t1]) -> - let tac,t = transform p (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, + let tac,t = transform sigma p (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zplus, [| t1; mk_integer negone |])) in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold sp_Zpred) :: tac,t | Kapp(Zmult,[t1;t2]) -> - let tac1,t1' = transform (P_APP 1 :: p) t1 - and tac2,t2' = transform (P_APP 2 :: p) t2 in + let tac1,t1' = transform sigma (P_APP 1 :: p) t1 + and tac2,t2' = transform sigma (P_APP 2 :: p) t2 in begin match t1',t2' with | (_,Oz n) -> let tac,t' = scalar p n t1' in tac1 @ tac2 @ tac,t' | (Oz n,_) -> @@ -951,11 +964,11 @@ let rec transform p t = | _ -> default false t end | Kapp((Zpos|Zneg|Z0),_) -> - (try ([],Oz(recognize_number t)) + (try ([],Oz(recognize_number sigma t)) with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> default false t) | Kvar s -> [],Oatom s | Kapp(Zopp,[t]) -> - let tac,t' = transform (P_APP 1 :: p) t in + let tac,t' = transform sigma (P_APP 1 :: p) t in let tac',t'' = negate p t' in tac @ tac', t'' | Kapp(Z_of_nat,[t']) -> default true t' @@ -1085,7 +1098,7 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation = let p_initial = [P_APP 2;P_TYPE] in let tac = shuffle_cancel p_initial e1.body in let solve_le = - let not_sup_sup = mkApp (Universes.constr_of_global (build_coq_eq ()), + let not_sup_sup = mkApp (Lazy.force coq_eq, [| Lazy.force coq_comparison; Lazy.force coq_Gt; @@ -1245,7 +1258,7 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation = and eq2 = val_of(decompile orig) in let vid = unintern_id v in let theorem = - mkApp (build_coq_ex (), [| + mkApp (Lazy.force coq_ex, [| Lazy.force coq_Z; mkLambda (Name vid, @@ -1356,15 +1369,15 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation = in loop -let normalize p_initial t = - let (tac,t') = transform p_initial t in +let normalize sigma p_initial t = + let (tac,t') = transform sigma p_initial t in let (tac',t'') = condense p_initial t' in let (tac'',t''') = clear_zero p_initial t'' in tac @ tac' @ tac'' , t''' -let normalize_equation id flag theorem pos t t1 t2 (tactic,defs) = +let normalize_equation sigma id flag theorem pos t t1 t2 (tactic,defs) = let p_initial = [P_APP pos ;P_TYPE] in - let (tac,t') = normalize p_initial t in + let (tac,t') = normalize sigma p_initial t in let shift_left = tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize_tac [mkApp (theorem, [| t1; t2; mkVar id |]) ])) @@ -1378,35 +1391,39 @@ let normalize_equation id flag theorem pos t t1 t2 (tactic,defs) = else (tactic,defs) +let pf_nf gl c = Tacmach.New.pf_apply Tacred.simpl gl c + let destructure_omega gl tac_def (id,c) = + let open Tacmach.New in + let sigma = project gl in if String.equal (atompart_of_id id) "State" then tac_def else - try match destructurate_prop c with + try match destructurate_prop sigma c with | Kapp(Eq,[typ;t1;t2]) - when begin match destructurate_type (pf_nf gl typ) with Kapp(Z,[]) -> true | _ -> false end -> + when begin match destructurate_type sigma (pf_nf gl typ) with Kapp(Z,[]) -> true | _ -> false end -> let t = mk_plus t1 (mk_inv t2) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id EQUA (Lazy.force coq_Zegal_left) 2 t t1 t2 tac_def | Kapp(Zne,[t1;t2]) -> let t = mk_plus t1 (mk_inv t2) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id DISE (Lazy.force coq_Zne_left) 1 t t1 t2 tac_def | Kapp(Zle,[t1;t2]) -> let t = mk_plus t2 (mk_inv t1) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id INEQ (Lazy.force coq_Zle_left) 2 t t1 t2 tac_def | Kapp(Zlt,[t1;t2]) -> let t = mk_plus (mk_plus t2 (mk_integer negone)) (mk_inv t1) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id INEQ (Lazy.force coq_Zlt_left) 2 t t1 t2 tac_def | Kapp(Zge,[t1;t2]) -> let t = mk_plus t1 (mk_inv t2) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id INEQ (Lazy.force coq_Zge_left) 2 t t1 t2 tac_def | Kapp(Zgt,[t1;t2]) -> let t = mk_plus (mk_plus t1 (mk_integer negone)) (mk_inv t2) in - normalize_equation + normalize_equation sigma id INEQ (Lazy.force coq_Zgt_left) 2 t t1 t2 tac_def | _ -> tac_def with e when catchable_exception e -> tac_def @@ -1419,10 +1436,10 @@ let reintroduce id = open Proofview.Notations let coq_omega = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> clear_constr_tables (); let hyps_types = Tacmach.New.pf_hyps_types gl in - let destructure_omega = Tacmach.New.of_old destructure_omega gl in + let destructure_omega = destructure_omega gl in let tactic_normalisation, system = List.fold_left destructure_omega ([],[]) hyps_types in let prelude,sys = @@ -1472,10 +1489,11 @@ let coq_omega = let coq_omega = coq_omega let nat_inject = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let is_conv = Tacmach.New.pf_apply Reductionops.is_conv gl in let rec explore p t : unit Proofview.tactic = - try match destructurate_term t with + Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma -> + try match destructurate_term sigma t with | Kapp(Plus,[t1;t2]) -> Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ Proofview.V82.tactic (clever_rewrite_gen p (mk_plus (mk_inj t1) (mk_inj t2)) @@ -1511,14 +1529,14 @@ let nat_inject = ] | Kapp(S,[t']) -> let rec is_number t = - try match destructurate_term t with + try match destructurate_term sigma t with Kapp(S,[t]) -> is_number t | Kapp(O,[]) -> true | _ -> false with e when catchable_exception e -> false in let rec loop p t : unit Proofview.tactic = - try match destructurate_term t with + try match destructurate_term sigma t with Kapp(S,[t]) -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (clever_rewrite_gen p @@ -1544,7 +1562,8 @@ let nat_inject = and loop = function | [] -> Proofview.tclUNIT () | (i,t)::lit -> - begin try match destructurate_prop t with + Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma -> + begin try match destructurate_prop sigma t with Kapp(Le,[t1;t2]) -> Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ (generalize_tac @@ -1641,7 +1660,8 @@ let not_binop = function exception Undecidable let rec decidability gl t = - match destructurate_prop t with + let open Tacmach.New in + match destructurate_prop (project gl) t with | Kapp(Or,[t1;t2]) -> mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_or, [| t1; t2; decidability gl t1; decidability gl t2 |]) @@ -1659,7 +1679,7 @@ let rec decidability gl t = | Kapp(Not,[t1]) -> mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_not, [| t1; decidability gl t1 |]) | Kapp(Eq,[typ;t1;t2]) -> - begin match destructurate_type (pf_nf gl typ) with + begin match destructurate_type (project gl) (pf_nf gl typ) with | Kapp(Z,[]) -> mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_eq, [| t1;t2 |]) | Kapp(Nat,[]) -> mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_eq_nat, [| t1;t2 |]) | _ -> raise Undecidable @@ -1671,35 +1691,44 @@ let rec decidability gl t = | Kapp(True,[]) -> Lazy.force coq_dec_True | _ -> raise Undecidable +let fresh_id avoid id gl = + fresh_id_in_env avoid id (Proofview.Goal.env gl) + let onClearedName id tac = (* We cannot ensure that hyps can be cleared (because of dependencies), *) (* so renaming may be necessary *) Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclTRY (clear [id])) - (Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> - let id = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] id) gl in + (Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + let id = fresh_id [] id gl in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (introduction id) (tac id) end }) let onClearedName2 id tac = Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclTRY (clear [id])) - (Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> - let id1 = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_left")) gl in - let id2 = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_right")) gl in + (Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + let id1 = fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_left") gl in + let id2 = fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_right") gl in Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ introduction id1; introduction id2; tac id1 id2 ] end }) +let rec is_Prop sigma c = match EConstr.kind sigma c with + | Sort (Prop Null) -> true + | Cast (c,_,_) -> is_Prop sigma c + | _ -> false + let destructure_hyps = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let type_of = Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl in - let decidability = Tacmach.New.of_old