aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/sphinx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/sphinx')
-rw-r--r--doc/sphinx/language/gallina-extensions.rst10
-rw-r--r--doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst26
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/doc/sphinx/language/gallina-extensions.rst b/doc/sphinx/language/gallina-extensions.rst
index 9dae7fd102..391afcb1f7 100644
--- a/doc/sphinx/language/gallina-extensions.rst
+++ b/doc/sphinx/language/gallina-extensions.rst
@@ -2155,6 +2155,12 @@ If `string` ends in ``.dot`` or ``.gv``, the constraints are printed in the DOT
language, and can be processed by Graphviz tools. The format is
unspecified if `string` doesn’t end in ``.dot`` or ``.gv``.
+.. cmdv:: Print Universes Subgraph(@names)
+
+Prints the graph restricted to the requested names (adjusting
+constraints to preserve the implied transitive constraints between
+kept universes).
+
.. _existential-variables:
Existential variables
@@ -2247,7 +2253,3 @@ expression as described in :ref:`ltac`.
This construction is useful when one wants to define complicated terms
using highly automated tactics without resorting to writing the proof-term
by means of the interactive proof engine.
-
-This mechanism is comparable to the ``Declare Implicit Tactic`` command
-defined at :ref:`tactics-implicit-automation`, except that the used
-tactic is local to each hole instead of being declared globally.
diff --git a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst
index 457f9b2efa..041f1bc966 100644
--- a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst
+++ b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/tactics.rst
@@ -3745,32 +3745,6 @@ Setting implicit automation tactics
Combines in a single line ``Proof with`` and ``Proof using``, see :ref:`proof-editing-mode`
- .. cmd:: Declare Implicit Tactic @tactic
-
- This command declares a tactic to be used to solve implicit arguments
- that Coq does not know how to solve by unification. It is used every
- time the term argument of a tactic has one of its holes not fully
- resolved.
-
- .. deprecated:: 8.9
-
- This command is deprecated. Use :ref:`typeclasses <typeclasses>` or
- :ref:`tactics-in-terms <tactics-in-terms>` instead.
-
- .. example::
-
- .. coqtop:: all
-
- Parameter quo : nat -> forall n:nat, n<>0 -> nat.
- Notation "x // y" := (quo x y _) (at level 40).
- Declare Implicit Tactic assumption.
- Goal forall n m, m<>0 -> { q:nat & { r | q * m + r = n } }.
- intros.
- exists (n // m).
-
- The tactic ``exists (n // m)`` did not fail. The hole was solved
- by ``assumption`` so that it behaved as ``exists (quo n m H)``.
-
.. _decisionprocedures:
Decision procedures