<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>coq/plugins/extraction/README, branch master</title>
<subtitle>The formal proof system</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0x7felf.com/coq/'/>
<entry>
<title>Switch the few remaining iso-latin-1 files to utf8</title>
<updated>2014-12-09T13:27:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pierre Letouzey</name>
</author>
<published>2014-12-09T11:48:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0x7felf.com/coq/commit/?id=af84e080ff674a3d5cf2cf88874ddb6ebaf38ecf'/>
<id>af84e080ff674a3d5cf2cf88874ddb6ebaf38ecf</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Grammar: "allowing to" is not proper English</title>
<updated>2014-08-25T13:22:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jason Gross</name>
</author>
<published>2014-08-12T12:51:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0x7felf.com/coq/commit/?id=bc6e87572b33eb5d98cbb23522a71fd7d23931b7'/>
<id>bc6e87572b33eb5d98cbb23522a71fd7d23931b7</id>
<content type='text'>
I'm not quite sure why, but I'm pretty sure it's not.  Rather, in
"allowing for foo" and "allowing to foo", "foo" modifies the sense in
which someting is allowed, rather than it being "foo" that's allowed.
"Allowing fooing" generally works, though it can sound a bit awkward.
"Allowing one to foo" (or "Allowing {him,her,it,Coq} to foo") is always
acceptable, in-as-much as it's ok to use "one".

I haven't touched the older instances of it in the CHANGES file.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
I'm not quite sure why, but I'm pretty sure it's not.  Rather, in
"allowing for foo" and "allowing to foo", "foo" modifies the sense in
which someting is allowed, rather than it being "foo" that's allowed.
"Allowing fooing" generally works, though it can sound a bit awkward.
"Allowing one to foo" (or "Allowing {him,her,it,Coq} to foo") is always
acceptable, in-as-much as it's ok to use "one".

I haven't touched the older instances of it in the CHANGES file.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Directory 'contrib' renamed into 'plugins', to end confusion with archive of user contribs</title>
<updated>2009-03-20T01:22:58+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>letouzey</name>
</author>
<published>2009-03-20T01:22:58+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0x7felf.com/coq/commit/?id=7d220f8b61649646692983872626d6a8042446a9'/>
<id>7d220f8b61649646692983872626d6a8042446a9</id>
<content type='text'>
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11996 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11996 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