decidability gl in - let pf_nf = Tacmach.New.of_old pf_nf gl in + let decidability = decidability gl in + let pf_nf = pf_nf gl in let rec loop = function | [] -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN nat_inject coq_omega) | decl::lit -> let i = NamedDecl.get_id decl in - begin try match destructurate_prop (NamedDecl.get_type decl) with + Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma -> + begin try match destructurate_prop sigma (NamedDecl.get_type decl) with | Kapp(False,[]) -> elim_id i | Kapp((Zle|Zge|Zgt|Zlt|Zne),[t1;t2]) -> loop lit | Kapp(Or,[t1;t2]) -> @@ -1720,7 +1749,7 @@ let destructure_hyps = | Kimp(t1,t2) -> (* t1 and t2 might be in Type rather than Prop. For t1, the decidability check will ensure being Prop. *) - if is_Prop (type_of t2) + if is_Prop sigma (type_of t2) then let d1 = decidability t1 in Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ @@ -1732,7 +1761,7 @@ let destructure_hyps = else loop lit | Kapp(Not,[t]) -> - begin match destructurate_prop t with + begin match destructurate_prop sigma t with Kapp(Or,[t1;t2]) -> Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ (generalize_tac @@ -1789,7 +1818,7 @@ let destructure_hyps = with Not_found -> loop lit) | Kapp(Eq,[typ;t1;t2]) -> if !old_style_flag then begin - match destructurate_type (pf_nf typ) with + match destructurate_type sigma (pf_nf typ) with | Kapp(Nat,_) -> Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [ (simplest_elim @@ -1806,7 +1835,7 @@ let destructure_hyps = ] | _ -> loop lit end else begin - match destructurate_type (pf_nf typ) with + match destructurate_type sigma (pf_nf typ) with | Kapp(Nat,_) -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (convert_hyp_no_check (NamedDecl.set_type (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_neq, [| t1;t2|])) @@ -1832,11 +1861,14 @@ let destructure_hyps = end } let destructure_goal = - Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in - let decidability = Tacmach.New.of_old decidability gl in + let decidability = decidability gl in let rec loop t = - match destructurate_prop t with + Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma -> + let prop () = Proofview.tclUNIT (destructurate_prop sigma t) in + Proofview.V82.wrap_exceptions prop >>= fun prop -> + match prop with | Kapp(Not,[t]) -> (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (unfold sp_not) intro) @@ -1851,7 +1883,7 @@ let destructure_goal = (Proofview.V82.tactic (Tacmach.refine (mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_not_not, [| t; dec; mkNewMeta () |])))) intro - with Undecidable -> Tactics.elim_type (build_coq_False ()) + with Undecidable -> Tactics.elim_type (Lazy.force coq_False) in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN goal_tac destructure_hyps in diff --git a/plugins/quote/g_quote.ml4 b/plugins/quote/g_quote.ml4 index e7e6ecef98..40c1028e5b 100644 --- a/plugins/quote/g_quote.ml4 +++ b/plugins/quote/g_quote.ml4 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ let loc = Loc.ghost let cont = Id.of_string "cont" let x = Id.of_string "x" -let make_cont (k : Val.t) (c : Constr.t) = +let make_cont (k : Val.t) (c : EConstr.t) = let c = Tacinterp.Value.of_constr c in let tac = TacCall (loc, ArgVar (loc, cont), [Reference (ArgVar (loc, x))]) in let ist = { lfun = Id.Map.add cont k (Id.Map.singleton x c); extra = TacStore.empty; } in diff --git a/plugins/quote/quote.ml b/plugins/quote/quote.ml index 6405c8cebd..23069a9abc 100644 --- a/plugins/quote/quote.ml +++ b/plugins/quote/quote.ml @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ open CErrors open Util open Names open Term +open EConstr open Pattern open Patternops open Constr_matching @@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ open Proofview.Notations We do that lazily, because this code can be linked before the constants are loaded in the environment *) -let constant dir s = Coqlib.gen_constant "Quote" ("quote"::dir) s +let constant dir s = + EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant "Quote" ("quote"::dir) s) let coq_Empty_vm = lazy (constant ["Quote"] "Empty_vm") let coq_Node_vm = lazy (constant ["Quote"] "Node_vm") @@ -165,7 +167,7 @@ exchange ?1 and ?2 in the example above) module ConstrSet = Set.Make( struct - type t = constr + type t = Constr.constr let compare = constr_ord end) @@ -183,7 +185,7 @@ type inversion_scheme = { let i_can't_do_that () = error "Quote: not a simple fixpoint" -let decomp_term c = kind_of_term (Termops.strip_outer_cast c) +let decomp_term sigma c = EConstr.kind sigma (Termops.strip_outer_cast sigma c) (*s [compute_lhs typ i nargsi] builds the term \texttt{(C ?nargsi ... ?2 ?1)}, where \texttt{C} is the [i]-th constructor of inductive @@ -195,8 +197,8 @@ let coerce_meta_out id = let coerce_meta_in n = Id.of_string ("M" ^ string_of_int n) -let compute_lhs typ i nargsi = - match kind_of_term typ with +let compute_lhs sigma typ i nargsi = + match EConstr.kind sigma typ with | Ind((sp,0),u) -> let argsi = Array.init nargsi (fun j -> mkMeta (nargsi - j)) in mkApp (mkConstructU (((sp,0),i+1),u), argsi) @@ -205,60 +207,61 @@ let compute_lhs typ i nargsi = (*s This function builds the pattern from the RHS. Recursive calls are replaced by meta-variables ?i corresponding to those in the LHS *) -let compute_rhs bodyi index_of_f = +let compute_rhs env sigma bodyi index_of_f = let rec aux c = - match kind_of_term c with - | App (j, args) when isRel j && Int.equal (destRel j) index_of_f (* recursive call *) -> - let i = destRel (Array.last args) in + match EConstr.kind sigma c with + | App (j, args) when isRel sigma j && Int.equal (destRel sigma j) index_of_f (* recursive call *) -> + let i = destRel sigma (Array.last args) in PMeta (Some (coerce_meta_in i)) | App (f,args) -> - PApp (pattern_of_constr (Global.env()) Evd.empty f, Array.map aux args) + PApp (pattern_of_constr env sigma (EConstr.to_constr sigma f), Array.map aux args) | Cast (c,_,_) -> aux c - | _ -> pattern_of_constr (Global.env())(*FIXME*) Evd.empty c + | _ -> pattern_of_constr env sigma (EConstr.to_constr sigma c) in aux bodyi (*s Now the function [compute_ivs] itself *) let compute_ivs f cs gl = - let cst = try destConst f with DestKO -> i_can't_do_that () in + let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in + let cst = try destConst sigma f with DestKO -> i_can't_do_that () in let body = Environ.constant_value_in (Global.env()) cst in - match decomp_term body with + let body = EConstr.of_constr body in + match decomp_term sigma body with | Fix(([| len |], 0), ([| name |], [| typ |], [| body2 |])) -> - let (args3, body3) = decompose_lam body2 in + let (args3, body3) = decompose_lam sigma body2 in let nargs3 = List.length args3 in - let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in - let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let is_conv = Reductionops.is_conv env sigma in - begin match decomp_term body3 with + begin match decomp_term sigma body3 with | Case(_,p,c,lci) -> (* <p> Case c of c1 ... cn end *) let n_lhs_rhs = ref [] and v_lhs = ref (None : constr option) and c_lhs = ref (None : constr option) in Array.iteri (fun i ci -> - let argsi, bodyi = decompose_lam ci in + let argsi, bodyi = decompose_lam sigma ci in let nargsi = List.length argsi in (* REL (narg3 + nargsi + 1) is f *) (* REL nargsi+1 to REL nargsi + nargs3 are arguments of f *) (* REL 1 to REL nargsi are argsi (reverse order) *) (* First we test if the RHS is the RHS for constants *) - if isRel bodyi && Int.equal (destRel bodyi) 1 then - c_lhs := Some (compute_lhs (snd (List.hd args3)) + if isRel sigma bodyi && Int.equal (destRel sigma bodyi) 1 then + c_lhs := Some (compute_lhs sigma (snd (List.hd args3)) i nargsi) (* Then we test if the RHS is the RHS for variables *) - else begin match decompose_app bodyi with + else begin match decompose_app sigma bodyi with | vmf, [_; _; a3; a4 ] - when isRel a3 && isRel a4 && is_conv vmf - (Lazy.force coq_varmap_find)-> - v_lhs := Some (compute_lhs + when isRel sigma a3 && isRel sigma a4 && is_conv vmf + (Lazy.force coq_varmap_find) -> + v_lhs := Some (compute_lhs sigma (snd (List.hd args3)) i nargsi) (* Third case: this is a normal LHS-RHS *) | _ -> n_lhs_rhs := - (compute_lhs (snd (List.hd args3)) i nargsi, - compute_rhs bodyi (nargs3 + nargsi + 1)) + (compute_lhs sigma (snd (List.hd args3)) i nargsi, + compute_rhs env sigma bodyi (nargs3 + nargsi + 1)) :: !n_lhs_rhs end) lci; @@ -266,7 +269,7 @@ let compute_ivs f cs gl = if