diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/indfun.ml | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/invfun.ml | 26 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/recdef.ml | 23 |
4 files changed, 31 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index 28982c37fe..c8f8a19e5b 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -372,12 +372,12 @@ let isLetIn t = | _ -> false -let h_reduce_with_zeta = - reduce +let h_reduce_with_zeta cl = + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce (Genredexpr.Cbv {Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false; - }) + }) cl) @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ let build_proof [ generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps)); thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps; - pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None; + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None); (fun g -> observe_tac "toto" ( tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); (fun g' -> @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam in let fname = destConst (fst (decompose_app (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in tclTHENSEQ - [unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]; + [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]); let do_prove = build_proof interactive_proof @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = (fun g -> if is_mes then - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference (delayed_force ltof_ref))] g + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference (delayed_force ltof_ref))]) g else tclIDTAC g ); observe_tac "rew_and_finish" diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml index 86abf9e2ef..84a4d910ef 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ let functional_induction with_clean c princl pat = in Tacticals.tclTHEN (Tacticals.tclMAP (fun id -> Tacticals.tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.subst_gen (do_rewrite_dependent ()) [id]))) idl ) - (Tactics.reduce flag Locusops.allHypsAndConcl) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.reduce flag Locusops.allHypsAndConcl)) g else Tacticals.tclIDTAC g in diff --git a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml index 56bc4328d1..cdb9c5067f 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml @@ -368,14 +368,14 @@ let prove_fun_correct evd functional_induction funs_constr graphs_constr schemes (* unfolding of all the defined variables introduced by this branch *) (* observe_tac "unfolding" pre_tac; *) (* $zeta$ normalizing of the conclusion *) - reduce + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce (Genredexpr.Cbv { Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false ; Genredexpr.rConst = [] } ) - Locusops.onConcl; + Locusops.onConcl); observe_tac ("toto ") tclIDTAC; (* introducing the the result of the graph and the equality hypothesis *) @@ -490,15 +490,15 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = tclTHENSEQ [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id); thin [id]; intros_with_rewrite ] g else if isVar args.(1) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(1)) (pf_env g)) then tclTHENSEQ[ - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))]; - tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))] ((destVar args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) )) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))]); + tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(1)))] ((destVar args.(1)),Locus.InHyp) ))) (pf_ids_of_hyps g); intros_with_rewrite ] g else if isVar args.(2) && (Environ.evaluable_named (destVar args.(2)) (pf_env g)) then tclTHENSEQ[ - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))]; - tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))] ((destVar args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) )) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))]); + tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY(Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_hyp [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalVarRef (destVar args.(2)))] ((destVar args.(2)),Locus.InHyp) ))) (pf_ids_of_hyps g); intros_with_rewrite ] g @@ -538,12 +538,12 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = ] g | LetIn _ -> tclTHENSEQ[ - reduce + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce (Genredexpr.Cbv {Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false; }) - Locusops.onConcl + Locusops.onConcl) ; intros_with_rewrite ] g @@ -553,12 +553,12 @@ and intros_with_rewrite_aux : tactic = end | LetIn _ -> tclTHENSEQ[ - reduce + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce (Genredexpr.Cbv {Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false; }) - Locusops.onConcl + Locusops.onConcl) ; intros_with_rewrite ] g @@ -698,18 +698,18 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_lemma)); (* Don't forget to $\zeta$ normlize the term since the principles have been $\zeta$-normalized *) - reduce + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce (Genredexpr.Cbv {Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false; }) - Locusops.onConcl + Locusops.onConcl) ; generalize (List.map mkVar ids); thin ids ] else - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst f)))] + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst (destConst f)))]) in (* The proof of each branche itself *) let ind_number = ref 0 in diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml index 09c5aa5673..046c7aa437 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml @@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ let tclUSER tac is_mes l g = if is_mes then observe_tclTHENLIST (str "tclUSER2") [ - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference - (delayed_force Indfun_common.ltof_ref))]; + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference + (delayed_force Indfun_common.ltof_ref))]); tac ] else tac @@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ let rec destruct_bounds_aux infos (bound,hyple,rechyps) lbounds g = observe_tclTHENLIST (str "destruct_bounds_aux2")[ observe_tac (str "clearing k ") (clear [id]); h_intros [k;h';def]; - observe_tac (str "simple_iter") (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl); + observe_tac (str "simple_iter") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl)); observe_tac (str "unfold functional") - (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1], - evaluable_of_global_reference infos.func)]); + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1], + evaluable_of_global_reference infos.func)])); ( observe_tclTHENLIST (str "test")[ list_rewrite true @@ -692,9 +692,8 @@ let mkDestructEq : [generalize new_hyps; (fun g2 -> let changefun patvars = { run = fun sigma -> - let sigma = Sigma.to_evar_map sigma in - let (sigma, c) = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2) in - Sigma.Unsafe.of_pair (c, sigma) + let redfun = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] in + redfun.Reductionops.e_redfun (pf_env g2) sigma (pf_concl g2) } in Proofview.V82.of_tactic (change_in_concl None changefun) g2); Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case expr)]), to_revert @@ -904,10 +903,10 @@ let make_rewrite expr_info l hp max = [observe_tac(str "make_rewrite finalize") ( (* tclORELSE( h_reflexivity) *) (observe_tclTHENLIST (str "make_rewrite")[ - simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl; + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl); observe_tac (str "unfold functional") - (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1], - evaluable_of_global_reference expr_info.func)]); + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl[(Locus.OnlyOccurrences [1], + evaluable_of_global_reference expr_info.func)])); (list_rewrite true (List.map (fun e -> mkVar e,true) expr_info.eqs)); @@ -1427,7 +1426,7 @@ let start_equation (f:global_reference) (term_f:global_reference) let x = n_x_id ids nargs in observe_tac (str "start_equation") (observe_tclTHENLIST (str "start_equation") [ h_intros x; - unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference f)]; + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference f)]); observe_tac (str "simplest_case") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkApp (terminate_constr, Array.of_list (List.map mkVar x))))); |
