aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml19
-rw-r--r--test-suite/bugs/closed/bug_13246.v69
2 files changed, 82 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml
index 26e2b18a02..77162ce89a 100644
--- a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml
+++ b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ open CErrors
open Util
open Names
open Nameops
-open Namegen
open Constr
open Context
open EConstr
@@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ let rec decompose_app_rel env evd t =
let (f', argl, argr) = decompose_app_rel env evd arg in
let ty = Retyping.get_type_of env evd argl in
let r = Retyping.relevance_of_type env evd ty in
- let f'' = mkLambda (make_annot (Name default_dependent_ident) r, ty,
+ let f'' = mkLambda (make_annot (Name Namegen.default_dependent_ident) r, ty,
mkLambda (make_annot (Name (Id.of_string "y")) r, lift 1 ty,
mkApp (lift 2 f, [| mkApp (lift 2 f', [| mkRel 2; mkRel 1 |]) |])))
in (f'', argl, argr)
@@ -1119,7 +1118,14 @@ let subterm all flags (s : 'a pure_strategy) : 'a pure_strategy =
*)
| Lambda (n, t, b) when flags.under_lambdas ->
- let n' = map_annot (Nameops.Name.map (fun id -> Tactics.fresh_id_in_env unfresh id env)) n in
+ let unfresh, n' =
+ let id = match n.binder_name with
+ | Anonymous -> Namegen.default_dependent_ident
+ | Name id -> id
+ in
+ let id = Tactics.fresh_id_in_env unfresh id env in
+ Id.Set.add id unfresh, {n with binder_name = Name id}
+ in
let unfresh = match n'.binder_name with
| Anonymous -> unfresh
| Name id -> Id.Set.add id unfresh
@@ -1542,7 +1548,7 @@ let cl_rewrite_clause_newtac ?abs ?origsigma ~progress strat clause =
(* For compatibility *)
let beta = Tactics.reduct_in_concl ~check:false (Reductionops.nf_betaiota, DEFAULTcast) in
let beta_hyp id = Tactics.reduct_in_hyp ~check:false ~reorder:false Reductionops.nf_betaiota (id, InHyp) in
- let treat sigma res =
+ let treat sigma res state =
match res with
| None -> newfail 0 (str "Nothing to rewrite")
| Some None ->
@@ -1553,7 +1559,7 @@ let cl_rewrite_clause_newtac ?abs ?origsigma ~progress strat clause =
let (undef, prf, newt) = res in
let fold ev _ accu = if Evd.mem sigma ev then accu else ev :: accu in
let gls = List.rev (Evd.fold_undefined fold undef []) in
- let gls = List.map Proofview.with_empty_state gls in
+ let gls = List.map (fun gl -> Proofview.goal_with_state gl state) gls in
match clause, prf with
| Some id, Some p ->
let tac = tclTHENLIST [
@@ -1583,6 +1589,7 @@ let cl_rewrite_clause_newtac ?abs ?origsigma ~progress strat clause =
Proofview.Goal.enter begin fun gl ->
let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in
let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in
+ let state = Proofview.Goal.state gl in
let sigma = Tacmach.New.project gl in
let ty = match clause with
| None -> concl
@@ -1602,7 +1609,7 @@ let cl_rewrite_clause_newtac ?abs ?origsigma ~progress strat clause =
cl_rewrite_clause_aux ?abs strat env Id.Set.empty sigma ty clause
in
let sigma = match origsigma with None -> sigma | Some sigma -> sigma in
- treat sigma res <*>
+ treat sigma res state <*>
(* For compatibility *)
beta <*> Proofview.shelve_unifiable
with
diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/closed/bug_13246.v b/test-suite/bugs/closed/bug_13246.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..11f5baaaf4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/bugs/closed/bug_13246.v
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Axiom _0: Prop.
+
+From Coq Require Export Morphisms Setoid Utf8.
+
+Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
+
+Reserved Notation "P ⊢ Q" (at level 99, Q at level 200, right associativity).
+Reserved Notation "P ⊣⊢ Q" (at level 95, no associativity).
+Reserved Notation "■ P" (at level 20, right associativity).
+
+(** Define the scope *)
+Declare Scope bi_scope.
+Delimit Scope bi_scope with I.
+
+Structure bi :=
+ Bi { bi_car :> Type;
+ bi_entails : bi_car → bi_car → Prop;
+ bi_impl : bi_car → bi_car → bi_car;
+ bi_forall : ∀ A, (A → bi_car) → bi_car; }.
+
+Declare Instance bi_equiv `{PROP:bi} : Equiv (bi_car PROP).
+
+Arguments bi_car : simpl never.
+Arguments bi_entails {PROP} _%I _%I : simpl never, rename.
+Arguments bi_impl {PROP} _%I _%I : simpl never, rename.
+Arguments bi_forall {PROP _} _%I : simpl never, rename.
+
+Notation "P ⊢ Q" := (bi_entails P%I Q%I) .
+Notation "P ⊣⊢ Q" := (equiv (A:=bi_car _) P%I Q%I) .
+
+Infix "→" := bi_impl : bi_scope.
+Notation "∀ x .. y , P" :=
+ (bi_forall (λ x, .. (bi_forall (λ y, P)) ..)%I) : bi_scope.
+
+(* bug disappears if definitional class *)
+Class Plainly (PROP : bi) := { plainly : PROP -> PROP; }.
+Notation "■ P" := (plainly P) : bi_scope.
+
+Section S.
+ Context {I : Type} {PROP : bi} `(Plainly PROP).
+
+ Lemma plainly_forall `{Plainly PROP} {A} (Ψ : A → PROP) : (∀ a, ■ (Ψ a)) ⊣⊢ ■ (∀ a, Ψ a).
+ Proof. Admitted.
+
+ Global Instance entails_proper :
+ Proper (equiv ==> equiv ==> iff) (bi_entails : relation PROP).
+ Proof. Admitted.
+
+ Global Instance impl_proper :
+ Proper (equiv ==> equiv ==> equiv) (@bi_impl PROP).
+ Proof. Admitted.
+
+ Global Instance forall_proper A :
+ Proper (pointwise_relation _ equiv ==> equiv) (@bi_forall PROP A).
+ Proof. Admitted.
+
+ Declare Instance PROP_Equivalence: Equivalence (@equiv PROP _).
+
+ Set Mangle Names.
+ Lemma foo (P : I -> PROP) K:
+ K ⊢ ∀ (j : I)
+ (_ : Prop) (* bug disappears if this is removed *)
+ , (∀ i0, ■ P i0) → P j.
+ Proof.
+ setoid_rewrite plainly_forall.
+ (* retype in case the tactic did some nonsense *)
+ match goal with |- ?T => let _ := type of T in idtac end.
+ Abort.
+End S.