Option.is_empty !c_lhs && Option.is_empty !v_lhs then i_can't_do_that (); (* The Cases predicate is a lambda; we assume no dependency *) - let p = match kind_of_term p with + let p = match EConstr.kind sigma p with | Lambda (_,_,p) -> Termops.pop p | _ -> p in @@ -297,11 +300,11 @@ binary search trees (see file \texttt{Quote.v}) *) (* First the function to distinghish between constants (closed terms) and variables (open terms) *) -let rec closed_under cset t = - (ConstrSet.mem t cset) || - (match (kind_of_term t) with - | Cast(c,_,_) -> closed_under cset c - | App(f,l) -> closed_under cset f && Array.for_all (closed_under cset) l +let rec closed_under sigma cset t = + (ConstrSet.mem (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) cset) || + (match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | Cast(c,_,_) -> closed_under sigma cset c + | App(f,l) -> closed_under sigma cset f && Array.for_all (closed_under sigma cset) l | _ -> false) (*s [btree_of_array [| c1; c2; c3; c4; c5 |]] builds the complete @@ -361,7 +364,7 @@ let path_of_int n = let rec subterm gl (t : constr) (t' : constr) = (pf_conv_x gl t t') || - (match (kind_of_term t) with + (match EConstr.kind (project gl) t with | App (f,args) -> Array.exists (fun t -> subterm gl t t') args | Cast(t,_,_) -> (subterm gl t t') | _ -> false) @@ -370,9 +373,10 @@ let rec subterm gl (t : constr) (t' : constr) = (* Since it's a partial order the algoritm of Sort.list won't work !! *) let rec sort_subterm gl l = + let sigma = project gl in let rec insert c = function | [] -> [c] - | (h::t as l) when eq_constr c h -> l (* Avoid doing the same work twice *) + | (h::t as l) when EConstr.eq_constr sigma c h -> l (* Avoid doing the same work twice *) | h::t -> if subterm gl c h then c::h::t else h::(insert c t) in match l with @@ -380,11 +384,15 @@ let rec sort_subterm gl l = | h::t -> insert h (sort_subterm gl t) module Constrhash = Hashtbl.Make - (struct type t = constr - let equal = eq_constr - let hash = hash_constr + (struct type t = Constr.constr + let equal = Term.eq_constr + let hash = Term.hash_constr end) +let subst_meta subst c = + let subst = List.map (fun (i, c) -> i, EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c) subst in + EConstr.of_constr (Termops.subst_meta subst (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c)) + (*s Now we are able to do the inversion itself. We destructurate the term and use an imperative hashtable to store leafs that are already encountered. @@ -392,7 +400,7 @@ module Constrhash = Hashtbl.Make [ivs : inversion_scheme]\\ [lc: constr list]\\ [gl: goal sigma]\\ *) -let quote_terms ivs lc = +let quote_terms env sigma ivs lc = Coqlib.check_required_library ["Coq";"quote";"Quote"]; let varhash = (Constrhash.create 17 : constr Constrhash.t) in let varlist = ref ([] : constr list) in (* list of variables *) @@ -402,34 +410,34 @@ let quote_terms ivs lc = match l with | (lhs, rhs)::tail -> begin try - let s1 = Id.Map.bindings (matches (Global.env ()) Evd.empty rhs c) in + let s1 = Id.Map.bindings (matches env sigma rhs c) in let s2 = List.map (fun (i,c_i) -> (coerce_meta_out i,aux c_i)) s1 in - Termops.subst_meta s2 lhs + subst_meta s2 lhs with PatternMatchingFailure -> auxl tail end | [] -> begin match ivs.variable_lhs with | None -> begin match ivs.constant_lhs with - | Some c_lhs -> Termops.subst_meta [1, c] c_lhs + | Some c_lhs -> subst_meta [1, c] c_lhs | None -> anomaly (Pp.str "invalid inversion scheme for quote") end | Some var_lhs -> begin match ivs.constant_lhs with - | Some c_lhs when closed_under ivs.constants c -> - Termops.subst_meta [1, c] c_lhs + | Some c_lhs when closed_under sigma ivs.constants c -> + subst_meta [1, c] c_lhs | _ -> begin - try Constrhash.find varhash c + try Constrhash.find varhash (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c) with Not_found -> let newvar = - Termops.subst_meta [1, (path_of_int !counter)] + subst_meta [1, (path_of_int !counter)] var_lhs in begin incr counter; varlist := c :: !varlist; - Constrhash.add varhash c newvar; + Constrhash.add varhash (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c) newvar; newvar end end @@ -448,11 +456,13 @@ let quote_terms ivs lc = let quote f lid = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let f = Tacmach.New.pf_global f gl in - let cl = List.map (fun id -> Tacmach.New.pf_global id gl) lid in + let cl = List.map (fun id -> EConstr.to_constr sigma (Tacmach.New.pf_global id gl)) lid in let ivs = compute_ivs f cl gl in let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in - let quoted_terms = quote_terms ivs [concl] in + let quoted_terms = quote_terms env sigma ivs [concl] in let (p, vm) = match quoted_terms with | [p], vm -> (p,vm) | _ -> assert false @@ -464,10 +474,12 @@ let quote f lid = let gen_quote cont c f lid = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> + let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in + let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let f = Tacmach.New.pf_global f gl in - let cl = List.map (fun id -> Tacmach.New.pf_global id gl) lid in + let cl = List.map (fun id -> EConstr.to_constr sigma (Tacmach.New.pf_global id gl)) lid in let ivs = compute_ivs f cl gl in - let quoted_terms = quote_terms ivs [c] in + let quoted_terms = quote_terms env sigma ivs [c] in let (p, vm) = match quoted_terms with | [p], vm -> (p,vm) | _ -> assert false diff --git a/plugins/romega/const_omega.ml b/plugins/romega/const_omega.ml index 4935fe4bbc..5c68078d7d 100644 --- a/plugins/romega/const_omega.ml +++ b/plugins/romega/const_omega.ml @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ let parse_term t = let parse_rel gl t = try match destructurate t with | Kapp("eq",[typ;t1;t2]) - when destructurate (Tacmach.pf_nf gl typ) = Kapp("Z",[]) -> Req (t1,t2) + when destructurate (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Tacmach.pf_nf gl (EConstr.of_constr typ))) = Kapp("Z",[]) -> Req (t1,t2) | Kapp("Zne",[t1;t2]) -> Rne (t1,t2) | Kapp("Z.le",[t1;t2]) -> Rle (t1,t2) | Kapp("Z.lt",[t1;t2]) -> Rlt (t1,t2) diff --git a/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml b/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml index ba882e39a2..cfe14b230c 100644 --- a/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml +++ b/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml @@ -740,6 +740,7 @@ and oproposition_of_constr env ((negated,depends,origin,path) as ctxt) gl c = let reify_gl env gl = let concl = Tacmach.pf_concl gl in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in let t_concl = Pnot (oproposition_of_constr env (true,[],id_concl,[O_mono]) gl concl) in if !debug then begin @@ -748,6 +749,7 @@ let reify_gl env gl = end; let rec loop = function (i,t) :: lhyps -> + let t = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t in let t' = oproposition_of_constr env (false,[],i,[]) gl t in if !debug then begin Printf.printf " %s: " (Names.Id.to_string i); @@ -1222,7 +1224,7 @@ let resolution env full_reified_goal systems_list = (* variables a introduire *) let to_introduce = add_stated_equations env solution_tree in let stated_vars = List.map (fun (v,_,_,_) -> v) to_introduce in - let l_generalize_arg = List.map (fun (_,t,_,_) -> t) to_introduce in + let l_generalize_arg = List.map (fun (_,t,_,_) -> EConstr.of_constr t) to_introduce in let hyp_stated_vars = List.map (fun (_,_,_,id) -> CCEqua id) to_introduce in (* L'environnement de base se construit en deux morceaux : - les variables des équations utiles (et de la conclusion) @@ -1258,6 +1260,7 @@ let resolution env full_reified_goal systems_list = let reified = app coq_interp_sequent [| reified_concl;env_props_reified;env_terms_reified;reified_goal|] in + let reified = EConstr.of_constr reified in let normalize_equation e = let rec loop = function [] -> app (if e.e_negated then coq_p_invert else coq_p_step) @@ -1281,9 +1284,9 @@ let resolution env full_reified_goal systems_list = let decompose_tactic = decompose_tree env context solution_tree in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize - (l_generalize_arg @ List.map Term.mkVar (List.tl l_hyps))) >> + (l_generalize_arg @ List.map EConstr.mkVar (List.tl l_hyps))) >> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.change_concl reified) >> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.apply (app coq_do_omega [|decompose_tactic; normalization_trace|])) >> + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.apply (EConstr.of_constr (app coq_do_omega [|decompose_tactic; normalization_trace|]))) >> show_goal >> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.normalise_vm_in_concl) >> (*i Alternatives to the previous line: @@ -1292,7 +1295,7 @@ let resolution env full_reified_goal systems_list = - Skip the conversion check and rely directly on the QED: Tacmach.convert_concl_no_check (Lazy.force coq_True) Term.VMcast >> i*) - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.apply (Lazy.force coq_I)) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.apply (EConstr.of_constr (Lazy.force coq_I))) let total_reflexive_omega_tactic gl = Coqlib.check_required_library ["Coq";"romega";"ROmega"]; diff --git a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml index 367a133330..adb11f4f88 100644 --- a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml +++ b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml @@ -66,19 +66,18 @@ let l_E_Or = lazy (constant "E_Or") let l_D_Or = lazy (constant "D_Or") -let special_whd gl= - let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.all (pf_env gl) in - (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) +let special_whd gl c = + Reductionops.clos_whd_flags CClosure.all (pf_env gl) (Tacmach.project gl) c -let special_nf gl= - let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.betaiotazeta (pf_env gl) in - (fun t -> CClosure.norm_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) +let special_nf gl c = + Reductionops.clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta (pf_env gl) (Tacmach.project gl) c type atom_env= {mutable next:int; mutable env:(constr*int) list} let make_atom atom_env term= + let term = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr term in try let (_,i)= List.find (fun (t,_)-> eq_constr term t) atom_env.env @@ -90,13 +89,17 @@ let make_atom atom_env term= Atom i let rec make_form atom_env gls term = + let open EConstr in + let open Vars in let normalize=special_nf gls in let cciterm=special_whd gls term in - match kind_of_term cciterm with + let sigma = Tacmach.project gls in + let inj = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr in + match EConstr.kind sigma cciterm with Prod(_,a,b) -> - if not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) b) && + if noccurn sigma 1 b && Retyping.get_sort_family_of - (pf_env gls) (Tacmach.project gls) a == InProp + (pf_env gls) sigma a == InProp then let fa=make_form atom_env gls a in let fb=make_form atom_env gls b in @@ -113,7 +116,7 @@ let rec make_form atom_env gls term = | App(hd,argv) when Int.equal (Array.length argv) 2 -> begin try - let ind, _ = destInd hd in + let ind, _ = destInd sigma hd in if Names.eq_ind ind (fst (Lazy.force li_and)) then let fa=make_form atom_env gls argv.(0) in let fb=make_form atom_env gls argv.(1) in @@ -134,7 +137,7 @@ let rec make_hyps atom_env gls lenv = function | LocalAssum (id,typ)::rest -> let hrec= make_hyps atom_env gls (typ::lenv) rest in - if List.exists (Termops.dependent (mkVar id)) lenv || + if List.exists (fun c -> Termops.local_occur_var Evd.empty (** FIXME *) id c) lenv || (Retyping.get_sort_family_of (pf_env gls) (Tacmach.project gls) typ != InProp) then @@ -312,6 +315,7 @@ let rtauto_tac gls= str "Giving proof term to Coq ... ") end in let tac_start_time = System.get_time () in + let term = EConstr.of_constr term in let result= if !check then Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.exact_check term) gls diff --git a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.mli b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.mli index 9a14ac6c79..0925523641 100644 --- a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.mli +++ b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.mli @@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ type atom_env= mutable env:(Term.constr*int) list} val make_form : atom_env -> - Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> Term.types -> Proof_search.form + Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> EConstr.types -> Proof_search.form val make_hyps : atom_env -> Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> - Term.types list -> - Context.Named.t -> + EConstr.types list -> + EConstr.named_context -> (Names.Id.t * Proof_search.form) list val rtauto_tac : Proof_type.tactic diff --git a/plugins/setoid_ring/g_newring.ml4 b/plugins/setoid_ring/g_newring.ml4 index 0987c44ae2..b1882ae8ac 100644 --- a/plugins/setoid_ring/g_newring.ml4 +++ b/plugins/setoid_ring/g_newring.ml4 @@ -77,9 +77,7 @@ END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddSetoidRing CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF | [ "Add" "Ring" ident(id) ":" constr(t) ring_mods_opt(l) ] -> - [ let l = match l with None -> [] | Some l -> l in - let (k,set,cst,pre,post,power,sign, div) = process_ring_mods l in - add_theory id (ic t) set k cst (pre,post) power sign div] + [ let l = match l with None -> [] | Some l -> l in add_theory id t l] | [ "Print" "Rings" ] => [Vernac_classifier.classify_as_query] -> [ Feedback.msg_notice (strbrk "The following ring structures have been declared:"); Spmap.iter (fun fn fi -> @@ -92,7 +90,7 @@ END TACTIC EXTEND ring_lookup | [ "ring_lookup" tactic0(f) "[" constr_list(lH) "]" ne_constr_list(lrt) ] -> - [ let (t,lr) = List.sep_last lrt in ring_lookup f lH lr t] + [ let (t,lr) = List.sep_last lrt in ring_lookup f lH lr t ] END let pr_field_mod = function @@ -114,9 +112,7 @@ END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddSetoidField CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF | [ "Add" "Field" ident(id) ":" constr(t) field_mods_opt(l) ] -> - [ let l = match l with None -> [] | Some l -> l in - let (k,set,inj,cst_tac,pre,post,power,sign,div) = process_field_mods l in - add_field_theory id (ic t) set k cst_tac inj (pre,post) power sign div] + [ let l = match l with None -> [] | Some l -> l in add_field_theory id t l ] | [ "Print" "Fields" ] => [Vernac_classifier.classify_as_query] -> [ Feedback.msg_notice (strbrk "The following field structures have been declared:"); Spmap.iter (fun fn fi -> diff --git a/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.ml b/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.ml index 657efe175b..f525570955 100644 --- a/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.ml +++ b/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.ml @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ open CErrors open Util open Names open Term +open EConstr open Vars open CClosure open Environ @@ -42,9 +43,9 @@ let tag_arg tag_rec map subs i c = | Prot -> mk_atom c | Rec -> if Int.equal i (-1) then mk_clos subs c else tag_rec c -let global_head_of_constr c = - let f, args = decompose_app c in - try global_of_constr f +let global_head_of_constr sigma c = + let f, args = decompose_app sigma c in + try fst (Termops.global_of_constr sigma f) with Not_found -> anomaly (str "global_head_of_constr") let global_of_constr_nofail c = @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ let global_of_constr_nofail c = with Not_found -> VarRef (Id.of_string "dummy") let rec mk_clos_but f_map subs t = + let open Term in match f_map (global_of_constr_nofail t) with | Some map -> tag_arg (mk_clos_but f_map subs) map subs (-1) t | None -> @@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ let rec mk_clos_but f_map subs t = | _ -> mk_atom t) and mk_clos_app_but f_map subs f args n = + let open Term in if n >= Array.length args then mk_atom(mkApp(f, args)) else let fargs, args' = Array.chop n args in @@ -81,9 +84,11 @@ let lookup_map map = with Not_found -> user_err ~hdr:"lookup_map" (str"map "++qs map++str"not found") -let protect_red map env sigma c = - kl (create_clos_infos all env) - (mk_clos_but (lookup_map map c) (Esubst.subs_id 0) c);; +let protect_red map env sigma c0 = + let evars ev = Evarutil.safe_evar_value sigma ev in + let c = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c0 in + EConstr.of_constr (kl (create_clos_infos ~evars all env) + (mk_clos_but (lookup_map map sigma c0) (Esubst.subs_id 0) c));; let protect_tac map = Tactics.reduct_option (protect_red map,DEFAULTcast) None @@ -96,9 +101,10 @@ let protect_tac_in map id = let closed_term t l = let open Quote_plugin in + Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma -> let l = List.map Universes.constr_of_global l in let cs = List.fold_right Quote.ConstrSet.add l Quote.ConstrSet.empty in - if Quote.closed_under cs t then Proofview.tclUNIT () else Tacticals.New.tclFAIL 0 (mt()) + if Quote.closed_under sigma cs t then Proofview.tclUNIT () else Tacticals.New.tclFAIL 0 (mt()) (* TACTIC EXTEND echo | [ "echo" constr(t) ] -> @@ -135,14 +141,16 @@ let _ = add_tacdef false ((Loc.ghost,Id.of_string"ring_closed_term" let ic c = let env = Global.env() in let sigma = Evd.from_env env in - Constrintern.interp_open_constr env sigma c + let sigma, c = Constrintern.interp_open_constr env sigma c in + (sigma, c) let ic_unsafe c = (*FIXME remove *) let env = Global.env() in let sigma = Evd.from_env env in - fst (Constrintern.interp_constr env sigma c) + EConstr.of_constr (fst (Constrintern.interp_constr env sigma c)) let decl_constant na ctx c = + let open Constr in let vars = Universes.universes_of_constr c in let ctx = Universes.restrict_universe_context (Univ.ContextSet.of_context ctx) vars in mkConst(declare_constant (Id.of_string na) @@ -171,11 +179,11 @@ let ltac_apply (f : Value.t) (args: Tacinterp.Value.t list) = let dummy_goal env sigma = let (gl,_,sigma) = - Goal.V82.mk_goal sigma (named_context_val env) mkProp Evd.Store.empty in + Goal.V82.mk_goal sigma (named_context_val env) EConstr.mkProp Evd.Store.empty in {Evd.it = gl; Evd.sigma = sigma} let constr_of v = match Value.to_constr v with - | Some c -> c + | Some c -> EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c | None -> failwith "Ring.exec_tactic: anomaly" let tactic_res = ref [||] @@ -210,7 +218,8 @@ let exec_tactic env evd n f args = let gl = dummy_goal env evd in let gls = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tacinterp.eval_tactic_ist ist (ltac_call f (args@[getter]))) gl in let evd, nf = Evarutil.nf_evars_and_universes (Refiner.project gls) in - Array.map (fun x -> nf (constr_of x)) !tactic_res, snd (Evd.universe_context evd) + let nf c = nf (constr_of c) in + Array.map nf !tactic_res, snd (Evd.universe_context evd) let stdlib_modules = [["Coq";"Setoids";"Setoid"]; @@ -220,7 +229,7 @@ let stdlib_modules = ] let coq_constant c = - lazy (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "Ring" stdlib_modules c) + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "Ring" stdlib_modules c)) let coq_reference c = lazy (Coqlib.gen_reference_in_modules "Ring" stdlib_modules c) @@ -238,19 +247,19 @@ let plapp evd f args = let fc = Evarutil.e_new_global evd (Lazy.force f) in mkApp(fc,args) -let dest_rel0 t = - match kind_of_term t with +let dest_rel0 sigma t = + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | App(f,args) when Array.length args >= 2 -> let rel = mkApp(f,Array.sub args 0 (Array.length args - 2)) in - if closed0 rel then + if closed0 sigma rel then (rel,args.(Array.length args - 2),args.(Array.length args - 1)) else error "ring: cannot find relation (not closed)" | _ -> error "ring: cannot find relation" -let rec dest_rel t = - match kind_of_term t with - | Prod(_,_,c) -> dest_rel c - | _ -> dest_rel0 t +let rec dest_rel sigma t = + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | Prod(_,_,c) -> dest_rel sigma c + | _ -> dest_rel0 sigma t (****************************************************************************) (* Library linking *) @@ -265,7 +274,7 @@ let plugin_modules = ] let my_constant c = - lazy (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "Ring" plugin_modules c) + lazy (EConstr.of_constr (Coqlib.gen_constant_in_modules "Ring" plugin_modules c)) let my_reference c = lazy (Coqlib.gen_reference_in_modules "Ring" plugin_modules c) @@ -309,13 +318,13 @@ let coq_mkhypo = my_reference "mkhypo" let coq_hypo = my_reference "hypo" (* Equality: do not evaluate but make recursive call on both sides *) -let map_with_eq arg_map c = - let (req,_,_) = dest_rel c in +let map_with_eq arg_map sigma c = + let (req,_,_) = dest_rel sigma c in interp_map - ((global_head_of_constr req,(function -1->Prot|_->Rec)):: + ((global_head_of_constr sigma req,(function -1->Prot|_->Rec)):: List.map (fun (c,map) -> (Lazy.force c,map)) arg_map) -let map_without_eq arg_map _ = +let map_without_eq arg_map _ _ = interp_map (List.map (fun (c,map) -> (Lazy.force c,map)) arg_map) let _ = add_map "ring" @@ -334,6 +343,8 @@ let _ = add_map "ring" (****************************************************************************) (* Ring database *) +let pr_constr c = pr_econstr c + module Cmap = Map.Make(Constr) let from_carrier = Summary.ref Cmap.empty ~name:"ring-tac-carrier-table" @@ -352,7 +363,7 @@ let find_ring_structure env sigma l = (str"arguments of ring_simplify do not have all the same type") in List.iter check cl'; - (try ring_for_carrier ty + (try ring_for_carrier (EConstr.to_constr sigma ty) with Not_found -> user_err ~hdr:"ring" (str"cannot find a declared ring structure over"++ @@ -379,7 +390,7 @@ let subst_th (subst,th) = let posttac'= Tacsubst.subst_tactic subst th.ring_post_tac in if c' == th.ring_carrier && eq' == th.ring_req && - eq_constr set' th.ring_setoid && + Term.eq_constr set' th.ring_setoid && ext' == th.ring_ext && morph' == th.ring_morph && th' == th.ring_th && @@ -485,8 +496,8 @@ let op_smorph r add mul req m1 m2 = (* (setoid,op_morph) *) let ring_equality env evd (r,add,mul,opp,req) = - match kind_of_term req with - | App (f, [| _ |]) when eq_constr_nounivs f (Lazy.force coq_eq) -> + match EConstr.kind !evd req with + | App (f, [| _ |]) when eq_constr_nounivs !evd f (Lazy.force coq_eq) -> let setoid = plapp evd coq_eq_setoid [|r|] in let op_morph = match opp with @@ -540,15 +551,15 @@ let build_setoid_params env evd r add mul opp req eqth = let dest_ring env sigma th_spec = let th_typ = Retyping.get_type_of env sigma th_spec in - match kind_of_term th_typ with + match EConstr.kind sigma th_typ with App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;req|]) - when eq_constr_nounivs f (Lazy.force coq_almost_ring_theory) -> + when eq_constr_nounivs sigma f (Lazy.force coq_almost_ring_theory) -> (None,r,zero,one,add,mul,Some sub,Some opp,req) | App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;req|]) - when eq_constr_nounivs f (Lazy.force coq_semi_ring_theory) -> + when eq_constr_nounivs sigma f (Lazy.force coq_semi_ring_theory) -> (Some true,r,zero,one,add,mul,None,None,req) | App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;req|]) - when eq_constr_nounivs f (Lazy.force coq_ring_theory) -> + when eq_constr_nounivs sigma f (Lazy.force coq_ring_theory) -> (Some false,r,zero,one,add,mul,Some sub,Some opp,req) | _ -> error "bad ring structure" @@ -581,6 +592,7 @@ let make_hyp_list env evd lH = (plapp evd coq_nil [|carrier|]) in let l' = Typing.e_solve_evars env evd l in + let l' = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr l' in Evarutil.nf_evars_universes !evd l' let interp_power env evd pow = @@ -616,7 +628,7 @@ let interp_div env evd div = plapp evd coq_Some [|carrier;spec|] (* Same remark on ill-typed terms ... *) -let add_theory name (sigma,rth) eqth morphth cst_tac (pre,post) power sign div = +let add_theory0 name (sigma, rth) eqth morphth cst_tac (pre,post) power sign div = check_required_library (cdir@["Ring_base"]); let env = Global.env() in let (kind,r,zero,one,add,mul,sub,opp,req) = dest_ring env sigma rth in @@ -646,6 +658,9 @@ let add_theory name (sigma,rth) eqth morphth cst_tac (pre,post) power sign div = match post with Some t -> Tacintern.glob_tactic t | _ -> TacId [] in + let r = EConstr.to_constr sigma r in + let req = EConstr.to_constr sigma req in + let sth = EConstr.to_constr sigma sth in let _ = Lib.add_leaf name (theory_to_obj @@ -693,13 +708,18 @@ let process_ring_mods l = let k = match !kind with Some k -> k | None -> Abstract in (k, !set, !cst_tac, !pre, !post, !power, !sign, !div) +let add_theory id rth l = + let (sigma, rth) = ic rth in + let (k,set,cst,pre,post,power,sign, div) = process_ring_mods l in + add_theory0 id (sigma, rth) set k cst (pre,post) power sign div + (*****************************************************************************) (* The tactics consist then only in a lookup in the ring database and call the appropriate ltac. *) -let make_args_list rl t = +let make_args_list sigma rl t = match rl with - | [] -> let (_,t1,t2) = dest_rel0 t in [t1;t2] + | [] -> let (_,t1,t2) = dest_rel0 sigma t in [t1;t2] | _ -> rl let make_term_list env evd carrier rl = @@ -708,7 +728,7 @@ let make_term_list env evd carrier rl = (plapp evd coq_nil [|carrier|]) in Typing.e_solve_evars env evd l -let carg = Tacinterp.Value.of_constr +let carg c = Tacinterp.Value.of_constr (EConstr.of_constr c) let tacarg