aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/plugins/funind
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind')
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml12
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/indfun.ml2
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/invfun.ml26
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/recdef.ml23
4 files changed, 31 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
index 28982c37fe..c8f8a19e5b 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
@@ -372,12 +372,12 @@ let isLetIn t =
| _ -> false
-let h_reduce_with_zeta =
- reduce
+let h_reduce_with_zeta cl =
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce
(Genredexpr.Cbv
{Redops.all_flags
with Genredexpr.rDelta = false;
- })
+ }) cl)
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ let build_proof
[
generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps));
thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps;
- pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None;
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None);
(fun g -> observe_tac "toto" (
tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t);
(fun g' ->
@@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam
in
let fname = destConst (fst (decompose_app (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in
tclTHENSEQ
- [unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))];
+ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]);
let do_prove =
build_proof
interactive_proof
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic =
(fun g ->
if is_mes
then
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference (delayed_force ltof_ref))] g
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference (delayed_force ltof_ref))]) g
else tclIDTAC g
);
observe_tac "rew_and_finish"
diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml
index 86abf9e2ef..84a4d910ef 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ let functional_induction with_clean c princl pat =
in
Tacticals.tclTHEN
(Tacticals.tclMAP (fun id -> Tacticals.tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.subst_gen (do_rewrite_dependent ()) [id]))) idl )
- (Tactics.reduce flag Locusops.allHypsAndConcl)
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.reduce flag Locusops.allHypsAndConcl))
g
else Tacticals.tclIDTAC g
in
diff --git a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
index 56bc4328d1..cdb9c5067f 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
@@ -368,14 +368,14 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes
(* unfolding of all the defined variables introduced by this branch *)
(* observe_tac "unfolding" pre_tac; *)
(* $zeta$ normalizing of the conclusion *)
- reduce
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce
(Genredexpr.Cbv
{ Redops.all_flags with
Genredexpr.rDelta = false ;
Genredexpr.rConst = []
}
)
- Locusops.onConcl;
+ Locusops.onConcl);
observe_tac ("toto ") tclIDTAC;
(* introducing the the result of the graph and the equality hypothesis *)
@@ -490,15 +490,15 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic =
tclTHENSEQ [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id); thin [id]; intros_with_rewrite ] g
else if isVar args.(1) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(1)) (pf_env g))
then tclTHENSEQ[
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))];
- tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))] ((destVar args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) ))
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))]);
+ tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))] ((destVar args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) )))
(pf_ids_of_hyps g);
intros_with_rewrite
] g
else if isVar args.(2) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(2)) (pf_env g))
then tclTHENSEQ[
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))];
- tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))] ((destVar args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) ))
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))]);
+ tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))] ((destVar args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) )))
(pf_ids_of_hyps g);
intros_with_rewrite
] g
@@ -538,12 +538,12 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic =
] g
| LetIn _ ->
tclTHENSEQ[
- reduce
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce
(Genredexpr.Cbv
{Redops.all_flags
with Genredexpr.rDelta = false;
})
- Locusops.onConcl
+ Locusops.onConcl)
;
intros_with_rewrite
] g
@@ -553,12 +553,12 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic =
end
| LetIn _ ->
tclTHENSEQ[
- reduce
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce
(Genredexpr.Cbv
{Redops.all_flags
with Genredexpr.rDelta = false;
})
- Locusops.onConcl
+ Locusops.onConcl)
;
intros_with_rewrite
] g
@@ -698,18 +698,18 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic =
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_lemma));
(* Don't forget to $\zeta$ normlize the term since the principles
have been $\zeta$-normalized *)
- reduce
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce
(Genredexpr.Cbv
{Redops.all_flags
with Genredexpr.rDelta = false;
})
- Locusops.onConcl
+ Locusops.onConcl)
;
generalize (List.map mkVar ids);
thin ids
]
else
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst f)))]
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst f)))])
in
(* The proof of each branche itself *)
let ind_number = ref 0 in
diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
index 09c5aa5673..046c7aa437 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ let tclUSER tac is_mes l g =
if is_mes
then observe_tclTHENLIST (str "tclUSER2")
[
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference
- (delayed_force Indfun_common.ltof_ref))];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference
+ (delayed_force Indfun_common.ltof_ref))]);
tac
]
else tac
@@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ let rec destruct_bounds_aux infos (bound,hyple,rechyps) lbounds g =
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "destruct_bounds_aux2")[
observe_tac (str "clearing k ") (clear [id]);
h_intros [k;h';def];
- observe_tac (str "simple_iter") (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl);
+ observe_tac (str "simple_iter") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl));
observe_tac (str "unfold functional")
- (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1],
- evaluable_of_global_reference infos.func)]);
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1],
+ evaluable_of_global_reference infos.func)]));
(
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "test")[
list_rewrite true
@@ -692,9 +692,8 @@ let mkDestructEq :
[generalize new_hyps;
(fun g2 ->
let changefun patvars = { run = fun sigma ->
- let sigma = Sigma.to_evar_map sigma in
- let (sigma, c) = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2) in
- Sigma.Unsafe.of_pair (c, sigma)
+ let redfun = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] in
+ redfun.Reductionops.e_redfun (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2)
} in
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (change_in_concl None changefun) g2);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case expr)]), to_revert
@@ -904,10 +903,10 @@ let make_rewrite expr_info l hp max =
[observe_tac(str "make_rewrite finalize") (
(* tclORELSE( h_reflexivity) *)
(observe_tclTHENLIST (str "make_rewrite")[
- simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl;
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl);
observe_tac (str "unfold functional")
- (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1],
- evaluable_of_global_reference expr_info.func)]);
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1],
+ evaluable_of_global_reference expr_info.func)]));
(list_rewrite true
(List.map (fun e -> mkVar e,true) expr_info.eqs));
@@ -1427,7 +1426,7 @@ let start_equation (f:global_reference) (term_f:global_reference)
let x = n_x_id ids nargs in
observe_tac (str "start_equation") (observe_tclTHENLIST (str "start_equation") [
h_intros x;
- unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference f)];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference f)]);
observe_tac (str "simplest_case")
(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkApp (terminate_constr,
Array.of_list (List.map mkVar x)))));