expr = Tacinterp.Value.of_closure (Tacinterp.default_ist ()) expr @@ -732,10 +752,10 @@ let ring_lookup (f : Value.t) lH rl t = let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in try (* find_ring_strucure can raise an exception *) + let rl = make_args_list sigma rl t in let evdref = ref sigma in - let rl = make_args_list rl t in let e = find_ring_structure env sigma rl in - let rl = carg (make_term_list env evdref e.ring_carrier rl) in + let rl = Value.of_constr (make_term_list env evdref (EConstr.of_constr e.ring_carrier) rl) in let lH = carg (make_hyp_list env evdref lH) in let ring = ltac_ring_structure e in Proofview.tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS !evdref) (ltac_apply f (ring@[lH;rl])) @@ -795,21 +815,22 @@ let af_ar = my_reference"AF_AR" let f_r = my_reference"F_R" let sf_sr = my_reference"SF_SR" let dest_field env evd th_spec = + let open Termops in let th_typ = Retyping.get_type_of env !evd th_spec in - match kind_of_term th_typ with + match EConstr.kind !evd th_typ with | App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;div;inv;req|]) - when is_global (Lazy.force afield_theory) f -> + when is_global !evd (Lazy.force afield_theory) f -> let rth = plapp evd af_ar [|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;div;inv;req;th_spec|] in (None,r,zero,one,add,mul,Some sub,Some opp,div,inv,req,rth) | App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;div;inv;req|]) - when is_global (Lazy.force field_theory) f -> + when is_global !evd (Lazy.force field_theory) f -> let rth = plapp evd f_r [|r;zero;one;add;mul;sub;opp;div;inv;req;th_spec|] in (Some false,r,zero,one,add,mul,Some sub,Some opp,div,inv,req,rth) | App(f,[|r;zero;one;add;mul;div;inv;req|]) - when is_global (Lazy.force sfield_theory) f -> + when is_global !evd (Lazy.force sfield_theory) f -> let rth = plapp evd sf_sr [|r;zero;one;add;mul;div;inv;req;th_spec|] in (Some true,r,zero,one,add,mul,None,None,div,inv,req,rth) @@ -832,7 +853,7 @@ let find_field_structure env sigma l = (str"arguments of field_simplify do not have all the same type") in List.iter check cl'; - (try field_for_carrier ty + (try field_for_carrier (EConstr.to_constr sigma ty) with Not_found -> user_err ~hdr:"field" (str"cannot find a declared field structure over"++ @@ -889,9 +910,11 @@ let ftheory_to_obj : field_info -> obj = classify_function = (fun x -> Substitute x) } let field_equality evd r inv req = - match kind_of_term req with - | App (f, [| _ |]) when eq_constr_nounivs f (Lazy.force coq_eq) -> - mkApp(Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq_data()).congr,[|r;r;inv|]) + match EConstr.kind !evd req with + | App (f, [| _ |]) when eq_constr_nounivs !evd f (Lazy.force coq_eq) -> + let c = Universes.constr_of_global (Coqlib.build_coq_eq_data()).congr in + let c = EConstr.of_constr c in + mkApp(c,[|r;r;inv|]) | _ -> let _setoid = setoid_of_relation (Global.env ()) evd r req in let signature = [Some (r,Some req)],Some(r,Some req) in @@ -901,15 +924,17 @@ let field_equality evd r inv req = error "field inverse should be declared as a morphism" in inv_m_lem -let add_field_theory name (sigma,fth) eqth morphth cst_tac inj (pre,post) power sign odiv = +let add_field_theory0 name fth eqth morphth cst_tac inj (pre,post) power sign odiv = + let open Constr in check_required_library (cdir@["Field_tac"]); + let (sigma,fth) = ic fth in let env = Global.env() in let evd = ref sigma in let (kind,r,zero,one,add,mul,sub,opp,div,inv,req,rth) = dest_field env evd fth in let (sth,ext) = build_setoid_params env evd r add mul opp req eqth in let eqth = Some(sth,ext) in - let _ = add_theory name (!evd,rth) eqth morphth cst_tac (None,None) power sign odiv in + let _ = add_theory0 name (!evd,rth) eqth morphth cst_tac (None,None) power sign odiv in let (pow_tac, pspec) = interp_power env evd power in let sspec = interp_sign env evd sign in let dspec = interp_div env evd odiv in @@ -924,7 +949,7 @@ let add_field_theory name (sigma,fth) eqth morphth cst_tac inj (pre,post) power let lemma4 = params.(6) in let cond_lemma = match inj with - | Some thm -> mkApp(params.(8),[|thm|]) + | Some thm -> mkApp(params.(8),[|EConstr.to_constr sigma thm|]) | None -> params.(7) in let lemma1 = decl_constant (Id.to_string name^"_field_lemma1") ctx lemma1 in @@ -946,6 +971,8 @@ let add_field_theory name (sigma,fth) eqth morphth cst_tac inj (pre,post) power match post with Some t -> Tacintern.glob_tactic t | _ -> TacId [] in + let r = EConstr.to_constr sigma r in + let req = EConstr.to_constr sigma req in let _ = Lib.add_leaf name (ftheory_to_obj @@ -985,6 +1012,10 @@ let process_field_mods l = let k = match !kind with Some k -> k | None -> Abstract in (k, !set, !inj, !cst_tac, !pre, !post, !power, !sign, !div) +let add_field_theory id t mods = + let (k,set,inj,cst_tac,pre,post,power,sign,div) = process_field_mods mods in + add_field_theory0 id t set k cst_tac inj (pre,post) power sign div + let ltac_field_structure e = let req = carg e.field_req in let cst_tac = tacarg e.field_cst_tac in @@ -1004,10 +1035,10 @@ let field_lookup (f : Value.t) lH rl t = let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in try + let rl = make_args_list sigma rl t in let evdref = ref sigma in - let rl = make_args_list rl t in let e = find_field_structure env sigma rl in - let rl = carg (make_term_list env evdref e.field_carrier rl) in + let rl = Value.of_constr (make_term_list env evdref (EConstr.of_constr e.field_carrier) rl) in let lH = carg (make_hyp_list env evdref lH) in let field = ltac_field_structure e in Proofview.tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS !evdref) (ltac_apply f (field@[lH;rl])) diff --git a/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.mli b/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.mli index f417c87cde..4367d021c0 100644 --- a/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.mli +++ b/plugins/setoid_ring/newring.mli @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ open Names open Constr +open EConstr open Libnames open Globnames open Constrexpr @@ -19,28 +20,12 @@ val protect_tac_in : string -> Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic val protect_tac : string -> unit Proofview.tactic -val closed_term : constr -> global_reference list -> unit Proofview.tactic - -val process_ring_mods : - constr_expr ring_mod list -> - constr coeff_spec * (constr * constr) option * - cst_tac_spec option * raw_tactic_expr option * - raw_tactic_expr option * - (cst_tac_spec * constr_expr) option * - constr_expr option * constr_expr option +val closed_term : EConstr.constr -> global_reference list -> unit Proofview.tactic val add_theory : Id.t -> - Evd.evar_map * constr -> - (constr * constr) option -> - constr coeff_spec -> - cst_tac_spec option -> - raw_tactic_expr option * raw_tactic_expr option -> - (cst_tac_spec * constr_expr) option -> - constr_expr option -> - constr_expr option -> unit - -val ic : constr_expr -> Evd.evar_map * constr + constr_expr -> + constr_expr ring_mod list -> unit val from_name : ring_info Spmap.t ref @@ -49,26 +34,10 @@ val ring_lookup : constr list -> constr list -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic -val process_field_mods : - constr_expr field_mod list -> - constr coeff_spec * - (constr * constr) option * constr option * - cst_tac_spec option * raw_tactic_expr option * - raw_tactic_expr option * - (cst_tac_spec * constr_expr) option * - constr_expr option * constr_expr option - val add_field_theory : Id.t -> - Evd.evar_map * constr -> - (constr * constr) option -> - constr coeff_spec -> - cst_tac_spec option -> - constr option -> - raw_tactic_expr option * raw_tactic_expr option -> - (cst_tac_spec * constr_expr) option -> - constr_expr option -> - constr_expr option -> unit + constr_expr -> + constr_expr field_mod list -> unit val field_from_name : field_info Spmap.t ref diff --git a/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.ml4 b/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.ml4 index fc988a2c5f..1094d50af1 100644 --- a/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.ml4 +++ b/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.ml4 @@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ let mk_lterm = mk_term ' ' let pf_type_of gl t = let sigma, ty = pf_type_of gl t in re_sig (sig_it gl) sigma, ty +let nf_evar sigma c = + EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma (EConstr.of_constr c)) + (* }}} *) (** Profiling {{{ *************************************************************) @@ -305,7 +308,7 @@ let unif_HOtype env ise p c = Evarconv.the_conv_x_leq env p c ise let unif_HO_args env ise0 pa i ca = let n = Array.length pa in let rec loop ise j = - if j = n then ise else loop (unif_HO env ise pa.(j) ca.(i + j)) (j + 1) in + if j = n then ise else loop (unif_HO env ise (EConstr.of_constr pa.(j)) (EConstr.of_constr ca.(i + j))) (j + 1) in loop ise0 0 (* FO unification should boil down to calling w_unify with no_delta, but *) @@ -332,10 +335,11 @@ let flags_FO = (Unification.default_no_delta_unify_flags ()).Unification.resolve_evars } let unif_FO env ise p c = - Unification.w_unify env ise Reduction.CONV ~flags:flags_FO p c + Unification.w_unify env ise Reduction.CONV ~flags:flags_FO (EConstr.of_constr p) (EConstr.of_constr c) (* Perform evar substitution in main term and prune substitution. *) let nf_open_term sigma0 ise c = + let c = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c in let s = ise and s' = ref sigma0 in let rec nf c' = match kind_of_term c' with | Evar ex -> @@ -352,7 +356,7 @@ let nf_open_term sigma0 ise c = | Evar_defined c' -> s' := Evd.define k (nf c') !s' | _ -> () in let c' = nf c in let _ = Evd.fold copy_def sigma0 () in - !s', Evd.evar_universe_context s, c' + !s', Evd.evar_universe_context s, EConstr.of_constr c' let unif_end env sigma0 ise0 pt ok = let ise = Evarconv.solve_unif_constraints_with_heuristics env ise0 in @@ -427,7 +431,7 @@ type tpattern = { up_a : constr array; up_t : constr; (* equation proof term or matched term *) up_dir : ssrdir; (* direction of the rule *) - up_ok : constr -> evar_map -> bool; (* progess test for rewrite *) + up_ok : constr -> evar_map -> bool; (* progress test for rewrite *) } let all_ok _ _ = true @@ -482,7 +486,9 @@ let evars_for_FO ~hack env sigma0 (ise0:evar_map) c0 = (* p_origin can be passed to obtain a better error message *) let mk_tpattern ?p_origin ?(hack=false) env sigma0 (ise, t) ok dir p = let k, f, a = - let f, a = Reductionops.whd_betaiota_stack ise p in + let f, a = Reductionops.whd_betaiota_stack ise (EConstr.of_constr p) in + let f = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr f in + let a = List.map EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr a in match kind_of_term f with | Const (p,_) -> let np = proj_nparams p in @@ -639,13 +645,14 @@ let match_upats_FO upats env sigma0 ise orig_c = | _ -> unif_FO env ise u.up_FO c' in let ise' = (* Unify again using HO to assign evars *) let p = mkApp (u.up_f, u.up_a) in - try unif_HO env ise p c' with _ -> raise NoMatch in + try unif_HO env ise (EConstr.of_constr p) (EConstr.of_constr c') with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> raise NoMatch in let lhs = mkSubApp f i a in - let pt' = unif_end env sigma0 ise' u.up_t (u.up_ok lhs) in + let pt' = unif_end env sigma0 ise' (EConstr.of_constr u.up_t) (u.up_ok lhs) in + let pt' = pi1 pt', pi2 pt', EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pi3 pt') in raise (FoundUnif (ungen_upat lhs pt' u)) with FoundUnif (s,_,_) as sig_u when dont_impact_evars s -> raise sig_u | Not_found -> CErrors.anomaly (str"incomplete ise in match_upats_FO") - | _ -> () in + | e when CErrors.noncritical e -> () in List.iter one_match fpats done; iter_constr_LR loop f; Array.iter loop a in @@ -658,7 +665,7 @@ let match_upats_FO upats env sigma0 ise c = let match_upats_HO ~on_instance upats env sigma0 ise c = - let dont_impact_evars = dont_impact_evars_in c in + let dont_impact_evars = dont_impact_evars_in c in let it_did_match = ref false in let failed_because_of_TC = ref false in let rec aux upats env sigma0 ise c = @@ -680,16 +687,17 @@ let match_upats_HO ~on_instance upats env sigma0 ise c = | KpatLet -> let x, v, t, b = destLetIn f in let _, pv, _, pb = destLetIn u.up_f in - let ise' = unif_HO env ise pv v in + let ise' = unif_HO env ise (EConstr.of_constr pv) (EConstr.of_constr v) in unif_HO (Environ.push_rel (Context.Rel.Declaration.LocalAssum(x, t)) env) - ise' pb b + ise' (EConstr.of_constr pb) (EConstr.of_constr b) | KpatFlex | KpatProj _ -> - unif_HO env ise u.up_f (mkSubApp f (i - Array.length u.up_a) a) - | _ -> unif_HO env ise u.up_f f in + unif_HO env ise (EConstr.of_constr u.up_f) (EConstr.of_constr(mkSubApp f (i - Array.length u.up_a) a)) + | _ -> unif_HO env ise (EConstr.of_constr u.up_f) (EConstr.of_constr f) in let ise'' = unif_HO_args env ise' u.up_a (i - Array.length u.up_a) a in let lhs = mkSubApp f i a in - let pt' = unif_end env sigma0 ise'' u.up_t (u.up_ok lhs) in + let pt' = unif_end env sigma0 ise'' (EConstr.of_constr u.up_t) (u.up_ok lhs) in + let pt' = pi1 pt', pi2 pt', EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pi3 pt') in on_instance (ungen_upat lhs pt' u) with FoundUnif (s,_,_) as sig_u when dont_impact_evars s -> raise sig_u | NoProgress -> it_did_match := true @@ -714,7 +722,7 @@ let match_upats_HO ~on_instance upats env sigma0 ise c = let fixed_upat = function | {up_k = KpatFlex | KpatEvar _ | KpatProj _} -> false -| {up_t = t} -> not (occur_existential t) +| {up_t = t} -> not (occur_existential Evd.empty (EConstr.of_constr t)) (** FIXME *) let do_once r f = match !r with Some _ -> () | None -> r := Some (f ()) @@ -728,13 +736,13 @@ let assert_done_multires r = r := Some (n+1,xs); try List.nth xs n with Failure _ -> raise NoMatch -type subst = Environ.env -> Term.constr -> Term.constr -> int -> Term.constr +type subst = Environ.env -> constr -> constr -> int -> constr type find_P = - Environ.env -> Term.constr -> int -> + Environ.env -> constr -> int -> k:subst -> - Term.constr + constr type conclude = unit -> - Term.constr * ssrdir * (Evd.evar_map * Evd.evar_universe_context * Term.constr) + constr * ssrdir * (Evd.evar_map * Evd.evar_universe_context * constr) (* upats_origin makes a better error message only *) let mk_tpattern_matcher ?(all_instances=false) @@ -790,13 +798,13 @@ let on_instance, instances = let rec uniquize = function | [] -> [] | (sigma,_,{ up_f = f; up_a = a; up_t = t } as x) :: xs -> - let t = Reductionops.nf_evar sigma t in - let f = Reductionops.nf_evar sigma f in - let a = Array.map (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma) a in + let t = nf_evar sigma t in + let f = nf_evar sigma f in + let a = Array.map (nf_evar sigma) a in let neq (sigma1,_,{ up_f = f1; up_a = a1; up_t = t1 }) = - let t1 = Reductionops.nf_evar sigma1 t1 in - let f1 = Reductionops.nf_evar sigma1 f1 in - let a1 = Array.map (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma1) a1 in + let t1 = nf_evar sigma1 t1 in + let f1 = nf_evar sigma1 f1 in + let a1 = Array.map (nf_evar sigma1) a1 in not (Term.eq_constr t t1 && Term.eq_constr f f1 && CArray.for_all2 Term.eq_constr a a1) in x :: uniquize (List.filter neq xs) in @@ -845,8 +853,11 @@ let rec uniquize = function | Context.Rel.Declaration.LocalAssum _ as x -> x | Context.Rel.Declaration.LocalDef (x,_,y) -> Context.Rel.Declaration.LocalAssum(x,y) in - Environ.push_rel ctx_item env, h' + 1 in - let f' = map_constr_with_binders_left_to_right inc_h subst_loop acc f in + EConstr.push_rel ctx_item env, h' + 1 in + let self acc c = EConstr.of_constr (subst_loop acc (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr c)) in + let f = EConstr.of_constr f in + let f' = map_constr_with_binders_left_to_right sigma inc_h self acc f in + let f' = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr f' in mkApp (f', Array.map_left (subst_loop acc) a) in subst_loop (env,h) c) : find_P), ((fun () -> @@ -901,7 +912,7 @@ let pr_pattern_aux pr_constr = function | E_As_X_In_T (e,x,t) -> pr_constr e ++ str " as " ++ pr_constr x ++ str " in " ++ pr_constr t let pp_pattern (sigma, p) = - pr_pattern_aux (fun t -> pr_constr_pat (pi3 (nf_open_term sigma sigma t))) p + pr_pattern_aux (fun t -> pr_constr_pat (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (pi3 (nf_open_term sigma sigma (EConstr.of_constr t))))) p let pr_cpattern = pr_term let pr_rpattern _ _ _ = pr_pattern @@ -1005,7 +1016,7 @@ type occ = (bool * int list) option type rpattern = (cpattern, cpattern) ssrpattern let pr_rpattern = pr_pattern -type pattern = Evd.evar_map * (Term.constr, Term.constr) ssrpattern +type pattern = Evd.evar_map * (constr, constr) ssrpattern let id_of_cpattern = function @@ -1037,7 +1048,7 @@ let interp_constr = interp_wit wit_constr let interp_open_constr ist gl gc = interp_wit wit_open_constr ist gl gc let pf_intern_term ist gl (_, c) = glob_constr ist (pf_env gl) c -let interp_term ist gl (_, c) = (interp_open_constr ist gl c) +let interp_term ist gl (_, c) = on_snd EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr (interp_open_constr ist gl c) let pr_ssrterm _ _ _ = pr_term let input_ssrtermkind strm = match Compat.get_tok (stream_nth 0 strm) with | Tok.KEYWORD "(" -> '(' @@ -1145,7 +1156,7 @@ let interp_pattern ?wit_ssrpatternarg ist gl red redty = if k = h_k || List.mem k acc || Evd.mem sigma0 k then acc else (update k; k::acc) | _ -> fold_constr aux acc t in - aux [] (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma rp) in + aux [] (nf_evar sigma rp) in let sigma = List.fold_left (fun sigma e -> if Evd.is_defined sigma e then sigma else (* clear may be recursive *) @@ -1202,7 +1213,7 @@ let interp_pattern ?wit_ssrpatternarg ist gl red redty = let sigma, rp = interp_term ist gl rp in let _, h, _, rp = destLetIn rp in let sigma = cleanup_XinE h x rp sigma in - let rp = subst1 h (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma rp) in + let rp = subst1 h (nf_evar sigma rp) in sigma, mk h rp | E_In_X_In_T(e, x, rp) | E_As_X_In_T (e, x, rp) -> let mk e x p = @@ -1211,7 +1222,7 @@ let interp_pattern ?wit_ssrpatternarg ist gl red redty = let sigma, rp = interp_term ist gl rp in let _, h, _, rp = destLetIn rp in let sigma = cleanup_XinE h x rp sigma in - let rp = subst1 h (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma rp) in + let rp = subst1 h (nf_evar sigma rp) in let sigma, e = interp_term ist (re_sig (sig_it gl) sigma) e in sigma, mk e h rp ;; @@ -1227,7 +1238,7 @@ let noindex = Some(false,[]) (* calls do_subst on every sub-term identified by (pattern,occ) *) let eval_pattern ?raise_NoMatch env0 sigma0 concl0 pattern occ do_subst = - let fs sigma x = Reductionops.nf_evar sigma x in + let fs sigma x = nf_evar sigma x in let pop_evar sigma e p = let { Evd.evar_body = e_body } as e_def = Evd.find sigma e in let e_body = match e_body with Evar_defined c -> c @@ -1264,7 +1275,7 @@ let eval_pattern ?raise_NoMatch env0 sigma0 concl0 pattern occ do_subst = let holep = mk_upat_for env0 sigma (sigma, hole) all_ok in let find_X, end_X = mk_tpattern_matcher ?raise_NoMatch sigma occ holep in let concl = find_T env0 concl0 1 (fun env c _ h -> - let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) c p in + let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) (EConstr.of_constr c) (EConstr.of_constr p) in let sigma, e_body = pop_evar p_sigma ex p in fs p_sigma (find_X env (fs sigma p) h (fun env _ -> do_subst env e_body))) in @@ -1280,7 +1291,7 @@ let eval_pattern ?raise_NoMatch env0 sigma0 concl0 pattern occ do_subst = let re = mk_upat_for env0 sigma0 (sigma, e) all_ok in let find_E, end_E = mk_tpattern_matcher ?raise_NoMatch sigma0 occ re in let concl = find_T env0 concl0 1 (fun env c _ h -> - let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) c p in + let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) (EConstr.of_constr c) (EConstr.of_constr p) in let sigma, e_body = pop_evar p_sigma ex p in fs p_sigma (find_X env (fs sigma p) h (fun env c _ h -> find_E env e_body h do_subst))) in @@ -1290,17 +1301,17 @@ let eval_pattern ?raise_NoMatch env0 sigma0 concl0 pattern occ do_subst = let p, e = fs sigma p, fs sigma e in let ex = ex_value hole in let rp = - let e_sigma = unify_HO env0 sigma hole e in + let e_sigma = unify_HO env0 sigma (EConstr.of_constr hole) (EConstr.of_constr e) in e_sigma, fs e_sigma p in let rp = mk_upat_for ~hack:true env0 sigma0 rp all_ok in let find_TE, end_TE = mk_tpattern_matcher sigma0 noindex rp in let holep = mk_upat_for env0 sigma (sigma, hole) all_ok in let find_X, end_X = mk_tpattern_matcher sigma occ holep in let concl = find_TE env0 concl0 1 (fun env c _ h -> - let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) c p in + let p_sigma = unify_HO env (create_evar_defs sigma) (EConstr.of_constr c) (EConstr.of_constr p) in let sigma, e_body = pop_evar p_sigma ex p in fs p_sigma (find_X env (fs sigma p) h (fun env c _ h -> - let e_sigma = unify_HO env sigma e_body e in + let e_sigma = unify_HO env sigma (EConstr.of_constr e_body) (EConstr.of_constr e) in let e_body = fs e_sigma e in do_subst env e_body e_body h))) in let _ = end_X () in let _ = end_TE () in @@ -1314,7 +1325,7 @@ let redex_of_pattern ?(resolve_typeclasses=false) env (sigma, p) = let sigma = if not resolve_typeclasses then sigma else Typeclasses.resolve_typeclasses ~fail:false env sigma in - Reductionops.nf_evar sigma e, Evd.evar_universe_context sigma + nf_evar sigma e, Evd.evar_universe_context sigma let fill_occ_pattern ?raise_NoMatch env sigma cl pat occ h = let do_make_rel, occ = @@ -1336,13 +1347,15 @@ let mk_tpattern ?p_origin env sigma0 sigma_t f dir c = ;; let pf_fill_occ env concl occ sigma0 p (sigma, t) ok h = + let p = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr p in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in let ise = create_evar_defs sigma in - let ise, u = mk_tpattern env sigma0 (ise,t) ok L2R p in + let ise, u = mk_tpattern env sigma0 (ise,EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) ok L2R p in let find_U, end_U = mk_tpattern_matcher ~raise_NoMatch:true sigma0 occ (ise,[u]) in let concl = find_U env concl h (fun _ _ _ -> mkRel) in let rdx, _, (sigma, uc, p) = end_U () in - sigma, uc, p, concl, rdx + sigma, uc, EConstr.of_constr p, EConstr.of_constr concl, EConstr.of_constr rdx let fill_occ_term env cl occ sigma0 (sigma, t) = try @@ -1355,7 +1368,7 @@ let fill_occ_term env cl occ sigma0 (sigma, t) = if sigma' != sigma0 then raise NoMatch else cl, (Evd.merge_universe_context sigma' uc, t') with _ -> - errorstrm (str "partial term " ++ pr_constr_pat t + errorstrm (str "partial term " ++ pr_constr_pat (EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr t) ++ str " does not match any subterm of the goal") let pf_fill_occ_term gl occ t = @@ -1395,10 +1408,13 @@ let ssrpatterntac _ist (arg_ist,arg) gl = let pat = interp_rpattern arg_ist gl arg in let sigma0 = project gl in let concl0 = pf_concl gl in + let concl0 = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl0 in let (t, uc), concl_x = fill_occ_pattern (Global.env()) sigma0 concl0 pat noindex 1 in + let t = EConstr.of_constr t in + let concl_x = EConstr.of_constr concl_x in let gl, tty = pf_type_of gl t in - let concl = mkLetIn (Name (id_of_string "selected"), t, tty, concl_x) in + let concl = EConstr.mkLetIn (Name (id_of_string "selected"), t, tty, concl_x) in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (convert_concl concl DEFAULTcast) gl (* Register "ssrpattern" tactic *) @@ -1421,6 +1437,7 @@ let ssrinstancesof ist arg gl = let ok rhs lhs ise = true in (* not (Term.eq_constr lhs (Evarutil.nf_evar ise rhs)) in *) let env, sigma, concl = pf_env gl, project gl, pf_concl gl in + let concl = EConstr.Unsafe.to_constr concl in let sigma0, cpat = interp_cpattern ist gl arg None in let pat = match cpat with T x -> x | _ -> errorstrm (str"Not supported") in let etpat, tpat = mk_tpattern env sigma (sigma0,pat) (ok pat) L2R pat in diff --git a/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.mli b/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.mli index 288a04e60a..894cdb9438 100644 --- a/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.mli +++ b/plugins/ssrmatching/ssrmatching.mli @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ val mk_tpattern_matcher : (* convenience shortcut: [pf_fill_occ_term gl occ (sigma,t)] returns * the conclusion of [gl] where [occ] occurrences of [t] have been replaced * by [Rel 1] and the instance of [t] *) -val pf_fill_occ_term : goal sigma -> occ -> evar_map * constr -> constr * constr +val pf_fill_occ_term : goal sigma -> occ -> evar_map * EConstr.t -> EConstr.t * EConstr.t (* It may be handy to inject a simple term into the first form of cpattern *) val cpattern_of_term : char * glob_constr_and_expr -> cpattern @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ val assert_done : 'a option ref -> 'a [solve_unif_constraints_with_heuristics] and [resolve_typeclasses]. In case of failure they raise [NoMatch] *) -val unify_HO : env -> evar_map -> constr -> constr -> evar_map -val pf_unify_HO : goal sigma -> constr -> constr -> goal sigma +val unify_HO : env -> evar_map -> EConstr.constr -> EConstr.constr -> evar_map +val pf_unify_HO : goal sigma -> EConstr.constr -> EConstr.constr -> goal sigma (** Some more low level functions needed to implement the full SSR language on top of the former APIs *) |